Can India match China's STEM success by rethinking its higher education model?
On a different ivy league: Students of Nanjing University My daughter, who is completing high school, has expressed interest in continuing her education in the biotech space at college level and beyond. While researching the top institutions globally in this space, I was surprised to see a plethora of Chinese universities dominating the rankings. As I looked through other STEM areas, the same pattern emerged - if not accentuated - with much larger presence of Chinese universities, especially in areas of computer science and AI.I recollected a conversation with a professor-friend of mine in the US, who had been tracking Chinese research output. He had told me that over the past 20 years, output from Chinese universities in STEM has been continuously exceeding that from the US.
For a country that still gets lampooned in international media for 'cheap copy' or 'substandard product', increasingly innovative capabilities in social media like TikTok, or in AI like DeepSeek and Manus, are stunning the world. China's dominance in solar cell manufacturing and EVs is already well known. So, how did China make it happen? Project 985, conceptualised in 1998 by the Jiang Zemin administration, selected 39 universities for increased investments to make them 'world-class'. The results are now showing. Focus on the number of universities has since gone far beyond the original 39. Ecosystems are forming around chosen universities similar to ones created in areas like Boston and Bay Area in the US.India responded to the looming challenge in its 2016 budget by identifying 20 universities across private and public sectors in which GoI was willing to invest significant sums to make them 'world-class'. After the initial hullabaloo over the selected private universities, not much discussion about investments or their impact has been made in the public space.While having many interesting ideas, India's next important effort around education through National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has been stuck in 'debates' over matters like 'imposition of Hindi' and 'central interference'. Here, too, the results show. While there was much joy in Kolkata for pipping Bengaluru as India's top research hub in the prestigious Nature Index 2024, the former was ranked 84th and the latter 85th among 200 science cities across the world. Beijing topped the list, followed by Shanghai, New York, Boston and Nanjing. Five Chinese cities were in the index's top 10 (compared to four American cities).
Can a democratic, diverse India respond in the same way to China's top-down, centralised approach to higher education excellence? Probably not. To achieve success, India should consider two things: Instead of trying to convert individual universities as islands of academic and research excellence, India should look to identify cities that could become hubs of subjects like AI, quantum computing, biotech and climate technology. Each of these areas could be looked at from all angles including - but not limited to - research and innovation, while expanding to consider its impact from areas like IP and legal issues, looking at commercialising these innovations, or even studying its impact across societies.
Indian cities are blessed with good academic institutions that can be leveraged to create talent across key futuristic areas by creating excellence in one area to start with. They can then become hubs of talent providing 360° perspectives across innovation, commercialisation and consulting, which a single-minded vision around research in an undemocratic monolithic society like China's cannot.
Given the Trump administration's unprecedented assault on its higher education system - the threat to shut down Harvard's foreign enrolment being the latest, even as it was blocked for the time being by a federal judge on Friday - India is the only large democratic country with both the ability and the willingness of its population to absorb institutions and academics seeking a safe haven outside the US. While NEP does talk about introducing foreign education institutions within India, we have so far failed to bring in anyone worthwhile. It would be advisable to relook at our policies and redouble efforts both from central and state levels to bring immediate improvement to India's higher education ecosystem. While we should continue to focus on building homegrown institutions, there's no doubt that competition from foreign universities, along with access to globally recognised academics, will provide immense opportunities to, and traction for, India's scholars.All this would, of course, require our politicians and administrators to be a little more thick-skinned and willing to accept criticism and research output that could even be contrary to their ideological posturings. But is it not what a healthy democracy is all about? If that allows us to 'reclaim' our 'Nalandas' and become a real 'Vishwaguru', pinpricks some politicians could feel would be a small cost to bear.While primary and secondary education improvements are necessary to solve today's problem, higher education can be the doorway for India to claim dominance in this century. If we don't act now, it'll be difficult to catch up to the yawning gap between us and China, and the US. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. What pizzas are Indians eating? The clue lies with India's largest QSR.
Why high gold prices are making both banks and their borrowers smile
How does IndusInd's 'fraud' tag affect its future?
RBI has cut repo rates twice in 3 months. But that isn't enough to boost the economy!
As India steps up commercial shipbuilding, it needs a supply chain boost
Stock Radar: RITES stock breaks out from Ascending Triangle pattern; time to buy?
Brokerage Radar: Morgan Stanley downgrades IndusInd Bank; BNP Paribas views DOMS Industries as top consumer sector pick
Corrections come and go; focus on business and its growth: 6 large-caps from different sectors with upside potential of up to 52%
Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Forest Blizzard', 'Fancy Bear': Cyber Companies Vs Hacker Nicknames
Washington: Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto and Alphabet's Google on Monday said they would create a public glossary of state-sponsored hacking groups and cybercriminals, in a bid to ease confusion over the menagerie of unofficial nicknames for them. Microsoft and CrowdStrike said they hoped to potentially bring other industry partners and the U.S. government into the effort to identify Who's Who in the murky world of digital espionage. "We do believe this will accelerate our collective response and collective defense against these threat actors," said Vasu Jakkal, corporate vice president, Microsoft Security. How meaningful the effort ends up being remains to be seen. Cybersecurity companies have long assigned coded names to hacking groups, as attributing hackers to a country or an organization can be difficult and researchers need a way to describe who they are up against. Some names are dry and functional, like the "APT1" hacking group exposed by cybersecurity firm Mandiant or the "TA453" group tracked by Proofpoint. Others have more color and mystery, like the "Earth Lamia" group tracked by TrendMicro or the "Equation Group" uncovered by Kaspersky. Crowdstrike's evocative nicknames - "Cozy Bear" for a set of Russian hackers, or "Kryptonite Panda" for a set of Chinese ones - have tended to be the most popular, and others have also adopted the same kind of offbeat monikers. In 2016, for example, the company Secureworks - now owned by Sophos - began using the name "Iron Twilight" for the Russian hackers it previously tracked as "TG-4127." Microsoft itself recently revamped its nicknames, moving away from staid, element-themed ones like "Rubidium" to weather-themed ones like "Lemon Sandstorm" or "Sangria Tempest." But the explosion of whimsical aliases has already led to overload. When the U.S. government issued a report about hacking attempts against the 2016 election, it sparked confusion by including 48 separate nicknames attributed to a grab bag of Russian hacking groups and malicious programs, including "Sofacy," "Pawn Storm," "CHOPSTICK," "Tsar Team," and "OnionDuke." Michael Sikorski, the chief technology officer for Palo Alto's threat intelligence unit, said the initiative was a "game-changer." "Disparate naming conventions for the same threat actors create confusion at the exact moment defenders need clarity," he said. Juan-Andres Guerrero-Saade, a top researcher at the cybersecurity firm SentinelOne, was skeptical of the effort, saying the cold reality of the cybersecurity industry was that companies hoarded information. Unless that changed, he said, "this is branding-marketing-fairy dust sprinkled on top of business realities." But CrowdStrike Senior Vice President of counter adversary operations, Adam Meyers, said the move had already delivered a win by helping his analysts connect a group Microsoft called "Salt Typhoon" with one CrowdStrike dubbed "Operator Panda."
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Light touch, not heavy hand, will unlock growth'
'Light touch, not heavy hand, will unlock growth' Rajeev Gauba Jun 2, 2025, 21:36 IST IST A member of Niti Aayog writes that the colonial-era punitive approach to governance hinders growth. GOI's doing its bit to foster trust-based governance, states must follow The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, which became operational on Aug 11, 2023, represents a paradigm shift towards trust-based governance . In one bold stroke, 183 provisions across 42 central Acts, administered by 19 ministries and departments, were decriminalised. This wasn't just another reform; it heralded a new philosophy of governance, dismantling of the colonial legacy, and a decisive move towards genuine ease of living and doing business.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Production could come to a halt by mid-July if China magnet curbs continue: Automakers
Representative Image (AI-generated) NEW DELHI: Raising an alarm over challenges in procuring rare earth magnets from China, the auto industry has told the govt that the matter will lead to the stoppage of production of certain models from this week, while heading to a complete shutdown by the middle of next month. This threatens the impending launch of many new models, apart from disturbing the entire value chain across passenger vehicles, two-wheelers, and commercial vehicles. Companies at risk of production disruptions include top makers such as Maruti Suzuki , Mahindra & Mahindra, Hyundai and Kia, Hero Moto, TVS, and Bajaj Auto. When asked how many weeks of inventory Maruti has before production would be impacted, the automaker said it submitted an import application and it would be difficult to give "very specific details" until it receives a response. "It is not a restriction. It is an endorsement of end use. In case there is an issue, we will inform all our stakeholders, including the stock exchange," Rahul Bharti, Senior Executive Director, Corporate Affairs, said. Bajaj Auto said late last week that the issue could have a "serious impact" on their EV production by July. The industry's warning comes even as delegations of industry body Siam (Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers) as well as component makers ACMA (Automotive Component Manufacturers Association) plan to visit China 'at the earliest' to expedite permissions to procure the magnets used across automotive applications, both in internal combustion engines and electric vehicles. H eavy industries minister, HD Kumaraswamy, on Monday said the govt is preparing to send a delegation of industry executives to China in 2-3 weeks to discuss the issue. The govt is working overtime to work out a solution to the issue which began after the Chinese govt, on April 4, imposed certain requirements in the export permit system for medium and heavy rare earth metals, its alloys, magnets, and related products. The rare earth magnets are used for components like speedometers, electric motors, e-axles, electric water pumps, automatic transmission kits, speakers, sensors, and ignition coils in engines. Companies say a circuitous approval process has to be followed before the magnets can be procured, and a final approval from China's Ministry of Commerce is also required. Over the past month, auto companies discussed the matter with various govt departments to get clarity regarding the process to be adopted for obtaining the EUC. On suggestions of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), they also had a discussion with the Embassy of China in India. However, there has been no solution so far. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
