logo
My neighbour has been dumping their rubbish in my back garden and trespassing. What can I do?

My neighbour has been dumping their rubbish in my back garden and trespassing. What can I do?

Irish Times4 days ago

I have recently inherited my parents' property, which includes some land bordering the west and south sides of a neighbour's
property
.
The land has grown wild over time and a lot of it, particularly the boundary area with this neighbour, is obscured from vision. In the past couple of months, I have worked my way through the overgrowth to inspect the boundary and found a number of issues relating to the neighbour. They have been actively dumping over the boundary wall for some time. This includes loose ashes, loose organic waste and plastic bags of same, as well as old gutter pipes, other building and
gardening
scrap items.
Additionally, I noticed that a Ring camera with a very wide viewing angle is installed on the neighbour's gable end. The camera is obviously directed over the boundary wall into my property. I have evidence that this camera is actively detecting motion on my property from quite a distance away.
At some point, the neighbour also employed someone to go onto my property and cut away a large swathe of the overgrowth. Presumably they felt they had a right because a hedge may have been growing over to their side, but the cleared area is approximately seven metres back from the boundary and is easily more than 10 metres in length. The neighbour also has a long-standing shed built up against the boundary which has, more recently, had a waste pipe extended out the back wall across the boundary. It is hanging in mid-air within my property, excreting what I presume is water vapour from an oil burner in the shed.
READ MORE
I have approached the neighbour directly, but she doesn't really seem to care. The waste pipe has been cut and is now downturned on to the boundary. There are now a large number of waste bags piled on the corner of her site, ready to tip over into mine. I will not be surprised if local wildlife tear these bags to bits.
I have approached the council, which has 'suggested' to her that she use the local waste collection service, which she shares with a sibling a few houses over. She has not shown any inclination to do this. I'm worried that the only way I can force her hand into rectifying these issues is to contact a solicitor to take a civil case against her. If at all possible, I do not want to go down this road.
Are there any other actions I can take that might motivate this neighbour to get herself back into a legally correct position regarding these issues? Thank you.
The dumping of domestic waste on adjoining properties is, unfortunately, quite a widespread practice, but one which is generally confined to locations that are overgrown or out of sight of the property owner concerned. The perpetrators can dump conveniently and undetected for some time. This is what has happened in your case.
You are fortunate that the boundary is clearly defined by a wall, otherwise a contentious dumping issue could develop into a boundary location dispute.
You are right to be concerned about taking a civil case. However, it is prudent to deal with it as if you were preparing the groundwork for a civil case. This means you should document all relevant data, including the nature of the dumping, trespassing, damage and dates of events including details of conversations etc. Check to see if the dumped material contains any item that directly links your neighbour to it. Your evidence should include photographs. You should also monitor the situation as frequently as possible.
Patrick Shine is a chartered geomatics surveyor, a chartered civil engineer and a member of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland
Your best course of action would be to approach your neighbour again, restate your concerns and, without accusing her directly, put the situation in context by explaining to her that the dumping is in breach of the 1996 Waste Management Act and that you will be obliged to make a formal report to the local council. You should also point out that the cutting of overgrowth on your land is an issue of trespass and damage that you will have to report to the gardai.
You should explain that the Ring camera position is in breach of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and is a matter for the Data Protection Commissioner. Despite the seriousness of the situation, your approach should be conciliatory and expressed in a tone that seeks an amicable resolution. In effect, you would be asking her to consider the situation and giving her an opportunity to see what she can do to resolve the issue.
As your land borders the west and south sides of her property, your overgrown hedge is likely to be preventing direct sunshine to her property from late morning to late evening. This may be an issue and if so, you could consider offering to cut back or reduce the height of some of the hedge, as part of building a cooperative relationship with her.
[
I'm worried about our home being devalued because our neighbour's trees block light. What can we do?
Opens in new window
]
[
My son lives abroad and wants to sell his house here but the tenant won't move out. What can he do?
Opens in new window
]
You may feel that this approach is too conciliatory, but this issue can go one of two ways. Either your neighbour is persuaded to cooperate and remove the dumped material, or she ignores you and leaves you with little option but to get legal advice, which risks escalating the situation into litigation. This is the route you said you want to avoid. Another reason for avoiding litigation is that your evidence is largely circumstantial. You do not have direct evidence of her dumping, trespassing or damaging your hedge.
An option you could consider, if your neighbour refuses to cooperate, is to clear the overgrowth. This action is undesirable from an environmental perspective and subject to seasonal restrictions. However, as people are unlikely to dump waste across their boundary on property that is open to view and well maintained, it may transpire to be your only option.
Patrick Shine is a chartered geomatics surveyor, a chartered civil engineer and a member of the
Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland
Do you have a query? Email
propertyquestions@irishtimes.com
This column is a readers' service. The content of the Property Clinic is provided for general information only. It is not intended as advice on which readers should rely. Professional or specialist advice should be obtained before persons take or refrain from any action on the basis of the content. The Irish Times and its contributors will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any content.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Queen's University Belfast divests from Israeli interests in protest over Gaza conflict
Queen's University Belfast divests from Israeli interests in protest over Gaza conflict

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Queen's University Belfast divests from Israeli interests in protest over Gaza conflict

Queen's University Belfast has confirmed it has divested from Israeli companies and universities. A representative for the university told The Irish Times on Friday that 'the final research partnership with an Israeli institution came to an end this week'. The university confirmed it has 'no student exchange programmes with Israel' and 'no direct investment in any Israeli companies'. In June 2024 Queen's announced it would divest from companies blacklisted by the United Nations Human Rights Council, which identifies firms operating in settlements in occupied Palestinian territories that it considers illegal under international law. READ MORE [ TCD's Israeli boycott draws criticism from Ireland's Jewish community Opens in new window ] While the university did not hold any direct investments in Israeli companies on the UN blacklist, it held a number of indirect investments through managed fund products. In May 2024, pro-Palestine student protesters occupied the main building at Queen's University, calling on the university to 'review all ties' with Israeli institutions and universities. Four months later, four men were arrested during a pro-Palestinian protest at Queen's during a protest at the visit of former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Kieran Minto, president of university's students' union, told The Irish Times that they welcome the confirmation that the university has fully divested from Israeli companies. They said the decision was a 'direct result of sustained student organising and advocacy' and they will 'continue to work with Queen's to ensure it upholds its commitments to support scholars and students at risk from the devastation in Gaza'. In a statement on Instagram, the 'Decolonise, Demilitarise and Democratise Group' led by students at Queen's rejected 'any narrative suggesting the decision was simply a reaction to actions taken at other universities'. [ Israel confirms it is arming 'clans' in Gaza to combat Hamas Opens in new window ] They said the decision to divest was 'the result of more than a year of positioning, manoeuvring and sustained negotiation with the university'. The board of Trinity College Dublin voted to cut all ties with Israeli universities and institutions on Wednesday. The decision followed a series of meetings of a taskforce set up between staff and student representatives. These meetings were arranged as part of an agreement to end a five-day encampment that was set up on the university's campus in May 2024. Jenny Maguire, outgoing president of Trinity College Dublin Students' Union, called the decision a 'historic win' which 'must be a catalyst for action across this island'.

Mystery couple at centre of bombshell new theory on Maddie McCann disappearance
Mystery couple at centre of bombshell new theory on Maddie McCann disappearance

Irish Daily Mirror

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Mystery couple at centre of bombshell new theory on Maddie McCann disappearance

New bombshell claims have emerged in the Madeleine McCann case with reports that the three-year-old was killed in a drink-driving accident and her body spirited away by a drunken couple. The latest theory was reportedly not acted upon by officials in Germany, despite Portuguese authorities requesting an investigation into a British man and his German wife. The claims include that the man's UK-based sister tipped off cops. But Portuguese media reports the German authorities rejected a request to use an undercover police officer with a fake identity to try to befriend the female suspect. The woman was allegedly driving a car that hit Madeleine whilst under the influence of alcohol, Portuguese daily Correio da Manha claimed today. Follow our liveblog below for go to our homepage for all the latest headlines. A British woman is reported to have tipped off police as long ago as 2018. She is the sister of an unnamed man at the centre of a new theory about Madeleine's disappearance. Describing the mystery couple - a British man and his German wife - as 'alcoholics' they place the woman in a cafe near the Ocean Club where she had been 'drinking' the night Madeleine went missing from the Algarve resort. The Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha has claimed: "German prosecutors were asked to authorise a covert police operation with someone posing as a friend of the woman's and trying to get her to confess, but the courts refused. "It was decided to continue solely with the investigation into suspect Christian Brueckner, rejecting other possibilities.' It has been claimed that the woman of the British man told investigators that she heard the man yelling: 'Why did you bring her?' Portuguese police are reportedly said to have got the knock-back from the Germans after urging them to look more closely into the possibility the woman they were tipped off about had driven home 'drunk' with Maddie after knocking her down and enlisted her husband's help in disposing of the "youngster's body at sea."

Never Flinch by Stephen King: Prolific author in crime thriller mode
Never Flinch by Stephen King: Prolific author in crime thriller mode

Irish Times

time14 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Never Flinch by Stephen King: Prolific author in crime thriller mode

Never Flinch Author : Stephen King ISBN-13 : 978-1399744331 Publisher : Hodder & Stoughton Guideline Price : £25 You don't write more than 70 novels without knowing how to follow your muse, and the muse that Stephen King is following is called Holly Gibney. She has now featured in seven novels or novellas for King, and she takes centre stage here again. Since we met her first 11 years ago as a mousy, repressed character in Mr Mercedes , Holly has found her confidence and blossomed into a smart and resourceful private detective. This story kicks off when the Buckeye City police department receives a letter from someone threatening to kill 'thirteen innocents and one guilty' in an act of atonement for the death of an innocent man. Holly is initially drawn into the investigation when the murders start, but then finds herself on the road acting as security for a controversial women's rights activist who is bringing her pro-choice rally from city to city, and has attracted the attention of a stalker with murderous intent. [ How Stephen King unlocks our imagination with every scare Opens in new window ] This is King in crime thriller mode, although elements of supernatural horror do occasionally push their way into Holly stories, where they seem ill at ease. The evil that Holly is chasing in Never Flinch is strictly flesh and blood, yet oddly the story feels less plausible than many of King's flights of fancy. READ MORE The idea that a shrinking violet such as Holly would take on a job as a bodyguard is utterly nonsensical – the character is far too smart and self-aware to put herself in that position – and is one of several elements that feel like parts from a different jigsaw. King takes aim at anti-abortion protests, queries the legal system, and there is a character that may or may not be trans, but is definitely problematic. It's a shame, as there are sections in here that work perfectly – the stalker gradually closing in on his prey could easily have been its own separate story, there are some heart-breaking father-son dynamics, and the murders in the serial killer story are genuinely chilling for how utterly senseless they are. King is simply too good at this not to make it a page turner but ultimately the whole novel seems to add up to slightly less than the sum of its parts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store