Ampol to Acquire About 500 Petrol Stations in $1.1 Billion Deal
The deal will give Ampol control of around 500 fuel and convenience sites currently operated by EG Australia, a subsidiary of the British-owned EG Group.
As per Reuters, the acquisition will be funded through AU$800 million in cash, sourced from existing debt, and approximately AU$250 million from the sale of Ampol shares.
Ampol Chairman Steven Gregg said the transaction would deliver scale and operational benefits.
'The combined network will have greater scale and significant cost synergies that will support strong returns and earnings growth for our shareholders,' he said.
Ampol expects the integration to deliver annual savings of between $65 million and $80 million. The company currently supplies fuel to 80,000 customers nationwide and serves around 3 million people each week through its retail outlets.
EG Group's Exit from Australia
The sale will mark EG Group's departure from the Australian market, five years after it entered through a $1.25 billion acquisition of Woolworths' fuel business.
The British-based operator, which has grown to over 6,000 sites worldwide, has been shedding non-core assets to reduce its debt load.
Earlier this week, EG agreed to sell its Italian business for 225 million euro as part of a broader strategy to strengthen its balance sheet.
The company's net debt stands at about US$5.3 billion, built up during an aggressive acquisition spree, and pre-tax profits have fallen sharply—from US$1.4 billion to US$10 million last year, according to The Times.
The sale of its Australian arm is subject to clearance from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel
Intel (INTC) stock is popping following reports that the US government is considering taking a stake in the legacy chipmaker after Trump's meeting with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Slatestone Wealth chief market strategist and host of Yahoo Finance's Trader Talk, Kenny Polcari, and Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal join Opening Bid to take a closer look at what the reported government partnership could mean for the US, Intel, and the evolving chip landscape. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. All right, let's fire up, uh, my stock of the day. The Trump administration is reportedly in talks with Intel to have the US government take a stake. Uh, Intel declined to comment specifically on this to me, but they did say this, uh, quote, Intel's deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. Uh, the questions here are many though. One, why would the administration even want to stake in an Intel that is scary behind chief rivals Nvidia and AMD? President Trump has interacted a lot with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and has got a taste as to what it means to be a leader in semiconductors. Two, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government at a time in which CEO Lipu Tang and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company. I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder. There's a lot of stake here, as Intel is and should be a beacon of US chip making, not the punching bag it has become. The company's financials have taken a major hit with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. A lot going on there. Still with me, my round table, Kenny, Paul Kerry, uh, Slate Stone Wealth chief market strategist, David Seif, Nomora chief economist, and Yahoo Finance reporter, senior reporter, Allie Canal. Kenny, I want to go over to you. Um, any interest in going long in Intel on news like this, uh, even in the, uh, keeping the back of your mind, or maybe just putting the front of your mind that this is a fundamentally, uh, just wrong company. I mean, nothing's going right for them. Uh, uh, agree. So Intel's not a name that I've ever owned, uh, and we don't own it here. But look, I it's certainly has a pop because of the news. But is the pop temporary? I'm not even sure. And I agree with you. Why would you want to get, why would the government want to now be partners with Intel? Why would Intel want to be partners with the government? And what does that say about future opportunities? Is the government now going to start this Trump going to start the stick his hand in other companies? Kenny, it's like the auto bailout. I mean, it reminds me of when they took a stake in GM, what, 15, 20 years ago. 100%. And so I'm a little bit I'm a little bit confused about that. But Intel's not a name that I ever owned at all. I think there's other places to put your money in the space. But so this news does nothing in terms of getting me excited about, oh, I got to jump on this Intel bandwagon. I do not. David, does the, does it benefit, um, the US economy to have a healthy Intel? Or at this point, the semiconductor industry led by Nvidia, AMD, and of course, Taiwan semiconductor, they have just passed this company by, and our economy can go chugging along relying on chips from these three companies. Yeah, I mean, you know, I don't have much to say about individual companies, but certainly, um, you know, the US has a multi-century track record of doing well by sort of not sticking its nose into things and allowing, allowing the private market to go where it may. Um, to the extent that Intel has been lagging behind, uh, it it may be the best thing for the economy to simply allow it to, uh, continue to either wither or sink or swim, so to speak, um, and allow the current leaders to continue to lead and only lose their lead if they actually get out competed. Uh, Allie, uh, we're just about almost two weeks away from that Nvidia earnings report. And it will look starkly different to what Intel put up a few weeks ago. And it's night and day. I mean, these are, these companies both might be making computer chips, but they couldn't be more different. Couldn't be more different. And Intel, I just feel like it's too late for the company to really catch up to AMD, to Nvidia. Of course, for the Trump administration, they're viewing this as an issue of national security, that they really want to make sure that Intel can survive through this volatile time. We did have the that CEO meeting with President Trump, and really we've seen that across the board of big tech, right? Apple CEO, Tim Cook, met with Trump recently. And then out of that meeting was a $100 billion investment in the US. So that is President Trump's goal. He wants to bring manufacturing production, all the things, including all the chip makers back onto the domestic soil. But they also have other types of agreements that they're rolling out that are very unique and really unprecedented. One of those being that revenue share agreement with Nvidia and AMD. They're letting them sell some of their chips to China for a kickback, for some of the revenue to the federal government. So there's just a lot of moving parts and moving pieces to this. It's still an unconfirmed report. Intel did say that they are looking forward to working with the government, but they didn't confirm whether or not this was actually happening. So it feels like the US is just going to continue to be involved in some of these companies, at least throughout the term of Trump's presidency. What ultimately comes from that and the legacy that leads and how it really changes what we view the the chip supply chain as at this current moment, that remains to be seen. Related Videos How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold Apple shares. Should you? Intel Soars as Trump Considers US Stake in Chipmaker 3 AI chip stocks that are best positioned right now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's meeting with Putin impacts investors
US President Trump is set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. Slatestone Wealth chief market strategist and host of Yahoo Finance's Trader Talk, Kenny Polcari, shares his expectations for the meeting and how it could move markets, while Nomura's chief economist David Seif examines the potential economic impact of the meeting's outcome. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. Kenny, I want to go over to you here. This is a market that is still inclined to trade on economic data rather than geopolitical events, but this meeting between President Trump and Vladimir Putin could that change the tone of the market, do you think? Listen, it can change the tone temporarily. Geopolitical stuff can cause chaos, short term chaos in the market because it doesn't really price stocks in the long term. So on a day like today, everybody's gonna be paying attention. They want to see how long Trump stays in the room or not in the room, right? He's already made it very clear. If he stays in there less than five minutes, there's no deal, he doesn't want to talk about it. And there's going to be more more threats and sanctions on Russia. If the if the if the meeting goes longer than five minutes, then we can all assume that maybe they're making some progress. And that should help to settle things down. So yes, while it's not gonna price stocks in the long term, people should be paying attention although it's not going to hit until 3:00 this afternoon just because of the time difference. So the market may not have a lot of time to react. David, good to see you here this morning, David. What What Hey, how are you? Good. What are the economic ramifications of a meeting like this? Well, you know, I think that the the Russia Ukraine war, of course, is is sort of a travesty, um, from a humanitarian basis. It's not a first order importance to the United States. And I actually think that if there were to be some sort of a solution, either coming out of this meeting, or or in the near future, uh, one of the biggest beneficiaries at least in sort of the developed world would actually be Europe. Europe has this war on its on this war on its doorstep. And, um, solving it would unlock a lot of the potential that, uh, or undo a lot of the hit that occurred in 2022 when the war began. Uh, In addition, I think other countries could benefit such as India because that would allow them to avoid these, the the tariffs that Trump has talked about from trading with Russia. And so relief from those could also be a benefit to, uh, to India in particular, which is is one of the main trading partners with Russia that's also been a historic US ally. Ali, I've been making the argument all week, the market has totally forgotten about geopolitical risks, so focused on corporate earnings, what's happening with interest rates, but look, any bad headline from this meeting will likely dent stocks. Full stop. Look, Brian, geopolitical risks are always lurking around the corner, and you often don't know when they're going to hit. And I referenced earlier that Israel-Iran escalation, and that really took markets by surprise. We saw that intense spike in oil. We saw equities fall. There was a lot of concern whether we could be heading into a World War III situation. So that's always something that you have to keep in mind. But I totally agree with you. There's just a lot of momentum in stocks right now. There's a lot of risk trading. We are looking at Big Tech cap companies continuing to outperform. Crypto stocks have surged. And like you were saying, earnings have really been a big driver for that. And across the board, we've seen analysts raise their forecast for the S&P 500, specifically citing earnings. And it's not just earnings expectations for 2025. It's really for 2026 and beyond as well. So that is where the optimism is stemming from that this rally has legs and that it can also continue to trade higher from here. And I've been speaking to a lot of sources about whether or not we are overbought in this market. And they tell me no, that we're really at a fair value considering where earnings are and how the fundamental story has largely remained intact. Of course, we saw those hotter than expected inflation reports this week. TBD on the impact of that will have on the Fed and equities and trade policy moving forward. Kenny, I originally met you eons ago down the New York Stock Exchange trading floor. So let's pretend we are back there right now. What trades do you put in or put on going into the close, knowing that this meeting with Trump and Putin will happen likely 30 minutes before the market closes? So I think you have to decide on where you stand, right? I'm more optimistic. I actually think that there's going to be a deal. So if that were the case, then I'm gonna I'm going to go long the market, right? I'm going to be I'm going to buy bets. I'm going to be in the market. If you're on the side of the case that you think there's not going to be a deal and the market's going to back off, then you want to get short the market or at least maybe you want to get short parts of the market, right? You'd want to go long oil. You'd want to go long gold if in fact, you think that there's not going to be a deal. So it depends on who you are is gonna dictate how you set yourself up or how you how you get ready for what this may be. I'm optimistic. I think there's going to be a deal. I think oil's going to go lower. I think gold's going to go lower. And I think stocks will continue to move higher. Related Videos Why Trump might push for a US gov't. stake in Intel Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold Apple shares. Should you? US July Retail Sales Rise Despite Tariff Uncertainty Watch: Trump Departs White House for Putin Summit on Ukraine Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US business inventories rise as expected in June
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. business inventories increased as expected in June, lifted by higher motor vehicle stocks. Inventories rose 0.2% after being unchanged in May, the Commerce Department's Census Bureau said on Friday. Inventories are a key component of gross domestic product and one of the most volatile. They increased 1.6% year on year. Inventories decreased at a $26.0 billion annualized rate in the second quarter, subtracting 3.17 percentage points from GDP growth. The drag was more than offset by a smaller trade deficit as a tariff-related flood of imports subsided. The economy grew at a 3.0% rate last quarter after contracting at a 0.5% pace in the January-March quarter. Retail inventories increased 0.2%, instead of 0.3% as estimated in an advance report published last month. They increased 0.2% in May. Motor vehicle inventories advanced 1.0%, rather than 0.9% as previously reported. They rose 0.6% in May. Retail inventories excluding autos, which go into the calculation of GDP, dipped 0.1% instead of being unchanged as initially reported. Wholesale inventories edged up 0.1% in June, while stocks at manufacturers rose 0.2%. Business sales rebounded 0.5% in June after falling 0.4% in May. At June's sales pace, it would take 1.38 months for businesses to clear shelves, down from 1.39 months in May. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
