FDA approves the world's only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV
The U.S. has approved the world's only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV, maker Gilead Sciences announced Wednesday. It's the first step in an anticipated global rollout that could protect millions – although it's unclear how many in the U.S. and abroad will get access to the powerful new option.
While a vaccine to prevent HIV still is needed, some experts say the shot — a drug called lenacapvir — could be the next best thing. It nearly eliminated new infections in two groundbreaking studies of people at high risk, better than daily preventive pills they can forget to take.
'This really has the possibility of ending HIV transmission,' said Greg Millett, public policy director at amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research.
Condoms help guard against HIV infection if used properly but what's called PrEP — regularly using preventive medicines such as the daily pills or a different shot given every two months — is increasingly important. Lenacapavir's six-month protection makes it the longest-lasting type, an option that could attract people wary of more frequent doctor visits or stigma from daily pills.
But upheaval in U.S. healthcare — including cuts to public health agencies and Medicaid — and slashing of American foreign aid to fight HIV are clouding the prospects.
Millett said "gaping holes in the system" in the U.S. and globally "are going to make it difficult for us to make sure we not only get lenacapavir into people's bodies but make sure they come back' even as little as twice a year.
Gilead's drug already is sold to treat HIV under the brand name Sunlenca. The prevention dose will be sold under a different name, Yeztugo. It's given as two injections under the skin of the abdomen, leaving a small 'depot' of medication to slowly absorb into the body.
Gilead didn't immediately announce its price. The drug only prevents HIV transmission – it doesn't block other sexually transmitted diseases.
Global efforts at ending the HIV pandemic by 2030 have stalled. There still are more than 30,000 new infections in the U.S. each year and about 1.3 million worldwide.
Only about 400,000 Americans already use some form of PrEP, a fraction of those estimated to benefit. A recent study found states with high use of PrEP saw a decrease in HIV infections, while rates continued rising elsewhere.
About half of new infections are in women, who often need protection they can use without a partner's knowledge or consent. One rigorous study in South Africa and Uganda compared more than 5,300 sexually active young women and teen girls given twice-yearly lenacapavir or the daily pills. There were no HIV infections in those receiving the shot while about 2% in the comparison group caught HIV from infected sex partners.
A second study found the twice-yearly shot nearly as effective in gay men and gender-nonconforming people in the U.S. and in several other countries hard-hit by HIV.
Ian Haddock of Houston had tried PrEP off and on since 2015 but he jumped at the chance to participate in the lenacapavir study and continues with the twice-yearly shots as part of the research follow-up.
'Now I forget that I'm on PrEP because I don't have to carry around a pill bottle,' said Haddock, who leads the Normal Anomaly Initiative, a nonprofit serving Black LGBTQ+ communities.
' Men, women, gay, straight – it really just kinds of expands the opportunity for prevention,' he added. Just remembering a clinic visit every six months 'is a powerful tool versus constantly having to talk about, like, condoms, constantly making sure you're taking your pill every day.'
'Everyone in every country who's at risk of HIV needs access to PrEP,' added Dr. Gordon Crofoot of Houston, who helped lead the study in men. 'We need to get easier access to PrEP that's highly effective like this is.'
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Three years left to limit warming to 1.5C, top scientists warn
The Earth could be doomed to breach the symbolic 1.5C warming limit in as little as three years at current levels of carbon dioxide the stark warning from more than 60 of the world's leading climate scientists in the most up-to-date assessment of the state of global 200 countries agreed to try to limit global temperature rises to 1.5C above levels of the late 1800s in a landmark agreement in 2015, with the aim of avoiding some of the worst impacts of climate countries have continued to burn record amounts of coal, oil and gas and chop down carbon-rich forests - leaving that international goal in peril. "Things are all moving in the wrong direction," said lead author Prof Piers Forster, director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at the University of Leeds."We're seeing some unprecedented changes and we're also seeing the heating of the Earth and sea-level rise accelerating as well."These changes "have been predicted for some time and we can directly place them back to the very high level of emissions", he the beginning of 2020, scientists estimated that humanity could only emit 500 billion more tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) - the most important planet-warming gas - for a 50% chance of keeping warming to by the start of 2025 this so-called "carbon budget" had shrunk to 130 billion tonnes, according to the new reduction is largely due to continued record emissions of CO2 and other planet-warming greenhouse gases like methane, but also improvements in the scientific global CO2 emissions stay at their current highs of about 40 billion tonnes a year, 130 billion tonnes gives the world roughly three years until that carbon budget is could commit the world to breaching the target set by the Paris agreement, the researchers say, though the planet would probably not pass 1.5C of human-caused warming until a few years later. Last year was the first on record when global average air temperatures were more than 1.5C above those of the late 1800s.A single 12-month period isn't considered a breach of the Paris agreement, however, with the record heat of 2024 given an extra boost by natural weather human-caused warming was by far the main reason for last year's high temperatures, reaching 1.36C above pre-industrial levels, the researchers current rate of warming is about 0.27C per decade – much faster than anything in the geological if emissions stay high, the planet is on track to reach 1.5C of warming on that metric around the year this point, long-term warming could, in theory, be brought back down by sucking large quantities of CO2 back out of the the authors urge caution on relying on these ambitious technologies serving as a get-out-of-jail card."For larger exceedance [of 1.5C], it becomes less likely that removals [of CO2] will perfectly reverse the warming caused by today's emissions," warned Joeri Rogelj, professor of climate science and policy at Imperial College London. 'Every fraction of warming' matters The study is filled with striking statistics highlighting the magnitude of the climate change that has already the most notable is the rate at which extra heat is accumulating in the Earth's climate system, known as "Earth's energy imbalance" in scientific the past decade or so, this rate of heating has been more than double that of the 1970s and 1980s and an estimated 25% higher than the late 2000s and 2010s."That's a really large number, a very worrying number" over such a short period, said Dr Matthew Palmer of the UK Met Office, and associate professor at the University of recent uptick is fundamentally due to greenhouse gas emissions, but a reduction in the cooling effect from small particles called aerosols has also played a extra energy has to go somewhere. Some goes into warming the land, raising air temperatures, and melting the world's about 90% of the excess heat is taken up by the oceans. That not only means disruption to marine life but also higher sea levels: warmer ocean waters take up more space, in addition to the extra water that melting glaciers are adding to our rate of global sea-level rise has doubled since the 1990s, raising the risks of flooding for millions of people living in coastal areas worldwide. While this all paints a bleak picture, the authors note that the rate of emissions increases appears to be slowing as clean technologies are rolled argue that "rapid and stringent" emissions cuts are more important than Paris target is based on very strong scientific evidence that the impacts of climate change would be far greater at 2C of warming than at has often been oversimplified as meaning below 1.5C of warming is "safe" and above 1.5C "dangerous".In reality, every extra bit of warming increases the severity of many weather extremes, ice melt and sea-level rise."Reductions in emissions over the next decade can critically change the rate of warming," said Prof Rogelj."Every fraction of warming that we can avoid will result in less harm and less suffering of particularly poor and vulnerable populations and less challenges for our societies to live the lives that we desire," he added. Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to keep up with the latest climate and environment stories with the BBC's Justin Rowlatt. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Kristi Noem discharged from hospital as ICE Barbie's sudden illness sparks conspiracy theories
Kristi Noem has been discharged from the hospital after suffering from an allergic reaction - as the coincidental timing of her symptoms sparked online conspiracy theories. The Homeland Security secretary, 53, was rushed to the hospital on Tuesday for what a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told the Daily Mail was an 'allergic reaction.' 'Secretary Noem had an allergic reaction today,' Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said. 'She was transported to the hospital out of an abundance of caution. She is alert and recovering.' On Wednesday, Noem was released from the hospital, according to the Wall Street Journal. But speculation swirled as Noem's hospitalization came just one day after she visited a biosafety lab that has been temporarily shuttered over safety concerns. On Monday, Robert F Kennedy shared a photo of himself, Noem and Rand Paul at the Integrated Research Facility in Frederick, Maryland. 'With @Sec_Noem and @SenRandPaul inspecting the biological hazard labs at Fort Detrick,' Kennedy, the Health and Human Services secretary, wrote. The MAHA Institute - a thinktank supporting Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again initiative - also posted online that the three had earlier visited the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases biosecurity lab at Fort Detrick. Some on X questioned whether Noem had suffered some sort of exposure to hazardous material. 'Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem visited a biological hazard lab the day before she was rushed to [the] hospital over an allergic reaction,' one X user pointed out, calling it 'probably just a coincidence.' Others were not so sure, however. 'She toured the NBACC, a DHS-run facility built after the 2001 anthrax attacks and used during COVID to analyze potential biothreats for the FBI. Now she's suddenly hospitalized,' another X user asked, incredulously. 'This isn't just an allergy,' he asserted. 'What the hell did she come into contact with?' A third X user also asked whether Noem experienced 'biochemical warfare firsthand. 'Biochemical terrorism is something to consider in today's upside down world!' she noted. According to its website, the Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick studies viruses 'causing high-consequence disease' like like Ebola or COVID. One of its major focus areas is to 'mitigate major public heath events related to emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases or biological weapons attacks.' But Kennedy's Department of Health and Human Services ordered an indefinite work stoppage at the facility in April. 'NIH has implemented a research pause—referred to as a safety stand-down—at the Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick,' HHS officials said at the time. 'This decision follows identification and documentation of personnel issues involving contract staff that compromised the facility's safety culture, prompting this research pause.' They added: 'During the stand-down, no research will be conducted, and access will be limited to essential personnel only, to safeguard the facility and its resources.' Dr Connie Schmaljohn, the lab's director, was also placed on administrative leave after she allegedly failed to report the incident to other officials. Speaking anonymously, an HHS source revealed to Fox News that the shutdown came after one of the researchers poked a hole in the other's protective equipment during a vicious 'lovers' spat'. As the shutdown continued, Kennedy told a Senate committee last month that the FBI was investigating the incident as a potentially 'deliberate criminal act' because the pathogens the researchers were handling were highly dangerous, according to the Daily Beast. It now remains unclear when the facility may resume, as Democrats push the Department of Health and Human Services for answers. They noted in a letter last week that scientists at the Integrated Research Facility 'study some of the most dangerous pathogens and viruses to prevent, address and eradicate high-consequence and deadly diseases.' The lawmakers added that safety measures there 'are of the utmost importance for our constituents in the surrounding communities' as they pressed for a timeline on when research operations would resume.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US judge invalidates Biden rule protecting privacy for abortions
June 18 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday struck down a rule adopted by the administration of former President Joe Biden that strengthened privacy protections for women seeking abortions and patients who receive gender transition treatments. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, Texas, said the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services exceeded its powers and unlawfully limited states' ability to enforce their public health laws when it adopted the rule last year. The rule prohibits healthcare providers and insurers from giving information about a legal abortion to state law enforcement authorities who are seeking to punish someone in connection with that abortion. "HHS lacked clear delegated authority to fashion special protections for medical information produced by politically favored medical procedures," wrote Kacsmaryk, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, a Republican, during his first term. Kacsmaryk in December had blocked HHS from enforcing the rule against a Texas doctor who had brought the lawsuit, Carmen Purl, pending the outcome of the case. Wednesday's decision blocks the rule nationwide. HHS and Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group that represents Purl, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Biden administration issued the rule as part of its pledge to support access to reproductive healthcare after the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that made access to abortion a constitutional right nationwide. It came in response to efforts by authorities in some Republican-led states that ban abortion, including Texas, to restrict out-of-state travel for abortion. Texas has filed a separate lawsuit challenging the rule, which is pending in federal court in Lubbock, Texas. HHS in a court filing last month said agency leadership appointed by Trump is evaluating its position in this case. Biden, a Democrat, said in announcing the rule that no one should have their medical records "used against them, their doctor, or their loved one just because they sought or received lawful reproductive health care."
