Law firms Kramer Levin and Herbert Smith Freehills approve merger
The deal is expected to take effect on June 1. The firms said the combination will create a top 20 firm globally, with over $2 billion in revenue and 26 offices.
The two firms had announced plans to merge in November. The combined firm will be called Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer.
Kramer Levin has offices in New York, Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C. The firm had nearly 340 lawyers and generated more than $435 million in total revenue in 2023, according to figures reported by the American Lawyer.
Herbert Smith Freehills is the product of a 2012 merger between London-founded Herbert Smith and Australian law firm Freehills. It has more than 2,400 lawyers in 23 offices globally, with New York as its sole U.S. outpost, according to its website. The firm generated more than $1.6 billion in revenue in 2023, the American Lawyer reported.
More than 50 lawyers from Kramer Levin's Paris office, which was not slated to be part of the merger, joined Morgan, Lewis & Bockius at the beginning of the year.
Paul Schoeman and Howard Spilko, co-managing partners of New York-founded Kramer Levin, in a Friday statement said combining with HSF "enables us to achieve our shared vision and potential for strategic growth in the U.S."
Law firms with roots in the U.K. have long sought growth in the U.S. legal market, including through mergers and partner hires in major U.S. cities.
London-founded Allen & Overy and New York's Shearman & Sterling last year completed a transatlantic merger to create A&O Shearman, which has nearly 4,000 lawyers globally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
No-fault evictions surge under Labour
The number of 'no-fault' evictions has surged under Labour as landlords rush to free up properties ahead of rent reforms that will ban the practice. So-called Section 21 evictions enforced by bailiffs rose by 8pc in the 12 months since Sir Keir Starmer was handed the keys to Downing Street, new figures show. Section 21 notices allow landlords to force renters out during their tenancy without needing a specified reason. It comes after Rushanara Ali, the Government's homelessness minister, was forced to resign after it was revealed she evicted tenants at her London property before increasing the rent. There were 11,402 repossessions by county court bailiffs following a Section 21 notice in the year to June, up from 10,576 from the previous 12 months, according to Ministry of Justice figures. The notices are served on tenants by landlords to begin the process of regaining possession of a property despite their shorthold tenancy not having expired. Under Labour's Renters' Rights Bill, landlords will need to apply for a hearing before they can evict a tenant. During the same period, there were 30,729 uses of fast-track evictions. These are available to landlords when a tenant has not left the property by a specified date. This was a slight drop from 32,103 in the preceding 12 months. A spokesman for the National Residential Landlord Association said: 'It is concerning that the number of bailiff repossessions relating to no-fault proceedings is increasing at a time when claims, orders warrants, and overall repossessions are decreasing year on year according to the Ministry of Justice's latest statistics. 'This illustrates that, even after receiving a court order to leave a property, tenants are opting to wait until they are removed by a bailiff. This is not in the interest of households or landlords, all of whom will have to endure additional stress and costs associated with evictions.' Last week Ms Ali quit her role as homelessness minister amid claims she gave tenants at a property she owned in east London four months' notice to leave before relisting the property with a £700 rent increase within weeks. Ms Ali's house was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only relisted as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i newspaper. Her actions went against Labour's flagship Renters' Rights Bill, which is in the final stages of becoming law, and introduces stronger protections for tenants. Once the law comes in, landlords who evict their tenants in order to sell their property will be banned from relisting it as a rental for six months. Instead, buy-to-let owners will only be able to evict for a very limited number of reasons, using a Section 8 notice, which requires a court hearing. The bill will also introduce a 12-month protected period from eviction at the start of a tenancy. Mairi MacRae, from homelessness charity Shelter, said: 'It is unconscionable that more than a year after the Government came to power, thousands of renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the Government said would be scrapped immediately.' A government spokesman said: 'No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill, which is a manifesto commitment and legislative priority for this Government. 'We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the Bill becomes law.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
UK's Turing AI Institute bosses respond to staff anger in letter
The heads of the UK's national institute for artificial intelligence (AI) have told staff they accept recent months have been "challenging" for staff as the charity undergoes "substantial" comes after staff raised "serious and escalating concerns" in a whistleblowing complaint this week submitted to the Charity warned the charity - which receives £100m from the government - is at risk of collapse after Technology Secretary Peter Kyle instructed it to prioritise defence, and threatened to pull its funding if it did a letter seen by the BBC, Chair Dr Doug Gurr said the Turing institute would "step up at a time of national need". He said it had already established a new senior working group comprising government officials and Turing institute whistleblowers have described the management's response as "performative"."Just talk, no action, nothing has changed," they said, speaking to the BBC on condition of anonymity because they fear losing their jobs for speaking out. Dr Gurr and Chief Executive Dr Jean Innes did not respond directly to accusations by the whistleblowers about a toxic internal culture of "retaliation" and "defensiveness". The pair said they had not seen the letter sent from whistleblowers to the Charity Commission, which has been shared with the BBC."We are committed to conducting our business with honesty, integrity and transparency and believe that a culture of openness and accountability is essential," they wrote, and linked to the Turing institute's whistleblowing whistleblowers and Peter Kyle have all called for an overhaul of leadership - but there was no mention of any change in the management team.A number of senior staff have left the organisation in recent months, and bosses said more people would either be made redundant or not have their contracts renewed as the restructure continues. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Why I'm ignoring Rachel Reeves's investment tips
As a relatively new mum, I recently stumbled across some top-tier parenting advice on Instagram. In a charming video, a fellow parent told me: 'You can't make a happy baby happier.' The idea is that if your child is occupied and settled, do not interfere under any circumstances. You might think that they could play with their piano 'the right way', but in fact bashing the entire toy against their teddy bear is working just fine. If you disrupt them, they may not be happy playing with the piano at all. I suppose it's a parent's take on the idiom 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' — a mantra that Rachel Reeves should perhaps observe. In her speech to investment bigwigs at Mansion House last month, the chancellor outlined a series of reforms that she hopes will create a nation of investors. As part of it, we will all be allowed to hold long-term asset funds in our stocks and shares Isas. Long-term asset funds, or LTAFs, were introduced in 2021 for those who wanted to invest in long-term, illiquid assets such as private equity or infrastructure. These types of funds are designed to hold the sort of assets that typical investment funds struggle to buy and sell fast enough to meet investor withdrawals. The initial target audience were managers running defined contribution pension schemes. Many analysts say that these sorts of investments are not suitable for most investors. They often involve businesses that have high rates of collapse and assets that can take years to sell. Returns can be volatile, and detailed information about the companies involved is tricky to get your hands on. But even outside this argument, Reeves's LTAF push ignores the fact that there is already a long-established, successful method for ordinary investors to invest in assets such as infrastructure, property and private companies: investment trusts. • Rachel Reeves could solve all her problems with a VAT raid These trusts are similar to investment funds in that they aim to make money for their investors by buying shares and other assets. The difference is that, unlike investment funds where you buy units in a fund, investors buy and sell shares in investment trusts on the stock exchange the way that they would buy or sell shares in Lloyds Banking Group or Microsoft. This means that the price you get for your investment when you sell is generally determined by what someone is willing to pay for it on the open market. It also means that they are the ideal home for the type of long-term, illiquid assets that Reeves is pushing through LTAFs. You can sell your shares whenever you want, without needing the trust's manager to sell any of their investments. As Laith Khalaf from the investment platform AJ Bell puts it: 'For retail investors, LTAFs are a solution to a problem that never existed.' And because they are companies in their own right (you may see them referred to as 'investment companies'), you can easily access them through most investment platforms. 'LTAFs are a total waste of time for private investors. Investment trusts are already excellent vehicles for investing in illiquid assets,' said Ben Yearsley from the wealth manager Fairview Investing. 'And LTAFs will struggle to take off unless they are easy to buy on investment platforms. Platforms do not like anything that is unusual and isn't dealt on a daily basis, and LTAFs are likely to have quarterly or six-monthly dealing.' Investors can also feel confident about investment trusts' past performance, although as any T&Cs worth their salt will tell you, this is not indicative of future returns. The data company Numis found that over ten years investment trusts outperformed investment funds in every sector except for the UK small-cap and Japanese small-cap sectors. It's worth saying that the investment trust world is not without its problems. There has been a prolonged spell of poor performance, and discounts (when an investment trust's share price means that its value is less than the value of the assets that it owns) have widened significantly over the past few years, but things seem to be moving in the right direction. Discounts have narrowed since the start of the year — so share prices are moving skywards — and some investors have done well from buyouts, mergers and share buybacks. In fact, a recent buyout of the Downing Renewables & Infrastructure trust means that there is an infrastructure-focused investment trust hole in my portfolio. And I don't need to wait for LTAFs to become available in my stocks and shares Isa to fill it. The options in the investment trust world are plentiful. In infrastructure, the best performing investment trust over the past decade is 3i Infrastructure. It has a total return (including dividends) of 178 per cent over the past ten years and takes more of a 'private equity' style approach to infrastructure investing (so there is slightly more equity-style risk). If I wanted something that specifically invests in renewable energy infrastructure, as my previous holding had, then the top performers include Greencoat UK Wind, which has a total return of 78 per cent over ten years and Foresight Solar, up 64 per cent. A report last year by the consultancy PwC estimated the total global requirement for infrastructure investment to be about $3.9 trillion (£2.9 trillion) a year. Once you add in the Labour government's pledge to double onshore wind, triple solar power and quadruple offshore wind by 2030, alongside its plans to overhaul planning laws, then the combination of infrastructure and renewables seems a potential winner. There are, of course, ways in which the investment trust sector could improve. At the moment there are too many trusts available, it is still reeling from the Saba saga, where investor activists bought up shares in trusts to try to force through changes, and discounts could be narrower. But as a place for investing in long-term illiquid assets, it is certainly a happy one. And as I have learnt from my young son, Reeves is unlikely to do much good by trying to make it happier.
