Interview: David Levering Lewis on ‘The Stained Glass Window' and His Reading Life
What books are on your night stand?
David Greenberg, 'John Lewis: A Life'; Joshua Green, 'The Rebels: Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the Struggle for a New American Politics'; Martha Hodes, 'My Hijacking: A Personal History of Forgetting and Remembering'; Michael Cook, 'A History of the Muslim World: From Its Origins to the Dawn of Modernity.'
What's the last great book you read?
The autobiography of Ulysses S. Grant. It is the most honest presidential memoir to date.
What's your favorite book no one else has heard of?
Ibn Hazm's 'The Ring of the Dove,' translated by A.J. Arberry (1953). An 11th-century treatise on Muslim love.
Describe your ideal reading experience.
I read Edith Wharton's 'In Morocco' while staying with my partner Dolores Root in Casablanca five or six years ago. Wharton visited the French protectorate to write a book that would appeal to tourists. Our hotel featured her clever work of propaganda on its shelves. I had missed it when I wrote 'God's Crucible: Islam and the Making of Europe, 570-1215.'
How have your reading tastes changed over time?
My reading has followed the course of my work. My 1962 dissertation on Emmanuel Mounier and the liberal crisis within French Catholicism demanded a level of Francophone reading that has greatly diminished. Historical biography and the civil rights bibliography take most of my time these days. But I am determined to do much more reading of novels and memoirs.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
15 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘Bring it on, Gavin,' White House says to Newsom on threat to sue over UCLA cuts
WASHINGTON — As Gov. Gavin Newsom and the University of California consider whether to sue the Trump administration to restore more than half a billion dollars in federal grants to ULCA, the White House on Tuesday had a terse response. 'Bring it on, Gavin,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt when asked about Newsom's opposition to a Trump plan demanding more than $1 billion and sweeping campus changes at UCLA to resolve federal antisemitism findings against the university. 'This administration is well within its legal right to do this, and we want to ensure that our colleges and our universities are respecting the First Amendment rights and the religious liberties of students on their campuses and UCLA has failed to do that, and I have a whole list of examples that I will forward to Gavin Newsom's press office, if he hasn't seen them himself,' Leavitt said. The statement was the first public comment from the White House about the high-stakes conflict between the nation's premier public university system and the Trump administration, which has accused UCLA of violating the civil rights of Jewish students, illegally considering race in admissions and treating transgender people in sports, healthcare and campus life in ways that the government claims hinder women's rights. Leavitt spoke after a question from The Times about how Trump would response Newsom's comments late last week that the settlement offer for UCLA was 'extortion' and 'ransom.' 'We'll sue,' Newsom said Friday. Responding to Leavitt's comments, a Newsom spokesperson pointed The Times to a meme posted on X after the press conference to X. 'Glorious leader is entitled to all treasures of the realm, especially from universities,' said the post from Newsom's press office account. The graphic features an image of what appears to a be a North Korean news anchor with a North Korea flag in the background. In an earlier joint statement with California legislative leaders, Newsom said that the action against UCLA 'isn't about protecting Jewish students — it's a billion-dollar political shakedown from the pay-to-play president. Trump has weaponized the Department of Justice to punish California, crush free thinking, and kneecap the greatest public university system in the world.' No lawsuit has been filed and the UC board of regents, who held an emergency meeting Monday afternoon over the grant cuts, has not announced how it will proceed aside from calling Trump's current terms 'unacceptable.' Newsom sits as a voting member on the 24-person board, has appointed several of its members and can wield influence on the body, although the final decision on a lawsuit or settlement rests with the regents. Newsom did not attend Monday's meeting. In a statement after the meeting, a UC spokesperson said the $1 billion price tag would be 'devastating.' 'UC's leadership spent recent days evaluating the demand, updating the UC community, and engaging with stakeholders,' said Meredith Turner, UC senior vice president of external relations. 'Our focus remains on protecting students' access to a UC education and promoting the academic freedom, excellence, and innovation that have always been at the heart of UC's work.' Hundreds of grants — from the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health and Department of Energy — are on hold at UCLA. The money funds research into cancer, math, brain science and other areas, and helps pay for graduate student stipends and tuition as well as lab upkeep. If the freezes stay for the long-term, administrators are considering layoffs and other budget reductions. Citing the reasons for the freezes, a July 30 NSF leter to UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk alleged UCLA 'engages in racism, in the form of illegal affirmative action, UCLA fails to promote a research environment free of antisemitism and bias; UCLA discriminates against and endangers women by allowing men in women's sports and private women-only spaces.' Frenk, in a campuswide message the next day, disputed the funding halt. 'This far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination,' he wrote.
Epoch Times
a day ago
- Epoch Times
Unlearning the Factory Mindset: How Education Must Evolve for the AI Era
AD Oleksii Pydsosonnii/The Epoch Times 8/12/2025 | Updated: 8/12/2025 We are at the start of a new industrial revolution, yet we still think with factory minds forged in the last revolution. Kay Rubacek is an award-winning filmmaker, author, speaker, and former host of NTD's 'Life & Times.' After being detained in a Chinese prison for advocating for human rights, she has dedicated her work to facing communist and socialist regimes in their modern, global forms. She has also contributed to The Epoch Times since 2010. Author's Selected Articles
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Dems suggest GOP redistricting has forced them to play partisan politics, Republicans argue nothing's changed
Amid the fight in Texas over Republicans' efforts to redraw the state's congressional maps, leaders of the Democratic Party have expressed the need to meet what they have described as partisan tactics, with more partisan tactics. But GOP elections experts argue Democrats have always been partisan in their congressional map drawing, despite an effort to frame the newly aggressive tactics as a reversal. One example is former Obama wingman and U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder, who did an interview with the New York Times about how he has "reversed course on gerrymandering." In 2017, Holder founded the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), to lead the Democratic Party's "comprehensive redistricting strategy" focused on drawing congressional maps "in a fair manner." This week, Axios reported Holder would be meeting with House Democrats to discuss their redistricting battle going forward, which comes after Holder told the Times that GOP efforts in Texas must be "met in the moment." "Everything should be on the table. We've got to put pressure on Republicans and make sure they understand that there's a price that they might have to pay in 2026," Holder told the Times earlier this month. "Whatever it is that might forestall this truly anti-democracy, authoritarian move that they're trying to pull in Texas has to be brought." "Nothing has changed except the donors funding his losing redistricting efforts now want Democrats to ignore their state constitutions, violate state and federal law, and gerrymander harder," said Adam Kincaid, the founder of the competing GOP group set up in 2017 to challenge the NDRC. The Republican redistricting efforts in Texas have resulted in Democrats fleeing the state – in many cases to Democrat-led havens that critics argue are highly gerrymandered themselves – to halt the GOP effort from going forward. These state-level challenges subsequently spurred nationwide resistance, including from Democratic Party governors around the country who have announced plans to retaliate by redrawing maps of their own, citing Trump and Republicans as their motivation. "If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice," said New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who has announced plans to try and redraw New York's congressional maps in response to Trump and Republicans. Meanwhile, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the redistricting push by Trump and Republicans has inevitably "forced" him to consider leading an effort to redraw California's congressional maps "to offset the rigging of maps in red states." Kincaid's group, the National Republican Redistricting Trust (NRRT), pointed Fox News Digital to an early 2018 NDRC's tax form, indicating the Democratic Party redistricting group's "organizational mission" and "most significant activities" are to "favorably position Democrats for the redistricting process." "Democrats like Eric Holder, Gavin Newsom, and Kathy Hochul have never cared about 'fairness' when it comes to redistricting; they have shown that they are willing to abandon their principles as long as it means more seats in Congress for Democrats," said Mason Di Palma, Communications Director at the Republican State Leadership Committee. "The American people can see right through their hypocritical power grab and will not let them off the hook." Meanwhile, conservative election law expert Hans von Spakovsky, said the idea that Holder has been against political gerrymandering as the head of the NDRC is "laughable." "They keep telling Trump that he needs to stop what's going on in Texas … Texas has to fix those districts, because the Fifth Circuit said," Spakovsky said in response to questions about partisanship in the ongoing redistricting fight. He argued that Trump can't just "ignore the law." Meanwhile, Spakovsky pointed out that Newsom's suggestion to lead an effort to redraw the state's congressional maps would mean getting rid of legislation aimed at making congressional map drawing less partisan, through independent redistricting committees. In Newsom's letter to Trump announcing his proposed retaliation, the governor concedes that he believes congressional maps should be drawn by "independent, citizen-led efforts," but insists that if the president does not "stand-down" he will have to go to lead his own effort. "We tried to play by a higher set of standards and rules with our independent redistricting, and we believe in that. And we are not talking about eliminating that commission," Newsom said during a press conference discussing his potential retaliatory efforts. "We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas, and we will nullify what happens in Texas." However, even with California's independent redistricting commission, Spakovsky says the California redistricting process has still been laden with partisanship, pointing to how after the 2024 election, Republicans statewide in California got about 40% of the vote, but they only have 17% of the congressional seats, or 9 out of 52 seats. "California's gerrymandered," Trump said last week during an interview on CNBC. "We should have many more seats in Congress in California." The week prior, Vice President J.D. Vance called gerrymandering in California "outrageous." Many of the Democrats who fled Texas have been criticized for fleeing to states that critics say have their own highly partisan congressional maps favoring Democrats, such as Illinois. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who has been at the forefront of efforts to force Democrats to return to their state, slammed Democrats involved in this redistricting fight from these Democrat-gerrymandered states as "completely out of control." "They've been engaged in gerrymandering for decades in California, Illinois, New York, and elsewhere, and what they have lost touch with is the people," Abbott said. Newsom's office challenged the assertions that California, and the governor, have a track record of engaging in partisan redistricting, insisting that Newsom actually "has a long history of supporting independent redistricting, both at the state and national level, a principle many Republicans have voiced opposition to over the years." Neither Holder, Hochul, nor representatives for the pair returned Fox News Digital's requests for comment.
