logo
Africa Day: The AU's Struggle to Silence the Guns

Africa Day: The AU's Struggle to Silence the Guns

IOL News23-05-2025
FLEEING residents from Sake, Eastern DRC alongside SANDF peacekeepers on February 7, 2024. The persistence of war and armed violence across regions of the continent has not only undermined the gains of economic integration, but it has also eviscerated the foundational promise of Agenda 206, says the writer.
Image: AFP
Zamikhaya Maseti
2025 marks 61 years since the founding of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), a historic convergence of visionaries and revolutionaries on May 25, 1963, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
This day has since become no ordinary one. It is a ritual of remembrance, a collective drumbeat for the dream of African unity, a dream rooted not in geographical proximity, but in spiritual and political solidarity.
In 2001, the OAU shed its skin and emerged as the African Union (AU), not as a betrayal of its founding ideals, but as an adaptation to a new global order. The torch passed, but the fire remained. In its early reconstitution, the AU sought to move from rhetoric to resolution, symbolism to structure.
In an assertion of Continental will and unity of purpose, the African Union ushered forth a landmark vision, Agenda 2063, as both a philosophical compass and policy blueprint. This 50-year vision is not a mere catalogue of developmental aspirations, but rather a strategic architecture crafted to catalyse Africa's renaissance.
One of the most consequential embodiments of this vision has been the historic establishment of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), a cornerstone in the architecture of continental economic reintegration.
As member states increasingly operationalise and harness the AfCFTA, what emerges is a palpable shift in the patterns of intra-African trade from fragmented, externally dependent economies to a more harmonised, internally networked market. The African continent is undoubtedly charting commendable waters on the frontiers of economic integration.
However, to mistake economic consolidation for holistic development would be a perilous fallacy. The work is not complete. It is not yet Uhuru.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Despite the rhythms of trade liberalisation and industrial corridors emerging in the headlines, a silent catastrophe haunts many parts of the continent. The very soil that cradles the Nile and once nourished civilizational brilliance is today the stage of starvation. The recently released Global Report on Food Crises, a collaboration by the Food Security Information Network and UNICEF, casts a glaring light upon this contradiction.
According to the findings, more than one-third of all people globally facing acute food insecurity are located in sub-Saharan Africa. We must confront the uncomfortable truth: Africa cannot trade its way out of famine unless it feeds itself first. Economic integration without agrarian transformation is an illusion.
If hunger is the symptom, then conflict is the wound that refuses to close. It bleeds across the map of Africa, an old affliction wearing new uniforms. The persistence of war and armed violence across regions of the continent has not only undermined the gains of economic integration, but it has also eviscerated the foundational promise of Agenda 2063: an Africa at peace with itself.
As we stand well into the third decade of this century, the drums of war have not ceased; they have only shifted theatres. From Sudan to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), from the Cabo Delgado region of Mozambique to the Sahel, the spectre of instability continues to unravel the threads of development, deepen humanitarian crises, and rob the Continent's youth of their futures.
The once hopeful promise of civilian-led governance lies buried beneath rubble and charred ministries.
Peacekeeping forces once lauded as the moral presence of global solidarity are now constrained, fatigued, and in retreat. The international community watches impotently, inert, ensnared by geopolitical fatigue and donor disillusionment.
South Africa, Africa's economic heavyweight and long considered a regional stabiliser, has not been spared the costs of its commitments. The recent loss of 14 soldiers in a deadly engagement in the DRC marks not only a human tragedy but a brutal reminder: African peacekeeping is increasingly paid for in African blood.
And the African Union? Once conceived as the moral heir to Pan-Africanism's dreams, it finds itself shackled by the limits of its diplomatic instruments. Conflict resolution mechanisms remain reactionary, underfunded, and often perceived as politically compromised. The result is a tragic irony: the very institution entrusted with 'African solutions to African problems' is itself engulfed in a crisis of credibility.
Africa is bleeding. And peace has become a deferred dream.
Africa's path to peace is jagged, riddled with contradictions, ambiguities, and unfinished transitions. If conflict is the fire, then constitutional fragility is the smoke that darkens the skies of continental progress. And nowhere is this drama more starkly performed than in the resurgent wave of coups d'état, particularly across the Sahel region.
The return of military rule is not merely a political regression. It is an ontological crisis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We need to ignore meaningless commissions and build on our hard-won freedoms
We need to ignore meaningless commissions and build on our hard-won freedoms

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

We need to ignore meaningless commissions and build on our hard-won freedoms

The irony of the map of Africa With reference to the spat between the ANC, EFF and MKP regarding Jacob Zuma's visit to Morocco, it is amusing to observe their defence of colonialism's biggest legacy in the light of their fervent anti-colonial rhetoric and historical "struggle" against colonialism. The territorial demarcation of the map of Africa is colonialism's most enduring legacy. The boundaries of colonies were the result of territorial and economic greed among the European colonisers, each scrambling in the late 19th century to aggrandize their empires. Through invasion and conquest, the intervention of European powers in Africa was a violent collision between Western and African cultures the aftershocks of which persist to this day. The biggest mistake the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) made on its formation in 1963 was its failure to redraw the map of Africa based on tribal and cultural integrity. Instead, the newly emancipated pursued power and prestige as presidents of the "states" bequeathed to them by colonialism. The only territory to break free of the colonial map is Eritrea – after a brutal and devastating 40- year war with Ethiopia. History shows that boundaries are not permanent. Eastern Europe's boundaries changed twice in the 20th century – post World War I and after the collapse of the USSR. Currently, separatist movements exist in Scotland and Spain. There is even one in the Western Cape. So it is ironic that the ANC, EFF and MKP are vociferous about preserving national sovereignty based on colonial boundaries. It's a pity that fondness does not extend to some of the worthwhile legacies of colonialism, such as medicine, education and infrastructure. | DR DUNCAN DU BOIS Bluff A tale of dreadful suffering and woe This is the most severe and devastating phase of starvation the Gaza Strip has experienced. Without exaggeration or distortion, the population is currently enduring a real famine. Humanitarian aid is virtually nonexistent. Available goods are extremely scarce and limited. Prices have reached astronomical levels, unaffordable even for those who still possess financial means. Most citizens, already exhausted by war and repeated displacement alerts, no longer have any money. The commission fees on withdrawing funds can be up to 45%. Numerous individuals have reported that for several days, they and their children have not eaten bread – the staple and often sole item on the table – because the price of 1kg of flour has reached $20 (R355). Other food items are simply inaccessible. Despite claims made nearly a month ago, when Prime Minister Netanyahu announced the allowance of humanitarian aid into Gaza – including the entrance of aid trucks through border crossings and the operations of Israeli-­American companies distributing food in high-risk zones (which, according to the latest UN report, resulted in the deaths of 798 civilians) – the reality on the ground remains starkly different. From the beginning, we warned that these aid deliveries were nothing more than misleading media propaganda intended to silence international criticism and obscure the ongoing campaign of military extermination being carried out by the occupying forces .In truth, more than 80% of the population does not receive any of this aid due to multiple factors: The general scarcity of aid, widespread theft and looting along the supply chain and in storage facilities, and serious deficiencies in logistical organisation and distribution mechanisms. In practical terms, civilians in Gaza have been under total siege and subjected to deliberate starvation since March 2, 2025 – the date the occupying forces closed the border crossings. That was 131 consecutive days ago. Since then, nothing new has entered their homes. Moreover, the population has been completely deprived of all meat products, dairy, vegetables, and fruits. The limited aid that does arrive consists solely of canned goods, dried legumes, and starchy foods such as rice and pasta. Additionally, the complete lack of access to essential medications has led to thousands of preventable deaths. This is an urgent message to all concerned parties: Gaza's people are enduring one of the most extreme forms of starvation, torture, and denial of their basic human rights – especially of late. The narrative that aid is entering Gaza and reaching those in need is profoundly misleading. The reality is that most of the population – those who are paying the price with their lives and health – continue to be denied access to food and critical resources, while propaganda serves the interests of those benefiting from false claims about aid distribution. | Alaa (full name withheld) Gaza Strip Commissions of inquiry rarely of value A few weeks ago, South Africans heard serious allegations about the existence and operation of a sophisticated criminal syndicate that has allegedly infiltrated law enforcement structures. On Sunday, July 13, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the formation of a commission of inquiry to focus on the shocking allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi and how the alleged deep-rooted corruption will be addressed. While I agree that the allegations must be attended to with the necessary diligence and that all parties must be given a fair chance to express themselves, citizens are tired of the many costly, time-consuming and unsuccessful commissions of inquiry. The most famous commission of inquiry, the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in the Public Sector, also known as the Zondo Commission, has yet to see its recommendations fully implemented or justice served against those who benefited from the abuse of power and state capture. Instead of a 'leave of absence', Ramaphosa should have suspended Minister Senzo Mchunu as a deterrent measure, thoroughly investigated the allegations, and then, if proven on a balance of probabilities, dismissed the minister after a fair that have the potential to uncover the truth only matter if their findings lead to action and are backed by consequences, sanctions, and justice. | MOHAMED SAEED Pietermaritzburg We need to build on the freedoms we won As we navigate the complexities of our 30-year democracy, it's essential to remember the principles that guided our struggle for freedom and continue to shape our path towards a more just and equitable society. In South Africa, we have made significant progress since the dawn of democracy. We've built a Constitution that enshrines the rights and freedoms of all citizens, regardless of race, gender, or creed. We've made strides in promoting social justice, addressing the legacy of apartheid, and building a more inclusive economy. However, we still face significant challenges. Inequality, poverty, and unemployment remain pressing issues, and we need to work together to address them. As liberals, we believe that individual freedom, equality, and democracy are essential to creating a society where everyone can thrive. We need to promote economic growth, investment, and job creation, while ensuring the benefits of growth are shared fairly among all South Africans. We need to protect and strengthen our democratic institutions, ensuring that they remain accountable to the people and responsive to their also need to celebrate our diversity and promote social cohesion. South Africa is a rainbow nation, and our diversity is our strength. By embracing our differences and promoting tolerance, we can build a more harmonious and inclusive society. As liberals, we believe the answers to South Africa's challenges lie in our shared values of freedom, equality, and democracy. We need to work together, across party lines and sectors, to build a brighter future for all South Africans. Let us continue to uphold these liberal values, working together to build a South Africa where everyone can live with dignity, pursue their dreams, and contribute to the greater good. A South Africa where freedom, equality, and democracy thrive. | Thulani Dasa Khayelitsha DAILY NEWS

The death of a former Zambian president: diplomacy, grief and ubuntu
The death of a former Zambian president: diplomacy, grief and ubuntu

The Star

time12 hours ago

  • The Star

The death of a former Zambian president: diplomacy, grief and ubuntu

Esther Lungu, former president Edgar Lungu's wife, is grappling with grief and unanswered questions after his death. Image: Supplied Sifiso Sonjica The passing of a former head of state is invariably a profound and reflective moment for any nation. In Zambia, a country with a proud legacy of democratic governance, cultural reverence for elders and strong communal values, the death of a past president initiates a period of mourning, national reflection, and often, political reconciliation. Yet, as evidenced by the complex and contested death and burial of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu, such events also carry deep diplomatic, legal, and emotional implications. They unveil fault lines within the state, raise questions about family rights, and underscore the challenges of balancing state authority with the wishes of grieving relatives. Importantly, these events remind us of the African philosophy of Ubuntu, which emphasizes our shared humanity and moral obligation to care for one another. In light of this, I found it worthwhile reflecting on the events surrounding Edgar Lungu's death and burial, the diplomatic entanglements that followed, the grief endured by his family, and the lessons that the African continent can draw through the lens of Ubuntu. Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema. The Zambian government is trying to force the repatriation of former president Edgar Lungu's body. Image: AFP The death and the diplomacy around It Lungu, who was Zambia's sixth president from 2015 until 2021, died on June 5, 2025, at a hospital in Pretoria. He was receiving treatment for a rare esophageal condition when complications from surgery resulted in his death. In response, the Zambian government declared a seven-day period of national mourning, which was later extended by an additional nine days. Flags were lowered to half-mast, and a state funeral was planned in Lusaka, in line with national customs and protocols for former presidents. However, what was intended to be a respectful and unifying national homage quickly turned into a diplomatic dispute. A private family service was scheduled in Johannesburg, but the Pretoria High Court, acting on a request from the Zambian Attorney General, stopped the burial, asserting that Lungu, as a former head of state, was both legally and symbolically a representative of the Zambian nation and therefore deserved a state burial in his homeland. South African officials, caught between honoring the family's wishes and maintaining diplomatic decorum, expressed regret over the situation while advocating for a solution that would respect the deceased's dignity. This unforeseen international legal conflict created a complex diplomatic challenge, turning what should have been a sacred and solemn event into a politically charged and widely publicised confrontation. Zambian President Edgar Lungu. Image: Rogan Ward/Reuters Burial standoff: State versus family At the heart of this controversy was a tense standoff between the Zambian government and the family of the deceased president. The authorities were adamant about bringing Lungu's remains back for interment at Embassy Park, the official burial site for national leaders in Lusaka, citing both national customs and constitutional precedent. They maintained that a state funeral was not merely a formality but an essential expression of national identity and respect. In contrast, Lungu's family asserted that he had specifically requested that President Hakainde Hichilema not attend his funeral, due to unresolved issues and allegations of persecution after his presidency. They also criticized the government's approach, arguing that the personal wishes of the deceased and the emotional needs of the family were being overshadowed by political symbolism. On June 18, the family obstructed the repatriation of his body, alleging a violation of their agreement. The next day, President Hichilema declared the official end of national mourning, stating that it was no longer practical to indefinitely delay the funeral arrangements. Subsequently, on June 20, the family made the unprecedented choice to privately inter Lungu in South Africa, marking him as the first former Zambian president to be buried outside the nation. However, on June 25, the High Court intervened once more, suspending the burial until a final decision on jurisdiction could be made on August 4. This ongoing standoff highlights a complex conflict involving national identity, personal legacy, family grief, and legal jurisdiction. It evolved into more than just a burial; it became a confrontation between constitutional formalities and deeply personal mourning. Diplomatic undercurrents This unusual incident has also put a strain on the diplomatic ties between Zambia and South Africa. The Minister of International Relations and Cooperation expressed support for the family's desires but remarked that a state funeral in Zambia would be "most appropriate" for someone of Lungu's stature. Pretoria's repeated legal interventions highlighted the complexities involved in hosting a former foreign head of state and emphasized the necessity of adhering to international norms and cross-border legal frameworks. President Hichilema formally apologised to the South African government, describing the situation as "diplomatic embarrassment". His apology recognized that internal conflicts - stemming from Zambia's unresolved political tensions - had spilled over into the regional sphere, disrupting diplomatic decorum and potentially harming Zambia's reputation as a model for peaceful political transitions. This situation highlights the urgent need for African nations to establis hprotocols that balance state responsibilities with the sensitivities of grieving families, particularly in cases involving prominent national figures whose legacies elicit mixed public reactions. Family's pain and public grief In the aftermath of his passing, the Lungu family has been engulfed in grief, exacerbated by public attention, legal challenges, and political unrest. They have faced intense media scrutiny, public discussions, and legal orders that have repeatedly interrupted their mourning. Most poignantly, reports have surfaced indicating that some family members have encountered travel bans and pressure from various political figures. Makibi Zulu, a family representative, poignantly remarked, 'Perhaps this time, Edgar has refused to be laid to rest without the truth being revealed.' This sentiment captures the family's view that Lungu's death has become a disputed story, highlighting deeper issues within Zambia's political landscape. Unverified claims of poisoning and systemic harassment have further politicised his death, complicating the family's quest for closure. As they navigate both personal loss and public controversy, the Lungu family's suffering underscores the challenge of disentangling the personal from the political in the life - and death - of a public figure. Their sorrow has become a symbol of a wider national discomfort, as citizens grapple with how to honour leadership in a time of divided memories. Ubuntu and pathways to healing The African concept of Ubuntu, often translated as 'I am because we are,' provides a vital framework for how such national moments can be approached with compassion, dignity, and unity. Ubuntu calls for empathy, shared humanity, and communal responsibility - values that are indispensable in moments of grief and division. As such, African societies must prioritize empathy over politics when national figures pass. Grieving families deserve support and space to mourn. This principle applies regardless of one's political alignment or opinions of the deceased's legacy. More so, the death or burial of a leader should not inflame tensions. Elders, traditional leaders, and mediators must facilitate respectful dialogue between state officials and families to avoid conflict and ensure dignity for all parties. This is important in balancing state honour with family customs. Most importantly, I am of the view that African Union and SADC should consider formal protocols for cross-border funerals of former leaders to prevent similar disputes and ensure that such events foster unity rather than discord.

Cyril Ramaphosa's bold move: Dismissing Nkabane to secure the Appropriation Bill
Cyril Ramaphosa's bold move: Dismissing Nkabane to secure the Appropriation Bill

IOL News

time14 hours ago

  • IOL News

Cyril Ramaphosa's bold move: Dismissing Nkabane to secure the Appropriation Bill

President Cyril Ramaphosa gives in to DA pressure to save the budget vote. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa was compelled to yield to the DA's pressure to dismiss Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane to secure the Appropriation Bill's passage on Wednesday. Ramaphosa's move comes ahead of the National Assembly's vote on the Appropriation Bill, which allocates funding to each national department. The DA had threatened to withhold support for Nkabane's departmental budget following allegations of misconduct and misleading Parliament regarding appointments to Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards. Following Nkabane's dismissal, the DA's spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, confirmed on Tuesday that they would vote with the ANC in every department, paving the way for the Appropriation Bill to pass without major challenges. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The ANC, as well as ministers in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, and Human Settlements, Thembi Simelane, have found temporary relief after Nkabane's axing. This follows the DA's confirmation that the party would vote with them for their respective departments but would pursue them over corruption allegations. 'Our caucus met this afternoon, and we have decided that we will support the other departmental budgets. So the DA will support the total budget. 'The axing of minister Nkabane came after relentless pressure from the DA on the president to get rid of the minister.' However, Aucamp said the party would keep applying pressure on the president to get rid of anybody in his government who is implicated in corruption, either by the Zondo Commission or through the VBS Bank looting scheme. Outgoing Higher Education and Training Minister Nobuhle Nkabane faced intense scrutiny, particularly for her alleged misleading of Parliament regarding the process of appointing the SETA board members. Image: GCIS 'The DA will keep on doing that, but we will support this budget,' Aucamp said. The Appropriation Bill requires 201 of 400 votes in the National Assembly. With the DA's support, the Bill is likely to pass without significant hurdles. Opposition parties, who cited her alleged misconduct and disregard for public service, welcomed Nkabane's removal. Buti Manamela, one of Nkabane's deputies, has been named the new minister of Higher Education and Training. Nomusa Dube-Ncube was appointed deputy minister. The ANC expressed confidence in the new leadership to advance access, equity, and quality in the higher education sector. Ramaphosa has wielded his axe three times in recent days. Nearly two weeks ago, he suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and placed him on special leave over explosive allegations that he interfered in police work investigations that involved political assassinations. Mchunu has since denied these allegations, but was succeeded by ANC heavyweight Firoz Cachalia. On Monday, after Nkabane's dismissal, Ramaphosa also announced the suspension of the South Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions, Adv Andrew Chauke. Manamela's appointment brought questions within the corridors of Luthuli House as officials once again questioned why Ramaphosa appointed him when he had not done so when he suspended Mchunu, overlooking his two deputies, Polly Boshielo and Cassel Mathale. A senior National Executive Committee member said, although it was Ramaphosa's prerogative to pick and choose as to who he preferred, he appeared to be selective and wanted to keep people who were trusted around him. 'Comrades have been talking about it… they say the president should be consistent in his dealings… But I for one think it's a tough decision. We have the SACP (South African Communist Party) having decided to contest the elections… and you have Buti (Manamela) and you want to keep him in the deputy position?... It's impossible. 'The president knows he has to yield to the SACP, and this appointment will quell the tensions we have with the SACP,' the source said. New Higher Education Minister Buti Manamela. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers Political analyst Sandile Swana said Ramaphosa needed to keep people he trusted close to him because he was on his way out since its his last term. 'How Cyril Ramaphosa removes ministers is largely guided by the balance of forces for the balance of power within the tripartite alliance or the ANC, so he has to make sure that he strengthens those who protect him from any fallout that might occur. 'When he appoints new people, he will want his bodyguards to feel that he is strengthening them. These are people that would be in favour of his faction or to appease a stakeholder base,' he said. Another political analyst, Professor Sethulego Matebesi, said Ramaphosa's recent removals of high-profile individuals pointed to a significant change in his administration. 'This action might be interpreted as an effort to resolve alleged inconsistencies or disputes within his administration and to consolidate power. 'However, as opposition parties and even some members of his party voice concerns, it also calls into question the ANC's stability and the possibility of internal strife,' he said. 'Ramaphosa's decisions are perceived as being selective, which is important. It seems as if he prefers some individuals over others out of loyalty or conformity,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store