
US tariffs will crush lives and livelihoods in Bangladesh, Cambodia garment industries
High tariffs might force companies to shut down or move to neighbouring countries that offer lower tariff rates, resulting in a loss of jobs, they say.
'The potential loss of jobs will cut the income and ability for workers to sustain their daily lives,' said Ath Thorn, vice president of the Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers' Democratic Union, which represents 80,000 workers across 40 factories.
Several countries in Asia have gotten notice of new tariff rates imposed by the United States to take effect August 1, after a 90-day pause on tariffs came to an end.
Manufacturing hubs such as Bangladesh and Cambodia will face high tariffs of 35% and 36% respectively, while neighbouring countries are still negotiating with the US government.
US President Donald Trump announced new tariffs through official letters posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, on July 8.
The US is the largest garment export destination for Bangladesh. The country's exports to the US totalled $8.4 billion last year and of that, garments comprised $7.34 billion.
Also in 2024, Cambodia exported nearly $10 billion worth of goods to the US, which accounted for nearly 40% of the nation's total exports, according to government customs statistics.
More than half of US imports from Cambodia were garments, footwear and travel goods such as luggage and handbags, a sector that makes up nearly half of the country's export revenue and employs more than 900,000 workers.
Unions and industry groups warn that these workers could be hit hard with job losses if the high tariffs force companies to move to countries under lower tariff rates or shut down altogether.
While Cambodia is looking at a tariff rate reduction from 49% in April, anxiety permeates its garment industry, which employs hundreds of thousands of people and is one of the developing nation's key economic pillars.
Meanwhile, the US and Vietnam have struck a trade agreement that set 20% tariffs on Vietnamese goods.
With a neighbour next door with a significantly lower tariff, many companies may choose to leave Cambodia, said Yang Sophorn, president of the Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions, which represents thousands of women who support their families as garment workers.
The fear is echoed by experts in Bangladesh, which faces a 35% tariff.
Selim Raihan, a professor of economics at the Dhaka University, said if tariff rates on Bangladesh's competitors like India, Indonesia and Vietnam prove to be lower, Bangladesh would face a serious competitive disadvantage.
Such a disadvantage could make supply chain decision-making more difficult and erode the confidence of buyers and investors, Raihan told Context.
'As production costs rise and profit margins shrink due to the tariff, many garment factories may be forced to scale back operations or shut down entirely,' Raihan said.
In Bangladesh, the 35% tariff announced by the US is more than twice the current 15% rates on Bangladeshi goods.
'With more than doubling tariff rates, can you imagine how the cost of the products will rise?' asked Mohiuddun Rubel, a former director of Bangladesh's garment manufacturers' association BGMEA and now additional managing director at textile maker Denim Expert Ltd.
The question is what happens to the tariffs for main competitor countries like India and Pakistan, said Rubel.
The US is negotiating a trade deal with India, while reciprocal tariff rates for Pakistan have not been announced yet.
Outsized effect on women
Potential layoffs within the garment industry will have an outsized effect on women workers, which Sophorn said would cripple entire families.
'If these women lose their jobs because high tariffs force factories to shut, it will not only impact Cambodia's economy, but now children may not be able to go to school and aging parents may not be able to afford medicine,' Sophorn said.
'The situation for women garment workers is already bad, but it will get worse if these tariffs were to come into effect.'
Many of the women she represents have taken bank loans to support their families and work in the garment industry to pay off their debts.
'If they lose their job, it means they will lose everything,' Sophorn said.
Tariffs would directly affect a sizable chunk of the four million workers in Bangladeshi's garment industry, most of whom are women from low income and rural backgrounds, Raihan said.
Thorn suggested Cambodia continue negotiations to get the tariffs down or find other ways to export more products, generate more income and create more work.
'If not, we will face problems,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Cane sugar vs corn syrup: Why Coca-Cola formulas differ across borders
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that soft-drink major Coca-Cola had agreed to begin using cane sugar in its beverages sold in the United States, following his discussions with the company. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump said on a Truth Social post. He thanked the company's leadership for their cooperation. "I have been speaking to @CocaCola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" –President Donald J. Trump — The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 16, 2025 While Coca-Cola has not confirmed any sweeping formula change, a company spokesperson responded that the beverage giant would 'share details on new offerings soon' and appreciated the president's 'enthusiasm' for its product, news agency Reuters reported. Why does Coca-Cola in the US use corn syrup? In the US, Coca-Cola is sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), not cane sugar. This has been the case since the 1980s, when many US food and beverage companies shifted from cane sugar to the cheaper alternative derived from corn. HFCS became popular due to its lower cost and abundant domestic supply. Products containing HFCS are less expensive to produce, offering a cost advantage over cane sugar. However, outside the US, especially in countries like Mexico and India, Coca-Cola still uses cane sugar, which is considered more natural by some consumers. Mexican Coca-Cola, known for its use of cane sugar, is even imported and sold in niche markets in the US for its perceived superior taste, CNN reported. What's driving the push to switch back to cane sugar? Trump's announcement ties into a broader campaign under the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative. The initiative, aligned with Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, urges food companies to eliminate certain ingredients considered unhealthy, including artificial dyes and high-fructose corn syrup. Kennedy has voiced strong criticism of American sugar consumption, calling for dietary guidelines that emphasise 'whole foods'. A May report from the MAHA Commission — a panel created under Trump to examine causes of chronic illness — highlighted HFCS as a contributor to conditions such as childhood obesity. Despite these concerns, medical experts generally treat HFCS and cane sugar similarly, recommending reduced consumption of both, Reuters reported. What's the political and economic angle? While the switch may appeal to health-conscious consumers, it also intersects with political and economic interests. Trump's home state of Florida is the top US producer of sugarcane, while corn refiners are concentrated in the Midwest. John Bode, CEO of the Corn Refiners Association, criticised the idea of replacing HFCS with cane sugar. 'Replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense,' he said, warning it could cost thousands of food manufacturing jobs, hurt farm income, and increase sugar imports — all without any nutritional gain. Has Trump's relationship with Coca-Cola always been positive? Trump's association with Coca-Cola has been both personal and political. He's long been known for his affection for Diet Coke, even famously installing a "Diet Coke button" in the Oval Office to summon the drink. He, however, has also clashed with the company in 2021, when Coca-Cola criticised Georgia's controversial voting laws. Trump responded with calls for a boycott, though his properties continued to serve Coca-Cola products. Despite past friction, relations seem to have improved. In January, Coca-Cola Chairman James Quincey presented Trump with a commemorative Diet Coke bottle ahead of his second swearing-in, a symbolic gesture reflecting the company's effort to stay in the administration's good graces, CNN reported. Why is Coke different in India? Coca-Cola in India uses cane sugar as its primary sweetener, unlike in the United States, where the drink is made with high-fructose corn syrup. The main difference between cane sugar and corn syrup lies in their sources and chemical composition: cane sugar is sucrose derived from sugar cane, while corn syrup (high-fructose corn syrup) is made from corn starch and contains a mix of glucose and fructose. Cane sugar typically costs more than high-fructose corn syrup; in recent years, cane sugar has been about 33 per cent to 150 per cent more expensive per pound, with production costs of cane sugar around $0.40 to $0.50 per pound versus $0.20 to $0.30 per pound for corn syrup, a Hindustan Times report mentioned. What happens next? While Coca-Cola has not confirmed a nationwide shift from HFCS to cane sugar in its US beverages, Trump's public pressure — and the larger health narrative — could influence future product formulations.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Thailand to cut tariffs on 90% of US goods to avoid Trump trade levy
Thailand is set to offer scrapping tariffs on 90 per cent of US goods, up from a previous plan for over 60 per cent, in a bid to avert a punishing levy threatened by President Donald Trump, according to a business group advising Thai negotiators. Bangkok's third proposal would potentially eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers on about 10,000 US products, Chanintr Chalisarapong, vice chairman of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, told Bloomberg News in an interview Thursday. He added that he expects the final tariff on Thailand will be set in a range of 18 per cent to 20 per cent — down from Trump's most recent threatened level of 36 per cent. The new proposal, which will be presented to Washington in a conference call Thursday, could reduce Thailand's $46 billion trade surplus with the US by 70 per cent within three years and lead to balanced trade within five years, according to Chanintr. The new figures are even more ambitious than Thailand's July 6 offer to cut tariffs on over 60 per cent of products and eliminate the trade gap in seven or eight years. 'I expect our proposal to be solid and practical. The numbers should be satisfactory to the US,' said Chanintr, who's consulted with negotiators led by Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira over the past week to finalize details. 'What we'll be offering is potentially more than Indonesia and Vietnam,' he said. 'Since we're a manufacturing country, we have potential to use a lot more US goods and process them into products that we can export.' Thailand is one of the Southeast Asian countries racing to finalize terms with the US. Failure to secure a reduced tariff with its largest export market, which accounted for about 18 per cent of Thailand's total shipments last year, could result in a sharp decline in merchandise shipments and shave as much as one percentage point off its projected export-driven economic growth. Trump has announced deals for 20 per cent tariffs on Vietnamese goods and 19 per cent for Indonesia, though transshipments through both countries would face higher levies. Bangkok rushed to sweeten its proposal after Trump announced last week that the 36 per cent tariff level on Thailand would start Aug. 1. Pichai, who had submitted a second proposal by then, said he was shocked and had been expecting a lower number. Thailand's new proposal may include a tax exemption for US digital services that operate in Thailand or serve Thai customers, Chanintr said. It may also pledge more imports of liquefied natural gas, Boeing Co. planes, and key US food and agricultural products. The latter could include corn, soybeans and barley, which are important to Trump voters in rural states, he added. Cheap US food and farm products are expected to help cut costs for the Thai pet food industry, which exports heavily to other countries. Lower costs for Thailand's animal feed industry will also likely boost productivity for the domestic poultry, livestock, and food-processing industries down the value chain, Chanintr said. Pichai, who has said he was pushing for a best-case rate of 10 per cent, is expected to hold more talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. In their meeting in Washington earlier this month, Pichai agreed to cut import taxes for US products that are in short supply in Thailand and tighten rules to prevent transshipments. 'We'd like for talks to conclude soon so that trade can continue. There's been too much uncertainty,' Chanintr said, adding he is confident Thailand can secure a deal before Aug. 1. 'We're so close to the finish line.' Thai growth is already under pressure from Southeast Asia's highest household debt and sluggish domestic consumption. A favorable deal would also ease investor concerns stoked by political turmoil following the court-ordered suspension of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra over alleged ethical misconduct in handling a border dispute with Cambodia. Thailand's exports rose about 15 per cent in the first five months of the year, driven largely by frontloading during the 90-day pause to allow tariff talks. 'This is a global trade war, not a bilateral one,' Chanintr said. 'Don't forget how high the stakes are.'


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Apple set a new 'iPhone manufacturing record' in India in the first six months of 2025: Trump Tariffs, fears and ...
Apple has reportedly set a new milestone in India in the first six months of 2025. According to a report in Economic Times, the iPhone-maker has reportedly achieved the fastest ramp-up in iPhone production and exports from India in the first half of 2025 ever since it started smartphone assembly in the country in 2017. The move is said to be an attempt on Apple's part to diversify global production amid threat of higher US tariffs on Chinese imports. Quoting market researcher Canalys, the report said that iPhone production in India surged 53% on-year during the January to June period, reaching 23.9 million units. As per research firm Cybermedia Research (CMR), iPhone export volumes touched 22.88 million units in H1 2025, from 15.05 million a year earlier, an increase of 52%. In value terms, Apple exported $22.56 billion worth of iPhones from India in the first half of 2025, compared to $14.71 billion a year earlier as per CMR. "This shift reflects improving yield rates, line maturity, and Apple's growing confidence in India as a core manufacturing base," said Sanyam Chaurasia, analyst, Canalys. Donald Trump's 25% tariff threat to Apple Apple also faces a significant challenge in India as President Trump has warned the company about imposing 25% tariff on imported iPhones if they are not manufactured within US borders. "I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else," Trump wrote on Truth Social in May. "If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Freehold Apartments in Dubai Starting from AED 675K Binghatti Developers FZE Explore Undo When Apple 'flew' 5 flights full of iPhones from India in flat 3 days Apple transported five planes full of iPhones and other products from India to the US in just three days during the final week of March. The urgent shipments were made to avoid a new 10% reciprocal tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump's administration that took effect on April 5. Apple's US warehouses are reportedly stocked for several months ahead with 'made-in-India' iPhones. Analyst said that stockpiling was aimed to allow Apple to maintain current pricing temporarily. 'The reserves that arrived at lower duty will temporarily insulate the company from the higher prices that it will need to pay for new shipments under the revised tax rates,' a source explained to TOI. In May, the US government later declared a 90-day pause on imposing reciprocal tariffs for most of its trading partners till July 9, which has since been extended to August 1. For India, the US has proposed a 26% tariff. Biggest iPhone manufacturers in India Foxconn (Hon Hai) and Tata Electronics are the leading manufacturers of iPhones in India. Last year, Tata Electronics took over operations of Wistron and Pegatron plants in the country. Apple iPhone 17 series manufacturing has reportedly started in India Apple is now reportedly planning to undertake simultaneous day-one manufacturing of the upcoming iPhone 17 in China and India. Apple iPhone 17 series is likely set for launch in September. Components for the iPhone 17 are reported to have already started arriving at the Foxconn plant in Tamil Nadu. "While not officially confirmed, the volume and type of these imports make it highly likely that trial production or early-stage assembly has commenced, months ahead of Apple's typical September launch window. This would mark a new benchmark with the earliest ever flagship ramp-up from India," Chaurasia said. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now