Alberta doctors push back on provincial COVID-19 task force report
A task force created by the UCP government to review the province's pandemic response has issued its final report and, while it is currently being reviewed by the province, Alberta doctors are pushing back, saying it contains misinformation and poses a threat to public health.
Among the $2-million report's key recommendations are calls for the provincial government to "immediately halt" the use of all COVID-19 vaccines without "full disclosure" of potential risks and to bar healthy children and teenagers from getting COVID shots.
Underpinning the 269-page document are a number of statements — that doctors argue go against medical and scientific consensus — criticizing the use of vaccines and a range of other pandemic protections while recommending doctors be allowed to prescribe alternative medications, including ivermectin.
Calling it "anti-science" and "anti-evidence," the Alberta Medical Association (AMA) claims the document advances misinformation.
"It speaks against the broadest and most diligent international scientific collaboration and consensus in history.… Science and evidence brought us through [the pandemic] and saved millions of lives," AMA president Dr. Shelley Duggan said in a statement.
The task force review was led by Dr. Gary Davidson, the former chief of emergency medicine at the Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre.
During the height of the fourth wave in 2021, Davidson claimed hospital admission numbers were overblown and being manipulated to justify public health restrictions — accusations Alberta Health Services rejected as false.
Calling him a "contrarian," Alberta Premier Danielle Smith last year defended her decision to appoint Davidson, saying the province wanted to hear from more diverse viewpoints.
MLA Eric Bouchard, a United Conservative Party (UCP) politician who represents Calgary-Lougheed, posted news of the report's completion on social media on Friday. He touted the report as bringing Alberta "one step closer to the truth."
In a subsequent post, which received hundreds of "likes" on X, formerly known as Twitter, Bouchard said he is committed to working with Albertans to "ensure that the historical pain caused by the response to COVID-19 does not repeat."
But the document's posting on an Alberta government website has also met with strong criticism from the members of the medical community.
'It's dangerous,' says U of C professor
A former chief medical officer of health for Alberta is pushing back against the report.
"I think it was a waste of time. It was a waste of money. And under no circumstances should the recommendations be implemented until there's been a full and expert public discussion of the report," said Dr. James Talbot, an adjunct professor at the University of Alberta.
Duggan, with the AMA, said she's hearing concerns from colleagues about "deficiencies and biases" in the report and fully agrees with those concerns.
"It's dangerous, frankly, that this report now exists on a government website," said Dr. Braden Manns, a professor of medicine and health economics at the University of Calgary.
"Distrust of public health officials is at an all-time high. This is not going to help"
The report should be retracted, according to Dr. Lynora Saxinger, an infectious diseases specialist at the University of Alberta Hospital.
"I would classify that as a public health threat. Because I think it actually gives a lot of poor quality information a veneer of respectability and official-ness," she said.
Both Manns and Saxinger were involved in the scientific advisory group, which reviewed emerging evidence as well as national and international guidance and provided recommendations to Alberta Health Services during the worst of the pandemic.
The task force is, at times, critical of the group's work, claiming their rapid turnaround times prevented "a full critical appraisal of the evidence."
Value of vaccines questioned
The report claims COVID-19 primarily affects the elderly, questions the value of vaccines, and calls on the government to rein in their use.
"[The] task force recommends halting the use of COVID-19 vaccines without full disclosure of their potential risks, ending their use in healthy children and teenagers, conducting further research into their effectiveness, establishing support for vaccine-injured individuals, and providing an opt-out mechanism from federal public health policy," it states.
According to Talbot, the recommendations, if adopted, would take away a parent's right to vaccinate their children as they see fit.
"This is a vaccine that's been given in the billions of doses. It's one of the safest, most effective vaccines we've ever had and yet they're calling into question [its] safety," he said.
The authors point to concerns about the risk of myocarditis in adolescent males and claims there is no long-term safety data for mRNA vaccines in minors.
Dr. Sam Wong, president of the section of pediatrics with the Alberta Medical Association, disagrees with the recommendations. He contends the group cherry-picked its data.
"It's kind of based on bad science and their recommendations are not really what I would consider valid.… If the government follows through on it, then it's bad public health," said Wong.
"The risk of myocarditis … is much higher and much more severe with COVID than than it is with the vaccination."
Manns also refutes numbers in the report.
"The risk of myocarditis is not 50 per cent. It's less than one in a thousand. It generally happens within the first couple doses. It [impacts] younger boys. You have to tailor the vaccinations to the type of individual," he said.
A risk-based approach is already used by the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, said Manns, adding there is solid evidence showing COVID immunizations reduce the risk of severe illness.
Ivermectin discussed
The report alludes to a lack of transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic and calls for legislative changes that would give doctors more freedom to prescribe "non-traditional" therapies during future pandemics.
Describing Alberta's approach to drugs such as ivermectin as "restrictive," the task force calls for whistleblower protection for doctors who raise concerns about public health measures or so-called "emerging therapies."
Ivermectin is an antiparasitic medication, for both veterinary and human use, that is not authorized for the treatment of COVID-19 in Canada.
"During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal agencies, health service providers and regulators discouraged the use of potentially lifesaving off-label treatments. This approach compromised the well-being of Albertans and violated their right to informed consent," the authors wrote.
Manns has serious concerns about how data on ivermectin is represented in the report and which information is included.
Several studies examining the efficacy of ivermectin during the pandemic have been withdrawn, he said.
"When you then get down to the good studies, unfortunately, ivermectin just didn't work. It didn't work in early COVID. It didn't work in severe COVID," he said.
The report takes aim at regulatory colleges, saying physicians who wanted to treat Albertans with off-label drugs, such as ivermectin, were "subject to disciplinary review."
It calls for changes to the Health Professions Act that would prevent colleges from obstructing the use of such drugs in the future.
When it comes to pandemic-related closures and restrictions, the report claims they did little to prevent transmission and had negative economic and social consequences. It calls for a more balanced approach to future decisions.
The authors argue Alberta put too much emphasis on immunity derived from vaccination rather than immunity acquired through infection, and say the government should be more balanced in its future communication and avoid "coerced vaccination."
Calling for more transparency about pandemic-related decision-making, the report also recommends future decisions related to a public health emergency should be made by the Alberta Emergency Management Agency or an appointed person.
Questioning 'consensus'
CBC News was unable to reach the task force chair, Dr. Gary Davidson, for comment.
However, during a podcast hosted by Chris Scott — an Alberta restaurant owner who was accused of breaching public health restrictions and later had his charges stayed — Davidson pushed back against the idea of "medical consensus."
"There's no such thing as consensus in science. That makes no sense," he said.
"Science is about questioning everything, experimenting and proving whether it's true or not. That's science. Consensus is a religion idea and I don't think it belongs in this field, personally."
A spokesperson for the minister of health told CBC News the provincial government received the interim report in August, for initial review, and a final report was received in December.
The government is reviewing it but has yet to make any final policy decisions, the statement said.
"The task force was designed to include health professionals from diverse practice areas, including infectious disease, public health, general practice, acute care, immunology, analytics and emergency medicine," the spokesperson said in an email.
"Their recommendations offer a perspective on how the government can be better positioned to protect the health and safety of Albertans in the future."
Meanwhile, Duggan with the Alberta Medical Association, worries about the implications of the report, arguing it "sows distrust."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Edmonton faces $1.5B capital funding budget shortfall — which is set to grow
The City of Edmonton doesn't have enough money to maintain its existing infrastructure, let alone build anything new. In a fiscal update on Tuesday at City Hall, administration said there is $1.5 billion capital funding shortfall. The money goes towards grants, neighbourhood renewals, fleet replacements and also for debt finance infrastructure. Edmonton isn't unique in this struggle — the city said this is an issue many cities are struggling with in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic. Five years ago, Edmonton paused increasing taxes — something thought to be necessary at the time when many households were dealing with financial struggles such as layoffs or business closures due to the global health emergency. Story continues below advertisement But now, Mayor Amarjeet Sohi says decisions like that, made by previous councils, are coming back to bite the city now. 'They froze taxes, they reduced taxes, they left this council with a huge deficit in our day-to-day operations — underfunding of city services like snow removal, not caring much about social equity issues that we are trying to tackle here, or grant funding that we have increased to community organizations.' 'Neglect will catch up on you and that's exactly what we see.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "Neglect will catch up on you and that's exactly what we see." 2:01 Edmonton city council approves 8.9% property tax increase in 2024 City leaders say the solution isn't as simple as just spending less, because that can end up costing more down the road. Get weekly money news Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Fiscal responsibility isn't just about keeping taxes low or repressing things because this is what you end up getting,' said Ward Anirniq councillor Erin Rutherford. Story continues below advertisement 'You end up with deferred maintenance, deferred renewal, and then we have the deficit that we're seeing today. 'That hole was dug over years and years — probably decades — and we can't get out of it in one fell swoop.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "That hole was dug over years and years — probably decades — and we can't get out of it in one fell swoop." Rutherford said one of the long-term solutions the city has come up with is a Universal Renewal Fund. She explained it's dedicated to things like neighbourhood renewal and road maintenance – which can't be funded through loans or money from other levels of government. 'Renewal isn't sexy. It's a lot of behind-the-scenes stuff. So you need what we call pay-as-you-go funding, which means we need cash in hand to fix the things. That's really hard to find unless you build up a piggy bank, so to say, of tax funding that is going straight to that purpose,' Rutherford said. 'It's saying to the residents, 'You know, I know we're taxing you on this, this is what it's going for. You know those potholes that you're complaining about all the time? It's because we're actually not renewing at our ideal state.' So to get there, we need to actually have this fund that, on an ongoing basis, will give us more cash in hand to do the work of maintaining our city.' 1:44 City of Edmonton explores avenues to address funding shortfall Sohi said the city has reduced the operating budget by nearly $200 million but more still needs to be done. Story continues below advertisement The mayor said the city's finances took a hit due to changes the province made to Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI) funding. The program allocated more than $15.2 billion to Alberta communities when it was in place between 2007 and 2023. The provincial government replaced MSI with the Local Government Fiscal Framework (LGFF) in 2024-25. 'We are getting one-third of what we were getting before, and we had to make it up by raising taxes or deferring the repairs. So I think municipalities in Alberta do not get the kind of support that is necessary to continue to provide good quality public services,' Sohi said. On top of the current shortfall, the city expects to be another $1.8 billion short in the next budget cycle, making the gap $3.2 billion. But that doesn't mean the city can just stop maintaining its assets — if nothing is done, Rutherford said it could mean closing down facilities and selling off assets. 'If we do nothing, in 20 years we'll have a huge proportion of our city assets in D and F condition, which means they're basically at failure level, and we will have to shut down some of the most valuable assets that Edmontonians have come to love, right? Our recreation centres, our libraries, our transit service will get worse. 'We will start to see those failures in service across the system.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "We will start to see those failures in service across the system." Story continues below advertisement 1:54 City of Edmonton environmental policies driving up capital budget costs Rutherford said that means the City of Edmonton will be quite limited in what new builds it commits to in the next four-year budget cycle. 'Any growth projects need to very strategic on things like safety — so fire halls, police stations — things that create tax uplift and economic wellness, and things that have funding from other orders of government.' Ultimately to tackle a billion-and-a-half-dollar gap, Edmonton taxpayers will be on the hook.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Ambrose says Ottawa can defeat western separatism with better listening
Former federal Conservative cabinet minister Rona Ambrose says the secessionist sentiment in Alberta is an unwelcome source of uncertainty for investors — but it could fizzle out quickly if Ottawa handles it right. Ambrose, now deputy chair at TD Securities, said Tuesday there's a feeling of resentment in Alberta and in neighbouring Saskatchewan. "I think that it can dissipate quite quickly if some of these underlying issues around how the energy sector has been treated by Ottawa are dealt with," she told a panel discussion at the Global Energy Show. Prime Minister Mark Carney can't take those feelings lightly, she said. "We've had 10 years that have created a huge division, east-west, in between the federal and provincial governments. He's got to heal that," Ambrose said of environmental policies Carney's predecessor, Justin Trudeau, brought in. "And so decisions he makes are not just for the economic benefit of Canada, but it's for the benefit of national unity, which is the most important thing a prime minister should always have top of mind." Ambrose said outreach and trust-building is paramount and the federal-provincial relationship is "already better." The chief executive of one of Canada's biggest oil and gas companies said the complaints are valid even if the separatist talk isn't the most constructive way to go about expressing them. "The way this separatist movement has manifested itself is really rooted in some grievances that I think are real and have frustrated this region for a long period of time," Cenovus Energy chief executive Jon McKenzie told the panel. McKenzie told reporters on the sidelines of the conference he has not been hearing from investors about the separatist rumblings, and that he agrees the movement will "go away" if political leaders address the concerns. Talk of Alberta going it alone or joining the United States has ratcheted up since the federal Liberals won a fourth term in office in April. In the province, where all but a few seats went Conservative blue, there is widespread discontent with federal environmental policies affecting the key oilpatch industry. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has introduced a bill that, if passed, would make it far easier for Albertans to launch referendums on various topics — including splitting from Canada. Last month, the top executive of another major Alberta company said mere talk of secession has already been hurting the investment climate. Atco Ltd. CEO Nancy Southern said Asian partners in a major hydrogen project indicated they won't make final investment decisions unless there is certainty around the issue. "There's just too many questions for them to be confident that they can move forward with large-scale investment decisions, and so I think the separatist discussion is very unhelpful and not constructive to Alberta," Southern said in a May interview. Questions include how an independent Alberta would get its products to coastal ports, what kind of trade deals it would have with its neighbours, what currency it would use and how stable the economy would be. Southern said she understands Albertans' frustration with the federal government. "We have had the short end of the stick on many occasions as a result of new regulations and legislation and rule of law," Southern said. "I'm a big believer that this prime minister wants to change things and I think we need to sit down and work together."
Calgary Herald
4 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Smoke free summers a thing of the past as Alberta gets hit with wildfire smoke from all sides
Wildfires burning across western Canada are having a major impact on the air quality in most of Alberta. Article content Article content Article content Smoke from wildfires burning in British Columbia, northern Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan are cumulatively worsening the air quality across municipalities in the province and experts are saying smoke-free summers are becoming a thing of the past. Article content Article content Article content Environment Canada's air quality health index (AQHI) is forecasting Edmonton will jump from a 9 out of 10 on Monday to a 10 on Tuesday. Article content Article content Article content Postmedia spoke with two experts in public health and medicine to discuss how Albertans can protect against the smoke, health risks and why does Alberta get so much smoke. Article content Low snow pack, warm and dry weather, and lack of precipitation are pointing to an unfavourable fire season for western Canada — specifically Alberta, says Jeff Brook, an associate professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. Article content Article content Brook said while there's smoke every summer, it is often just above the ground at low levels. However over the past 10 years, he said, researchers are seeing cases where smoke conditions are becoming progressively worse. Article content Article content Article content 'We generally think that the smoke particles are as harmful when we inhale them as regular pollution, and we need to treat them that way,' Brook said. Article content Article content Alberta getting more smoke in recent weeks is in part due to 'luck of the draw' and paired with weather patterns over multiple days as wildfires continue to burn, according to Brook. Article content Article content The reason why Edmonton might get more smoke is due to its proximity to the boreal forest regions, which are often very susceptible to fires. Article content Brook said smoke particles can endure quite readily even when indoors — half of what is outside will get inside. Article content Article content One of the best ways to protect against smoke particles, especially the smaller ones, is by using an air purifier. He said purchasing one is extremely effective, but for those who want to make one at home using a high quality furnace filter, box fan and card board would also be efficient.
