
Intelligence leaders are set to brief Congress on Trump's Iran strikes
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Members of Congress will hear directly from President Donald Trump 's intelligence leaders Tuesday, receiving classified briefings just three days after Trump directed strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and a day after Iran struck a US base in Qatar.The briefings also come the day after Trump proclaimed on social media that Israel and Iran had agreed that there will be an "Official END" of their conflict.Democrats in Congress, along with some Republicans, have questions about Trump's unilateral decision to launch military action, arguing he should have come to Congress for approval - or at least provided more justification for the attacks."We expect them to explain to the American people what were the results in terms of actually thwarting Iran's capacity to become a nuclear power and what are the Trump administration's plans to avoid another potentially disastrous war in the Middle East, where thousands of American lives are potentially at risk," said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries.The separate briefings for the House and Senate will be led by CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, along with Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and deputy secretaries of state Christopher Landau and Steve Feinberg.The meetings could turn contentious as many lawmakers feel they have been left in the dark on what led to the strikes and amid escalating tensions between the White House and Congress over the role of the United States internationally - disagreements that don't always fall along party lines.Democrats have been generally suspicious of Trump's strategy, and his motives abroad, but some believe the U.S. could have a role in supporting Israel against Iran. Others strongly believe the U.S. should stay out of it.Some of Trump's strongest Republican supporters agree with the Democrats, echoing his earlier arguments against "forever wars." But many others in the party enthusiastically backed the strikes, saying he should have the power to act on his own."President Trump deserves all the credit," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., after Trump said there would be a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. "This is what peace through strength looks like."Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, suggested in a post on X that Trump should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., posted: "Historic! The President of Peace!"Democrats said they would be looking for more information about the ceasefire that Trump claimed on social media. Israel and Iran did not immediately acknowledge any ceasefire.After Iran's retaliation on the U.S. base in Qatar on Monday, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said he wanted an additional classified briefing "laying out the full threat picture, the intelligence behind Iran's retaliation, and the details, scope, and timeline of any US. response."Senate Democrats are also forcing a vote as soon as this week on a resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., requiring congressional approval for specific military action in Iran."You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not," Kaine said Monday.Communication between the White House and Congress about Iran has been limited for most members. Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell.Trump said the attacks were "limited in scope and purpose" and "designed to minimize casualties, deter future attacks and limit the risk of escalation."Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, said he wants to ask the intelligence officials what they know about the damage done by the bombings, and how successful they were."There's a reason why the Constitution requires the Congress to be informed and the president to seek approval in beginning a war, which is the founders thought that the people should have a say, that the president shouldn't act alone," Blumenthal said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?
US President Donald Trump hinted at a "regime change" in Iran just hours after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday, 'This mission [US attacking Iran's nuclear sites] was not and has not been about regime change.' The idea of killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also surfaced during the Iran-Israel conflict. It was said that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the Iranian Supreme Leader, but the US President later claimed Khamenei was an "easy target" but would not be killed, "at least for now". This left the door open for a discussion of what exactly President Trump meant by "regime change." Meanwhile, Israel, which is in conflict with Iran, has not ruled out killing Khamenei. Last week, Israel Defense Minister Israel Katz said of Khamenei: 'This man absolutely should not continue to exist.' Cambridge dictionary defines a 'regime change' as a complete change of government, especially one brought about by force. Meanwhile, Britannica says a regime change refers to the overthrow of a government considered illegitimate by an external force and its replacement with a new government according to the ideas or interests promoted by that force. Simply put, a change of regime means forming a new government. In case of Iran, a regime change would require Israel or the US having a figure in mind to replace Khamenei and send troops to the country, Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, DC, told CNN. A delay in choosing the new Supreme Leader could fuel another possibility for a regime change in Iran. Iran's government is a unique hybrid system which has elements of a theocracy and a republic. The Supreme Leader is at the top of Iran's power structure. He is "the guardian jurist who is effectively Iran's leader for life," the CRF explained. The president is the second-highest-ranking official in Iran. Particularly, Khamenei, the 86-year-old cleric, has ruled Iran for more than 35 years as its highest authority, rising to power a decade after the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew a US-backed monarch. So, what will happen if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dies? Will his death lead to a regime change? Khamenei can be replaced by a new leader, but changing the regime itself is likely to trigger unrest in the Islamic Republic. Choosing a leader on time may not necessarily lead to a "regime change" in Iran. After US strikes in Iran, The New York Times, citing sources, reported that Khamenei has chosen three successors as his replacement in case military commanders die in Israeli strikes. However, the US reportedly fears that Iran could get "somebody worse than Khamenei," a source told the New York Post. Experts reportedly said that if the Supreme Leader is killed and the Guardian Council delays naming a successor, the risk of instability could grow. Parsi from Quincy Institute in Washington also warned that "a possible outcome of Khamenei's potential killing is total regime collapse." One possible scenario is Iran's various ethnic groups vying for power after Khamenei's death. Experts say that any attempt at regime change in Iran risks collapsing the state altogether – "a scenario that could splinter Iran and send shockwaves across the Middle East," CNN reported. Earlier, The Telegraph reported that Khamenei's death could create a vacuum at the heart of the government that might trigger internal strife and civil unrest. This is because Khamenei's death is likely to create opportunities for Iran's ethnic minority groups to rise up. Reports suggest that separatist groups who have long opposed the Islamic Republic may seek to take advantage of what they may see as an opportunity. This could "potentially ignite local conflicts that could spiral into a broader civil war." If Iran's regime falls, 'there would be support for ethnic separatist groups by the Israelis, and perhaps the US,' Parsi said. This would lead to a situation where remnants of the state are going to be consumed with fighting separatists. Another possibility is "military intervention", which "rarely leads to democratisation," Hamed Mousavi, associate professor of International Relations at the University of Tehran, told CNN. "Military factions that could take over are 'not going to be the type of regime that the US may have had in mind,' Parsi said. "They are unlikely to seek diplomatic routes with Israel or the US, but could take a more hawkish approach that sees possession of a nuclear bomb as the only deterrent to more attacks," Parsi said.

Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal
/ Jun 24, 2025, 01:27PM IST Iran and Israel have finally agreed for ceasefire implementation hours after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire on Truth Social. Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi praised armed forces for relentless strikes against Israel until the ceasefire deadline. He denied any ceasefire agreement exists, warning Israel to halt aggression by 4 a.m. Tehran time to avoid further retaliation. Iran launched six waves of ballistic missiles targeting central and southern Israel, killing four civilians in Beersheba when a missile hit an apartment building. Israeli forces intercepted most missiles but one made impact. The intense missile barrage occurred minutes before the proposed ceasefire phase began, reflecting high regional tensions. Araghchi stressed the final decision on ending military operations is pending, signaling uncertainty in the fragile conflict's future.#IsraelIranCeasefire #MiddleEastTensions #TrumpNews #TehranStrikes #BreakingNews #QatarMediation #IDFUpdates #IranCrisis #Geopolitics #Ceasefire2025 #WorldAtWar #PeaceOrWar #GlobalAlert #USForeignPolicy #MideastConflict


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response
News about a missile attack by Iran on Israel after the ceasefire between the two countries took effect is "denied", Iranian media reported, quoting state TV. "Victory has forced Israel to unilaterally accept defeat and stop its aggression" said Iran, as quoted by Fars News. Israeli military said earlier it detected missile launches from Iran to which Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said Israel would respond 'forcefully'. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. The Israeli military reported two missiles fired from Iran mid-morning on Tuesday, leading sirens to blare in the north several hours after US president Trump announced a ceasefire plan, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reports. The army initially said it had identified missiles launched from Iran 2.5 hours after the start of the ceasefire. 'Two missiles were launched from Iran and they were intercepted,' a military official told AFP on condition of anonymity, with the army saying people could leave shelters about 15 minuutes after the first alert. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he has ordered the country's military to respond forcefully to what he said was Iran's violation of a ceasefire with Israel, Reuters reports. The directive followed an announcement by the military that it had detected missile launches from Iran towards Israel. The Israeli military said it was working to shoot down Iranian missiles after detecting the launch. Earlier, US president Donald Trump had said that the ceasefire was now in effect. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. He said, "In light of Iran's blatant violation of the ceasefire declared by the President of the United States – through the launch of missiles toward Israel – and in accordance with the Israeli government's policy to respond forcefully to any breach, I have instructed the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) … to continue high-intensity operations targeting regime assets and terror infrastructure in Tehran.