logo
Friday briefing: ​Can the NHS and Labour survive another strike by resident doctors?

Friday briefing: ​Can the NHS and Labour survive another strike by resident doctors?

The Guardian4 days ago
Good morning. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, working in the NHS have begun their five-day strike.
At the heart of this dispute is the government's offer of a 5.4% pay increase this year, after a 22% rise over the previous two years. Ministers say this amounts to a total uplift of 28.9% over three years.
But the offer has been met with anger from doctors, who argue that nearly two decades of pay restraint have eroded their salaries significantly in real terms. They are striking as part of their campaign for a 29% pay rise, to be delivered over several years.
But Wes Streeting, the health secretary, denounced the move as 'completely unreasonable', stating that 'no trade union in British history has seen its members receive a 28.9% pay rise only to immediately respond with strikes'. He argued that a strike by resident doctors 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement', urging them not to join industrial action this morning.
The two sides have become deeply entrenched in their positions and are further apart than ever. To understand the ins and outs of this dispute, the political consequences it could have, and whether there is an off-ramp, I spoke to Denis Campbell, the Guardian's health policy editor. That's after the headlines.
Gaza | The head of the main UN agency serving Palestinians has said his frontline staff are fainting from hunger, as the number of people dying of starvation in Gaza continued to rise and hopes for a ceasefire faded as negotiations collapsed.
UK | A man was found guilty of murdering his two-week-old son in a Somerset baby unit, causing skull and neck injuries while nurses worked nearby.
South-east Asia | Thailand evacuated more than 100,000 people along the Cambodian border as the two countries fought for a second day in their bloodiest military clashes in over a decade, with 14 dead as of Friday.
UK politics | Jeremy Corbyn confirmed he is setting up a new political party with ex-Labour MP, Zarah Sultana, to 'take on the rich and powerful'.
Russia | A Soviet-era passenger plane has crashed in Russia's far-east, killing all 48 people on board.
When Labour entered government there was a brief period of calm after years of turbulence between NHS doctors and the Conservatives.
'When Wes Streeting became the health secretary in July of last year he inherited a really long-running, messy, difficult, protracted dispute involving resident doctors,' Denis Campbell told me.
'In simple terms, resident doctors in England who belonged to the British Medical Association (BMA) had been seeking for some time a pay rise of 35%. They wanted that sum over a number of years to make up for the significant erosion in the real-terms value of their pay that they had seen since 2008-2009. In pursuit of that goal, they had gone on strike 11 different times, totalling 44 days, under the previous Conservative governments.'
Combined with action by other NHS staff, these walkouts forced the cancellation of about 1.5m appointments and cost the health service an estimated £1.5bn.
'Streeting said resolving the dispute was going to be his first priority as health secretary, and he was as good as his word. He met the junior doctors' committee of the BMA right away after stepping into office, and a few weeks later they seemed to have resolved things by giving them a pay rise of about 22% spread over two years,' Denis.
That pay rise was backed by a large majority of resident doctors, and for a time it seemed the dispute was over. Until now.
What's at the heart of this dispute?
According to the BMA, resident doctors have seen the real value of their pay fall by nearly 21% over the past 17 years. This is the equivalent, they say, of working one day in every five for free (there is some dispute over these calculations). The resident doctors' committee of the BMA is now seeking a further 29% pay rise over several years.
Supporters of the strike argue that resident doctors are not just asking for more money but highlighting a system on the brink. Many say they are overworked, underpaid, and increasingly unable to deliver the level of care patients need. For them, this dispute is about valuing the people who hold the NHS together day in, day out, often under immense pressure
Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, co-chair of the BMA resident doctors' committee, tweeted that a new doctor starts on £17.60 an hour: 'Name one other profession that gets paid less than their assistants. That is how far doctor pay has eroded.'
While these figures are contested, Denis points out that the basic starting salary for a resident doctor is £38,831. On top of that, they typically earn about 15% more for working antisocial hours, including nights and weekends. The best-paid resident doctors this year will earn a basic salary of about £74,000.
'This is important for people to understand this dispute. The union now believes that all doctors deserve to have the pay they have lost since 2008 restored. They are unshakeable and unwavering and determined in their beliefs that they are going to get that sum of money: starting with resident doctors and potentially extending to all other groups of doctors such as consultants,' Denis said.
How has the government responded?
There have been talks between the union and government ministers, but no breakthrough yet. A major sticking point has been that Streeting says this year's pay deal of 5.4% for 2025–26 is final.
'Streeting has said this is completely unaffordable and completely unreasonable. Talks have failed to bridge the gap and, as a result, anything up to about 55,000 resident doctors in England are legally entitled to go on strike from Friday onwards for up to six months,' Denis said.
'Streeting said there's no money to reopen negotiations. There have been discussions about whether some kind of student loan forgiveness or debt relief might be offered. Resident doctors' loans can be up to £100,000. Streeting has also floated the idea of less generous pensions in exchange for higher pay now. But none of these ideas have really got anywhere.'
The trouble, he added, is that while Streeting is only willing to talk to doctors about other issues, such as their working conditions, access to hot food, issues around leave, and training places, the BMA is absolutely focused on full pay restoration.
'So there's very little common ground: one side says they won't talk about pay, the other says they'll only talk about pay. It's hard to see how, after the disruption these strikes will cause, this dispute is going to be resolved,' Denis said. 'The two sides are just too far apart.'
What has the response been within and outside the NHS?
Denis canvassed views among senior doctors and hospital bosses last week to gauge the mood about this strike. The response was overwhelming and conclusive: they were against it.
'The consensus was that the resident doctors were being greedy, out of touch, and failing to read the room. They say the public finances are strained, and that over the last few years at least, these doctors have had good pay rises relative to other public sector workers. No other trade union is seeking anything like these sums. And no other union has a goal of full restoration,' Denis said.
Resident doctors have historically had significant public support, even when they were striking again and again. 'You had 55-65% of the public still seeming to be on the side of the doctors. People believed they deserved a hefty pay rise,' Denis said.
But that support has soured. Recent polling shows that previously strong approval by voters for strikes by resident doctors has dramatically reduced to just 26%.
'So they seem to have really lost the public support that they enjoyed. Even previously when they were taking the strike action, while they were being vilified and castigated, the public seemed to get it … that these doctors are the workhorse of the NHS, covering weekends and overnight shifts that consultants don't want to or don't have to do any more.
'I think the public view now seems to be that the resident doctors are being unreasonable,' Denis said.
What are the political ramifications?
This is a particularly significant moment for the Labour government because of its central NHS pledge is to bring down hospital waiting times to 18 weeks, Denis said. 'We hear every week about the NHS backlog, which is currently around 7.4m operations and treatments. The government has made some modest progress – getting it down from 7.6m to 7.4m, but these strikes could wreck that limited progress. This key NHS pledge could become unattainable.'
It's why Streeting has described these strikes as 'a gift to Nigel Farage'. He told a meeting of Labour MPs that ministers were 'in the fight for the survival of the NHS' and if Labour failed, Farage would argue for it to be replaced by an insurance-style system.
But resident doctors see their fight for fair pay as a fight for the soul of the NHS, citing widespread burnout among colleagues and a growing exodus from the health service.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Denis added: 'The two sides seem very far apart on the fundamentals. I would really worry that we're back into a groundhog day situation, with strikes by younger doctors that occur so regularly and for such prolonged times as we saw under the last government are back to haunt this one.'
The great actor, playwright, LGBTQ+ activist and now quilter Harvey Feinstein does not mince his words – especially on the subject of one of Donald Trump's enablers, Ric Grenell, now boss of the Kennedy Center. 'He proudly says, 'I am a gay, married man.' Who got you those rights, you lowlife little creep​?' Alex Needham, acting head of newsletters
This Guardian editorial warning that time is running out to stop a genocide in Gaza feels like an important moment for the British press. Aamna
If you've got a long journey with kids ahead of you this summer, then waste no time in clicking on this piece from the Filter. Twenty tips to make family journeys go more smoothly. Public service journalism at its finest. Alex
This Sunday's Women's Euro final between England and Spain is a rematch of the 2023 World Cup final in Sydney. But as Sophie Downey deftly explores, both teams have changed since that fateful encounter. Aamna
As I return to my regular job as the Guardian's arts editor, I was invigorated by this passionate defence of reviews by Richard Body in the New Yorker. Far from being conservative, he says, they're progressive and soul-stirring, a unique conversation between critic, artist and reader. Alex
Cricket | Ben Stokes finished with figures of five for 72 before Zak Crawley struck 84 as England closed the second day on 225 for two, trailing India's first-innings total by 133 runs.
Cycling | David Rozman, a long-term Ineos staff member, has left the Tour de France after an investigation was launched by the International Testing Agency (ITA) into alleged messages he exchanged in 2012 with the subsequently convicted German doping doctor Mark Schmidt.
Rugby | Garry Ringrose has self-reported concussion symptoms, which has forced the British and Irish Lions head coach, Andy Farrell, into a last-minute reshuffle ahead of Saturday's second Test against the Wallabies.
The Guardian again leads on the Palestinians' plight: 'Let aid in, pleads UN chief, as even his staff faint from hunger in Gaza'. 'Britain must do more' says the Mirror and the Labour MP Emily Thornberry is the face of that statement. The i paper has 'UK ready to recognise Palestinian state in peace deal'. 'Farms close at record rate after IHT raid' is the claim in the Telegraph. The Express has 'Doctors' 5-day strike is a 'threat to lives'' and the Times goes in that direction as well: 'PM: Strikes pose threat to NHS as we know it'. 'I won't cave in to militant doctors' the health secretary is credited with saying on the Mail's front. The Metro pens a letter to the England women's coach, Sarina Wiegman, and says 'Good luck, let's go!'. The Financial Times splashes on 'Tesla shares tumble after Musk warns Trump's anti-EV agenda will hit profit'.
Our critics' roundup of the best things to watch, read, play and listen to right now
TVWashington Black | ★★★☆☆
Atrocious dialogue, ludicrous plot, nausea-inducing love scenes: this adaptation of Esi Edugyan's novel about the era of transatlantic slavery is highly wobbly. But the stunning scenery of Nova Scotia, strong performances – especially from Sterling K Brown – and world-building make it highly watchable. Hannah J Davies
Film
Gazer | ★★★★☆A paranoid noir chiller shot on 16mm in Jersey City, Gazer is a fascinatingly uneasy debut from Ryan J Sloan. Co-writer Ariella Mastroianni stars as Frankie, a woman with a neurodegenerative condition who can't judge the passing of time and finds herself caught in a disturbing plot involving a stranger's plea for help. Unbearably tense and ineffably creepy, it's a genuinely skin-crawling, hallucinatory ride, with hints of Lynch and Cronenberg. Peter Bradshaw
TheatreInter Alia | ★★★★☆
Rosamund Pike rules in Suzie Miller's companion drama to Prima Facie, playing a crown court judge whose world is upended by an accusation close to home. Directed by Justin Martin, with music ratcheting up the tension, it's a searing commentary on the justice system and a purposefully uncomfortable insight into contemporary parenting. Pike is in constant motion, juggling career, motherhood and emotional labour, but can't protect her son from peer pressure – or, in the end, himself. Emma John
Music
Tyler, the Creator: Don't Tap the Glass | ★★★★☆Tyler, the Creator's ninth album expels – for the most part – the soul-searching of last year's Chromakopia in favour of half an hour of early 80s rhythms and slick one-liners. The musical reference points are deployed with an evident love of the source material; the hooks work. But it's not the whole story: on the concluding Tell Me What It Is, Tyler drops the boasts in favour of heartsore self-examination. Fourteen years on, he still reserves the right to be contradictory. Alexis Petridis
Euros 25: Can the Lionesses bring it home again? – podcast
What can the tournament so far tell us about England's chances on Sunday? Faye Carruthers reports
A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad
The world's smallest snake, as thin as a strand of spaghetti, has been rediscovered in Barbados 20 years after its last sighting. The Barbados threadsnake, thought to be extinct, was found under a rock in the centre of the island during an ecological survey by conservation organisation Re:wild.
During the survey in March, Justin Springer, who had been looking for the threadsnake among other reptiles for more than a year, jokingly told his colleague: 'I smell a threadsnake,' while turning over a rock trapped under a tree root. And there it was.
'When you are so accustomed to looking for things and you don't see them, you are shocked when you actually find it,' he said.
Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday
And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
Quick crossword
Cryptic crossword
Wordiply
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BREAKING: David Lammy ultimatum to Israel over Gaza 'affront' applauded at UN
BREAKING: David Lammy ultimatum to Israel over Gaza 'affront' applauded at UN

Daily Mirror

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

BREAKING: David Lammy ultimatum to Israel over Gaza 'affront' applauded at UN

David Lammy has blasted the Israeli government - saying its "drip feeding" of aid to Gaza is an "affront" to the world. The Foreign Secretary was applauded at the UN General Secretary as he said the UK would recognise the Palestinian state by September unless Israel acts. In a brief speech he said: "The devastation in Gaza is heartbreaking. "Children are starving and Israel's drip feeding of aid has horrified the world. These are an affront to the values of the charter of the United Nations." The Foreign Secretary went on to say Britian "bears a special burden of responsibility" for a two-state solution. He said: "Let me be clear - the Netanyahu government's rejection of a two state solution is wrong. It's wrong morally, and it's wrong strategically. It harms the interests of the Israeli people." "Our demands on Hamas remain absolute and unwavering," he clarified. In a statement from Downing Street, the Prime Minister said the Palestinian people have "endured terrible suffering" with "catastrophic failure of aid". He added: "We see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. The suffering must end." Earlier on Tuesday, UN-backed experts said "the worst-case scenario of famine" was currently playing out in Gaza and warned of "widespread death" without urgent action. It came as the Prime Minister held an emergency Cabinet meeting to discuss a peace plan for the region. He had summoned ministers back from the summer recess to discuss the proposals, which have been shared with France, Germany and US President Donald Trump. Downing Street said the PM "opened by saying that he had called the meeting to address the situation in Gaza which was getting more desperate by the day".

Poll reveals the one major reason Britons aren't having children
Poll reveals the one major reason Britons aren't having children

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Poll reveals the one major reason Britons aren't having children

Nearly half of British adults are putting off or deciding against having children, with money worries a top factor, a stark new poll reveals. A survey of 18 to 50-year-olds from pollsters Ipsos, shared exclusively with The Independent , shows that 44 per cent of adults plan to delay having children, or are deciding against it altogether – with the cost of raising children, including food, clothing and education, cited as the most common reason (39 per cent). And a third of prospective parents said they were put off by the cost of childcare in the UK – despite the government's rollout of extended free nursery hours. While a third of respondents said they weren't having children because they simply didn't want to, others said they were put off by fears over climate change, with worries over how global warming will affect their child's future, and how having children may harm the environment. The poll comes as birth rates in England and Wales are at their lowest rate on record, and as deaths are expected to consistently outnumber births in the UK from 2030. Lord Michael Farmer, a vocal supporter of family stability, criticised the systemic issues underlying low birth rates and argued that parents needed more financial support. 'The UK's tax system discourages childbearing; it is one of the least family-friendly in the OECD. No allowances are made for dependants, so our tax system also disadvantages single parents. The current level of marriage allowance gives scant recognition of low-earning or non-earning second parents,' he said in a House of Lords debate in November. In 2023, more people died than were born in the UK. This gap is only expected to widen between 2030 and 2050, according to projections from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This means that the majority of population growth is driven by immigration rather than births. Education secretary Bridget Phillipson told The Independent in June that the steep decline in birth rates is 'a big challenge' for the UK, which needs to be addressed. She added: 'I've heard from lots of people that the choices that they wanted to make have been constrained, in terms of when to start a family and how many children they have, by factors like the cost of childcare, housing costs, instability at work.' Fertility rates are shrinking faster than in any other G7 nation, falling by 25 per cent in the UK since 2010. However, women are still having slightly more children on average than those in Japan, Italy and Canada. Despite advancements in flexible working and parental leave, some parents polled said they believed that it is harder to raise children now than in previous generations, with the cost of living and the price of housing increasing beyond pay. The majority of adults (56 per cent) believe it is harder to be a parent in the UK today than 20 years ago, with 61 per cent of women saying it was harder to raise a child now compared to men (52 per cent). And even older generations agreed, with those aged 55 to 75-year-olds the most likely to believe (59 per cent) that parenthood is trickier now than two decades ago. The decline in birth rates has generated much discussion among politicians. Recently, Nigel Farage pledged he would abolish the two-child benefit cap if Reform came into power, as part of a '180-degree shift' to reverse low birth rates. But his stance has not yet fully won over the public, who still trust Labour more than any other party to support parents and families, according to Ipsos' poll. This is in spite of Sir Keir Starmer's refusal to remove the two-child benefit cap, after pledging to reduce child poverty, which sparked public rebellion among Labour MPs. Meanwhile, the Tories are less trusted to support families than both Reform and Labour. The party's current leader, Kemi Badenoch, has previously said she believes maternity pay is 'excessive', and that 'families on benefits should make the same responsible decisions about having children as everyone else'. But more than 1 in 5 people said that they don't trust any major party to support families with their policies. Tackling affordable housing is the most popular policy change, which would lead to people having more children, according to 42 per cent of Ipsos respondents. The cost of renting in Britain has now reached new record highs, according to Rightmove , with average asking rent at £1,365 per month. Meanwhile, fewer young people are buying homes, as housing prices are far outpacing wage growth. Over 1 in 3 adults also believe that making childcare more affordable for parents with preschool children would incentivise more people to have children. The government has rolled out 15 hours of free childcare to children aged nine months to two years old, which from September will be extended to 30 hours of childcare a week. However, recent calculations from the Institute of Fiscal Studies, revealed by The Independent, show that uptake is likely to be 25 per cent higher than expected, and since the number of childcare places has barely increased in recent years, it will be a struggle for many to secure places. Improving access to free nursery hours will no doubt be a welcome move, since full-time childcare on average costs between 37 to 43 per cent of the average income in the UK.

Why has it been so difficult for Britain to recognise the state of Palestine?
Why has it been so difficult for Britain to recognise the state of Palestine?

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why has it been so difficult for Britain to recognise the state of Palestine?

Keir Starmer's determination to recognise the state of Palestine begs a simple question. Not so much 'Why?' – for decades, a two-state solution that would see a Palestinian homeland established in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem has been the policy of successive UK governments, and one that was voted for, overwhelmingly, in the Commons 11 years ago. But, rather, how today's announcement following an emergency meeting of the Cabinet, that the British government – exasperated by the ongoing situation in Gaza and the dwindling prospects of a two-state solution with Israel – will formally recognise Palestine in September, could have been quite so long in the making. Britain has played a pivotal role in the pre-history of the present Israeli-Palestinian conflict, starting with the 1917 Balfour Declaration. The then-British foreign secretary's letter to Lord Rothschild promising support for a 'national home for the Jewish people' set our seal on a future Israeli state. While many Palestinians understandably see the Declaration as the root of all their travails, it was intended as a classic diplomatic fudge. It did not actually specify that it would mean a Jewish state in what was then still a division of the Ottoman Empire, but which would soon be under British control following General Allenby's victory over the Turks in the First World War. Moreover, Balfour promised that 'nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine' – which is a quaint way of describing the existing, and then overwhelmingly Arab, population of Palestine. Nor did it say how this protection would be achieved. But none of this alters the fact that, more than a century later, this proviso is the the Balfour Declaration's great unfinished business. Fast forward to May 1948. The declaration of an independent state of Israel by its first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, following the hasty abandonment of territory mandated to British control in 1920 by the League of Nations, and coupled with the Israeli army's successful defence against immediate invasion by five neighbouring Arab states, left the new nation in control of 78 per cent of what had once been British-administered Mandatory Palestine. The Balfour Declaration – along with the United Nations decision to divide the territory into two states, one Arab and one Jewish – would prove pivotal in creating a conflict that still scars the Middle East. But it is subsequent events that explain why formal recognition of an independent, sovereign state of Palestine has still not yet happened. For more than half a century, Western governments – Britain included – have said that there should be a Palestinian state that encompasses Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. But in 1967, when the Six Day War broke out with its neighbours, Israel seized the former territory from Egypt and the latter two others from Jordan. The subsequent UN Resolution 242 called for Israel to withdraw in return for recognition by Arab states – but neither the pullback nor the recognition ever came to pass. At that point in time, Palestinians still hankered after sovereignty over the whole of historic 'Palestine' – including what had already been the state of Israel for almost 20 years, and from which more than 700,000 Palestinians had been forced to flee, in a displacement and dispossession known as the Nakba, meaning 'catastrophe' in Arabic. Israel, far from withdrawing from the territorial gains made during conflicts, has set up settlements, meaning that at least 620,000 Israelis now live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Several of the most extreme members of the Netanyahu government are eager to resettle Gaza in the same way. In 1988, there was a dramatic change of thinking within the then-Palestinian leadership – it's so-called 'historic compromise'. Led by Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian Liberation Organisation would confine its aspiration to sovereignty over the territories occupied in 1967. All negotiations that have taken place since then – at Oslo in 1993, at Camp David in 2000, and between Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas as part of a secret realignment plan that was never implemented – have envisaged, to some degree, a two-state solution, with Israel and Palestine living side by side. Shortly after Arafat's historic compromise, 78 countries recognised the new Palestinian state. Today, the number declaring formal recognition stands at 147. Earlier this month – more than a decade after Sweden became the first EU country to formally acknowledge Palestinian sovereignty, a move followed last year by Ireland, Spain and Norway – the French president Emmanuel Macron became the first leader of a G7 country to promise he will seek to do the same at the UN General Assembly in September. As critics of recognition frequently, and correctly, point out; acknowledging a state of Palestine that includes the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem is essentially notional, since, in the absence of a successful peace process, there is no state to recognise. Though the Palestinian Authority was granted observer status at the United Nations in 2012, along similar lines to that afforded to the Vatican, it has no voting rights. Moreover, the United States has consistently used its veto to block Palestine's full UN membership. As recently as April, the UK abstained in a Security Council resolution vote on the recommendation regarding the admission of Palestine into the UN. Nevertheless, France's move – which paved the way for today's announcement of a road map by Keir Starmer, which is supported by Macron and the German chancellor Friedrich Merz – is not an empty one. It registered growing outrage at the carnage, and the scale of the famine, perpetrated by Israel in Gaza in retaliation for brutal attacks by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023, which killed 1,200 Israelis and took another 251 hostages. The French president is said to have been especially affected by his conversations with Palestinian survivors when he visited Egypt in April. France joining with Saudi Arabia in sponsoring the UN summit currently underway in New York to revive talks into a two-state solution sends a clear political message to Israel's leadership. It is also a reminder that, since 2002, Riyadh has promised to recognise Israel – as Egypt and Jordan have already done – but only if it agrees to a return to pre-1967 borders. Will Britain's belated recognition of a state of Palestine make any difference? It will certainly lend weight and credence to those hoping to change minds in Washington. It would also go some way as an acknowledgement of the UK's historic role and duty in the region. And we can only hope that it might help solve a conflict in which the destruction, killing and starvation in Gaza is but the latest – and direst – consequence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store