Flexport sells former freight unicorn Convoy's tech two years after buying it
Flexport announced the sale on Monday to DAT Freight & Analytics, but declined to disclose terms.
'Over the past 18 months, we rebuilt and relaunched the [Convoy] platform as a neutral digital freight execution layer that serves brokers, carriers, and shippers across the market,' Flexport Ryan Petersen said in a statement. 'That investment paid off. The platform is now stronger, more widely used, and far more valuable than when we acquired it. As the Convoy Platform matured, it was clear that to achieve its full potential, it needed to be a neutral infrastructure layer.'
Petersen wrote that the sale of Convoy's tech will allow his company to 'focus our capital and energy on our core business' of helping customers move freight around the world.
The sale comes just a few months after Flexport announced the rollout of a suite of AI-powered tools, and a plan to launch waves of new products for its customers twice a year — an approach inspired by Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky.
Flexport told TechCrunch at the time that the second product release will come in 'late summer.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Google's Smart Home Ecosystem Is Crumbling
When I started using a Google smart speaker six years ago, I was all in. Voice assistants have never been perfect—in fact, they always kind of sucked—but I found (having also used Alexa and Siri) that Google Assistant sucked just a little bit less than the competition. And the fact that it was actually linked to Google search for real web queries made it even better. Flash forward to now, and everything I just wrote couldn't be further from the truth. Things are arguably worse for the Google Assistant and Google's entire smart home ecosystem than they've ever been, and the transition (or full-on enshittification, if you're feeling spicy) into the dumpster was seemingly fast. As a result of that dysfunction, people who use the Google Home platform as their hub for smart home products like lights, cameras, and speakers have been pouring their frustrations onto forums like Reddit en masse over the past month. For those not-so-happy customers, the Google Home app seemed to be flat-out broken, meaning some affected couldn't even turn their lights on or off. When I say shit was broken, I mean shit was broken. Those problems were, in fact, so bad that Google addressed issues publicly on social media and promised to do better. Things did not improve, however. Issues for lots of people have persisted, and last week, news of a possible class action lawsuit started to percolate. Yikes. Hey everyone, I want to acknowledge the recent feedback about Google Assistant reliability on our home devices. I sincerely apologize for what you're experiencing and feeling! — Anish Kattukaran (@AnishKattukaran) July 23, 2025If you haven't been using Google products for your smart home needs, it may seem surprising that Google could so suddenly and rapidly drop the ball on an entire ecosystem of hardware and software. If you have been using Google Home and Google Assistant for your smart home needs, however, you're less likely to be surprised by the recent fallout. As someone who has been in this ecosystem, I can say from experience that recent blowback isn't the product of some bug or anything spontaneous, for that matter; it feels more like the product of years of erosion and neglect. The complaints over Google Home and Google Assistant date back so far that I initially ignored recent issues bubbling up on forums. More dissatisfaction with Google Assistant? In my line of work, we call that a day that ends in 'y.' And I'm not the only one. I'm just going to quote this full post below, not because it's special, but because it's a common complaint—a part that summarizes the whole. One Redditor wrote on r/GoogleHome two months ago: 'It used to be amazing. Then it started being more and more unreliable for activation. Then not being useful at all for opening times. Then being useless for pretty much any question that involves some thinking. Now I can't even stop a timer that is actively going off because it thinks that nothing's playing. I'm so tired of it.' It's hard to say when the slide toward the garbage bin started to happen; maybe it was when Google stopped collecting and listening to people's voice commands years ago; maybe it was when Google started to pivot more towards chatbots and generative AI, leaving its other platforms to rot; maybe the whole Google Home team got locked in some Severance-style room inside of Google's Mountain View HQ and no one has been able to find them for a few years. Regardless of how we got here, the fact that we're here now of all times feels almost ironic. By Google's estimation—and the estimation of competitors like Amazon and Apple—this is supposed to be a golden age of voice assistants. Thanks to large language models, voice assistants are supposed to get a major glow-up and should be more capable of understanding natural language and multistep commands. Maybe that will still happen, but for now, all of that promise is still in the future, with Siri delayed and Amazon's Alexa+ idling in early access. I don't know, maybe you just have to hit rock bottom in order to make progress, but at this point, it's hard to take Google's word for it, so all we're left with is a broken home, so to speak. From the outside, it looks to me like Google's smart home empire is crumbling, and for the sake of all of us and our stupid smart lights, I hope a fix is in sight.
Fast Company
2 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Is retirement approaching? Use these expert tips to build up your cash cushion
While most retirement portfolios include allocations to stocks and bonds in the years leading up to retirement, most retirement savers don't hold much more than an emergency cushion in cash. Thus, an important job in the years before retirement is building up that cash cushion. The good news is that cash yields are up, meaning cash holdings aren't the 'dead money' they were a few years ago. And equity investments have performed well, too—at least until very recently. That means that most investors can build their cash stakes, at least in part, by pruning appreciated holdings. Here's some guidance on the amount, source, and location of those liquid reserves, according to the Bucket approach to retirement portfolio planning. Rightsizing Bucket 1 Your cash bucket should consist of one to two years' worth of portfolio withdrawals, not living expenses. In order to set up Bucket 1 initially, think through your cash flow sources for the first few years of retirement. For example, let's say a 66-year-old wants to retire in two years and expects that he'll need to spend $80,000 per year, in total, from his $1.5 million portfolio, at that time. He wants to delay filing for Social Security until age 70, so all of his spending will come from his portfolio in those first few years of retirement. After that, roughly half his spending needs will come from Social Security. If he wanted to be conservative, he could build a cash cushion consisting of $160,000—his years 1 and 2 portfolio withdrawals. His Bucket 2—high-quality bonds—would consist of eight years' worth of portfolio withdrawals, which at that point will be $40,000 per year. The remaining $1 million and change could go into a globally diversified equity portfolio. Where to put the money? It's also worth considering the 'where' of your liquid reserves. To do so, consider your sequence of withdrawals in retirement. Taxable accounts are often first in the queue for retirement withdrawals because their ongoing tax costs are higher than tax-sheltered accounts. But some retirees may benefit from spending from their tax-deferred accounts early in retirement, with an eye toward reducing future required minimum distributions and tax bills. This is a good spot to get some advice from a financial or tax advisor. Armed with the knowledge of where you'll turn for your spending in the first part of your retirement, you can then figure out where best to hold your liquid reserves. Where to get the money? The next step is figuring out how to build up this reserve. Ideally, you'd give yourself a couple of years to enlarge your cash position rather than having to find the money just before retirement. For preretirees who are still saving for retirement, start by directing new contributions into cash. Say, for example, the aforementioned retiree is directing a couple years' worth of IRA and 401(k)contributions to cash. He could arrive at nearly half his target cash allocation by the time he reaches his retirement. There's also potential bonuses and inheritances. If you've recently received a surprise cash injection, the assets are a logical source for bulking up cash reserves. Another solid option is to build up cash by peeling back on highly appreciated asset classes, especially US stocks. Trimming equities and adding those assets to cash and bonds reduces risk and helps cover cash flows for the first few years of retirement. Finally, you can reduce risky positions. Consider the employer stock you know you should scale back on or the individual-stock portfolio that's duplicative of what's in your mutual funds. Such holdings can be ideal sources when building up your cash reserves, but mind the tax consequences if you're selling them from a taxable account.
Gizmodo
2 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Acting NASA Chief Tells Agency to Build a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon, Before China Does It First
NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy is fast-tracking the agency's plans to build a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface, a move that highlights the Trump administration's focus on human spaceflight and establishing a long-term presence on the Moon. Duffy issued a directive to expedite the timeline for the reactor, aiming for a launch date to the Moon by 2030, Politico first reported. In the directive, Duffy mentions China and Russia's joint plan to put a nuclear reactor of their own on the Moon in the mid-2030s, citing a concern that the two countries could 'potentially declare a keep-out zone' that would hinder NASA's ability to do the same. 'To properly advance this critical technology to be able to support a future lunar economy, high power energy generation on Mars, and to strengthen our national security in space, it is imperative the agency move quickly,' Duffy wrote in the directive, which was sent out on Thursday, July 31. NASA has been working on a Fission Surface Power System for the Moon since 2022, when the agency awarded three $5 million contracts to its commercial partners to develop initial concept designs for a small reactor. At the time, NASA specified that the reactor should stay under 6 metric tons and be able to produce 40 kilowatts of electrical power, enough to power around 33 households. In the new directive, however, Duffy not only wants NASA to move fast on its project, but he also specified that the reactor should produce 100 kilowatts of power, enough for about 80 households. With the ongoing Artemis program, NASA wants to establish a sustainable human presence on the Moon. Building a habitat on the lunar surface would prove tricky without power, and relying on solar energy alone would likely be insufficient. The day-night cycle on the Moon lasts for about a month, with roughly two weeks of sunlight followed by two weeks of darkness that would leave solar arrays without its energy source. On the other hand, fission reactors can operate around the clock, even in the Moon's shadowy craters and during the long lunar nights. Establishing a power source on the Moon is crucial for human exploration, an aspect of NASA's objectives that the current administration is especially keen on. NASA is preparing for severe budget cuts under the White House's proposed budget for 2026, which threaten several of its robotic missions to space. Under the proposed budget, NASA's planetary science budget would drop from $2.7 billion to $1.9 billion. On the other hand, the agency's human space exploration budget would receive an additional $647 million compared to the 2025 budget. The recent directive is part of the administration's push to send humans to the Moon and Mars and to establish dominance in the new space race with China and Russia. The directive orders NASA to designate an agency official to oversee the project within 30 days and for it to issue a request for proposals from commercial partners within 60 days.
