Joe's fate in the 'You' series finale and that 'cheeky' final scene, explained by the showrunners
Warning: Major spoilers ahead for season five of Netflix's "You."
Joe Goldberg got the ending that he's long deserved.
Netflix's hit thriller series " You," which stars Penn Badgley as Joe, a romantic at heart with a penchant for repeatedly murdering in the name of love, released its final season on Thursday.
The 10-episode fifth season is a culmination of years of Joe narrowly escaping real consequences for his actions. But now, he's finally locked up for good thanks to the efforts of a new character named Louise Flannery (Madeline Brewer), a woman who dupes Joe into falling in love with her through a carefully curated persona known as Bronte.
In a spoiler-filled discussion with Business Insider, co-showrunners, executive producers, and writers Michael Foley and Justin W. Lo explained Joe's fate and why death would be "too easy" a conclusion, why Badgley wanted audiences to see Joe at his "most horrific" in the bloody finale, and the "cheeky" way the last scene winks at fans' complicity.
Michael Foley: Penn always gets an early draft and gives us his thoughts and sometimes jumps on the phone with us. He's very communicative on set in prep about the episode that he's filming. Obviously, he has such a great handle on his character that it is really just about honing in on things.
But in this final season, the goal, as you hopefully witnessed in the finale, was that we see Joe Goldberg at his worst. And that was really important to Penn, that he was at his most horrific. He wanted to help us in our mission to have everybody stop and see him be so horrific that we all have to question what we just co-signed for all this time and sort of burst the delusion that he's a rootable hero.
So, that was really important to him. That's why he's in his boxers in the rain and that's why he's punching a woman for the first time. We usually cut away from the violence. We just wanted it to get really nasty and awful. And he was very much leading the charge in that regard. He's like, do not pull punches with this guy. I want him in the end to just be a monster.
Episode seven is when people finally start turning on him a bit, and we see characters from his past come out of the woodwork, like Annika, Ethan, and Paco. Who else was on your bucket list of people that you wanted to bring back, but it didn't work out?
Justin W. Lo: I'm trying to think who else we wanted. I think we got mostly everyone we wanted to be in that montage. We did this thing in the writer's room where we put a list of people who would be pro-Joe, against Joe, and sort of neutral, and then we brainstormed what they would be saying about him. One of our favorites was Paco, of course, because Paco is pro-Joe, but what he says ends up screwing Joe over in a major way. So, that was one of our favorite discoveries.
I was surprised not to see Jenna Ortega's character, Ellie. I feel like she would've been such a fun fit in there. Was she one of the people that you tried to get?
Foley: That was complicated by the fact that she's doing "Wednesday" in Ireland and it just seemed like a non-starter. We just couldn't figure out a way to make it work.
If Ellie was in that montage, what side would she have been on?
Lo: Oh, pro-Joe [ laughs ]. Well, I think... hmm. It's a good question. It could have gone either way. You could make an argument for pro-Joe, because he was there for her during a very difficult time in her life. But you could also say, I think Ellie's very smart and she probably knows that he had something to do with her sister's death, even though it was Love. So she could have turned against him as well.
Who came up with the idea for Bronte to shoot Joe in the penis, and what does that add to the punishment that Joe deservedly got in the final season?
Lo: Greg Berlanti came up with the idea for the dick shot, and it was symbolic. Everybody, Penn, the showrunners, Greg, Sera [Gamble], we all wanted to make sure that Joe was taken down and no longer a romantic or sexual icon. And so that is the best way to do that. Couldn't get more pointed than that.
In that moment when Bronte pulls the gun on him and he begs her to kill him, was he genuinely OK with dying at her hands in that moment, or was he just bluffing?
Foley: She's suggesting that he's going to have to face what he really is, and that means he's going to sit in a courtroom, he's going to hear testimony of people who lost loved ones to Joe Goldberg, and that would break the delusion that he's a white knight and a good guy, and he couldn't handle that.
So he was actually in that moment choosing death and hoping for death. And both Louise and we, the writers, thought that death was too easy, that we needed to put him in a veritable cage, and he needed to live on without knowing the feeling of a lover's touch, without his freedom, et cetera.
Foley: The specifics of it, in terms of him being in prison and living, were things that we worked out pretty late in the final season.
But in terms of him A) not getting away with it, B) not being redeemed, C) facing loved ones or people who he wronged, all of that was known early on, going into the season, if not a season or two earlier. We just didn't know the actual shape it would take.
What was the conversation like with Penn when you mapped out the specifics of that final scene and his ending?
Foley: There's a single line that Louise says to him, which is that "the fantasy of a man like you is how we cope with the reality of a man like you." That's the most important line this season for us, if not in the series, and he was a big fan of that line. He liked that it was the closest we were going to come to just sort of really stating our message, if you will. So yeah, we were all completely on the same page about Joe's condemnation, Joe's end.
In the final scene, Joe's reading a creepy letter and he's still delusional and putting the blame on other people. It kind of felt like a little nod to the fans who thirsted over Joe this whole time, despite him being a murderer. What was the message you were trying to convey in that scene?
Lo: We were trying to convey that Joe will never take responsibility for anything that he's done, that he always has to blame someone, and in this case, it's society, and he's speaking to us.
It's a cheeky way to show that we have been complicit and he's turning against us in this one moment. We have been with him, in his voiceover part of his thought processes, in the whole series. And in this moment, he turns against us and blames us, the society, for creating him and for loving him.
In the past, the female leads of the show have not fared well, but Louise, Kate, and Marienne all get their happy endings. Why was it important for the series to end with these women not being casualties?
Foley: The entire run of the series, yes, there is Joe getting what Joe needs to get, in terms of killing for love. And then sometimes the killing can just seem bleak, and we want to entertain, and we don't want to lose our audience. And so it felt like with Kate, she had earned her absolution and her redemption, being willing to die by going back down to the basement to kill Joe. That's why we kept her alive, but it just didn't feel additive to kill. We don't want to kill people just for killing's sake.
I would just say that Louise, in the end, keeping her alive was very important to us because we wanted the show to end with a woman's voice. Like, yes, we add this coda with Joe where he says, "It's not my fault, it's yours." But the real ending of the show is a woman having a voice and having agency, and Louise walking out of that bookstore and saying, "Joe Goldberg is not going to write my story. I'm going to define who I am." That was very important to us.
Beck is such an important part of this whole season, and it brings the show full circle. What was it like pitching that to Elizabeth Lail and getting her back for a couple of scenes?
Lo: The Beck storyline always brings tears to my eyes because it is so deep. And I say that Beck really got a raw deal in season one and she didn't do anything to deserve what she got. And she has been that symbol of innocence that got marred this whole series, really.
So, it felt fitting to be able to give her justice. And that's why I think that the connection to Bronte was so powerful. You can feel it all through the season as soon as we learn the connection between them in that fifth episode.
[Elizabeth] loved it. She was so excited to be part of the final season and she loves this character, too. So it was very meaningful for her to be able to be such a big part of the end of Joe Goldberg's story.
Foley: I think it would've started to get repetitive and we would've been going to this same well in many ways, narratively. I don't know a single person in the writer's room who felt like, "Oh, if only we had one more season, we could tell this story or that story."
I think we are really happy that we brought it full circle. Rarely do TV writer-producers get to finish the story. And we got to, we did it in a satisfying way, we got to bring it back to New York. So as a viewer and as a writer, I don't have an appetite for more, but it's only because I'm so sated. I'm very satisfied with how this story was told.
Lo: I hope they're very satisfied. I see a lot of stuff online about like, "This show will have to end with Joe either in prison or dead." A lot of people are saying that, and so I'm really curious to see what they will think of the ending, which is, of course, he's not dead, but he is shot. And I guess there are some people who want him to get away with it. I am excited to see what they have to say the most, because we did not let him get away with it.
Foley: We won't escape unscathed, and that's fine. People really hated that the character Love had to die. And guess what? I loved writing that character. I loved being on set with Victoria Pedretti, who's incredibly talented, but what was best for the story was where the story went.
So, hopefully, if people can be objective, they could say this was the right way and the best way to end it. And if not, then all the power to 'em.
This interview has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time Business News
38 minutes ago
- Time Business News
How Technology Is Shaping the Future of Entertainment
The entertainment industry has always evolved with technology, from the invention of the radio to the rise of streaming platforms. But today, the pace of transformation is faster than ever. Artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), blockchain, and next-gen content delivery are reshaping how we consume, create, and interact with entertainment. In this article, we'll explore the key technologies revolutionizing the entertainment industry, what they mean for consumers and creators, and where this digital evolution is headed. The transition from cable and satellite TV to streaming platforms like Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video has redefined how audiences consume content. Unlike traditional TV, which followed a linear schedule, streaming offers instant access to thousands of titles on demand. Platforms now use machine learning algorithms to analyze viewing history, watch time, and behavior to deliver personalized recommendations. This not only improves user engagement but also shapes future content development. For instance, Netflix's data influences decisions on show renewals, casting, and even plot direction. AI is increasingly used in pre-production and post-production processes. It can generate scripts, assist in editing, and even recreate actors' faces or voices through deepfake technology. ScriptAI and tools like Jasper and Sudowrite are helping writers brainstorm and refine stories. Chatbots and AI-powered assistants now serve as digital concierges for fans—recommending what to watch, answering trivia, and even creating custom playlists. AI also powers subtitles, dubbing, and translations, helping entertainment companies scale globally. VR offers full immersion, transporting viewers into 360-degree worlds. Companies like Meta (formerly Facebook) are investing heavily in VR through platforms like Meta Quest, while game developers are creating hyper-realistic virtual experiences that blur the lines between digital and real life. AR, on the other hand, overlays digital elements onto the real world. Apps like Pokémon GO or Snapchat filters have shown how AR can turn everyday surroundings into interactive entertainment zones. Artists, musicians, and performers are also exploring VR and AR to reach fans in innovative ways. Virtual concerts—like Travis Scott's Fortnite show or Ariana Grande's Rift Tour—are redefining the concept of live entertainment. The concept of the metaverse—a shared, persistent, virtual universe—is gaining traction. While still in early stages, platforms like Roblox, Decentraland, and Meta Horizons offer social, gaming, and entertainment experiences within digital worlds. Entertainment companies are eyeing the metaverse as the next frontier. From virtual movie theaters to NFT art galleries and avatar-based concerts, the possibilities are limitless. Creators and companies can now sell virtual merchandise, experiences, and tickets. NFTs (non-fungible tokens) play a major role in enabling digital ownership. Imagine owning a limited-edition concert outfit for your avatar or a collectible video clip from your favorite artist. Blockchain technology is promoting transparency and decentralization in media. Smart contracts enable artists to get paid instantly and fairly when their content is used or streamed, bypassing traditional middlemen like labels or studios. Platforms like Audius and Theta are experimenting with decentralized models where fans can directly support their favorite creators, creating a more equitable entertainment economy. Blockchain also strengthens digital rights management. Immutable records on the blockchain make it easier to track ownership, usage rights, and revenue sharing, reducing piracy and copyright infringement. Interactive storytelling—where the audience makes decisions that influence the plot—is rising in popularity. Netflix's Black Mirror: Bandersnatch was a breakthrough moment for interactive video content, and gaming companies continue to lead in creating choice-based narratives. Gamification features like live polls, quizzes, and real-time interaction keep viewers engaged longer. Twitch's success proves that blending entertainment with live user interaction creates a powerful feedback loop that strengthens fan loyalty. With the evolution of 4K, 8K, and even higher-resolution screens, visual fidelity continues to improve. HDR (High Dynamic Range) and Dolby Vision bring richer colors and better contrast, creating cinema-level experiences at home. Audio is no longer just stereo or surround. Technologies like Dolby Atmos and Apple's Spatial Audio provide three-dimensional soundscapes. For listeners, this means feeling like they're in the center of the action—whether it's a concert or a movie scene. As tech reshapes the industry, new job roles are emerging—AI trainers, virtual environment designers, blockchain developers, metaverse architects, and digital rights managers. For aspiring creatives, technical literacy is becoming as important as artistic skill. Understanding data analytics, basic programming, or AR/VR platforms can give professionals a competitive edge. Affordable tools for editing, animation, and sound design allow independent creators to produce studio-quality content. Platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Substack have empowered solo creators to build massive audiences without traditional gatekeepers. Technology is not replacing traditional entertainment—it's enhancing and expanding it. The future lies in hybrid experiences that combine physical and digital, passive and interactive, real and virtual. Whether it's watching a movie in VR, attending a holographic concert, or owning a piece of your favorite show as an NFT, the boundaries are being redefined. For creators, producers, and fans alike, the message is clear: adapt and explore. The future of entertainment is being written in code, created with algorithms, and powered by immersive, intelligent tech. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Love Is Blind UK''s Bobby and Jasmine Johnson Are Expecting First Baby Together: 'Dreamt of This Moment'
Love is Blind UK alums Jasmine and Bobby Johnson are expecting their first baby — and Bobby wrote a special rap to announce their big news "I've pictured your tiny face a thousand times. I've dreamt of this moment long before I knew how good life could get. Then I met your dad and the rest was written in love 🤍," Jasmine wrote in an announcement on Instagram, adding: "Baby Johnson Coming Winter 2025!!" The couple met on season 1 of Netflix's Love is Blind UK and tied the knot on the dating show last yearNetflix's Love is Blind UK alums Jasmine and Bobby Johnson are going to be parents! In an Instagram Reel video shared on Monday, June 9, the season 1 couple announced that they are expecting their first baby together, due later this year. "We've been keeping a secret 🤫," Jasmine, 29, wrote in the caption of their joint post. "I've pictured your tiny face a thousand times. I've dreamt of this moment long before I knew how good life could get. Then I met your dad and the rest was written in love 🤍." "Baby Johnson Coming Winter 2025!!" she added. The video begins with a sit-down interview with the couple, both donning white shirts and Jasmine showing off her baby bump, speaking about how they might want to raise their future child. "I ideally want to raise children in a household where our foundation is on 100," the nurse-turned-TV star says in the clip, before the camera zooms out to reveal that the Reel is actually a short music video for an original song about their life together and their baby on the way, written by Bobby, 33. "I was lost but now I'm found, well ever since you rescued me/ We sit and talk on rainy days, just debating baby names," he raps in the clip. "I'm looking at your baby bump... I guess we'll have to wait until the day you come/To know if you're our daughter or our baby son," the song continues. "I'll be happy either way!" Bobby and Jasmine were among the couples who left the pods hand-in-hand during Love Is Blind's first season in the U.K. During the 2024 season, Jasmine, a nurse from London, and rapper Bobby quickly bonded in their pods, and Bobby, who admitted at the time that from the 'start,' Jasmine was 'the girl for me.' After rapping a poem divulging his feelings, Bobby proposed, and Jasmine accepted. By the end of the season, the pair had tied the knot. In February this year, the couple opened up about their difficulties trying to conceive with Grazia UK, as Bobby called the process a "rollercoaster." "In the beginning, we were very naive," Jasmine told the British outlet at the time. "[I thought] I was going to get pregnant as soon as we had sex. Obviously, that's not the case." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The pair shared at the time that Jasmine had seen a doctor and had been using ovulation testing to help the process along. But because they had both discussed wanting children while they were on the Netflix series, they felt pressure from fans and social media followers who would often ask if Jasmine was pregnant yet. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! "I think the difficult thing for Jasmine is if people comment on your photos and they're like, 'oh, I can see the bump,' or 'you're pregnant, I can tell it,'" Bobby shared. "Things like that – it's quite insensitive sometimes." Jasmine told the outlet that despite the challenges, having a supportive partner has made a massive difference in the process. "Having a partner there to support you, oh my gosh, it's a blessing," she added. "A lot of people don't get that privilege to go through their pregnancy journey with a supportive partner. It's not going to happen tomorrow, but it will happen when the time is right." Read the original article on People


Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Tony Awards: Hollywood A-listers brought the spotlight to Broadway, but stage thespians carried the day
Broadway finally got its groove back. The 2024-25 season was the highest-grossing season on record and the second-highest in terms of attendance. Hollywood A-listers, such as George Clooney in 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' and Denzel Washington and Jake Gyllenhaal in 'Othello' got in on the action, raising Broadway's media profile along with its ticket prices. Two Emmy-winning alums of HBO's 'Succession,' Sarah Snook in 'The Picture of Dorian Gray' and Kieran Culkin in 'Glengarry Glen Ross,' have been treading the boards, as has Netflix's 'Stranger Things' standout Sadie Sink in 'John Proctor Is the Villain.' And though the experience seems to have been memory-holed, Robert Downey Jr. made a respectable Broadway debut in September in Ayad Akhtar's too-clever-by-half AI drama, 'McNeal.' On Sunday, the Tony Awards paid homage to the astonishing array of acting talent that drew audiences back to the theater. But it wasn't star power that determined the evening's prizes. It was boldness — unadulterated theatrical fearlessness — that carried the day. The ceremony, held at Radio City Music Hall amid the art deco splendor of old New York, was presided over by Tony-winner Cynthia Erivo, a natural wonder of the theatrical universe. One of the turbo-powered stars of the blockbuster screen adaptation of 'Wicked,' she was the ideal host for a Broadway year that owed its success to the unique ability of high-wattage stage performers to forge a singular connection with audiences. Viewers watching the ceremony on CBS were offered a glimpse of the cyclonic energy she can generate in a bubbly opening number celebrating the nominees. It didn't matter that most watching from home hadn't seen the shows name-checked in the specially composed novelty song. The vivacity of the art form broke through the screen courtesy of Erivo's capacity to blast through any barrier with her truthful virtuosity. Will Aronson and Hue Park's 'Maybe Happy Ending' was the evening's big winner, picking up six Tonys, including best musical. Branden Jacobs-Jenkins' 'Purpose,' which received the Pulitzer Prize for drama this year, was chosen as best play in a season showcasing a refreshingly wide range of ambitious playwriting. Anna D. Shapiro's sharply-tuned production of Jonathan Spector's 'Eureka Day,' a bitingly funny satire on the vaccine debate, won for play revival. And Jamie Lloyd's radical reworking of 'Sunset Blvd.' took the prize for musical revival. All in all, it was a strong season for directing. Michael Arden won for his exquisitely humane staging of the futuristic robot musical, 'Maybe Happy Ending.' And Sam Pinkleton was honored for his wild and whirling synchronization of Cole Escola's 'Oh, Mary!' As a critic, I don't usually have to pay for theater tickets, but I got a taste of the ludicrousness when charged $500 to see Washington and Gyllenhaal in a flaccid revival of 'Othello.' Apparently, I got off cheaply compared to a friend who paid even more for a worse seat on the same night. But the price-gouging didn't dent my appreciation for a season that reminded me of the privilege of being in the room where the theatrical magic happens. (Yes, even 'Othello' had its intermittent rewards.) Communing with audiences in the presence of gifted stage performers is one of the last bastions of community in our screen-ridden society. I was grateful that CNN made the agonizingly timely 'Good Night, and Good Luck' available to a wider public, presenting Saturday night's performance live. But watching Clooney and company on TV wasn't the same as being in the Winter Garden with them during the performance. It wasn't simply that the camerawork profoundly altered the visual storytelling. It was that at home on my couch I was no longer enclosed in the same shared space that brought history back to the present for a charged moment of collective reflection. The Tony Awards honored those actors who embraced the immediacy of the theatrical experience and offered us varieties of performance styles that would be hard to find even in the more obscure reaches of Netflix. Cole Escola, the first nonbinary performer to win in the lead actor in a play category, accepted the award for their fiendishly madcap performance in 'Oh, Mary!' — a no-holds-barred farcical display of irreverence that ignited a firestorm of hilarity that threatened to consume all of Broadway. Snook won for her lead performance in 'The Picture of Dorian Gray,' a multimedia collage of Wilde's novel that had the protean 'Succession' star playing opposite screen versions of herself in what was the season's most aerobically taxing performance. Francis Jue, who delivered the evening's most moving and politically pointed speech, won for his shape-shifting (and age-defying) featured performance in the revival of David Henry Hwang's 'Yellow Face.' And Kara Young, who won last year in the featured actress in a play category, repeated for her heightened artistry in 'Purpose,' the kind of extravagant performance no screen could do justice to. Nicole Scherzinger, who was honored as best lead actress in a musical for her portrayal of Norma Desmond in a bracing revival of Andrew Lloyd Webber's 'Sunset Boulevard,' demonstrated the power of theater to seize hold of us when she performed 'As If We Never Said Goodbye' on the telecast. In her Broadway debut, Scherzinger, who came to fame with the Pussycat Dolls, faced stiff competition from Audra McDonald, the six-time Tony winner starring in 'Gypsy.' No performance moved me more this season than McDonald's harrowing portrayal of Rose. In George C. Wolfe's revival, the character is a Black woman struggling not just with her frustrated dreams of stardom displaced onto her children but with the injustice of history itself. McDonald was given the impossible task of performing 'Rose's Turn' on the telecast, her character's Lear-like cri de cœur in song. She delivered, as she always does, but again I wish audiences at home could experience the broken majesty of this number in context at the Majestic Theatre, where theatergoers have been rising up in unison, wiping away tears, to express their gratitude for McDonald's sacrificial generosity. Darren Criss, an alum of 'Glee,' received his first Tony for endowing an outdated robot with a sophisticated taste for jazz with a deft physical life and diffident (yet unmistakable) humanity. His lead performance in 'Maybe Happy Ending' (perfectly in sync with that of his impressive co-star, Helen J Shen) is as responsible for the musical's unexpected success as Arden's staging and Dane Laffrey and George Reeve's Tony-winning scenic design. Natalie Venetia Belcon, the heart and soul of 'Buena Vista Social Club' along with the band, was honored for her featured performance in the musical that tells the story of Cuban musical style that defied history to seduce the world. And Jak Malone, who was responsible for the evening's second most riveting speech, won for his gender-blurring featured performance in'Operation Mincemeat: A New Musical.' These performances, by names you probably don't know all that well, embraced the special properties of an art form that is larger than life and all the more acutely exposed for being so. It takes enormous skill and dedication to find the delicacy in such theatrical grandeur. These artists know that flamboyance needn't preclude subtlety, and that stardom neither guarantees nor bars revelation. Actors from all ranks are clearly hungering for the kind of substance and freedom that the stage can uniquely provide. Off-Broadway has been filled with marquee talents connecting with audiences whose main interest is potent work. Patsy Ferran, starring opposite Paul Mescal in the Almeida Theatre production of 'A Streetcar Named Desire' at the Brooklyn Academy of Music's Harvey Theater, was, hands down, the best performance I saw all year. Andrew Scott in 'Vanya' at the Lucille Lortel Theatre, Adam Driver in Kenneth Lonergan's 'Hold on to Me Darling' also at the Lortel, Lily Rabe in Mark O'Rowe's adaptation of Ibsen's 'Ghosts' at Lincoln Center Theater's Mitzi E. Newhouse and Nina Hoss and Adeel Akhtar in the Donmar Warehouse production of 'The Cherry Orchard' at St. Ann's Warehouse left me feeling, as only theater can, more consciously alive and connected. The speeches at the Tony Awards, for the most part, skirted politics. This reticence was surprising given what we're living through. But there's something deeply political when we gather to look in the mirror that artists hold before nature. The politics are implicit, and this year Broadway reminded us that our humanity depends upon this ancient, timeless art.