logo
Editorial: As sugar is attacked, Chicago candymaker Ferrara keeps the Nerds coming

Editorial: As sugar is attacked, Chicago candymaker Ferrara keeps the Nerds coming

Yahoo27-05-2025

These are nervous times in the food industry. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy is centralizing control of health-related agencies under his authority. He's advancing his 'Make America Healthy Again' campaign by, paradoxically, slashing more than 80,000 from the federal health workforce. That sets the stage for what Chicago's Journal of the American Medical Association recently quoted in a headline as, 'guaranteed pandemonium.'
Among his bold statements about the modern food supply, Kennedy has said Americans are being 'unknowingly poisoned' by canola and soybean oil, for instance, and described the sale of so-called 'ultra-processed' food like hot dogs and chips to Native Americans as a 'genocide.' He wants to ban long-approved dyes and preservatives. And he's angling to use government power to remake school lunches and prevent food-stamp recipients from shopping in some of the most popular sections of the grocery aisles. Many are applauding him.
And as for the sweet stuff most Americans enjoy in moderation? 'Sugar is poison,' Kennedy said last month, and Americans need to know that it's poison.
We share his goal of food policy that yields a healthy population. We also have an interest in Chicago-based businesses.
The $2 billion Chicago company that makes Lemonheads, Jelly Bellies and Nerds unsurprisingly takes a different view from Kennedy. As Ferrara Candy Co.'s Katie Duffy says, 'Everything we produce is safe to eat.'
This page recognizes that sugar has contributed to the obesity epidemic and we don't think that all of Kennedy's warnings are without foundation. But we've also long recoiled against Uncle Sam telling Americans what to eat. If a food product is safe from a scientific standpoint, the government has no business blocking it from the marketplace. Food producers should be honest about what's in their products so people can make informed decisions. Armed with that information, we believe people are smart enough to make their own decisions without Nanny State intervention.
Candy is a good example: Do you know anybody who puts Laffy Taffy at the center of the plate for dinner or serves a steak with a side of Twizzlers? Just about everyone understands that too much sugar in the diet can be unhealthy. But people also realize they can safely enjoy a treat now and then without bringing on the deadly, chronic conditions that Kennedy invokes in scare tactics that we worry will backfire.
For now, the food industry is proceeding with cautious optimism. At Ferrara, which has a long, proud history of making candy in Chicago, the business outlook is still positive, according to Greg Guidotti, chief marketing officer.
Taking a break from handing out Freeze-Dried Sweet Tarts and Nerds Gummy Clusters at a recent trade show in Indianapolis, Guidotti reaffirmed that his fast-growing company sees its future in sugar-based candy (called just 'Sugar' in industry parlance, to distinguish it from 'Chocolate'). 'We have intentions to be the global leader in Sugar,' Guidotti said. 'We're definitely the U.S. leader.'
The company's 'shining star,' as he puts it, is the Nerds business, which he said has grown from just $70 million in sales pre-pandemic to $900 million today. 'Nerds Clusters changed the game,' he explained, referencing a product that combines the traditionally crunchy Nerds with those with a gummy center.
The National Confectioners Association, which runs the candy show, is focused on ensuring the FDA can do its traditional job. Indeed, the U.S. needs a central regulator to determine what's safe, and as we've written before, food producers should not knowingly add dangerous ingredients into our food supply. And while many are focused on distributing safe, delicious products, it's true that there are major food manufacturers that prioritize low-cost production over guaranteeing a safe, healthy food supply.
The FDA must retain the capacity to evaluate food based on science and enact policy that follows science.
Consumers are still making room in their budgets for sweets. Last year, retail sales of chocolate, candy, gum and mints topped $54 billion. With sales like this, it's hard not to acknowledge that Americans are consuming a lot of sweets.
We're all for enjoying sugar — and Sugar — in moderation. But let's not lose our heads.
Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr.'s policies will make America's maternal mortality rates worse
RFK Jr.'s policies will make America's maternal mortality rates worse

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr.'s policies will make America's maternal mortality rates worse

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists rightly criticized Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s announcement at the end of last month that his department will no longer recommend the Covid vaccine for pregnant women. Covid was the leading cause of maternal mortality in 2021, and the ACOG correctly pointed out that the vaccine is safe and that it provides needed protection for expectant mothers and their unborn children. The decision by Kennedy's agency to delete the recommendation that pregnant women be vaccinated against a virus that was recently the leading cause of maternal death should prompt us to ask: Where are pregnant women in Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' plan? As a maternal health physician, public health expert and equity leader, I'm as unhappy as ACOG is with the specific decision the HHS has made to stop recommending the Covid vaccine for my pregnant patients. Contracting Covid during pregnancy increases the risk of complications, including death. But I'm even more outraged and alarmed by something else HHS has done on Kennedy's watch: omit maternal mortality review committees (MMRCs) and perinatal quality collaboratives (PQCs) from the new structure of HHS. Maternal mortality review committees show us what is killing mothers and how we can stop it. Perinatal quality collaboratives give us the tools to act. They help hospitals and providers implement lifesaving solutions. These programs are not bureaucratic add-ons, but the main reason our nation has made progress in reducing maternal deaths. And yet, in a new proposed budget, programs run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, such as the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, maternal mortality review committees and perinatal quality collaboratives are conspicuously missing. Together, these programs have led to measurable improvements in maternal outcomes across the country. From 2021 to 2023, the U.S. saw statistically significant decreases in maternal mortality. That's not a coincidence — it's the result of a national, coordinated strategy rooted in evidence and accountability. The removal of this infrastructure is more than a policy shift — it's a dismantling of the very system that allowed us to fight back against a maternal health crisis. And the stakes are especially high for Black women and rural mothers, who face the greatest disparities in maternal outcomes. Without MMRCs, we lose the ability to track those disparities. Without PQCs, we lose the mechanism to fix them. In smaller hospitals, especially, quality improvement isn't a given — it's something PQCs make possible by helping teams implement patient safety bundles that might otherwise remain unused. Forty-six states and six U.S. territories have MMRCs supported by a CDC grant. This funding provides support to perform case reviews of maternal deaths, while the CDC provides the infrastructure, including a database that allows the results of such reviews to be aggregated. Data from MMRCs in 38 states in 2020, for example, showed that the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths was mental health conditions, inclusive of suicide and accidental overdose, and 84% of those deaths were deemed preventable. Those findings gave rise to federal programs such as the maternal mental health hotline which, I'm thankful, will continue to be supported in the proposed HHS budget. The CDC also provides funding to support 36 state-based PQCs. This is an example of how the programs work together: In Louisiana, our maternal mortality review identified obstetric hemorrhage as our leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in 2018. As a result, the Louisiana Perinatal Quality Collaborative (LaPQC) through the reducing maternal morbidity initiative and the safe births initiative worked to implement the AIM obstetric hemorrhage patient safety bundle. As a result, Louisiana mothers experiencing hemorrhage saw a 39% decrease in severe maternal morbidity (SMM), with a 58% decrease among Black women. These aren't anecdotes. They are blueprints for saving lives. Like the decision to stop recommending the Covid vaccine, if the decision to remove these programs from the budget stands, we will reverse course. The U.S. already has the highest maternal mortality rate among high-income countries. Removing these programs is likely to make the national crisis worse. We cannot allow that. My message to policymakers is simple: You can't 'Make America Healthy Again' if you ignore the risks of pregnancy and childbirth. Reinvest in the programs that are working. Fund the programs that show us why mothers are dying and what to do to keep more mothers alive. Preserve the public health infrastructure that has already started to move the needle in the right direction. If we as a country fail to act, then more mothers will die — and the tragic part is, we'll know we had the tools to prevent it. This article was originally published on

New Gold Star on Hamilton's west side is open and has an expanded menu
New Gold Star on Hamilton's west side is open and has an expanded menu

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New Gold Star on Hamilton's west side is open and has an expanded menu

Jun. 6—A relocated Hamilton west side Gold Star restaurant is now open and is much larger than its former location on Main Street. It is in a plaza on North Brookwood Avenue that will see explosive growth in the next few years. A Valvoline is being built nearby, next to Wendy's and a newly announce Kroger Marketplace will be close, too. The Gold Star is corporate-owned as it replaces a building owned by now-former franchisee Carlo Salem, who is retiring. Gold Star Chili CEO Roger David said the work to select a location and build it took at least five years. However, it's been his priority for just about his entire 10-year tenure as CEO. Plans for the project were approved by Hamilton City Council in 2023. "It's very, very rewarding to be here," he said. David said patrons will notice a few things walking through the door, one being "an elevated level of hospitality." Another is an expanded menu, which in addition to the classic conies and ways, the restaurant will serve single and double burgers, deckers, fried chicken sandwiches, milkshakes and garlic parmesan fries, which David says "are the best in the city." The westside Hamilton store is a little bigger than the newer prototype restaurants being built over the past few years. The new Gold Star store replaced an old Pizza Hut, but David said they used that pizza restaurant's existing footprint, which resulted in a bigger space. "It has a tremendous dining room in there, we can accommodate a large group," he said. Gold Star plans to continue its partnership with community groups, including the schools, churches "and any organization that congregates." "We'll be a part of whatever their needs may be," he said. But helping with food banks and pantries is where the 60-year-old restaurant chain "really, really leans in heavily." "Understanding community needs is kind of where it starts, but with hunger, that's typically where we lean in a little heavier," he said. While the North Brookwood Gold Star has been open for a couple of weeks, the Cincinnati-based chain will formally celebrate its opening the weekend of Aug. 9 and 10, where guests can get free cheese coneys with the purchase of a drink, and chances to win free burgers for a year. The restaurant is open daily from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. at 108 N. Brookwood Ave.

"I don't want to see my parents fighting": Fox News struggles to cope with Trump-Musk explosion
"I don't want to see my parents fighting": Fox News struggles to cope with Trump-Musk explosion

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"I don't want to see my parents fighting": Fox News struggles to cope with Trump-Musk explosion

The cracks in the MAGA alliance are beginning to show, and Fox News isn't quite sure how to patch them. The conservative outlet appeared to be in damage control on Thursday as the rift between Donald Trump and Elon Musk continued to deepen. Many of the network's prominent commentators tried to cope with the situation, downplaying the public clash, describing it as a predictable outcome of a relationship between two powerful individuals and urging the two men to reconcile. 'Sometimes, guys fight,' said Jesse Watters. 'Guys sometimes will punch you in the face, and the next night you're having a beer. Sleep with your girlfriend, and you patch things up.' 'These guys are like roommates,' he added. "They're just blowing off steam.' Greg Gutfeld also reached for metaphors when he urged the two billionaires to 'knock it off.' 'It's like, I don't want to see my parents fighting," Gutfeld said. 'I like Batman and Robin. I don't like Spy vs. Spy.' He also praised Trump and Musk for airing out their grievances transparently for everyone to see. Sean Hannity sought to strike a similarly conciliatory tone, saying that just last week the two men were 'best friends,' and that the dispute ultimately came down to a disagreement over a piece of legislation. 'You have the president of the Free World; the richest guy on earth, one of the strongest guys on earth,' Hannity added. 'Conflicts? They're kind of predictable ... they disagree on policy.' Hannity predicted that Musk and Trump would work it outOther Fox figures didn't shy away from the implications of the very public breakdown. 'This is not a story that anyone was looking for,' Will Cain said. 'Hard to see a path forward for these two to repair their relationship." He called the feud 'a big, ugly battle,' and lamented the consequences for the country. Laura Ingraham, typically a Trump defender, urged the former president to pull back. 'Musk is his own person,' she said. 'Threatening to pull [his] government contracts—that's not wise, when five minutes ago you were of course hailing Musk's work in helping rescue the stranded Americans in space.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store