B.C. man gets hunting ban, $13,000 penalty after illegally killing bighorn ram
NORTH VANCOUVER - A British Columbia man has been banned from hunting sheep in the province for three years after he illegally killed a bighorn ram and lied to authorities about where the hunt took place.
B.C.'s Conservation Officer Service says in a statement posted to Facebook that Heith Proulx of Kelowna killed the ram in October 2023 near Pavilion Lake, 28 kilometres northwest of Lillooet.
The service says Proulx had the animal inspected as required by law a month later and told inspectors the ram was harvested from an area where it was open season on bighorns.
But the service says global positioning co-ordinates showed it was killed in a closed area.
The service says Proulx admitted to lying about the location of the hunt when officers spoke to him in March 2024, and he has since pleaded guilty to making a false statement to official record keepers under the Wildlife Act.
Proulx was fined $13,000 and cannot hunt or accompany other hunters for hunting any type of sheep for the next three years in B.C.
The service says much of the fine will go to the Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation, while Proulx had to forfeit all wildlife parts seized in the case to the Crown and retake an outdoor recreation conservation program.
'The harvest of a mature ram from this closed area is contrary to conservation objectives and resulted in an overall harvest that exceeded the annual allowable harvest established to guide sustainable harvest levels,' the service says in its statement.
The service says the Fraser River area, which includes Lillooet, supports about half of B.C.'s California bighorn sheep population.
It says a provincial senior wildlife biologist who submitted an impact statement to the courts in this case found that the value of an opportunity for non-resident hunters to harvest one wild bighorn ram in B.C. has risen to more than $150,000 in the last few years.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Direct indictments now in place for all four accused in Taig Savage murder
All four charged in the 2021 homicide of Taig Savage, a young man from Penticton, will proceed directly to trial after Crown prosecutor Kurt Froehlich filed direct indictments at the Penticton courthouse on Monday. This move eliminates the need for preliminary hearings. Savage, 22, was found unresponsive near Penticton Secondary School on the morning of September 5, 2021, after reportedly being attacked in a group beating. He died shortly after being transported to hospital. Police say he had left home that morning wearing pajamas and a hoodie. After a lengthy investigation, second-degree murder charges were laid in April 2024. The accused include three individuals who were under 18 at the time of the incident and are therefore protected under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. The fourth is Isaac Hayse Jack, now 22, who was 18 at the time and is charged as an adult The three youths were initially charged with manslaughter, but their charges were upgraded to second-degree next court appearance for all four accused under the direct indictment is scheduled for July 14. Jack remains free under strict bail conditions. Two of the three young offenders have recently breached their bail conditions. One male youth is currently in custody following his second breach in recent weeks. He has been held for nearly three weeks and is scheduled for a bail hearing on June 17 in Kelowna. The Crown has indicated it will seek jail time after he previously pleaded guilty to an earlier breach. His lawyer, Nelson Selemaj, is expected to request his release under 24-hour supervision, including electronic ankle monitoring. However, the Crown will argue for continued detention until trial. On May 16, the youth pleaded guilty to breaching a court-ordered curfew. The Crown is seeking a 30-day sentence, potentially longer in light of his second arrest. While Selemaj requested a pre-sentence report, Froehlich argued it was unnecessary, citing an existing Gladue Report. Judge Greg Koturbash agreed to postpone sentencing to hear from the youth's community service officer. Meanwhile, the only female co-accused, now 19, recently pleaded guilty to assault related to a separate incident in November 2023. Because she was a minor at the time of the homicide charge, her identity remains protected. She faces up to six months in jail, with sentencing set for June 19. According to Froehlich, the woman was driving through a hotel parking lot in downtown Penticton when a stranger criticized her driving. After a brief exchange, she followed him, parked, approached on foot, and struck him in the face. The unprovoked attack, caught on video, was later reported to police. The incident violated her bail conditions, leading to 13 days in custody before her release under new terms. Froehlich called the assault 'a serious aggravating factor,' emphasizing how rare it is for someone facing a murder charge to commit another violent offense while on bail. He recommended three to six months in jail, followed by two years' probation with strict conditions, including anger management and a no-contact order with the lawyer Cory Armour argued for a conditional sentence to be served in the community, highlighting the woman's remorse and life changes, including moving in with her grandmother, securing full-time work, and accepting responsibility. Armour submitted five letters of support and noted her grief over the recent loss of her stepfather and stress from her charges being upgraded.' She is committed to keeping on a straight path,' Armour said, urging the court to avoid incarceration. Justice Lynette Jung will deliver her sentencing decision on June 19. Until then, the woman remains under her grandmother's supervision. Jack and the three co-accused had initially opted for preliminary hearings, which are now cancelled due to the direct indictments. The three co-accused will be tried together by judge and jury. Jack will face a separate trial, also by judge and mother, Tracey, was again present in court Monday. She has attended nearly every hearing. DW Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
'Catastrophic:' sting urged over Star's myriad breaches
The Star has been named as a worse offender than Crown in breaking anti-money laundering compliance laws by letting high-risk gamblers funnel billions through its casinos. As financial watchdog AUSTRAC seeks $400 million in penalties against The Star in the Federal Court, the company has cried poor saying that an amount this large would push it into administration. Lawyers for the government agency pushed for a hefty fine on Tuesday, saying the casino operator and others in the industry should be deterred from similarly lax controls on potentially dirty money. "The sting must be there in the penalty, it must maintain its deterrent effect," barrister Joanne Shepard said, as a hearing continued. The Star has pointed to recent financial struggles, arguing it was only able to pay a fine of $100 million. In contrast, Crown agreed to pay a $450 million fine in May 2024 for similar money-laundering breaches. This amount was a "benchmark" which could be used to determine how much The Star could pay, AUSTRAC barrister Simon White SC argued. "The conduct in this case is measurably worse than that in Crown," he said. The Star's breaches were deliberate, he argued, in contrast to Crown. Management at The Star continued to engage with high-risk gamblers without proper controls and risk assessments in place despite clear findings revealed in a public inquiry into Crown, Mr White said. About $138 billion in cash turnover had come in solely through junkets with an additional $20 billion sourced from high-risk customers, Mr White said. "$138 billion just from junkets coming through the casino environment is potentially catastrophic in so many ways Your Honour," he told Justice Cameron Moore. The business had benefited from the breaches bringing in almost $1.3 billion in revenue through junkets at its Sydney and Queensland casinos and at least $1.33 billion more through high-risk gamblers. Additionally, very significant volumes of high-risk cash were pushed through its slot machines, the court was told. While a projected $343 million was expected to be paid to make The Star's anti-money laundering systems compliant, this should have been an expense made years ago, Mr White said. And without the proper measures in place, the casino had an unfair competitive advantage over its rivals, he noted. Earlier on Tuesday, Ms Shepard argued against The Star's claims of financial distress. She pointed out that a "white knight" had recently emerged with US gaming giant Bally's Corporation promising to inject $300 million into the firm. The casino could raise further capital, look into debt refinancing or dip into almost $60 million set aside from the sale of its Treasury Brisbane business, she told Justice Moore. In the 2017, 2018 and 2019 financial years, The Star had brought in $2.4 billion to $2.5 billion in annual revenue, Ms Shepard said. In the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, the firm's revenue never dipped below $1.5 billion, she added. An independent expert report released in May valued The Star between $1.17 billion and $1.38 billion with liabilities of about $490 million, the court was told. The hearing continues. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Sexual assault survivors calling on Ontario to lift policy that limits access to community justice programs
Marlee Liss still remembers how dehumanizing it felt to sit through the preliminary trial of the man accused of sexually assaulting her, disturbed by how she was treated while testifying, as she answered a series of invasive questions. It took three years for the Toronto woman's case to make it to trial. The whole time, she said, she didn't necessarily want her alleged assailant to go to jail — she just wanted him to take accountability. Thanks to a referral from her Crown attorney, the case was put on pause in 2019 so that Liss could pursue a community justice program, also known as restorative justice. There, she got to hear her alleged assailant take accountability in a private room, apologizing to her directly. He also underwent months of therapy. Liss said the prosecutor agreeing to resolve the case outside the daunting courtroom was the most healing moment in the entire process. "It was the first time someone was finally saying … 'Your voice matters, what you need matters, your boundaries matter, your healing matters. Let's act according to what you need,'" said Liss, who is the founder of the global advocacy group, Survivors 4 Justice Reform. Because the case was diverted from the court system, Liss's alleged assailant did not receive a criminal conviction, but by the time the community justice program was complete, Liss said she was confident he wouldn't re-offend. Liss's experience is rare. In Ontario, sexual offences are among a list of serious offences deemed ineligible for referral to community justice programs by Crown prosecutors. According to a 2023 report from the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), the Crown attorney for Liss's case was later formally disciplined for her actions. Survivors 4 Justice Reform is calling on the province to scrap that policy. The group has written an open letter to the Ministry of the Attorney General, co-signed by 50 individuals and organizations that work with and advocate for sexual assault survivors. "Denying survivors this option perpetuates a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to meet the complex realities of sexual violence," says the letter, shared publicly on Monday. A spokesperson for the minister of the Attorney General declined to comment, having not yet seen the letter. Charlotte Carron then declined to answer questions from CBC about the policy of not referring sexual assault cases to community justice programs and whether that might be changed in the future. "It would not be appropriate to comment on this topic without seeing the letter," she said via email. Restorative justice can take different forms, including therapy, healing circles rooted in Indigenous practices, rehab programs or volunteer work. People accused of crimes have to assume responsibility for their actions and be willing to make "meaningful amends" to participate, according to the province's Crown Prosecution Manual. "The idea that restorative justice could be a thing that lets perpetrators off the hook — I think we have to start by recognizing perpetrators are not on the hook right now with the criminal legal system," said Liss. Right now, community justice programs are available in Ontario to sexual assault survivors who haven't reported their case to police. But many don't know that's an option, Liss said. She says people's first instinct is to call the police, and once a case is in the legal system it's too late. "We really want it to be possible for people who are already going through the criminal legal system to be able to change their mind … that's what consent is," Liss said. Emily Quint says she wishes she'd known about restorative justice as the sexual assault case against her alleged assailant was going through the legal system. The charges were eventually stayed because of an unreasonable delay in 2023. Hers was one of 59 sexual assault cases that year in Ontario which were stayed due to delays, according to data from from the Ministry of the Attorney General. "I was re-traumatized, re-victimized, just treated like I was absolutely nothing," she said. WATCH | Emily Quint's case tossed over court delays: While she understands why many survivors want to see their assailants punished, Quint says it was never about that for her. "I wanted to stand up and say, 'this is what happened to me and it wasn't OK,'" she said. " I wanted healing for myself, healing for him, counselling for myself, counselling for him." Lack of access is another barrier Lawyer Deepa Mattoo said she's seen many survivors prefer seeking justice outside the court in her time as director of the Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic, which supports survivors of gender-based violence. She says they would go to the Human Rights Tribunal or the now-defunct Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. Mattoo agrees survivors should have greater choice, but says the clinic tends not to refer them to restorative justice programs because of low availability for those services throughout the province. "Those options need to be designed and available in [the] community for people to be referred out to," Mattoo said. The policy barring prosecutors from referring sexual assault survivors to these programs is a big reason that programs are under-resourced, according to Rosel Kim, a senior staff lawyer at LEAF, one of the organizations that co-signed the open letter. Not only should the province relax its policy, Kim says, but it should also increase the funding for the programs as well. "If you just sort of lift the moratorium, but they don't provide options, that's not meaningful either," Kim said.
