
Egyptian Media Figure: We Must Remove Hamas From The Picture, Lay The Groundwork For Regional Peace Based On Shared Interests
In his February 17, 2025 column in the London-based Saudi daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat , titled 'The Palestinian Cause – Recovery or Collapse?', Egyptian media figure Khaled Al-Berry wrote that it was a mistake on the part of the moderate Arab countries to tolerate the extremism of Hamas, a movement that serves the interests of Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood and undermines the pursuit of peace, using Palestine merely as a tool to expand its influence in the region. Al-Berry called on the moderate countries to formulate a plan for sidelining Hamas, promoting a discourse of peace and strengthening cooperation through joint economic and security projects with Israel.
Khaled Al-Bari (X.com/khaledalberry)
The following are translated excerpts from his article: [1]
'In our neighborhood there is a building called 'Egypt,' and beside it there is another building inhabited by the 'Israel' family and the 'Palestine' family, who are fighting for ownership of the building. The Israel family once [also] took over a floor in the Egypt building, but Egypt later freed it and signed a peace agreement with that family, creating the current situation. Now the Israel family, with the support of the Americans, wants to evict the Palestine family from the building and expel them to the floor [in the Egypt building] that Egypt previously freed. This would mean the reoccupation of our Egypt building and the destruction of the foundation on which the peace agreement was built. The Egyptians, along with the other supporters of peace, therefore agree that this action, if taken, will undermine the achievements of peace and take us back to the situation before [the peace agreement]... not to mention that it is a crime to expel a people from their land.
'The involvement of [U.S. President Donald] Trump has complicated the [power] balance, but nothing surprises us anymore when it comes to American foreign policy. Bush attacked Iraq and Obama supported the chaos [the reference is likely to the Arab Spring]. This is part of a game that must be taken into account in advance.
'This is the first lesson we [must learn] in handling the crisis. We must follow the growing political and cultural changes in the U.S. and in other strong and significant countries… [Soccer] teams do a so-called 'post-mortem' [of their losses], or an analysis after the fact, to discover the flaws. If we apply this to the Palestinian-Israeli issue we will discover that the main flaw was our tolerance of an element [i.e., Hamas] that used offensive rhetoric, adopted a negative conduct and received its orders from Iran, the resistance axis and the hostile Muslim Brotherhood organization. It started a civil war that weakened the Palestinians, tarnished the image of their cause and drove Fatah out of [the Gaza Strip]. Despite this, we did not neutralize this element and did not sever our ties with it, but trusted it to allow us to move ahead with the issue of peace, although we knew that its basic goal, since its inception, was to torpedo any chance of peace. Worse, figures in the academy and the media adopted its claims, so much so that [these claims] took over public opinion.
'This is not to say that Israel was not stubborn in the peace talks and has not worked to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. The world has condemned it for this. But political action has its own rules. You can always refuse a proposal, but at the same time you must work with what you have and be responsible. Resorting to terror only increases the extremism of the other side. Israel once supported Rabin, Peres and Ehud Barak, but today this camp within [Israel] has disappeared, while the voice of the opposing camp has grown stronger, a camp that says simply: 'Do you want a state controlled by Hamas as your neighbor? Read [this movement's] charter. Look what it has done to its [Palestinian] rivals.'
'The second flaw was failing to develop the idea of peace into plans that would permanently bind the interests of several sides. Egypt and Israel share economic and security interests that cannot all be listed here. And if we add to this the peace plans with the Gulf countries, the list will grow longer.
'The map shows us the moves of the regional forces. Turkey is present in Libya and is trying to inherit Iran's role as an influential [element] in Syria. Our southern borders are not stable, and the Nahda dam [Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam] constitutes a serious threat. Iranian militias [i.e., the Houthis] are targeting our economic interests at the mouth of the Red Sea…
'But [even] the worst crises also have advantages. The first [advantage of the present crisis] is that the public has witnessed with its own eyes the goal of certain well-known groups [in the resistance axis]. They said in the past that Palestine is just a toothpick that helps them to achieve their main goal, and now they have proved this in practice… [2]
'[Another advantage is that] the public saw that the moderate countries are the ones that safeguard the national interests, not the slogan-[spouting] countries and their allies. And the third advantage is that we have all realized how much this conflict – in the present circumstances and given Hamas' perception of it – can harm us.
'These advantages create the right climate to present a different proposal for the future that will ensure a better future for all sides. [This proposal] rests on three principles:
1. Media that strengthens the discourse of peace, [stresses] its importance for all and helps the public to understand the complexity of this conflict;
2. Removing 'Hamas' from the picture;
3. Tying peace to economic and strategic interests.'
[1] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 17, 2025.
[2] The reference is to a remark made by Hamas official Mahmoud Al-Zahhar, who said that Palestine was just a 'toothpick' and that Hamas' plan went far beyond Palestine. A video of his remarks was leaked to Al-Arabiya and aired in June 2019 (X.com/AlArabiya, June 11, 2019).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Israel hits Yemen's port of Hodeidah
Shafaq News/ On Tuesday morning, Israel launched heavy airstrikes on the docks of Yemen's Red Sea port of Hodeidah, according to the Houthi-affiliated Al-Masirah TV. No further details were provided regarding the extent of material or human losses. The Israeli army stated that Israel's navy struck Houthi targets, alleging that the facility is used to transfer weapons. #عاجل 🔴 سفن صواريخ تابعة لسلاح البحرية هاجمت أهدافًا تابعة لنظام الحوثي الارهابي في ميناء الحديدة في اليمن⭕️هاجم جيش الدفاع من خلال سفن صواريخ تابعة لسلاح البحرية صباح اليوم أهدافًا تابعة لنظام الحوثي الارهابي في ميناء الحديدة في اليمن. لقد جاءت الغارات ردًّا على الاعتداءات… — افيخاي ادرعي (@AvichayAdraee) June 10, 2025 The attack follows a statement from the Israeli military, posted late Monday on X, urging the evacuation of the Houthi-controlled Yemeni ports of Ras Isa, Hodeidah, and Salif. #عاجل تحذير لكل المتواجدين في الموانئ البحرية التي يسيطر عليها النظام الحوثي الإرهابي⭕️ميناء رأس عيسى⭕️ميناء الحديدة⭕️ميناء الصليف🔴أمامكم تحذير هام وعاجل🔴نظرًا لقيام النظام الحوثي الإرهابي باستخدام الموانئ البحرية لصالح أنشطته الإرهابية نحث جميع المتواجدين في هذه الموانئ… — افيخاي ادرعي (@AvichayAdraee) June 9, 2025 Despite the ongoing strikes, the Houthis have continued launching missiles and drones toward Israel, claiming their operations are in support of Palestinians in Gaza, where the Israeli war has killed more than 54,927 people and wounded over 126,615—most of them women and children—according to health authorities in the Strip.


Iraq Business
7 hours ago
- Iraq Business
Iraq offers support for Lebanese Investors and Workers
By John Lee. Iraq's Minister of Labour and Social Affairs, Mr Ahmed Al-Asadi, has confirmed his country's readiness to provide all possible facilitation for Lebanese workers in Iraq, provided that they comply with legal procedures designed to ensure their rights and protection. The remarks were made during a meeting with Lebanon's Minister of Labour, Dr Mohammad Bahjat Haidar, on the sidelines of the 113th session of the International Labour Conference in Geneva. The two ministers discussed ways to enhance bilateral cooperation, particularly in investment and encouraging Lebanese business owners to return to invest in Lebanon. Mr Al-Asadi acknowledged the impact of Lebanon's economic crisis on capital flows, especially in light of past failures in the banking sector. However, he affirmed Iraq's commitment to supporting Lebanon's economic recovery by encouraging Iraqi investors to explore opportunities there. He described investment as fundamental to national development, noting that Iraq has seen significant investment-driven growth over the past two to three years. On the subject of foreign and Arab workers in Iraq, Al-Asadi highlighted concerns about the large number of workers entering the country illegally. He stated that Iraq's Council of Ministers has issued a decision to regularise the status of such workers, enabling them to obtain residency and register with the Ministry of Labour. This step ensures their eligibility for legal wages, social security registration, and broader labour rights. The Minister reiterated Iraq's openness to Lebanese labour, stressing the importance of legal registration as a guarantee for protection and rights. (Source: Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs)


Shafaq News
11 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Kurdistan's $110B gamble: A new front in the Baghdad-Erbil oil war
Shafaq News/ More than two years after the suspension of Kurdish oil exports following an international arbitration ruling, tensions between Baghdad and Erbil have reignited once again. This time, the dispute centers on a $110B oil and gas agreement between the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and two American companies. Signed during a high-profile visit by KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani to Washington, the deals target the development of strategic gas fields in the Region's al-Sulaymaniyah province. The first contract involves HKN Energy, a US-based company active in Kurdistan since 2007. HKN holds a 62% majority stake in the Sarsang block in northern Kurdistan, alongside ShaMaran (18%) and the KRG (20%), and has extracted over 63 million barrels of oil from the Swara Tika and East Swara Tika fields and employs between 200 and 500 staff across its offices in Erbil and Texas. The second company, WesternZagros, is a Canadian energy firm founded in 2003 and operating in Kurdistan since 2005. Headquartered in Calgary, it manages operations from Erbil and al-Sulaymaniyah and has invested more than $1B in the Region, with main assets including the Kormir and Karmian fields, estimated to contain 5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 900 million barrels of recoverable oil. According to KRG officials, the Miran and Topkhana-Kormir fields covered by the agreements are expected to supply 24-hour electricity to the Region and potentially export surplus power to the rest of Iraq. 'This is not just about energy security—it's about political leverage,' local energy analyst Kovand Sherwani told Shafaq News. 'If implemented, these projects could drastically reduce the Region's reliance on Iranian fuel and grant it more bargaining power with Baghdad.' The United States welcomed the deals as a step toward enhancing Iraq's energy sovereignty. A senior State Department official told Shafaq News, 'The United States believes that Iraq will be more stable and sovereign by achieving energy independence and distancing itself from Iran's harmful influence,' the official stated. 'We encourage Baghdad and Erbil to work together to begin gas production as soon as possible,' he added. American energy expert Dr. Paul Sullivan of Johns Hopkins University also told Shafaq News that 'Erbil's decision to strike massive deals with US companies signals closer ties between Kurdistan and Washington in a vital sector, and may imply implicit American support for the Region.' However, he cautioned that 'unless constitutional disputes are resolved through a federal oil and gas law, this move will only deepen the crisis with Baghdad.' The Iraqi government responded swiftly to the deal. The Oil Ministry issued a statement rejecting the deals as 'null and void,' asserting that they violate Iraq's laws and the authority of the federal government. Citing the constitutional status of Iraq's natural resources, Baghdad argued that the KRG has no right to unilaterally sign contracts, especially while operating under a caretaker government awaiting elections, due to possible obligations on future administrations. MP Basim Naghamish, a member of the Parliamentary Oil and Gas Committee, echoed the ministry's stance. 'It is unacceptable for any party to operate independently of the federal government on the oil file. What Erbil has done—signing contracts with foreign companies unilaterally—constitutes a serious constitutional and financial violation. We will use all legal means to stop this unilateral move and protect Iraq's national wealth,' he stated. The deals also triggered a backlash in Parliament, including from some of the KRG's traditional allies, with several Baghdad-based parties within the governed Shiite Coordination Framework accusing the Region of violating revenue-sharing agreements, warning that such unilateral moves could derail national budget negotiations and legislative cooperation. In response, Kurdish officials defended the deals as essential to securing energy stability and financial sustainability in the face of continued delays in federal budget transfers and the suspension of oil exports through Turkiye. The Region has faced mounting liquidity pressures since March 2023, when the International Chamber of Commerce ruled against Turkiye's unilateral export of Kurdish crude, leading to losses exceeding $20B in potential revenue. Economist Mustafa Faraj told Shafaq News the deal could be a 'double-edged sword' for the KRG. 'There's no doubt these agreements represent a major investment opportunity. They could revitalize Kurdistan's economy through infrastructure development, job creation, and expanded power generation.' But, he added, 'They're not a magic bullet. Their success hinges on legal clarity and political stability. If the dispute with Baghdad remains unresolved, investors may hesitate, and implementation could be delayed.' At the same time, the KRG garnered support from Kurdish and American lawmakers, who pointed to Baghdad's repeated delays in disbursing the Region's financial entitlements, including unpaid May salaries, leaving Erbil with no choice but to seek independent solutions to meet its basic energy and fiscal needs. At the core of the legal conflict is Iraq's 'failure' to enact a federal oil and gas law. Article 112 of the 2005 Constitution calls for cooperative management of natural resources between Baghdad and the regions, yet in the absence of binding legislation, both sides have adopted clashing interpretations of the constitution. 'The legislative vacuum has created a constitutional gray zone,' political analyst Yassin Aziz told Shafaq News. 'There is no operational clarity between the center and the regions—especially regarding who oversees which stage of oil production, from exploration to export.' He added that divergent views on federalism itself exacerbate the conflict. 'While Kurdistan believes the constitution grants it real and broad powers, many in Baghdad remain committed to a centralist mindset, viewing any independent economic initiative as a challenge to state authority.' Observers agree that the only long-term solution lies in passing a comprehensive federal oil and gas law that balances regional rights with federal oversight. Yet after nearly two decades of impasse, that breakthrough remains out of reach. In the meantime, Erbil appears determined to proceed, leveraging US backing and investor confidence to solidify its energy sector, though Baghdad must decide whether to double down on legal confrontation—or return to the negotiating table.