RCB get ₹20 crore for winning IPL 2025, runners-up PBKS receive ₹12.5 crore
Ahmedabad, Jun 4 (PTI) Newly-crowned IPL champions Royal Challengers Bengaluru have received ₹ 20 crore for winning the 18th edition of the league while runners-up Punjab Kings got richer by ₹ 12.5 crore.
RCB lifted their maiden title in the world's biggest T20 league by getting the better of PBKS by six runs in an exciting summit showdown here on Tuesday, ending a long wait of 18 years for the team as well as its talisman Virat Kohli.
Third-Place finishers Mumbai Indians earned ₹ 7 crore for reaching Qualifier 2, while the fourth-placed Gujarat Titans were given ₹ 6.5 crore for playing in the Eliminator.
Over the years, the IPL prize money has grown exponentially.
In the inaugural 2008 edition, the winning side received ₹ 4.8 crore, whereas the runner-up team was awarded ₹ 2.4 crore.
DDCA wins 'Best Pitch and Ground' award
============================
The Delhi District Cricket Association (DDCA) has got the 'Best Pitch and Ground' award for the matches held at the Arun Jaitley Stadium. Besides the recognition, DDCA also got richer by ₹ 50 lakh.
The stadium hosted seven matches this season, all of them being preliminary fixtures.
DDCA President Rohan Jaitley expressed his gratitude, stating, "This award is a testament to the tireless work of our curators, staff, and management. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards in cricket infrastructure."
List of winners with prize purse:
Runners-up PBKS: ₹ 12.5 crore
Third-placed Mumbai Indians: ₹ 7 crore
Fourth-placed Gujarat Titans: ₹ 6.5 crore
Orange Cap winner (Sai Sudharsan): ₹ 10 lakh
Purple Cap winner (Prasidh Krishna): ₹ 10 lakh
Emerging Player winner (Sai Sudharsan): ₹ 10 lakh
Most Valuable Player (Suryakumar Yadav): ₹ 15 lakh
Super Striker of the season (Vaibhav Suryavanshi): ₹ 10 lakh Tata Curvv car
Fantasy King of the season (Sai Sudharsan): ₹ 10 lakh
Best Catch winner (Kamindu Mendis): ₹ 10 lakh
Most Dot Balls (Mohammed Siraj): ₹ 10 lakh
Super Sixes (Nicholas Pooran): ₹ 10 lakh
Fours of the season (Sai Sudharsan): ₹ 10 lakh
Fairplay Award (Chennai Super Kings): ₹ 10 lakh
Pitch and Ground (Delhi Capitals home ground New Delhi): ₹ 50 lakh
List of award winners in the RCB vs PBKS final
Player of the Match (Krunal Pandya): ₹ 5 lakh
Super Striker (Jitesh Sharma): ₹ 1 lakh
Most Dot balls (Krunal Pandya): ₹ 1 lakh
Most fours (Priyansh Arya): ₹ 1 lakh
Fantasy King (Shashank Singh): ₹ 1 lakh
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"I Want To Stay Here Too": Father Holds On To Grave Of Son Killed In Stampede
Bengaluru: Out to celebrate the victory of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru in the Indian Premier League, 11 people were killed and 47 were injured when a stampede broke out at the gates of the Chinnaswamy Stadium on Wednesday. The statistics, however, sometimes overshadow the personal tragedies, and a video of a father crying and holding on to his son's grave has brought them sharply into focus. The video shows BT Lakshman - the father of 21-year-old Bhumik Lakshman, who died in the stampede - wailing at his son's grave at their native village in Hassan district. "What happened to my son should not happen to anyone," he says, lying down on the ground with his head pressed against the grave. "The land I had bought for him is where his memorial has been built." Refusing to let go, Mr Lakshman says, "I don't want to go anywhere else now. I want to stay here too," as two other men approach him and help him to his feet. "No father should have to face what I am facing," he laments. A final-year engineering student, Bhumik was among the thousands of people who had gathered outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium on Wednesday to celebrate and catch a glimpse of the players who had won the RCB the IPL title after an 18-year wait. He was among the 11 people, including a 14-year-old girl, who had died in the stampede that followed. Mr Lakshman had spoken to reporters after the tragedy and appealed to the government that his son's body be given to him without being "cut up" during a post-mortem. "I had only one son, and now I have lost him. Please give me his body, don't conduct a post-mortem and cut his body into pieces. The Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister may visit us (the victims of the tragedy), but they can't bring him back," he had said, fighting tears. BJP's Attack The video of Mr Lakshman at his son's grave has also been shared by the Karnataka unit of the BJP, which has accused Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar of being "murderous". "Murderous CM @siddaramaiah sir, murderous DCM @DKShivakumar sir, if you had made up your mind, you could have taken a photo with your children and grandchildren in a luxurious hotel with a cup. But your insistence on taking a photo on the steps of the Vidhana Soudha has made 11 families wash their hands in tears every day. Can you give this father his son back?" the handle of the Karnataka unit of the BJP posted in Kannada on X. The reference was to the felicitation of the RCB players at the Vidhana Soudha - the state legislature complex - where several key Congress leaders, including Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, were present. The Congress, however, has repeatedly accused the BJP of politicising the issue and said the Karnataka government is doing all it can to help the families of the victims and ensure that a tragedy like this doesn't occur again. The police have arrested four people in connection with the stampede and five police officers, including the Bengaluru Police Commissioner, have been suspended. On Friday, the Karnataka government also sacked Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's Political Secretary K Govindaraj as well as the state intelligence department chief.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Poverty in India reduced via tangible boost in household living standards, incomes
New Delhi: The World Bank's revised figures reinforce that poverty in India has reduced not just statistically, but through tangible improvements in household living standards and incomes, according to a government factsheet released on Saturday. India's poverty decline is a story of technical refinement meeting policy results. In the face of a raised poverty benchmark, India showed that more honest data, not diluted standards, can reveal real progress. As the global community recalibrates poverty goals, India's example sets a precedent: evidence-based governance, sustained reforms, and methodological integrity can together deliver transformational outcomes, the factsheet read. The World Bank has announced a major revision to global poverty estimates, raising the International Poverty Line (IPL) from $2.15 per day (2017 PPP) to $3.00 per day (2021 PPP). While the change led to a global increase in the count of extreme poverty by 125 million, India emerged as a statistical outlier in a positive direction. Using more refined data and updated survey methods, India not only withstood the raised threshold but also demonstrated a massive reduction in poverty. The new poverty line would have increased the count of global extreme poverty by 226 million people. But thanks to India's data revision, the net global increase was only 125 million — as India's revised data reduced the count by 125 million on its own, the data showed. India's latest Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) adopted the Modified Mixed Recall Period (MMRP) method, replacing the outdated Uniform Reference Period (URP). This shift used shorter recall periods for frequently purchased items and captured more realistic estimates of actual consumption. As a result, consumption recorded in national surveys rose, leading to a drop in poverty estimates. In 2011–12, applying MMRP reduced India's poverty rate from 22.9 per cent to 16.22 per cent, even under the older $2.15 poverty line. In 2022–23, poverty under the new $3.00 line stood at 5.25 per cent, while under the older $2.15 line, it dropped further to 2.35 per cent. In 2023–24, the average Monthly Per Capita Expenditure (MPCE) was Rs 4,122 in rural areas and Rs 6,996 in urban areas, excluding the value of items received free through social welfare programmes. When these are included, the figures rise to Rs 4,247 and Rs 7,078, respectively. This is significant increase from the rural MPCE of Rs 1,430 and urban MPCE of Rs 2,630 in 2011-12. The urban-rural consumption gap has narrowed from 84 per cent in 2011–12 to 70 per cent in 2023–24, indicating a reduction in consumption disparities between urban and rural households. All 18 major states reported an increase in average MPCE for both rural and urban areas. Odisha experienced the highest rural increase (about 14 per cent), while Punjab saw the highest urban increase (about 13 per cent). 'The Gini coefficient, a measure of consumption inequality, decreased from 0.266 to 0.237 in rural areas and from 0.314 to 0.284 in urban areas between 2022–23 and 2023–24, suggesting a reduction in consumption inequality across most major states,' according to the factsheet.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Crowd management is not an optional job
The tragic loss of lives in the recent stampede in Bengaluru — coinciding with the IPL cricket tournament — underscores a disturbing and recurring reality: crowd management and police bandobast (security deployment) are still too often treated as routine, symbolic, and reactive. At times, they are reduced to photo opportunities rather than the collaborative, preventive effort that public safety demands. While each event has unique features, there are certain non-negotiable principles that must govern crowd safety to prevent tragedy. Organisers must be held to higher standards As per licensing rules, no event should be conducted without official permission from the local administration. Organisers are expected to submit a realistic estimate of the expected turnout, along with details of promotional strategies used for mobilisation. This estimate forms the foundation of all safety and security planning. Once submitted, the police department develops its own plan in coordination with other civil agencies, under the leadership of the chief secretary and the director general of police (DGP). Organisers must be fully co-opted into this process and certify the infrastructural readiness of the venue — including holding capacity, structural condition, maintenance, availability of emergency exits, and suitability of location. Free-entry events or overselling tickets often attract unpredictable crowds, increasing the risk of stampedes. Organisers must also provide details on event timing — especially if held after sunset — and submit plans for safety measures during those hours. Adequate signage to guide spectators to exits, restrooms, and medical services is essential. Backup power supply, clean drinking water, sanitation, and clear crowd dispersal protocols are basic requirements. Parking for buses, cars, and two-wheelers must be well-organised with signage and token systems to regulate flow and deter theft. Private security must be hired to supplement police deployment. Surveillance tools such as CCTV systems should be mandatory, and organisers must establish a control room for real-time monitoring with proper logging and preservation of footage. If the event is profit-oriented, the organisers must bear the cost of policing, as per standard protocol. These funds are rightly routed to police welfare. Police bandobast While organisers bear the initial burden of preparation, the ultimate responsibility for law and order lies with the political leadership and civil administration. Planning begins at police headquarters, where senior officers coordinate with sister agencies — municipal bodies, fire departments, medical teams, and disaster response units. This integrated effort must be led by the chief secretary. Manpower needs are assessed based on the event's nature, location, and expected crowd size. Venues should be mapped and divided into manageable sectors, each under the charge of designated officers as per an official, written deployment plan. Every officer must receive clear verbal and written briefings outlining their duties, assigned positions, and key points of contact. Importantly, potential 'X-factor' scenarios — such as sudden surges, VIP movements, weather disruptions, or technical failures — must be anticipated and planned for. Contingency planning is not a luxury; it is an operational necessity. Senior officers must ensure seamless coordination with political leadership, especially for high-profile or sensitive events. However, they must also retain professional autonomy when it comes to enforcing safety norms. Any directive that compromises crowd safety should be firmly resisted. Breakdowns in communication between top-level commanders and ground-level personnel are among the most dangerous and common causes of failure during large events. This gap must be eliminated through continuous updates, situational awareness, and robust feedback loops during the event. Who pays the price when systems fail? These protocols are not theoretical — they are drilled into police officers during training. So why are they often ignored when it matters most? In the case of the IPL tragedy, both political pressure and commercial interest appear to have played a role. Truth will emerge with time, with the hurried announcement of suspension of the police commissioner. Whatever the cause, the result is the same: ordinary citizens pay with their lives, while VIPs remain protected in cushioned zones, issuing statements and announcing ex gratia payments — not from their own pockets, but from the public exchequer. Time for structural accountability The ongoing inquiry must answer key questions- was the required application for conducting the event submitted?Were red flags raised by the police ignored? Who overruled safety objections — and why? We must demand accountability. Law and order is not a discretionary favour to the public — it is a core duty of the state. Public safety is what the police and civil administration are trained, recruited, and paid to ensure. Tragedies at public events are not 'accidents' if they were predictable and preventable. They are institutional failures — of planning, of enforcement, and sometimes, of courage. It is time we asked: Who failed? And who paid the price? And perhaps it is time to name and shame — not out of vindictiveness, but in pursuit of genuine accountability and reform. (The writer, India's first female IPS officer, is former lieutenant governor of Puducherry)
