logo
China is unleashing a new export shock on the world

China is unleashing a new export shock on the world

Miami Herald4 hours ago

Two decades ago, China shocked the United States with its ability to make and ship things fast and inexpensively on a scale never before seen. The resulting surge of exports reshaped America's economy and its politics.
Today, a new China shock is cascading across the globe from Indonesia to Germany to Brazil.
As President Donald Trump's tariffs start to shut China out of the United States, its biggest market, Chinese factories are sending their toys, cars and shoes to other countries at a pace that is reshaping economies and geopolitics.
This year, China's trade surplus with the world is nearly $500 billion -- a more than 40% increase from the same period last year.
As the world's two superpowers duke it out over trade, the rest of the world is now bracing for an even bigger China shock.
'China has loads of things that it needs to export, and whether or not the U.S. puts tariffs on China, it's pretty much impossible to stop the shifts in flows,' said Leah Fahy, a China economist at Capital Economics.
The flood of exports from China is the consequence of government policy and a slowing domestic economy. To soften the blow of a real estate crisis that reduced the wealth of millions of households, Beijing has for several years been shoveling money into its manufacturing sectors, which are making far more things than there is demand for at home.
China's global market share for all categories of goods has risen sharply, according to an analysis by Fahy. This will continue despite the tariffs because Beijing is unlikely to change the course of its export-oriented policies.
By diverting the flow of its stuff to Southeast Asia, Latin America and Europe, China has already eased the economic effect of a plunge in demand from the United States. But it puts China in potential conflict with trading partners that are also facing pressure from Washington.
Trump is threatening steep tariffs for the same countries that are being inundated with more Chinese goods, like Vietnam, Cambodia and Indonesia. Those tariffs have, for now, been put on pause for negotiations. Some countries have benefited from an increase in investment by foreign companies that are trying to shift production from China as quickly as possible.
Others have also been able to reship some Chinese goods by exporting them to the United States. But if they cannot negotiate the tariffs much lower, homegrown companies in countries facing severe U.S. tariffs in Southeast Asia and elsewhere could be crushed by competition from Chinese companies.
As much as Trump has disrupted trade with tariff levels not seen in a century, the drastic shift in China's exports was building long before he took office in January.
China's property crisis -- a glut of housing, plunging prices and widespread bankruptcies -- began to reverberate through the economy in 2021. China's policymakers wasted no time diverting cheap loans away from developers to exporters and manufacturers, a move that eventually offset the collapse in construction, which at its peak contributed to one-third of economic growth.
For Beijing, it was a tried-and-tested move: Throw money at the problem.
'They often overinvest to get the scale first, and then the process is aided by government policies,' said Tommy Wu, an economist at Commerzbank. 'That contributes to why we have this problem today.'
China had already embarked on a domestic industrial policy in 2015, known as Made in China 2025, to make higher-skilled, more valuable goods like sophisticated computer chips and electric vehicles. That initiative led the United States and Europe to raise tariffs on electric cars, solar panels and other high-technology products.
But China's drive to boost manufacturing since the property market collapse has gone much further. Even while making more advanced products, Chinese manufacturers doubled down on making tchotchkes, the kinds of cheaper things that China excelled at making two decades ago. China rewrote the playbook, confounding economists.
'China is not developing the way economic theory suggests, and now we are faced with a new model,' said Priyanka Kishore, an economist in Singapore, referring to the traditional trajectory of economies that move away from low-end manufacturing as they become more mature and developed.
'This is a challenge because it exacerbates pressures on the rest of the world,' Kishore said.
With tariffs starting to realign trade flows and supply chains, the economic effect is beginning to show.
In Germany, where shipments of Chinese goods last month rose 20% from a year earlier, companies have expressed concerns to Wu, the economist from Commerzbank. Carmakers feel it most acutely.
China has made 45% more electric vehicles this year, even as Chinese companies are engaged in a vicious price war at home because of flagging consumer appetite. Exports of electric vehicles have soared 64.6% this year, according to the Chinese Association of Automobile Manufacturers.
Countries that have borne the brunt of the jump in Chinese imports have also seen sharp declines in their own manufacturing, leading to job losses and bankruptcies.
In Indonesia, garment factories are closing, citing their inability to compete with cheaper clothes from China. Some 250,000 people lost their jobs in the garment industry in 2023 and 2024, said Redma Gita Wirawasta, chair of the Indonesian Filament Yarn and Fiber Producers Association. Thai auto parts manufacturers have shut down because of Chinese electric vehicles. Brazilian carmakers have called on the government to initiate an antidumping probe into Chinese cars sold in the country.
For most countries, there are two options. The first is to do nothing and watch manufacturing get hollowed out, said Sonal Varma, the chief economist for Asia, with the exception of Japan, at Nomura, the Japanese bank.
The other option is to raise tariffs and use other protectionist measures in specific sectors, just as the United States has done with China. This risks the ire of China, which uses trade and investment as leverage in its diplomatic overtures, or the United States.
'Supply chains are getting bifurcated along geopolitical lines,' Varma said. 'It has become a lot more difficult for countries to decide: Who do you align with?'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures fall amid uncertainty over whether US will join Israel's attack on Iran

US stock futures fell as investors braced for ongoing Israel-Iran hostilities that could draw in the US, along with the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate decision. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) slipped 0.3%. President Trump met with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss Israel and Iran, raising speculation that the US could join Israel's attack. The White House did not provide any details on the meeting, and the president spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu afterward. Iran has reportedly readied missiles for strikes on US bases in the event the US takes action. Stocks fell during the day on Tuesday and oil jumped as Trump appeared to more directly align with Israel's aims in Iran, saying "our patience is wearing thin" and calling for "unconditional surrender" from Iran. Reports also circulated ahead of his national security meeting that the president is seriously considering joining Israel's strikes. The developments marked a dramatic shift from the day before, when Iran said that it wanted to reach a ceasefire and return to the negotiating table on its nuclear program. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Prior to Israel's opening salvo on Iran Friday, Wall Street anticipated the Fed's next interest rate announcement would dominate market news this week. The central bank is due to reveal its decision on Wednesday at 2 p.m. ET, and analysts expect policymakers to hold rates steady. The Fed's "dot plot" and Fed Chair Jerome Powell's comments at a 2:30pm ET press conference will be in high focus as investors seek clues as to whether two rate cuts are still on the table this year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports
Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports

New York Times

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Federal Judge Certifies Class Action for Transgender People Seeking Passports

A federal judge in Boston granted class-action status to transgender and nonbinary Americans on Tuesday in a lawsuit challenging a U.S. State Department policy that requires passports to reflect only the holder's sex recorded on their original birth certificate. The order extends a preliminary injunction blocking the State Department from enforcing the policy against six plaintiffs to apply to all class members who apply for or update passports while the case proceeds. In the earlier order from April, U.S. District Judge Julia E. Kobick concluded that the passport policy likely violates the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee because it discriminates based on sex and is 'rooted in irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans.' The State Department filed an appeal of the preliminary injunction last week. The government maintains that it has a strong interest in passports that accurately reflect the holder's sex. The State Department adopted the new policy earlier this year to comply with an executive order from President Trump directing all government agencies to limit official recognition of transgender identity and mandating that federal documents reflect what it termed the 'immutable biological classification as either male or female.' In court documents, plaintiffs argued that a mismatch between the sex listed on their passport and their gender identity puts them at risk of suspicion and hostility that other Americans do not face. During the first weeks of Mr. Trump's administration, several plaintiffs received passports with an 'F' or 'M' marker contrary to the one they had requested. Another learned that selecting an 'X' marker, indicating a nonbinary gender identity, was no longer an option, though it had been allowed since 2022. The government argued against certifying trans and nonbinary passport holders as a legal class in the case, contending that gender identity is subjective and that a class-wide injunction would create an undue administrative burden. Judge Kobick, who was nominated by former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., found that those claims did not outweigh significant harm faced by transgender and nonbinary passport holders. She noted that plaintiffs in the case had described being forced to 'effectively 'out' themselves every time they presented their passports,' leading to anxiety and fear safety fears. 'These are the types of injuries that cannot adequately be measured or compensated by money damages or a later-issued remedy,'' she wrote.

Trump's quiet truce on California water
Trump's quiet truce on California water

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's quiet truce on California water

SACRAMENTO, California — President Donald Trump promised to break California's water rules wide open. So far, he's mostly working within them. Five months after Trump issued a pair of directives for federal agencies to overturn state and Biden-era rules limiting water deliveries, the federal government has done no such thing. Instead, it's quietly increasing water flows following the very rules Trump once railed against — at least for now. It's a sharp contrast to Trump's otherwise confrontational posture toward California and climate policy. In just the last week, he rescinded the state's authority to phase out gas-powered vehicles and sent the National Guard into Los Angeles over Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections. It's also a sharp contrast to Trump's campaign rhetoric, when he vowed to force Newsom to reverse a lawsuit blocking his first-term effort to loosen environmental protections in the state's main water hub, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. But Trump seems mollified now, declaring victory over the state at a White House event last week. The president brought up the familiar theme of water flowing out to the Pacific Ocean instead of being used in farms and cities, called it 'ridiculous' and declared of the water: 'We got them to take it now.' What's changed? For one, California had a wet winter, which tends to smooth over political differences. And the Trump administration suffered an early headline-grabbing debacle in February when it dumped summer irrigation water from Central Valley dams in a misguided effort to send it to fires in Los Angeles. Newsom has also aligned himself more with Trump on water, as when he jilted Delta-area Democrats last month in pushing to expedite a tunnel to move more supplies from Northern to Southern California. More substantively, some of the water districts that might be expected to agitate for Trump to overturn Biden-era water rules concede that they actually allow more deliveries than Trump's version. 'Our goal really is to try and implement some of the adaptive management and other actions that are in the [Biden-era rules] that provide some flexibility to benefit water supply and the fishery as well,' said Thaddeus Bettner, the executive director of the Sacramento River Settlement Contractors, a group of municipal and agricultural water districts in the northern Central Valley. So even though Trump's January directives gave federal officials the option to redo the Biden-era rules, they haven't done that so far — avoiding both lawsuits and negative headlines. The January orders also directed federal water agencies to write a report within 90 days on how to deliver on Trump's promises, but the White House is keeping that quiet, as well, declining to release it publicly. 'Less than a month into his second term, President Trump turned on the water to prevent another tragedy like the recent California wildfires, and he has urged Democrats like Gavin Newsom to adopt policies that better maintain our nation's forests,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in an email. 'He will continue to protect America's abundant natural resources, and updates to our water policy will come from him.' Environmental groups in the sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, however, aren't buying the quiet approach. They say the Trump administration is still violating endangered species rules, pointing to examples when federal officials pumped more water out of the Delta than state officials, killing or injuring protected species of salmon and trout in the process. 'Reclamation's behavior is cause for extreme concern for the health of the Bay-Delta and for the communities and people who care about and depend on this ecosystem,' the groups wrote in a letter last month to state water officials. (Bureau of Reclamation spokesperson Mary Lee Knecht said the agency 'continues to operate the Central Valley Project to maximize water supply and hydropower in full compliance' with the Biden-era rules.) There are a couple of opportunities coming up for Trump to make more of a splash. He has yet to nominate a Bureau of Reclamation commissioner, who could sway the agency one way or the other. And on Tuesday, state and federal lawyers are due to update a judge on whether they want to continue the lawsuit Newsom lodged against Trump in 2020. Water agencies that have been mostly laudatory of Trump are still restive. Westlands Water District's general manager, Allison Febbo, called the Trump administration's latest projected increase in summer water allocations, from 50 to 55 percent, 'disappointing' given that reservoirs are filled to the brim. 'The operations quagmire that has contributed to the self-inflicted water crisis we have in this state, and reconfirmed by the Biden administration before leaving office, are still wreaking havoc on the water projects,' Johnny Amaral, chief of external affairs at the Friant Water Authority, said in a text message. 'Every minute that goes by is a lost opportunity to end the crisis, and the clock is ticking.' Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store