logo
Gavel in hand, here are Mike Lee's plans for the Senate energy committee

Gavel in hand, here are Mike Lee's plans for the Senate energy committee

Yahoo14-05-2025

WASHINGTON — The hearing began without much fuss or fanfare. Senators quietly took their spots in their semicircular seating arrangements as Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, banged the gavel against the wooden desk.
It was a short business meeting for the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to consider a handful of lower-level nominations. It was mostly quick and efficient. But in other ways, it was cordial — at times, even playful.
'I'm told that we have colleagues in the building traveling to the committee hearing room by way of Neptune, apparently,' Lee said with a smile as committee action was paused due to the absence of some members.
'We will patiently await them. Sen. (Jim) Risch has offered to do a song and dance routine,' Lee added, prompting laughter from the room.
It was a rare moment of levity in a usually stoic institution. But it offers a glimpse into Lee's leadership style and how he plans to guide his party through difficult challenges ahead.
Lee is confident his conservative values, as well as his close relationship with President Donald Trump, will help with that.
To the untrained eye, Lee is quite the enigma. He is prolific on social media, with the Utah senator posting several times an hour with seemingly no topic left untouched.
But in the halls of Congress, Lee carries himself a bit differently — he walks briskly through the hallways, rarely stopping to chat with reporters he is not familiar with.
When he does engage with questions, Lee carefully considers his words. This is a contrast from his online persona, but is emblematic of his background in law: cautious, calculated, deliberate.
That lesser-known personality is the key to Lee's modus operandi. Although he is not known for being a bipartisan dealmaker, Lee has occasionally crossed the aisle on issues such as sentencing reform — and the Utah senator has good relationships with some Democrats despite policy disagreements.
'I'm looking forward to continuing to work with Sen. Mike Lee to deliver for the people and places of New Mexico, Utah, and all of America,' Sen. Martin Heinrich, Lee's Democratic counterpart on the committee, told the Deseret News. 'I've always believed in working across the aisle — especially when it comes to protecting access to our public lands."
Lee was tapped as Energy and Natural Resources chairman at the beginning of this year, taking over the powerful committee at a crucial time for Republicans. Utah's senior senator has big plans for the committee, particularly when it comes to issues such as public lands and permitting reform.
'A lot of our Western communities have managed public lands with unmatched expertise for generations and have been able to balance multiple interests from ranching, grazing, recreation and conservation,' Lee told the Deseret News in an interview. 'We've achieved this despite sometimes hostile, overbearing federal policies that can distort that balance and threaten our way of life.'
The issue of public lands is expected to become a flashpoint in the coming weeks as some Republicans push to sell thousands of acres of federally-owned land in Utah and Nevada in the party's upcoming reconciliation package.
Lee has advocated to sell or transfer public lands for years, pushing instead to allow the state to control the roughly 35 million acres of federally-owned land in the Beehive State, roughly 67% of the state. Other Republicans have supported selling the land or to increase federal revenue by greenlighting new oil and gas leases.
Making those changes will be challenging. A handful of Republicans have already opposed any proposals to sell public lands due to conservation and environmental concerns.
'There's a lot of frustration down in the West. I understand that,' Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., who co-founded the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus, said last week. 'But I prefer the management scheme. And I give an example as a hotel — if you don't like the management of a hotel, don't sell the hotel. Change the management. That's where I sit on that position.'
The public lands issue could also put Lee at odds with ranking member Heinrich, who told the Deseret News one of his top priorities would be to 'keep public lands in public hands.'
'It is also vitally important that we make sure that hardworking families can continue to access their public lands, whether it's for hunting, fishing, hiking or just clearing their minds,' Heinrich said. 'The work we do on this committee is about building a stronger future for our kids — we must do that by working together to advance smart energy policy, keep public lands in public hands, and pursuing common-sense collaboration.'
Another key issue Lee will need to navigate as part of the reconciliation process includes intraparty disagreements over what to do with former President Joe Biden's signature Inflation Reduction Act.
Several Republicans have been adamant they want to eliminate the IRA in full, including Lee. However, some GOP lawmakers in both the House and Senate are pushing to preserve a handful of green energy credits, warning that a full repeal would result in higher utility costs nationwide.
Lee said he is aware of those concerns and that conversations are ongoing to address them. But he cautioned against cherrypicking parts of the law to uphold while discarding others.
'I know there's a wide range of opinions on this,' Lee said. 'I think the minute you start trying to draw perimeter lines around certain projects, it's going to be very difficult to contain the damage.'
The Republicans wary of repealing the law in full include Utah Sen. John Curtis, who recently signed on to a letter against a full repeal, warning it could lead to 'significant disruptions' and weaken the United States on the global stage.
However, Curtis told the Deseret News he and Lee have been able to have 'good conversations about energy policy and where things go in reconciliation and beyond.'
'Utahns are fortunate to have Sen. Lee as chair of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee and have a seat at the table when it comes to the management of our public land,' Curtis said. 'Our rural communities face incredible burdens because of decisions made by bureaucrats in Washington.'
Lee also noted the IRA originally passed Congress with only Democratic votes, arguing Republicans should not 'be eager to do their work for them in keeping any of that in there.'
Overall, Lee said his main focus on the committee is to rein in the power of the federal government to ensure fewer decisions are made by 'unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats,' which he says often costs taxpayers more money.
As part of those efforts, Lee has made it a top priority to pass the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny Act, or REINS Act, that seeks to change how regulations are passed and implemented in the federal government. The bill would require regulations with an economic impact of $100 million or more to be approved by Congress, giving lawmakers more control over how agencies operate.
Lee has heavily pushed for the REINS Act for years, arguing it is crucial to rein in the federal government and reestablish separation of powers.
'If Congress had to vote on many of the same regulations that are costing taxpayers that much money, most of those couldn't pass because people would realize at some point it's overkill to adopt such exacting standards when it's not at all clear what benefit we're gaining from it and how that benefit matches up against the cost,' Lee told the Deseret News.
Lee also plans to focus much of his time on permitting reform, which he said would be 'one of the most important things that we'll do through the Energy and Natural Resources Committee in this Congress.'
Lee has long expressed a desire to streamline the permitting process to boost energy production, telling the Deseret News he wants to not only reform the authorization phase — which lawmakers spend a majority of their time on, he said — but also the build-out phase, which encompasses the actual construction of projects that are approved.
Although Trump's reconciliation package has occupied most discussions in Congress over the last five months, Lee said talks about permitting reform are already underway and will likely ramp up in the coming months.
Aside from his work on energy and natural resources, Lee is known for his conservative voting record and close relationship with the White House.
Lee has positioned himself as one of Trump's most vocal supporters in Congress and this has allowed him to wield strong influence in the Senate. Lee said that relationship has been 'very helpful' in taking over the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, noting the president is 'very bullish on energy.'
'Every time I need to get him personally on something, I'm always able to reach him very quickly,' Lee told the Deseret News.
That ease of access, Lee said, is sure to help with the forthcoming reconciliation package on issues that are likely to drive a wedge between Republican lawmakers.
'Where there is a difference of opinion within the party … it can be helpful to have somebody who can exercise leadership in resolving the dispute,' Lee said.
On issues such as disagreements on the Inflation Reduction Act and green energy tax credits, Trump will 'absolutely' be able to find consensus.
'Very often the president can be the one to resolve disputes among members of his party in Congress,' Lee said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard
Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard

Boston Globe

time8 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump charts new territory in bypassing Newsom to deploy National Guard

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump invoked a section of the US code that allows the president to bypass a governor's authority over the National Guard and call those troops into federal service when he considers it necessary to repel an invasion or suppress a rebellion, the law states. California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, has sharply criticized the move, saying state and local authorities have the situation under control and accusing Trump of attempting to create a 'spectacle.' Advertisement The directive, announced by the White House late Saturday, came after some protests against immigration raids turned violent, with protesters setting cars aflame and lighting fireworks, and law enforcement in tactical gear using tear gas and stun grenades. Trump claimed in his executive order that the unrest in Southern California was prohibiting the execution of immigration enforcement and therefore met the definition of a rebellion. Advertisement Legal experts said they expect Trump's executive order to draw legal challenges. On Sunday, Newsom asked the Trump administration to rescind his deployment of the National Guard, saying the administration had not followed proper legal procedure in sending them to the state. Trump said the National Guard troops would be used to 'temporarily' protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and 'other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations.' Goitein called Trump's exercise of the statute an 'untested' departure from its use by previous presidents. She said presidents have in the past invoked this section of federal law in conjunction with the Insurrection Act, which Trump did not. The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy armed forces or the National Guard domestically to suppress armed rebellion, riots or other extreme circumstances. It allows US military personnel to perform law enforcement activities - such as making arrests and performing searches - generally prohibited by another law, the Posse Comitatus Act. The last time a president invoked this section of US code in tandem with the Insurrection Act was in 1992, during the riots that engulfed Los Angeles after the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King. The Insurrection Act has been invoked throughout US history to deal with riots and labor unrest, and to protect Black Americans from the Ku Klux Klan. Advertisement During his 2024 campaign, Trump and aides discussed invoking the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to quell anticipated protests, and he said at an Iowa rally that he would unilaterally send troops to Democratic-run cities to enforce order. 'You look at any Democrat-run state, and it's just not the same - it doesn't work,' Trump told the crowd, suggesting cities like New York and Los Angeles had severe crime problems. 'We cannot let it happen any longer. And one of the other things I'll do - because you're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in - the next time, I'm not waiting.' Trump's willingness to use the armed forces to put down protests has drawn fierce blowback from civil liberties groups and Democrats, who have said suppressing dissent with military force is a violation of the country's norms. 'President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in response to protests is unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power,' Hina Shamsi, director of the National Security Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. 'By taking this action, the Trump administration is putting Angelenos in danger, creating legal and ethical jeopardy for troops, and recklessly undermining our foundational democratic principle that the military should not police civilians.' Goitein said Trump's move to invoke only the federal service law might be calculated to try to avoid any political fallout from invoking the Insurrection Act, or it's merely a prelude to doing so. 'This is charting new ground here, to have a president try to uncouple these authorities,' Goitein said. 'There's a question here whether he is essentially trying to deploy the powers of the Insurrection Act without invoking it.' Advertisement Trump's move also was unusual in other ways, Goitein said. Domestic military deployments typically come at the request of a governor and in response to the collapse of law enforcement control or other serious threats. Local authorities in Los Angeles have not asked for such help. Goitein said the last time a president ordered the military to a state without a request was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators. Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck wrote on his website that invoking the Armed Services Act - and not the Insurrection Act - means the troops will be limited in what role they will be able to perform. 'Nothing that the President did Saturday night would, for instance, authorize these federalized National Guard troops to conduct their own immigration raids; make their own immigration arrests; or otherwise do anything other than, to quote the President's own memorandum, 'those military protective activities that the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably necessary to ensure the protection and safety of Federal personnel and property,'' Vladeck wrote. Rachel E. VanLandingham, a former Air Force attorney and professor at the Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles, echoed the point. Unless acting under federal orders from the president, National Guard units are state organizations overseen by governors. While under state control, Guard troops have broader law enforcement authorities, VanLandingham said. In this situation, the service members under federal control will have more restraints. 'But it can easily and quickly escalate to mortal and constitutional danger,' she said, if Trump decides to also invoke the Insurrection Act, which would give these Guard members and any active-duty troops who may be summoned to Los Angeles the authority to perform law enforcement duties. Advertisement During his first term as president, Trump suggested invoking the Insurrection Act to deal with protests over the 2020 police killing of George Floyd, but his defense secretary at the time, Mark T. Esper, objected and it never came to fruition. Trump asked the governors of a handful of states to send troops to D.C. in response to the Floyd protests there. Some governors agreed, but others turned aside the request. National Guard members were present outside the White House in June of that year during a violent crackdown on protesters demonstrating against police brutality. That same day, D.C. National Guard helicopters overseen by Trump's Army secretary then, Ryan McCarthy, roared over protesters in downtown Washington, flying as low as 55 feet. An Army review later determined it was a misuse of helicopters specifically designated for medical evacuations. Trump also generated controversy when he sent tactical teams of border officers to Portland, Oregon, and to Seattle to confront protesters there.

Elon will lose fight with Trump, Musk's father tells Russia
Elon will lose fight with Trump, Musk's father tells Russia

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon will lose fight with Trump, Musk's father tells Russia

Credit: Tsargrad TV Elon Musk will lose his fight with Donald Trump and made a 'mistake' by challenging him, his father has said. Speaking at a political conference in Moscow, Errol Musk claimed his billionaire son was suffering 'PTSD from the White House' and blamed his row with the US president on 'stress'. 'Trump will prevail – he's the president, he was elected as the president. So, you know, Elon made a mistake, I think. But he is tired, he is stressed,' he told Russian media. Last week, Elon Musk and Mr Trump traded insults after the Tesla chief executive denounced the president's sweeping new tax and spending Bill as 'a disgusting abomination'. He also called for the president's impeachment and claimed the Republican was 'in the Epstein files' – US government intelligence documents on Jeffrey Epstein, the late paedophile financier. In response, Mr Trump threatened to cancel US government contracts with Mr Musk's companies, which include SpaceX. Errol Musk told Izvestia, a Russian daily newspaper: 'You know they have been under a lot of stress for five months – you know – give them a break. 'They are very tired and stressed, so you can expect something like this.' Despite the pair's war of words, Mr Musk said he still believed his son's relationship with the president could be mended, describing the row as 'just a small thing' that would 'be over tomorrow'. He made the comments during an appearance at Future Forum 2050, a conference attended by Kremlin heavyweights and led by Alexander Dugin, a Russian ultra-nationalist philosopher often described as Vladimir Putin's 'brain'. Errol Musk was also pictured sitting next to Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister. At one point he praised Putin as a 'very stable and pleasant man' and blamed Western media for projecting 'nonsense' about Russia. It came as Stephen Bannon, Mr Trump's former chief strategist, claimed that in April Elon Musk had a physical altercation with Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, down the corridor from the Oval Office. Mr Bannon said: 'President Trump heard about it and said: 'This is too much,'' according to The Washington Post. A source told the newspaper that concerns were also raised over Mr Musk's alleged drug use. Mr Musk, the world's richest man, helped bankroll Mr Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. He was then hired to head the new Department of Government Efficiency, controversially tasked with downsizing the federal workforce and slashing spending. The tech entrepreneur stepped back from the role late last month, ending a turbulent 130-day stint in the administration. On Saturday, the US president said his relationship with Mr Musk was over, and warned there would be 'serious consequences' if Mr Musk switched his allegiance to the Democrats and funded rival candidates. Credit: Reuters Delighting in the row, Russian MPs have offered political asylum to the South African-born businessman. Last week, Dmitry Novikov, the deputy chairman of the state Duma committee on international affairs, said Moscow would welcome him to the country 'if he needs it'. Senior Putin allies have also mockingly offered to help mediate between the two men. 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys!' said Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president, referring to Mr Musk's satellite internet network. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

‘He knows where to find me,' Gov. Newsom responds to Trump administration arrest threat
‘He knows where to find me,' Gov. Newsom responds to Trump administration arrest threat

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘He knows where to find me,' Gov. Newsom responds to Trump administration arrest threat

California Gov. Gavin Newsom responded to threats over the weekend by the Trump administration that he could be arrested if he interferes with ICE arrests of undocumented immigrants. 'He's a tough guy, why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom said during an interview with MSNBC News on Sunday. The governor also issued some strong statements toward the president and his administration's crackdown on immigration. 'But, you know what? Lay your hands off 4-year-old girls that are trying to get educated. Lay your hands off these poor people that are just trying to live their lives, man. Trying to live their lives, paying their taxes … been here 10 years,' Newsom said. The governor's comments come in response to threats by Trump's 'border czar,' Tom Homan, to arrest anyone who obstructs the immigration enforcement effort, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, NBC News reported. 'I'll say about anybody,' Homan told the television network. 'You cross that line, it's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.' For her part, Bass said Homan's comments were unnecessary. 'I spoke to him last night. He understands that I am the mayor of the city; the last thing in the world I'm going to do is get into a brawl with the federal government. So that just made no sense. There was no reason for that comment,' she told NBC News. Newsom and other Democratic leaders have criticized Trump's use of the National Guard in trying to quell anti-ICE immigration protests that turned violent in Los Angeles over the weekend, saying the escalation in force will only lead to further trouble. Newsom also announced plans to sue the Trump administration over the deployment. Meanwhile, Trump has indicated he would be willing to bring in the U.S. Marines if he felt the situation called for it. Trump also backed up Homan's warning to officials, saying they will 'face judges' if they stand in the way. 'Who the hell is this guy? Come after me, arrest me, let's just get it over with, tough guy,' Newsom responded. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store