logo
Tesla Cybertruck Banned In UK But Slated To Launch In Australia

Tesla Cybertruck Banned In UK But Slated To Launch In Australia

Forbes2 days ago

The Cybertruck is headed Down Under.
Photo by Tesla
In February, we brought you a story about the Tesla Cybertruck being banned, seized and impounded by British police in the U.K. due to its lack of a conformity certificate, its sharp edges, it being too big and too heavy for British roads, its illegal light bar, and its supercar-like acceleration. Britain's National Transportation Safety Board chairwoman Jennifer Hominy said of the Tesla, 'The Cybertruck is an over-6000 lb piece of steel that has no business going a quarter mile in under 11 seconds.'
Since Elon Musk's controversial foray into U.S. politics, and the subsequent backlash from the motoring public, all Tesla models, including the Cybertruck are suffering falling sales. Owners of the edgy, poorly built truck are now finding it hard to sell or trade-in their vehicles as resale values fall through the floor.
But it's not all bad news. There is a ray of light for Tesla on the horizon, and it comes, strangely enough, from Down Under.
That's right, the Cybertruck is being seriously considered to go on sale in Australia. According to 'evcentral.com' a local site, Tesla Australia has been briefed on the Australian Design Rule (ADR) changes required to launch the Cybertruck in Australia, as the controversial truck prepares to debut there.
Country Director for Tesla Australia, Thom Drew, says the Cybertruck was 'never off the table' for a local launch – despite the vehicle reservation system being stripped from the Tesla Australia site – and instead says demand in the USA pushed back any global rollout.
But while Mr Drew stopped short of confirming a local launch, he says it has 'always been on the radar,' suggesting a debut Down Under is close.
Generally considered as a one million car sales per year market, the Australian car market is one of the most progressive and open in the world, with virtually every car brand on sale except Acura, Citroen, Chrysler, Dodge and Infiniti. By contrast, Australia was one of the first markets to open up to Chinese brands such as BYD, Geely, Chery, GWM, MG, Zeekr, Deepal, JAC, XPeng, NIO, Leapmotor and Haval and has remained arguably the world's best test bed for Chinese cars.
The local Tesla team have sought a briefing on how to get the Cybertruck to comply with ADR regulations, following a 12-month Australian roadshow with a US-spec left-hand-drive truck. As far as design regulations stipulate, the truck apparently does not require much modification to meet local design standards. 'There are small changes to bumper widths, some external lighting requirements, and obviously left to right-hand drive, and just a few engineering changes like that, but fundamentally it'd be the same vehicle.' These changes could add between $5,000 to $10,000 to the price of a truck.
Drew adds, 'I can't tell you a timeline, or if or when, but just locally, we're advocating for it as much as we can.' If it is launched, and that would be in early 2026 at the earliest, it will be the first version of the Cybertuck to debut with right-hand-drive anywhere in the world.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rio Tinto Agrees to New Management Plan in Area Where It Destroyed Ancient Caves
Rio Tinto Agrees to New Management Plan in Area Where It Destroyed Ancient Caves

Wall Street Journal

time33 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Rio Tinto Agrees to New Management Plan in Area Where It Destroyed Ancient Caves

SYDNEY—Rio Tinto has agreed to a new management plan with a local indigenous group that covers its iron-ore operations in an area of Australia's Pilbara region where it destroyed two ancient rock shelters five years ago. The destruction of the Juukan rock shelters in 2020 led to the departure of several senior Rio Tinto executives, including then CEO Jean-Sébastien Jacques. It showed how environmental and cultural issues have taken center stage in an industry that is fighting to change investors' perceptions that mining is problematic.

Australia's BlueScope surges on Trump's plan to double tariffs on steel imports
Australia's BlueScope surges on Trump's plan to double tariffs on steel imports

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Australia's BlueScope surges on Trump's plan to double tariffs on steel imports

By Nikita Maria Jino (Reuters) -Shares of Australian steel producer BlueScope Steel jumped on Monday to a more than three-month high after U.S. President Donald Trump said he planned to double tariffs on imported steel. Shares of BlueScope, which operates five businesses in North America including the North Star mill in Ohio, were up as much as 9.4% at A$24.88 in early trade. The stock was among the top performers in the broader ASX 200 benchmark index, which was down 0.4%. Trump on Friday said that he planned to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50%, ratcheting up pressure on global steel producers and deepening his trade war. These proposed tariffs could bode well for BlueScope in enhancing steel prices in the U.S., thus driving tailwinds for the company, said Grady Wulff, a market analyst at Bell Direct. In mid-February, the stock rose 12% after the company's chief executive Mark Vassella said that the business could benefit from Trump's protectionist tariffs. However, shares have slipped nearly 10% since Vassella's statements. Uncertainty of a rebound in demand from China for steel and steelmaking ingredients has weighed on all companies with exposure to this market, Wulff said, along with tariffs which are increasing uncertainty around the recovery of demand for steel-related materials. BlueScope has borne the brunt of weak iron ore prices, which have fallen 3.5% so far this year. North America was BlueScope's biggest revenue-generating segment in the six months to December 31, 2024, accounting for 42%, or A$309 million ($199.77 million), of all underlying earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation. Australia made up 39%, or A$288 million. ($1 = 1.5468 Australian dollars)

Hey chatbot, is this true? AI 'factchecks' sow misinformation
Hey chatbot, is this true? AI 'factchecks' sow misinformation

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hey chatbot, is this true? AI 'factchecks' sow misinformation

As misinformation exploded during India's four-day conflict with Pakistan, social media users turned to an AI chatbot for verification -- only to encounter more falsehoods, underscoring its unreliability as a fact-checking tool. With tech platforms reducing human fact-checkers, users are increasingly relying on AI-powered chatbots -- including xAI's Grok, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Google's Gemini -- in search of reliable information. "Hey @Grok, is this true?" has become a common query on Elon Musk's platform X, where the AI assistant is built in, reflecting the growing trend of seeking instant debunks on social media. But the responses are often themselves riddled with misinformation. Grok -- now under renewed scrutiny for inserting "white genocide," a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries -- wrongly identified old video footage from Sudan's Khartoum airport as a missile strike on Pakistan's Nur Khan airbase during the country's recent conflict with India. Unrelated footage of a building on fire in Nepal was misidentified as "likely" showing Pakistan's military response to Indian strikes. "The growing reliance on Grok as a fact-checker comes as X and other major tech companies have scaled back investments in human fact-checkers," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with the disinformation watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP. "Our research has repeatedly found that AI chatbots are not reliable sources for news and information, particularly when it comes to breaking news," she warned. - 'Fabricated' - NewsGuard's research found that 10 leading chatbots were prone to repeating falsehoods, including Russian disinformation narratives and false or misleading claims related to the recent Australian election. In a recent study of eight AI search tools, the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University found that chatbots were "generally bad at declining to answer questions they couldn't answer accurately, offering incorrect or speculative answers instead." When AFP fact-checkers in Uruguay asked Gemini about an AI-generated image of a woman, it not only confirmed its authenticity but fabricated details about her identity and where the image was likely taken. Grok recently labeled a purported video of a giant anaconda swimming in the Amazon River as "genuine," even citing credible-sounding scientific expeditions to support its false claim. In reality, the video was AI-generated, AFP fact-checkers in Latin America reported, noting that many users cited Grok's assessment as evidence the clip was real. Such findings have raised concerns as surveys show that online users are increasingly shifting from traditional search engines to AI chatbots for information gathering and verification. The shift also comes as Meta announced earlier this year it was ending its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, turning over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as "Community Notes," popularized by X. Researchers have repeatedly questioned the effectiveness of "Community Notes" in combating falsehoods. - 'Biased answers' - Human fact-checking has long been a flashpoint in a hyperpolarized political climate, particularly in the United States, where conservative advocates maintain it suppresses free speech and censors right-wing content -- something professional fact-checkers vehemently reject. AFP currently works in 26 languages with Facebook's fact-checking program, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union. The quality and accuracy of AI chatbots can vary, depending on how they are trained and programmed, prompting concerns that their output may be subject to political influence or control. Musk's xAI recently blamed an "unauthorized modification" for causing Grok to generate unsolicited posts referencing "white genocide" in South Africa. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the "most likely" culprit. Musk, the South African-born billionaire backer of President Donald Trump, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. "We have seen the way AI assistants can either fabricate results or give biased answers after human coders specifically change their instructions," Angie Holan, director of the International Fact-Checking Network, told AFP. "I am especially concerned about the way Grok has mishandled requests concerning very sensitive matters after receiving instructions to provide pre-authorized answers." burs-ac/nl

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store