U.K. parliament poised to decriminalize abortion in England and Wales as crime bill amendment passes easily
London — British lawmakers voted Tuesday to decriminalize abortion in England and Wales after a lawmaker argued it was cruel to prosecute women for ending a pregnancy. The House of Commons approved an amendment to a broader crime bill that would prevent women from being criminally punished under an antiquated law.
Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour Party member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said the change was needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths.
"This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help," she said. "Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end."
The amendment passed 379-137. The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked.
Protesters from the "Abortion Rights" group gather near the U.K. Parliament in London, where lawmakers were voting on an amendment to decriminalize abortion, June 17, 2025.
Alishia Abodunde/Getty
Under current law, doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019. There is no specific law in Scotland barring abortions, and the country is generally viewed as more lenient in its approach to enforcing other laws that could apply in abortion cases, though rights advocates continue to call for a domestic law specifically decriminalizing the act.
Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks in England and Wales. That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more.
Anti-abortion groups opposed the measures, arguing it would open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy.
"Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers," said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the U.K.'s biggest pro-life campaign group.
The debate came after recent prosecutions have galvanized support to repeal parts of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.
In one case, a mother of three was sentenced to more than two years in prison in 2023 for medically inducing an abortion about eight months into her pregnancy.
Carla Foster, 45, was released about a month later by an appeals court that reduced her sentence. Judge Victoria Sharp said that case called for "compassion, not punishment" and there was no useful purpose in jailing her.
Last month, a jury acquitted Nicola Packer on a charge of unlawfully self-administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to procure a miscarriage. Packer, who took abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant, testified that she did not know she had been pregnant more than 10 weeks.
Supporters of the bill said it was a landmark reform that would keep women from going to prison for ending their pregnancy.
"At a time when we're seeing rollbacks on reproductive rights, most notably in the United States, this crucial milestone in the fight for reproductive rights sends a powerful message that our lawmakers are standing up for women," said Louise McCudden of MSI Reproductive Choices.
A second amendment that would have gone even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses, did not get to a vote.
A competing Conservative measure that would have required an in-person appointment for a pregnant woman to get abortion pills was defeated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
UK Inheritance Tax Surge on Rich Was Mistake, Policy Author Says
One of the architects of the UK Labour government's flagship crackdown on the wealthy said it was a 'mistake' to expose non-doms to an immediate 40% inheritance tax on their overseas assets. Arun Advani, director of the independent Centre for the Analysis of Taxation, told Bloomberg News he had recommended staggering the introduction of IHT on the super-rich who live in Britain but are not resident for tax purposes. A gradual approach would have stopped many of them leaving the country, he said.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
British parliament takes first step toward decriminalizing late-term abortions
The British parliament took the first step toward decriminalizing late-term abortions in England and Wales on Tuesday. In a 379-137 vote, the House of Commons approved an amendment to a broader crime bill to prevent women from being prosecuted for having abortions after the legal limit, potentially through birth. The current law prohibits abortions after 24 weeks, except under specific circumstances such as the life of the mother. Labour Member of Parliament Tonia Antoniazzi, who introduced the amendment, said the change was necessary on behalf of the more than 100 women investigated over the last five years for suspected illegal abortions. As quoted by the Associated Press, she said, "This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help." Antoniazzi added, "Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end." Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic now allow UK women to receive abortion pills through the mail for use within the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. That has led to several instances in which women were prosecuted for obtaining abortion pills illegally to terminate pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. One woman, a mother of three, was sentenced to two years in prison for medically inducing an abortion around her eight-month mark in 2023. An appeals court reduced her sentence a month later, and she was released. The judge said that case called for "compassion, not punishment" and there was no useful purpose in jailing her. Alithea Williams of the UK Society for the Protection of Unborn Children condemned the vote in a statement. "We are horrified that MPs have voted for this extreme and barbaric proposal. If this clause becomes law, a woman who aborts her baby at any point in pregnancy, even moments before birth, would not be committing a criminal offence," Williams said. "In fact, by dismissing the Infant Life Preservation Act intended to provide legal protection to a child during birth, a woman who killed her baby during delivery would not be committing an offence." "And this has been pushed by an abortion lobby cynically exploiting a situation that they brought about," she added. "The cases they use of women being prosecuted for abortion – a number in the single digits – came about because of a policy they championed – sending women abortion pills in the post without in person appointments." Another amendment would have prohibited medical professionals from being prosecuted for helping a woman obtain an abortion, but it did not get a vote. The crime bill must now pass through the House of Commons before proceeding to the House of Lords. It can be delayed there, but not blocked.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Police Mishandled Fatal Crash Between American Driver and U.K. Teenager, Review Says
An independent review has sharply criticized the police in Britain over their handling of a 2019 road collision between an American driver and a teenage British motorcyclist in which the teenager died and the American subsequently fled the country on a claim of diplomatic immunity. The review, a 118-page report published on Wednesday, said that the police should have arrested the American driver, Anne Sacoolas, at the scene and that officers later mishandled forensic evidence. It also found fault with a senior officer's social media posts and public remarks about the case, and with how officers interacted with the parents of the 19-year-old victim, Harry Dunn. In publicizing the findings on Wednesday, the Northamptonshire Police, the force that was responsible for the case, apologized to Mr. Dunn's parents, Charlotte Charles and Tim Dunn. 'The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts,' Emma James, the Northamptonshire Police's head of protective services, said in a statement. The fatal crash occurred as Ms. Sacoolas, a U.S. State Department employee whose husband worked for the American government at a British military base, was driving on the wrong side of the road near the village of Croughton, in central England, in August 2019. Mr. Dunn, whom her car struck, died later in a hospital. The episode caused international friction when Ms. Sacoolas left Britain three weeks after the crash, claiming diplomatic immunity. Britain issued an extradition request for her return, but the U.S. government rejected it, arguing in a statement at the time that honoring it 'would render the invocation of diplomatic immunity a practical nullity and would set an extraordinarily troubling precedent.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
