
Roy Lichtenstein's last NYC home sell to unknown buyer for $6.5M
Located at 739 Washington Street in Manhattan's West Village, the redbrick Greek Revival townhouse sold this week for $6.525 million, marking the latest step in the methodical dissolution of the artist's once-expansive real estate footprint.
Tucked into a quiet block steps from the Hudson River, the three-story home built in 1845 spans nearly 3,700 square feet and retains many of its 19th-century details, including pumpkin pine floors, six fireplaces and intricate molding.
20 The last New York City property owned by celebrated pop artist Roy Lichtenstein has sold for $6.525 million.
Michael Weinstein
20 The home occupies nearly 3,700 square feet.
Michael Weinstein
20 Greek Revival townhouse served as a guesthouse for Lichtenstein, according to listing agent Lee Ann Jaffee of Compass.
Michael Weinstein
Despite being used as an office for the Roy Lichtenstein Foundation in recent years, the home's layout and period charm offered strong appeal to buyers drawn to historic authenticity in a neighborhood increasingly dotted with modern conversions.
It was initially listed for $6.9 million in November before entering into contract just a few short months later, at the start of 2025.
Clayton Orrigo, also of Compass, represented the unidentified buyer.
20 The townhouse is located at 739 Washington Street in the West Village.
Michael Weinstein
20 Built in 1845, the six-bedroom, 3.5-bath residence is the latest in a series of properties being sold by the Lichtenstein estate.
Michael Weinstein
20 Roy Lichtenstein's wife, Dorothy, purchased the residence for them to use as a guesthouse back in 1995.
Michael Weinstein
20 The property was initially listed in November 2024 for $6.9 million.
Michael Weinstein
The building sits directly adjacent to Lichtenstein's longtime home and studio, a former metalworking shop at 741/745 Washington Street, donated in 2022 by his widow, Dorothy Lichtenstein, to the Whitney Museum of American Art.
According to Lee Ann Jaffee of Compass, who co-listed the property with colleague Steven Sumser, 'It was a guest house. I shouldn't say he never lived there. I do not know of him ever living there. It was always represented to me that it was a guest house.'
Just a few feet south lies 747 Washington Street, a garage that once housed the artist's personal art and wine collection.
The Post previously reported that the property sold earlier this year for $5.5 million to an anonymous buyer operating under the LLC 'WHAAM-NOMAD'— a not-so-subtle nod to Lichtenstein's iconic 1963 painting 'Whaam!'
20 The garage at 747 Washington Street, which housed Roy Lichtenstein's personal art and wine collection, sold for $5.5 million in March.
Google Earth
The sale of 739 Washington concludes a physical chapter in the Lichtenstein estate's multi-year effort to downsize and distribute the artist's holdings following Dorothy's death last July. She had spent decades preserving and stewarding her husband's legacy through exhibitions, donations and the meticulous cataloguing of his oeuvre through the Roy Lichtenstein Foundation.
That work has culminated in a broader unwinding.
The foundation has announced it will cease operations by 2026, having fulfilled its mission of publishing Lichtenstein's catalogue raisonné and distributing thousands of works and archival materials to institutions around the world.
Among the most prominent recipients, the Whitney now occupies Lichtenstein's former Manhattan studio as the permanent home of its Independent Study Program.
20 Roy Lichtenstein's studio and main residence at 741-745 Washington Street was been donated to The Whitney Museum of American Art in 2022.
Google Maps
20 Pop artist Roy Lichtenstein (1923 – 1997) in his New York studio, 1962.The building — originally constructed in 1912 — was where Lichtenstein lived, painted, and entertained visitors during his later years.
'He worked downstairs, ate lunch at the same diner every day, and lived upstairs in a one-bedroom with Dorothy,' according to Curbed. The space is currently being renovated by Johnston Marklee, the architecture firm behind major museum projects in Houston and Chicago.
Just next door, the garage at 747 Washington has a more utilitarian design, but it proved equally valuable.
In addition to room for four cars, it includes a steel-and-wood staircase leading to a private office, a landscaped roof deck and skyline views.
20 Roy Lichtenstein's longtime Hamptons retreat, once a carriage house, hit the market for roughly $20 million in September following the death of his wife, Dorothy, and remains on the market.
Richard Taverna for Sotheby's International Realty
Beyond Manhattan, the artist's coastal sanctuary is also on the market.
In September, the couple's longtime home, once a carriage house on Southampton's prestigious Gin Lane, was listed for $19.99 million, The Post reported.
The 2-acre property, where Roy worked in a separate studio across the lawn and Dorothy ultimately passed away last summer, had never before been for sale in the 54 years since the Lichtensteins purchased it.
'It's going to make a really nice home for somebody because it's unique,' Harald Grant of Sotheby's International Realty, one of the co-listing agents, told The Post.
20 A photo showing inside Roy Lichtenstein's Southampton studio.
20 The perfectly manicured gardens at the Lichtenstein's longtime Hamptons estate.
Richard Taverna for Sotheby's International Realty
While the real estate assets are being dispersed, the centerpiece of the estate's final chapter is unfolding this evening and Friday night at Sotheby's New York.
More than 40 works from the private collection of Roy and Dorothy Lichtenstein are headed to the auction block as part of the house's marquee Contemporary Evening and Day Sales.
Estimated to exceed $35 million in total, the works chart four decades of the artist's output—from early drawings to large-scale paintings, sculptures, and prints.
'From drawings to paintings to sculpture, this phenomenal group of works provides a front row seat to Lichtenstein's incomparable genius,' David Galperin, Sotheby's Vice Chairman and Head of Contemporary Art in New York, said in a statement.
20 More than 40 works from the Lichtensteins' personal collection will be offered at Sotheby's on the evenings of May 15 and 16, with expectations exceeding $35 million, according to the auction house.
Getty Images
'Together, the group is a survey of the artist's reflections of art history over four decades of practice.'
Among the highlights is Reflections: Art (1988), estimated to fetch between $4 million and $6 million. The acrylic-on-canvas piece belongs to Lichtenstein's celebrated 'Reflections' series, where he obscured iconic images with simulated glass glares — both a play on illusion and a metaphor for art's relationship to perception.
'To my father, art was all about composition,' said Mitchell Lichtenstein, the artist's son, in a statement. 'When asked for comment about his subject matter, he often said, 'It's just marks on a page.''
20 A painting seen at Roy Lichtenstein's Southamptons studio, situated in the middle right, titled 'Reflections: Art' from 1988, painted with acrylic, oil and graphite on canvas and is estimated to go for between $4,000,000 – 6,000,000.
Sotheby's
20 Woman: Sunlight, Moonlight 1996, acrylic on wood, estimate $4,000,000 – 6,000,000
Sotheby's
Other marquee offerings include Woman: Sunlight, Moonlight (1996), a double-sided sculpture in painted wood — a study for a bronze edition later acquired by institutions like The Broad in Los Angeles — and Stretcher Frame with Cross Bars III (1968), one of only eleven such works exploring the backside of a painting.
'The amusing aspect of the Stretcher Frame painting is that of the two sides of a canvas, it depicts the side we least want to see,' said Mitchell.
Sculptures such as Mirror I (1976) echo the artist's lifelong fascination with the idea of reflection and illusion, while collage studies like Interior with African Mask (Study) (1990) reveal his painstaking process in constructing his 'Interiors' series, which poked fun at the aspirational settings common in shelter magazines.
20 Mirror I
1976, painted and patinated bronze
Estimate $1,000,000 – 1,500,000
20 Roy Lichtenstein with his wife, philanthropist Dorothy, at his New York studio in 1968.
Getty Images
'One amusing thing to consider about the Interior series is that the generic furniture ad aesthetic of the rooms depicted in them is likely to be antithetical to the taste of the collector and to the room in which they hang the work,' Mitchell noted.
Other featured works include Haystacks (1968), Lichtenstein's tongue-in-cheek nod to Monet's Impressionist series, reinterpreted with bold Ben-Day dots; Entablature (1975), incorporating sand from the Southampton beaches near his studio; and Cover Image (The Gun in America) for Time Magazine (Study) (circa 1968), a graphite-on-paper rendering originally commissioned in response to the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy.
'Lichtenstein was keenly aware of his place in the lineage of art history,' said Lucius Elliott, Head of Sotheby's Contemporary Evening Auctions in New York. 'The crux of his practice is this interrogation of the nature of art and image making.'
20 Mirror I Interior with African Mask (Study) 1990, tape, cut painted paper, cut sponge-painted paper, cut printed paper, marker, graphite pencil on board Estimate $800,000 – 1,200,000 Estimate $1,000,000 – 1,500,000
Sotheby's
20 Cover Image (The Gun in America) for Time Magazine (Study) Circa 1968, graphite on paper, estimate $200,000-300,000
Sotheby's
Born in New York City in 1923, Roy's early artistic ambitions took shape at Ohio State University after World War II.
He rose to fame in the 1960s for his stylized comic book paintings and went on to produce over 5,000 works spanning media, genres, and decades. Despite early critical controversy, his pieces are now held by museums including MoMA, the Whitney, the Centre Pompidou, and the Art Institute of Chicago.
His widow, Dorothy, was instrumental in cementing that legacy. A Brooklyn native and former gallery director, she co-founded the Roy Lichtenstein Foundation and was its longtime president, overseeing major donations of more than 1,000 works to institutions worldwide.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump rips ‘disgusting degenerate' Pelosi, alleges ‘average' minded husband got rich off ‘inside information'
President Trump blasted former House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi as a 'disgusting degenerate' while alleging that she and her hubby reaped a fortune off 'inside information.' 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all INSIDE iNFORMATION!' Trump wrote in a blistering attack on Truth Social late Saturday. Trump also implied that someone should look into Pelosi (D-Calif.) and gloated over how he overcame two impeachment efforts the leading Democrat oversaw. 'Is anybody looking into this??? She is a disgusting degenerate, who Impeached me twice, on NO GROUNDS, and LOST! How are you feeling now, Nancy???' Trump wrote. It is not immediately clear what sparked Trump's broadside against Pelosi, 85, who has fiercely denied any accusations of insider trading. 3 Nancy Pelosi has defended her husband's business ventures as part of the free market. AP 3 President Trump has long seethed at Nancy Pelosi, who was the source of many political headaches for him during his first term. NATHAN HOWARD/POOL/EPA/Shutterstock 'Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' spokesperson Ian Krager told The Post last month. The Post contacted a Pelosi spokesperson for a response to Trump's latest swipe against her. Nonetheless, the speaker emeritus has long faced scrutiny over her husband Paul's venture capital and other business endeavors. Lawmakers are not required to publicly divulge their net worth, which means it is unclear exactly how much she is worth. An estimate from Quiver Quantitative has pegged it at least $263.23 million, making her the fourth richest member of Congress. But there are open questions about whether she is even wealthier than that. Last year, Paul Pelosi's trades in 2024 outperformed the S&P 500's 25% gain last year, by hauling in some 54% in returns, as The Post previously reported, citing Bloomberg data. In January, Paul Pelosi invested in an artificial intelligence health firm, Tempus AI, buying it when it was worth some $31.83 per share. But then the firm cut a $200 million deal with AstraZeneca and is now worth about $60.87 a share, almost double the price when Paul Pelosi purchased it. 3 Nancy Pelosi and her husband, Paul, have a nine-figure fortune. FilmMagic Other transactions that have raised eyebrows include well-timed trades of NVIDIA, Palo Alto Networks, energy company Vistra, and more. Last year, Paul Pelosi dumped some $2.2 million shares of Microsoft stock, in one of his largest sales in about three years, just a few months before the Federal Trade Commission began an antitrust probe of the company. Back in 2021, Pelosi ripped into a push for a ban on stock trades by members of Congress, arguing that 'we're a free‑market economy.' She has since backed some iterations of such a ban. Last month, Sen. Josh Hawley's (R-Mo.) Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act cleared a key Senate Committee and drew ire from both Trump and other Republicans. The PELOSI Act restricts lawmakers from owning individual stocks or trading them. Initially, Trump raged against Hawley as a 'second-tier' senator after being left under the impression that the ban would apply to him and require key divestments. Hawley has since appeared to have won Trump over after explaining that the ban would not impact presidents until early 2029, when his term concludes. That bill could come up when the Senate reconvenes from recess next month. Pelosi has not said whether or not she intends to vie for reelection in 2026.


New York Post
19 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Weapons' was the big gun at the box office, raking in $18.2M on its opening day
The theaters were definitely locked and loaded. 'Weapons' blasted to No.1 on Friday as its opener pulled in $18.2 million, according to The Numbers. The flick, which The Post praised as 'the best horror movie of the summer' could be enjoying an over $30 million opening weekend. Its star, Josh Brolin, who plays the father of one of 17 children who run away on the same night, told Collider why the film stands out amongst others in the genre. 'Right now, with so much content, you're just watching things on whatever streaming service you're on, and you're just going, 'F–k, why is this so boring, man? Why?' And just go to the next thing. 'It's all the same s–t.' 3 Julia Garner stars in the mystery horror 'Weapons.' ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection 'Freakier Friday,' which The Post called 'a decent comeback movie' for its star Lindsay Lohan, landed in second place with sales of $12.7 million. The long-awaited sequel to 2003's 'Freaky Friday' — which has Jamie Lee Curtis reprising her role — could be looking at an up to $32 million opening weekend haul. Curtis explained to USA Today why the sequel took more than two decades. 3 Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan reprise their roles in 'Freakier Friday,' a sequel to the 2003 original. ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection 'There was no possible way we could have done a sequel to 'Freaky Friday' until Lindsay was old enough chronologically to be the mother of a 15-year-old,' she told the outlet. 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' flew down two notches to third place, earning $4.5 million on its third Friday in theaters. The superhero film, distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, saw a 66% drop during its second week at the box office and Disney CEO Bob Iger addressed the elephant in the room during a recent Q&A with analysts. 'Even though, for instance, there have been 'Fantastic Four' movies before, we kind of consider the one that we did an original property in many respects because we're introducing those characters to people who are not familiar with them at all,' he said. 3 Pedro Pascal plays Mister Fantastic in 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection In fourth was the family animated comedy 'The Bad Guys 2,' down two spots from last Friday, with a $3.07 million take. In less than a week in theaters, the Pixar film earned $50 million globally, surpassing the entire box office earnings of the animation company's 2021 movie 'Luca,' according to Collider. 'The Naked Gun' fell two places to fifth, with $2.37 million in sales. The legacy sequel, which was released last Friday, is star Liam Neeson's highest-grossing movie of the decade.


New York Post
20 hours ago
- New York Post
Nearly half of Gen Z would pick money over love, new survey finds
Leave the fiancé, take the 401k. A stunning 46% of Gen Zers would pick long-term financial stability over romance, and close to 1 in 3 said they'd even take a former partner back if that ex got rich, according to a new dating survey by matchmaking service Tawkify. 'Money equals safety, security and freedom,' Brie Temple, Tawkify's CCO and chief matchmaker, told The Post. 'Taking an ex back because they got rich isn't just about the bank account. It's about what that wealth symbolizes: security, ambition and maybe a sense that they've 'leveled up' since the breakup.' Advertisement 4 Nearly half of Gen Zers would pick long-term financial stability over romance, and close to 1 in 3 said they'd even take a former partner back — if that ex got rich. EDUARDOIVAN – The June 2025 survey asked 1,000 Americans about how money shapes dating today. Gen Xers were the most financially cautious, with 52% saying they'd choose money over love — but Gen Z wasn't far behind. They've got a number in mind, too: 1 in 10 Gen Z women say their ideal match should be making $200,000 or more, and most won't settle for anything under $80,000. Advertisement By contrast, Millennials were the most love-struck: 59% said they'd rather have a 'broke and magical' relationship than one with financial security. And across the larger population, about 63% of Americans said they'd marry for love, even if it meant a lifetime of financial struggle. 4 Millennials were the most likely to prioritize love over romance, while Gen Z and Gen X were the most financially cautious. djile – Still, for many daters, love has a limit — and a minimum salary. Nearly half of Gen Z, 46%, said they wouldn't date someone who's unemployed, even if they were attracted to them, a factor that beat out political differences as a dealbreaker. Advertisement Today's singles of all ages care about more than just income, they're sizing up spending habits, savings goals and long-term financial compatibility, Temple told The Post. 'We're asking more about how people handle money, what kind of lifestyle they want and how they see their future,' she said. 'Even if two people really get along, different views on finances can cause problems later.' Nearly 70% of respondents across all generations said they've stayed in relationships longer than they should have because of shared finances, with a quarter noting the relationship was long-term. 4 Nearly half of Gen Z said they wouldn't date someone who's unemployed, even if they were attracted to them, beating out political differences as a dealbreaker. crizzystudio – Advertisement Gen Z's mindset is shaped by years of economic instability, including the aftermath of the 2008 recession, ballooning student debt and pandemic-era job losses, said Marisa Cohen, a Long Island-based marriage and family therapist. 'The pressure to focus on finances likely feels so urgent because of the economic uncertainty Gen Z has dealt with through most of their lives,' she told The Post. 'Being tied to a relationship in which there is financial insecurity or uncertainty may compete with their own personal goals and pursuits.' And money talk now happens earlier and can make or break a connection, said Damona Hoffman, a certified dating coach and author of 'F the Fairy Tale: Rewrite the Dating Myths and Live Your Own Love Story.' 4 Still, Gen Z hasn't totally ruled out romance. A slim majority, 54%, said they'd still choose a 'broke and magical' relationship over one that's rich and lifeless. Jack Forbes / NY Post Design 'Daters are terrified of partnering with someone who has bad credit or unmanaged debt,' she said. 'You could have a fancy car, a nice apartment and put your dates on credit cards but be sitting on mounds of high-interest loans.' Still, Gen Z hasn't totally ruled out romance. A slim majority, 54%, said they'd still choose a 'broke and magical' relationship over one that's rich and lifeless. 'Gen Z is dating with their eyes wide open,' Temple said. 'They still want love but only when it fits into a life that feels secure, balanced and true to who they are.'