The delicate dance to preserve the magic of Abbey Road's legendary Studio One
Famous for hosting Adele, Harry Styles and U2, it's where the scores of 'Star Wars,' 'Harry Potter' and 'Wicked' were recorded, as well as the soundtracks of blockbuster games like 'Call of Duty,' 'Halo' and 'Final Fantasy.' It's also where Ryan Gosling delivered his memorable 'I'm Just Ken' for 'Barbie.'
Nearly a century after its opening, Studio One underwent a six-month multimillion-pound refurbishment, with the main priority being the preservation of one very important thing: the sound.
'What we don't want to do is change the acoustics, so every minute detail in the room has been conserved and preserved, so the sound doesn't shift,' said Sally Davis, managing director of Abbey Road Studios.
The reverb of the 4,844 square-foot (450 square-meter) room has been maintained at 2.3 seconds, the same as it was in the '70s, so there's been no redecorating or style makeover, leaving the original Art Deco wall panels untouched.
'We have simply washed down the walls to preserve that sound,' said Davis, adding that the floor was re-sanded and oiled, but not varnished. Most of the upgrades, she explained, are technological upgrades in the control room. 'This room is just about preserving that magic.'
A pilgrimage for music fans
Opened in 1931, this hallowed hall — once a nine-bedroom house on a grand suburban street in London's St. John's Wood neighborhood — became the world's first recording studio. It's where stereo was invented and it's visited every day by music fans from around the world, who are happy just to stand on the street outside.
Davis says that more than a million people a year make a pilgrimage to the crossing outside, many to recreate the cover of The Beatles' 'Abbey Road' album — and that number could increase after Sam Mendes' upcoming biopic starring Paul Mescal, Barry Keoghan, Harris Dickinson and Joseph Quinn as the Fab Four over four films.
And while Lennon, McCartney, Harrison and Starr are famously known for using Studio Two, they also made history in the larger Studio One, which they used for the world's first global live performance, a rendition of 'All You Need Is Love' that was beamed to television sets around the world in 1967.
Before The Beatles, Studio One had already cemented its place in music history, when it was opened by British composer Sir Edward Elgar, who recorded his 'Land of Hope and Glory' with the London Symphony Orchestra. It's also hosted other music greats like Maria Callas, Igor Stravinsky, Daniel Barenboim, Fats Waller and Glenn Miller.
Due to its huge size, more than double Studio Two, you can fit a 110-piece orchestra and 110-person choir at the same time – which is perfect for recording film soundtracks, and explains why six to seven out of every 10 Hollywood films are scored at Abbey Road.
History being made
Standing on the balcony, overlooking the 40-foot-high (12-meter-high) room, Davies points out the original screen that was used to show 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' (1981) while musicians played along to record the soundtrack.
Since then, everything from 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy and Marvel's 'Black Panther' to 'Guardians of the Galaxy' and 'Barbie' were scored in Studio One. For the latter, all the musicians came in with something pink, whether it was a pink instrument or piece of clothing.
Oscar-nominated composer Daniel Pemberton has been recording in Studio One since 2009 and calls his 'creative home' a 'spectacular space.'
'Outside, it just looks like a normal house. And then you come in and you find this space in it that's like almost the size of a football pitch. In fact, I have played football in there once,' he laughs.
Pemberton is known for scoring 'Spider-Man: Across the Spider Verse,' 'Ferrari,' 'The Trial of the Chicago 7' and creating the 'Slow Horses' theme song and 'Strange Game,' with Mick Jagger.
'What's so exciting about a room like Studio One is what happens on the day is what happens for the rest of time,' he said. 'It's like history is being made, whether it's good history or bad history or whatever, you're making a moment then.'
Pemberton notes the stories, whether personal or musical, that have unfolded within the walls of Studio One.
'The ghosts are insane in there,' he said.
Davis agrees that the history adds to the enchantment.
'You walk into this room and you can feel it … There is a magic in the sound. It sounds phenomenal. There is a spirituality in who has been here, who has performed here. So when we see artists come through, you know that immediate reaction of, 'Oh my gosh. I'm in Studio One.''
To celebrate the reopening this week, Abbey Road Studios showcased an unusual art form for the space: dance, which incorporated Pemberton's scores, remixed by resident artist Jordan Rakei and choreographed by Joseph Toonga.
'It kind of like threw me back a bit like, wow, it really is big,' said Toonga of the first time he saw the studio. He then incorporated that feeling into a dance which spanned hip-hop, krumping and ballet.
Up next, the first client to record in Studio One since the refurbishment is a hush-hush Hollywood franchise.
But there are lots of secrets at Abbey Road. One of them is Pemberton's plan to record the unique rattling sound of the new railings for a movie soundtrack.
There was concern that the hollow Art Deco style bars would upset the acoustics of the room, and a backup plan was made to fill them with sand if they messed with the reverb.
Luckily, the empty bars were allowed to stay because Pemberton is delighted by the noise they make when you run past them with keys — it's another dramatic sound that can only be created in Studio One and will make its way into theaters around the world, via a film score.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Christie Brinkley shares advice on marriages — and claims they might be ‘outmoded construction'
Advertisement Christie Brinkley is sharing some insight into how to make a marriage work. During a recent appearance on an episode of the 'Are You a Charlotte?' podcast, she and host Kristin Davis started talking about relationships and whether marriage is 'an outmoded construction' in today's world, which might make it 'hard to keep that connection going.' 'You could get married, like, 'We'll see if you want to renew it in five years,'' Brinkley said. 'Every five years, go, 'Do you want to renew?' That way, if you're getting bored or whatever, you can get out of it without all the lawyers and all that stuff.' The 71-year-old Sports Illustrated model has been married four times. Her first marriage was to Jean-François Allaux from 1973 to 1981, later marrying Billy Joel from 1985 to 1994, Richard Taubman from 1994 to 1995 and Peter Cook from 1996 to 2008. Advertisement Her four marriages resulted in Brinkley welcoming three children. She had her daughter Alexa, now 39, with Joel, while she shares son Jack, 30, and daughter Sailor, 27, with Cook. 6 Sports Illustrated model Christie Brinkley is sharing her views on what makes a marriage work. Getty Images 6 Brinkley married Billy Joel in 1985. AP Advertisement 6 The model was married to Richard Taubman from 1994 to 1995. Getty Images 6 Her fourth husband was Peter Cook. Getty Images 'I'm too trusting,' she told The New York Times in July when asked what she's learned from her four marriages. 'I'm a fool for love. That love takes work. Sometimes you need to rely on experts. I wish I could have found ways to save some; I wish I hadn't married others.' She continued to discuss her past relationships with the outlet, explaining 'the relationships I was in made me feel unloved,' but that she knows 'that in the right arms, I'm lovable.' Advertisement While on the podcast, Brinkley also spoke to Davis about her current love life and what it's been like to try out dating apps for the first time, explaining her daughter Sailor put her on the apps without her permission, but was surprised by the results. 6 Brinkley says that her marriages taught her that she is 'a fool for love. That love takes work.' Getty Images 6 '[Sailor] said, 'Mom, you're right not to go on [dating apps] because the same guys that, you know, said yes to me are saying yes to you,'' Brinkley said about her daughter putting her on dating platforms. Getty Images '[Sailor] said, 'Mom, you're right not to go on [dating apps] because the same guys that, you know, said yes to me are saying yes to you,'' Brinkley said. Brinkley previously opened up about her past relationships, along with other details from her life, in her memoir, 'Uptown Girl,' telling Davis that when she began writing the book, she 'quickly discovered some chapters I really didn't want to write about,' but that those were the chapters her 'publishers were most interested in.' 'They're like, 'People will relate because people go through divorces and people go through all of that – it has to be relatable,'' said Brinkley. 'And if you're going to give the fun adventures and some of the stuff that modeling has afforded me, you also have to say it's not always the good stuff.' She also spoke about her relationship with Joel in the HBO documentary, 'Billy Joel: And So it Goes,' saying she 'wanted it to work.' Advertisement In the documentary, she explained that their relationship started out fun, but began to deteriorate due to his busy schedule and late nights out, leaving her to wonder 'What am I even doing here?' 'I don't think it's a secret that his drinking got pretty bad, and he couldn't really remember what he did when he was drinking, so he didn't really know how he could hurt people,' Brinkley said. 'One night, we had an argument and I said, 'I really can't take this anymore, and I'm just going to take Alexa back up to New York and leave, and he said, 'Yeah, fine, go.''
Los Angeles Times
8 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
These nonfiction writers looked for the future of L.A. Did they find it?
The Los Angeles we know has long been an irresistible subject for novelists and moviemakers — so much so that they've often tortured reality to make it conform to their imagination. Robert Towne mined the history of the Los Angeles Aqueduct in his screenplay for 'Chinatown' but moved the story ahead up by some two decades, from 1913 to the 1930s, to give his scenario its noir sensibility. Ridley Scott and his filmmaking team depicted a future Los Angeles beset with darkness and a never-ending downpour of rain for 'Blade Runner' — never mind that its source material, Philip K. Dick's novel 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,' was set in San Francisco, that provincial burg some 400 miles to the north. But the task of depicting a future Los Angeles hasn't been monopolized by fiction writers. Nonfiction writers have joined them in their obsession. They include the late environmentalist Marc Reisner, author of the indispensable 'Cadillac Desert,' the public policy expert Steven P. Erie of UC San Diego, historians such as Kevin Starr and Carey McWilliams, and polemicists such as Mike Davis. Even most of those whose subject is or has been the L.A. of their own time have taken pains to look ahead. How well have they outlined the future of Los Angeles and Southern California? Let's see. The tone of nonfiction conjectures about the future of Los Angeles generally fall into two categories, elegiac or apocalyptic — and sometimes both: 'utopia or dystopia,' in the words of Davis. Davis was the avatar of the latter approach. The first of his books about Los Angeles, 'City of Quartz' (1990), mostly looked back at the history of the city's development. It was his follow-up, 'Ecology of Fear' (1998), that really attempted to sketch out a future for the city, based on his vision of 'the great unbroken plains of aging bungalows, stucco apartments, and ranch-style homes — as it erodes socially and physically into the twenty-first century.' Davis drew a line from what he saw as 'the current obsession with personal safety and social insulation ... in the face of intractable urban poverty and homelessness, and despite one of the greatest expansions in American business history' in the mid-1990s to explain 'why fear eats the soul of Los Angeles.' He wasn't far wrong. A few years later, I visited the maker of underground nuclear shelters fashioned from corrugated steel at his shop and showroom on the 5 Freeway in Montebello, where he was doing great business for models that started at $78,000 each; 'Yes, paranoia does sell' was how I headlined my column. It still does: Guard dogs, surveillance cameras and sentry-protected neighborhood tracts have proliferated all around the Southland. Davis foresaw the continued development of 'tourist bubbles' — theme park-like 'historical district, entertainment precincts, malls ... partitioned off from the rest of the city' — think developer Rick Caruso's shopping center the Grove, opened in the Fairfax District in 2002, which presents blank or billboarded walls to the outside world, enclosing a Disneyesque landscape of shops and restaurants inconspicuously monitored by security services. ::: As opinion pollsters know, when you ask people what the future will look like, they invariably paint a picture that looks just like the present, only more so: If there's a crime wave when they're being polled, they foretell a world beleaguered by armed gangs; if there's a recession, they expect a world of unrelieved poverty; if it's a period of technological advancement, they foresee a world of flying cars. Writers projecting a future of L.A. tended to fall into the same pattern. The Slovenian transplant Louis Adamic, who had emigrated to the United States in 1913 and settled in the port community of San Pedro, scrutinized Southern California with pitiless objectivity in a 1930 essay titled 'Los Angeles! There she blows!' Adamic mentioned the conviction among Angelenos that their city 'will ultimately — perhaps within the next three or four decades — be the biggest city in the world.' And he acknowledged that 'the place has many great advantages, among the foremost, of course, being Climate, and but a single drawback, which, however, is an extremely serious one — that of water shortage.' Nevertheless, noting that the city's population had doubled over the previous 10 years to nearly 2 million, he confidently predicted that it would number 3 million by 1935. It didn't reach that mark until the 1980s, and it's not the first time, nor the last, that a prediction of the city's future overshot the target. His concern about water, of course, was spot-on. Another writer who extrapolated from what he saw of the Los Angeles of his time was Morrow Mayo, whose 1933 book 'Los Angeles' is quoted elsewhere in The Times' Future of L.A. package. Mayo expressed the opinion that even if 'the territory known as the 'City of Los Angeles'' grew from its then-population of 1.2 million to 4 million or more, he doubted that 'it will ever be permanently the great vibrant, vital, nerve-center of the Pacific coast.' The reason, Mayo wrote, was its climate — 'meant for slow-pulsing life; a climate where man, when he gets adjusted to the environment, takes his siesta in the middle of the day. Go-getterism in this climate does violence to every law of nature.' What kept Los Angeles even marginally vibrant was the steady influx of vigorous immigrants from the East and Midwest. After a few generations under the sun, Mayo concluded, 'it will settle back to normalcy, and become in tune with nature, for man has never yet failed to adjust himself to the climate in which he lives.' Thus did Mayo pioneer the stereotype of the laid-back Angeleno with barely a care in the world. On the other hand, Mayo quoted a fellow prognosticator as finding in the city's industrial districts 'that same peculiarly contented type of workman, the same love of little homes 'across the street from the factory,' the diligence and care for the flowers in the front yard, or the fruit trees and vegetables in the rear, a total lack of the Bohemian spirit, the love of a comfortable, humble existence,' that could be seen in Philadelphia. As a picture of Los Angeles, Mayo wrote, 'I suspect that it is prophetic. 'Los Angeles — the Philadelphia of the West.'' Such miscalculations point to another pitfall facing those who would dare to predict the future of Los Angeles: Change has come so rapidly that any prediction can be confounded within the lifetime of its author. Thus Carey McWilliams, that indefatigable chronicler of the California pageant, wrote in his book 'Southern California Country: An Island on the Land' that the aircraft industry was 'likely to remain in the region and even to expand production.' McWillliams wrote those words in 1946; by 1980, when he died, the industry had crashed in Southern California, entering a long period of retrenchment that ended with Boeing's closing of the region's last commercial aircraft manufacturing plant in 2005. The Long Beach plant's 300 workers were transferred to Boeing's military aircraft assembly line, but that was shut down in 2015, ending an era, as The Times observed, in which the region was. 'once synonymous with the manufacture of aircraft.' The trajectory of the Los Angeles ecology, and by extension that of Southern California and the entire state of California, was the subject of Reisner's 1986 book, 'Cadillac Desert.' He viewed the water politics of the region, quite properly, through the prism of winner-take-all economics. Water was wasted by farmers and urban residents because it was almost free. That was already beginning to change in his time, he observed, but the process would need years, even decades, to play out — if it ever could. 'The West's real crisis is one of inertia, of will, and of myth,' he wrote in the closing pages of 'Cadillac Desert.' Reisner looked ahead, hopefully, to a West that 'might import a lot more meat and dairy products from states where they are raised on rain, rather than dream of importing those states' rain .... A region where people begin to recognize that water left in rivers can be worth a lot more — in revenues, in jobs — than water taken out of the rivers.' 'At some point, perhaps within my lifetime, the American West will go back to the future than forward to the past.' Regrettably, Reisner, who died in 2000, didn't live to see that happen. Whether his hope will ever be fulfilled remains an open question. Perhaps the most penetrating look at the future of Los Angeles and its state came from Peter Schrag, a former editorial page editor at the Sacramento Bee. In his 1998 book 'Paradise Lost,' Schrag sought not simply to foretell the region's future, but to explicate how its future foretold what was in store for the country as a whole. (Its subtitle was 'California's Experience, America's Future.') When he wrote the book, California was in one of its boom phases. It was again 'the driving engine of national economic growth and likely to remain in that position until well into the next century .... Because of foundations laid forty years go ... it is at the forefront of the world's leading-edge technologies and of its creative energy.' (He was right about that, at least up to this moment.) But Schrag also pointed to the state's 'increasingly dysfunctional governmental and fiscal public institutions, the depleted state of its public infrastructure, services, and amenities, the growing gaps between its affluent and its poorer residents, and its pinched social ethos,' which 'hang like dark clouds in the sunny skies.' California had exported to other states the facile low-tax policies of Howard Jarvis and Ronald Reagan's view of government as 'the problem, not the solution.' In addition, Schrag saw that the emergence of social media 'may insure against the power of Big Brother to dominate communications, but they also amplify the power of shared ignorance .... What used to be limited to gossip over the back fence is now spread in milliseconds.' And he foresaw how the changing demographics of California would be replicated nationwide: 'The new kids now crowding into the schools and universities of California — black, brown, Asian — will constitute the majority of the state's workforce, and a good part of the nation's, in the next decade, and forever after,' he wrote. Schrag had his finger on an essential truth about Los Angeles and California that remains true to this day: They're the subject of unending curiosity for readers of history and current affairs no less than for consumers of novels and movies. That has been true since the vision of a land of gold — El Dorado — drew the Spanish conquistadors to these shores. The world wishes to know what L.A. and California are, and where they are headed. Kevin Starr, writing in 1995, understood how that impulse would play out in the decades to come. 'The United States is testing its future through California,' he said in an essay for the website of the California State Library, which he served as state librarian from 1994 to 2004. Establishing California as a 'bellwether state,' he wrote: 'The American people are asking a series of questions which now become the California challenge .... Can the American people turn to positive effect the cultural diversity of a nation in the process of being transformed? ... Can the American people maintain their standards of living and education?' Starr's answer to the questions he posed was a resounding yes! 'In recent times,' he wrote, the American people have turned to California and asked it to create a technology revolution, and California responded .... The American people have turned to California for new models of lifestyle, new ways of enjoying and celebrating the gift of life, and California responded with an outpouring of architecture, landscaping, entertainment, sport and recreation.' The confidence that Starr projected 20 years ago may have faded, and may fade further in the future in Los Angeles and up and down the state. But one thing that probably will remain true is that the region's path into the future will inspire writers to keep peering into their crystal balls, cloudy as they are.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Beloved Actress, 66, Makes Surprising Remark About Her Role in 'Harry Potter'
Beloved Actress, 66, Makes Surprising Remark About Her Role in 'Harry Potter' originally appeared on Parade. Emma Thompson isn't impressed by her role as Professor Sybil Trelawney in Harry Potter. Though fans loved the actress in the role, Thompson, 66, recently admitted that she doesn't hold that performance very high on the scale of things she's done in her career. 'It's not really an important part of my creative endeavors. I'm really sorry. I don't even be rude to those of you who like 'Harry Potter,' but you know, I came in, did a bit with glasses and a lot of hair, and then left having been quite well paid," Thompson said at the Locarno Film Festival, according to Deadline. Interestingly, this isn't the first time that Thompson has spoken about her role in Harry Potter. In fact, in 2008, she told MovieWeb that she wouldn't be returning to the franchise because of her role in Nanny McPhee. Moreover, she stated that the Nanny McPhee filmes were ones that she "really" cared about."The Harry Potters are great big franchises that are something I'm not emotionally attached to or necessarily particularly creatively attached to. That's more like doing a turn, whereas the Nanny McPhees are something I've written. The art is in those films, they're very handmade, they're something that's very close to me. Those are the ones I really care about," Thompson said at the time. Thompson brought Professor Trelawney to life in Prisoner of Azkaban and made additional (though brief) appearances in Order of the Phoenix and Deathly Hallows Part II. However, her role was fairly small in the films, relatively speaking, and she didn't form the attachment that other actors did, perhaps due to the fact that she was only on set for a short amount of time. Beloved Actress, 66, Makes Surprising Remark About Her Role in 'Harry Potter' first appeared on Parade on Aug 9, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Aug 9, 2025, where it first appeared. Solve the daily Crossword
