
Watch: Syrians Celebrate After Trump Announces Lifting Of US Sanctions
US President Donald Trump's announcement from Saudi Arabia about the United States easing wide-ranging sanctions on Syria sparked festivities in the capital, Damascus, as Syrians hoped for relief after years of impoverishment by civil war and restrictions. Syrian interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa welcomed Trump's "courageous" move and said now his government can "begin the real work, with which modern Syria will be reborn."
Speaking in a television address, al-Sharaa said the American Presidnet's decision "was a historic and courageous decision, which alleviates the suffering of the people, contributes to their rebirth and lays the foundations for stability in the region".
The sanctions were widely seen as a major obstacle to Syria's economic recovery and post-war reconstruction, and their lifting can bring much-needed investment to the country emerging from decades of autocratic rule by the Assad family, as well as the war, which left an estimated 90 per cent of its population in poverty.
After the announcement, videos from Damascus emerged on social media, showing hundreds of men, women, and children gathered at Umayyad Square, with music blasting in the background. While some people were seen dancing and waving Syrian flags, others drove by in their cars, with an anticipation of a better life palpable in their celebrations.
#Watch | Syrians Celebrate After Trump Announces Lifting Of US Sanctions
Read more: https://t.co/ZZfnL7QUcm pic.twitter.com/bjbj73otbo
— NDTV WORLD (@NDTVWORLD) May 15, 2025
"Now, we are not going to have any excuse by the government that there are sanctions that prevent doing this or that," Jihad Yazigi, founder and editor of the Syria Report, told the Washington Post.
Hazem al-Loda, 31, a taxi driver who worked long hours to put food on the table, said that though US sanctions were meant to target the Assad regime, it was people who suffered the most.
"The government didn't suffer. The rich found ways around it. We saw their fancy cars driving the streets in front of us, while we couldn't afford anything made after 2011," he told the Post.
Sanctions On Syria And Trump's Announcement
The US has imposed three sanctions programs on Syria. In 1979, the country was designated a "state sponsor of terrorism" because its military was sound of being involved in neighbouring Lebanon's civil war and had backed armed groups there. In 2003, then-President George W Bush signed the Syria Accountability Act into law, which focused heavily on Syria's support of designated terror groups, its military presence in Lebanon, its alleged development of weapons of mass destruction, as well as oil smuggling and the backing of armed groups in Iraq after the US-led invasion.
In 2019, during Trump's first term, he signed the Caesar Act, sanctioning Syrian troops and others responsible for atrocities committed during the civil war that started in 2011 and left more than half a million dead, displaced millions.
Coupled with similar measures by other countries, the sanctions have touched every part of the Syrian economy and everyday life in the country. They have led to shortages of goods from fuel to medicine, and made it difficult for humanitarian agencies responding to receive funding and operate fully. Companies around the world struggle to export to Syria, and Syrians struggle to import goods of any kind because nearly all financial transactions with the country are banned. That has led to a blossoming black market of smuggled goods.
During his Riyadh visit this week, Trump offered to lift sanctions on Syria, mostly imposed during the repressive rule of ousted president Bashar al-Assad. The move comes as a major boost to the war-ravaged country, still getting to grips with Sharaa's December toppling of Assad. Trump however gave no indication that the United States would remove Syria from its blacklist of state sponsors of terrorism -- a designation dating back to 1979 over support to Palestinian militants that severely impedes investment.
What Lifting Of Sanctions Mean For Syria?
After Trump's announcement, Syria's currency gained 60 per cent on Tuesday night - a signal of how transformational the removal of sanctions could be. Still, experts believe it will take time to see any tangible impact on Syria's economy.
Per an Associated Press report, removal of all three sanctions could mean banks could return to the international financial system or car repair shops could import spare parts from abroad. If the economy improves and reconstruction projects take off, many Syrian refugees who live in crowded tented encampments relying on aid to survive, could decide to return home.
"If the situation stabilised and there were reforms, we would then see Syrians returning to their country if they were given opportunities, as we expect," Lebanese economist Mounis Younes told AP.
The easing of sanctions also has an important symbolic weight because it would signal that Syria is no longer a pariah, said President al-Shaar.
"Unless enough layers of sanctions are peeled off, you cannot expect the positive impacts on Syria to start to appear," said al-Shaar. "Even if you remove some of the top ones, the impact economically would still be nonexistent."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
Amid Trump Tariffs, India To Launch FTA Negotiations With Eurasian Economic Union
Last Updated: The commerce ministry told the Rajya Sabha that India has strengthened its trade ties over the past five years, signing five major FTAs and progressing on several new deal. Amid the Trump administration's imposition of 50 percent tariffs, India may have one more free trade agreement in the pipeline as it launch negotiations with the Eurasian Economic Union, which has Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation. India signed the terms of reference (ToR) with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), on Wednesday. It was signed by Additional Secretary, Department of Commerce, Government of India, Ajay Bhadoo, and Deputy Director, Trade Policy Department, Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC), Mikhail Cherekaev. During his visit, Bhadoo also called on minister incharge of trade, EEC, Andrei Slepnev. The heads of negotiation groups apprised the minister about the milestone achieved with the signing of the ToR and discussed next steps to formally launch the negotiation process, including organisational aspects of the future trade deal. 'The ToR provides the framework for negotiations and is expected to unlock untapped trade potential, increase investments and establish a stronger, durable India-EAEU economic partnership. Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to the early conclusion of the agreement and to building a long-term institutional framework for trade cooperation," a commerce ministry statement said. There is a growing trade turnover between India and the EAEU, which stood at USD 69 billion in 2024, registering a 7 percent increase over 2023. With a combined GDP of USD 6.5 trillion, the proposed free trade agreement (FTA) is expected to expand market access for Indian exporters, support diversification into new sectors and geographies, enhance competitiveness against non-market economies, and deliver significant benefits to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME). Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Jitin Prasada told the Rajya Sabha in a written reply that India has strengthened its trade ties over the past five years, signing five major FTAs and progressing on several new deals. The agreements inked over the past five years include the India-Mauritius Comprehensive Economic Cooperation and Partnership Agreement (CECPA) implemented in 2021, the India-UAE Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and the India-Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) in 2022, the India-European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) in 2024, and the India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) signed in 2025, which is yet to come into force. India has concluded negotiations for a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with Oman, and is in advanced talks for several other agreements, including the India-EU FTA, India-Australia Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA), India-Sri Lanka Economic and Technology Cooperation Agreement, India-Peru FTA, India-Chile CEPA, India-New Zealand FTA, and a bilateral trade agreement with the United States. Additionally, India is reviewing and upgrading older trade pacts such as the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (2009) and the India-Korea CEPA (2009). view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The difficult path to peace in Ukraine
Where does Europe end and Russia begin? This centuries-old question underlies the meeting between President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders in Washington on Monday. The resolution of Russia's war against Ukraine will settle this question, at least for now. Ukrainians are a separate and distinct people. Ukraine is a nation with its own history, language, poets, heroes and myths. Vladimir Putin denies this, but the facts speak for themselves. Generations of Ukrainians struggled for independence, and it has fallen on this generation to preserve it. They've fought the Russian invaders with courage, ingenuity and persistence in the face of daunting odds. They've exposed the hollowness of Mr. Putin's claim that he has restored Russia as a great power. Although Russian troops outnumber Ukrainian troops, Russia's army has paid dearly for incremental gains. Russia doesn't deserve an inch of Ukraine's territory. In April 2014, during a period of Russian aggression against Ukraine, the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology polled the inhabitants of eight southern and eastern Ukrainian regions that the Kremlin was targeting. Only 15% of the population supported the idea of seceding from Ukraine and joining Russia, while 70% opposed it. Pro-Russian sentiment never reached a majority, even in Donetsk or Luhansk—regions with a high percentage of Russian speakers. Most Ukrainians want to be part of Europe, not Russia. They want to join the European Union, not an economic association led by Mr. Putin's cronies. They deny what Mr. Putin affirms, that the collapse of the Soviet Union was the biggest geopolitical tragedy of the 20th century. They certainly don't want to help restore Russia. They want to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the strongest barrier against this outcome. The war's resolution will determine the extent to which Ukrainians can attain these goals. After meeting with Mr. Putin in Alaska, Mr. Trump abandoned his pursuit of an immediate cease-fire in favor of a comprehensive settlement, the approach on which Mr. Putin has insisted. In Monday's meeting, however, France's President Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz made it clear to Mr. Trump that they would continue to push for a cease-fire in the first phase of these negotiations. Mr. Trump also took off the table the economic sanctions he had threatened to impose if Mr. Putin refused to accept a cease-fire. In an interview Sunday on 'Meet the Press," Secretary of State Marco Rubio made it clear sanctions would be imposed only if Mr. Trump concluded that Russia was stonewalling the negotiations. What's next? Mr. Putin won't relinquish the Ukrainian territory he has seized, Ukraine can't win it back on the battlefield, and neither Europe nor the U.S. is prepared to take the steps necessary to push out the Russians. Meanwhile, Mr. Zelensky won't sign a document giving Russia sovereignty over the territories it has claimed. Nor will he give up a region that Mr. Putin has reportedly demanded must surrender: the portion of Donetsk that remains outside Russia's control and contains some of Ukraine's strongest defensive lines. Relinquishing it would be the modern equivalent to the Munich Agreement that Czechoslovakia was forced to sign in 1938, in which it agreed to cede its critical border regions and defenses to Nazi Germany. Rather than agreeing to a settlement that would leave open the possibility of Ukrainian membership in NATO, Mr. Putin appears prepared to continue the war indefinitely. Mr. Zelensky can't accept any arrangement that would leave his country facing Russia alone. He needs formal security guarantees along the lines of NATO's Article 5 from Europe's best-armed countries and the U.S. By opening the door to U.S. participation in such an arrangement, Mr. Trump has removed, at least in principle, a significant obstacle to ending the conflict. It's hard to imagine that Mr. Zelensky would take seriously any security guarantee without foreign troops on Ukrainian soil. France and the U.K., Europe's only nuclear powers, would have to take the lead. The Poles and Italians might agree to participate. Mr. Trump may balk at stationing U.S. troops in Ukraine, but without U.S. intelligence, air power and commitments to back them up if Russia reneges, most Europeans would be reluctant to leave their own forces exposed. The majority of Ukrainians are 'firmly against" any territorial concessions. If negotiations proceed, Mr. Zelensky may confront a challenge even harder than rallying his country against aggression: persuading his fellow citizens that Ukraine's sovereignty and independence can be secured only at the price of its territorial integrity. Peace may not be possible without some concessions to Russia, but courageous leaders in Kyiv can allow most of Ukraine to move toward the West—a process that the U.S. should facilitate and the EU should accelerate. Only then will Europe's boundary be secured.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Renovation of 4 Tripura rly stns under way: Vaishnaw
Agartala: In a significant push towards modernizing Tripura's railway infrastructure, the renovation of four major stations — Agartala, Dharmanagar, Kumarghat, and Udaipur — is progressing well under the Amrit Bharat Station Project. Railway minister Ashwini Vaishnaw informed Parliament on Wednesday that work has already commenced at two of these stations, with the remaining two set to begin shortly. Responding to a query from Lok Sabha MP Biplab Kumar Deb, Vaishnaw emphasized the govt's commitment to expanding and modernizing rail infrastructure nationwide, aiming to enhance connectivity, facilities, and safety. "The pace of development in this sector has increased nearly 6.5 times during the Modi-led Central Government compared to the previous UPA regime," Vaishnaw stated. Detailing the ongoing projects, Deb highlighted that at Agartala Railway Station, lift installation is complete, and construction of a 12-meter foot overbridge and a new station building is underway. At Dharmanagar Station, platform shelters, approach roads, and boundary walls are finished, with work on a circulating area, foot overbridge, and escalator in progress. In Kumarghat, a 12-meter footbridge, circulating area, approach road, new waiting hall, and platform shelters are being constructed. Meanwhile, Udaipur Station is seeing the development of a footbridge and improvements to the waiting hall and toilets. The modernization efforts are part of a broader strategy to prioritize better passenger services and enhanced comfort across India's rail network. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.