China hands over new batch of food assistance to Zimbabwe
Addressing the ceremony in Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwean Deputy Minister of Public Service, Labor and Social Welfare Mercy Dinha thanked China for the food assistance, comprising about 3,000 tonnes of rice and wheat, saying the food will go a long way in helping vulnerable citizens.
"We are looking at child-headed families, persons with disabilities, and the elderly. We are going to make sure that this consignment reaches those in need, especially the hard-to-reach areas," Dinha said.
"China is our all-weather friend. They have assisted us in infrastructural development and agriculture. So I really want to thank China for participating in the development of Zimbabwe," Dinha said.
For his part, Chinese Ambassador to Zimbabwe Zhou Ding emphasized China's commitment to helping Zimbabwe achieve food security and reduce poverty, saying the food assistance is part of China's response to Zimbabwe's international appeal for food aid following last year's devastating drought.
"As we always say, a friend in need is a friend indeed. China and Zimbabwe are time-honored friends," Zhou said. "As friends, we are always ready to provide help when our Zimbabwean brothers and sisters need it most."
Noting that China always attaches great importance and priority to issues of food security and poverty reduction, Zhou said the two countries should continue strengthening partnerships to boost food security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump tariffs on buyers of Russian oil raise global risks
WASHINGTON: From punishing Brazil to trying to curb imports of fentanyl, US President Donald Trump has wielded the threat of tariffs as an all-purpose foreign policy weapon. With a Friday deadline for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or have its oil customers face secondary tariffs, Trump has found a novel, but risky, use for his favourite trade tool. The administration took a step towards punishing Moscow's customers on Wed-nesday, imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods from India over its imports of Russian oil, marking the first financial penalty aimed at Russia in Trump's second term. No order has been signed for China, the top Russian oil importer, but a White House official said on Wednesday, secondary measures that Trump has threatened against countries buying the petroleum were expected on Friday. These are the latest in a string of Trump's tariff threats on non-trade issues such as pressing Denmark to give the US control of Greenland, attempting to stop fentanyl deliveries from Mexico and Canada, and penalising Brazil over what he described as a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro. While secondary tariffs could inflict pain on the Russian economy – severing a top source of funding for Russian President Vladimir Putin's war effort – they also carry costs for Trump. Oil prices will likely rise, creating political problems for him before next year's US midterm congressional elections. The tariffs would also complicate the administration's efforts to secure trade deals with China and India. For his part, Putin has signalled that Russia is prepared to weather any new economic hardship imposed by the US and its allies. There is 'close to zero chance' Putin will agree to a ceasefire due to Trump's threats of tariffs and sanctions on Russia, said Eugene Rumer, a former US intelligence analyst for Russia who directs the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's Russia and Eurasia Programme. 'Theoretically if you cut off Indian and Chinese purchases of oil that would be a very heavy blow to the Russian economy and to the war effort. But that isn't going to happen,' he said, adding that the Chinese have signaled they will keep buying Russia's oil. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Russian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond. Secondary tariffs would hurt Russia, the world's second leading oil exporter. The West has pressured Russia since late 2022 with a price cap on its oil exports, intended to erode Russia's ability to fund the war. That cap has piled costs on Russia as it forced it to reroute oil exports from Europe to India and China, which have been able to import huge amounts of it at discounted prices. But the cap also kept oil flowing to global markets. In an early sign that Putin hopes to avoid the tariffs, the White House said that Putin and Trump could meet as soon as next week, following a meeting between US envoy Steve Witkoff and the Russian leader on Wednesday. But some analysts are skeptical that Moscow is ready to stop the war. Brett Bruen, former foreign policy adviser for former president Barack Obama now head of the Global Situation Room consultancy, cautioned that Putin has found ways to evade sanctions and other economic penalties. And even if tariffs and sanctions cut into Russia's revenues, Putin is not under much domestic pressure. Secondary tariffs, Bruen said, could start to cause some economic pain. 'But the question is whether that really changes Putin's behaviour.' The tariffs could also create new problems for the Trump administration as it pursues sweeping trade deals, especially with India and China. Kimberly Donovan, a former US Treasury official, said the tariffs could hamper the US bilateral and trade relationships with India and China. 'You've got two major oil importers that can kind of dig in their heels and push back, knowing what the US needs out of them,' said Donovan, now director of the Economic Statecraft Initiative in the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Centre. China has demonstrated leverage over the US by cutting off mineral exports and new tariffs would upset a delicate balance negotiated since May to restart those flows critical to a host of US industries. India has leverage over generic pharmaceutical exports and precursor chemicals to the US. Both countries say that oil purchases are a sovereign matter and contend that they are playing by the previous rules, namely the price cap on Russian crude. Secondary tariffs would raise the cost of imports into the US of products from Russia's customers, giving them an incentive to buy their oil elsewhere. Squeezing the shipments risks spiking fuel prices and inflation around the world that could pose political difficulties for Trump. The month after Moscow's February 2022 invasion, fears of disruptions from Russia pushed international crude prices close to US$130 per barrel, not far from their all-time high of US$147. If India were to stop buying 1.7 million barrels per day of Russian crude, about 2% of global supply, world prices would jump from the current US$66, analysts said. JP Morgan analysts said this month it was 'impossible' to sanction Russian oil without triggering a price jump. Any perceived disruptions to Russian shipments could propel Brent oil prices into the US$80s or higher. Despite Trump's statements that US producers would step in, it would be unable to quickly ramp up, they said. Russia could retaliate, including closing the CPC Pipeline from Kazakhstan, which could create a global supply crisis. Western oil firms Exxon, Chevron, Shell , ENI and TotalEnergies ship up to 1 million barrels per day via CPC, which has total capacity of 1.7 million bpd. Cullen Hendrix, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said energy shocks are never welcome, especially not amidst a softening housing market and weak job growth. A key question is whether Trump can frame any economic pain as necessary to force Russia to negotiate. – Reuters
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
US-India tensions cast doubt on future of Quad, as well as possible Trump visit
As trade tensions between Washington and New Delhi escalate, an anticipated high-profile visit of US President Donald Trump to India this fall is now clouded by uncertainty. The rift that is testing a relationship between what their diplomats sometimes tout as the world's oldest and largest democracies is not only weakening bilateral ties, but also casting doubt on the future of a critical Indo-Pacific bloc aimed at countering China's growing influence in the region. The White House has been pressing India for substantive 'deliverables' the 'America first' president could announce during the trip, planned for the Quad leaders' summit in September or October, according to a person familiar with preparations for a summit. Initially, both sides had aimed to finalise a comprehensive trade agreement to coincide with the visit to give the occasion strategic and political momentum. However, the source said that without a trade breakthrough, it is increasingly unlikely that Trump will make the trip. The Quad, which also includes Japan and Australia, was formed in 2004 but remained dormant until 2017. Resurrected by Trump in his first term, the alliance was enthusiastically embraced by former US president Joe Biden as part of his Indo-Pacific strategy. Under Biden, the bloc was elevated to leaders' level in 2021. Trump threatened to 'substantially' increase tariffs for India in the 'next 24 hours' on Tuesday, after having berated India in recent days for making 'massive' oil purchases from Russia. According to another person familiar with Indian thinking, Trump's attacks have left New Delhi 'bitter'. During the five rounds of talks between April 2 and July, New Delhi had sought 'preferential' trade treatment because of its status as a reliable partner to the US in the Indo-Pacific as the Biden administration portrayed India as a democratic regional counterweight to China. However, Trump has remained firm in his demand for full market access, showing little willingness to acknowledge New Delhi's strategic role in countering Beijing's influence, slapping Indian imports with 25 per cent tariffs. Experts say a breakdown in US-India trade negotiations, coupled with potential cancellation of Trump's New Delhi visit, could hand Beijing a strategic Indo-Pacific win. Lisa Curtis, who served as deputy assistant to the president and senior director for South and Central Asia during Trump's first term from 2017 to 2021, said that Trump was 'ignoring the bigger geopolitical picture and the larger challenges to US national security' because of his 'narrow' focus on tariffs and trade balance. Curtis, now director of the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Center for New American Security in Washington, said 'the security imperative to counter growing Chinese military power and influence requires the United States to draw countries like India into a closer embrace with the United States, not pick fights to try to gain better market access.' She described the Quad as an effective mechanism to promote activities and policies in the Indo-Pacific that support US interests, such as countering Chinese economic and military coercion, adding that 'if US-India trade talks break down and Trump cancels his visit to India, this would be a clear win for China.' 'The first Trump administration successfully elevated the US-India relationship and built strategic trust and confidence in the relationship. The second Trump administration's lack of strategic perspective on US-India ties threatens to undermine that progress,' Curtis said. According to Wendy Cutler, a former American diplomat and trade negotiator, the growing trade friction between Washington and New Delhi 'calls into question the timing of a Quad Leaders' meeting' and is 'not helpful as preparations are being discussed'. 'The prospect of announcing the successful conclusion of a bilateral trade agreement undoubtedly made a visit to India by the President more compelling than just a Quad Leaders' meeting,' said Cutler, now vice-president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, a Washington think tank. She added that India and other US trading partners were aware of Trump's fixation with trade and tariffs and there was hope that 'over time issues on strategic cooperation will move to the forefront'. Christopher Clary, a political science professor at the State University of New York's University at Albany, said the Quad is 'less important now for Washington than it was in the Biden administration or the first Trump term'. He said the bloc remains useful to have a 'frequent gathering of the most economically and militarily capable democracies in Asia,' and that if Quad members do not align their strategies 'China will have greater room to enhance its global and regional influence'. Curtis said it is possible the US and India could still conclude a trade deal by September to pave the way for a Trump visit to India in the autumn. 'The prospects for a deal at the moment, however, look somewhat bleak,' she said, adding that Trump's repeated criticisms of India are 'backing Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi into a corner, making it increasingly difficult for him to be seen as making concessions.' According to Manjari Chatterjee Miller, a senior fellow for India, Pakistan and South Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank in New York, 'unless Modi and Trump can reach an agreement, this is an incredibly destabilising moment for the US-India relationship, and recovery will be difficult'. She said 'the last thing India wants is for a strong Russia-China relationship to develop at India's expense', adding that the US administrations over the past decade typically overlooked the Russia factor to build a strong relationship with India. 'China indeed could benefit from a tense US-India relationship,' Miller added. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump demands CEO of US chip maker Intel resign 'immediately'
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump demanded Thursday that the new boss of US chip maker Intel resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, a day after Senator Tom Cotton said he had written to Intel questioning Lip-Bu Tan's connections to firms in China. In a statement issued Thursday, Tan said the company was "engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised and ensure officials "have the facts." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies, but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In Cotton's letter, posted on his website, the senator alleged Tan controls dozens of Chinese companies and holds stakes in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms. "At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People's Liberation Army," Cotton wrote. The Republican Senator also noted Tan's role as the previous head of Cadence Design Systems, which he said recently "pleaded guilty to illegally selling its products to a Chinese military university." Cotton said while serving in that role, Tan transferred "its technology to an associated Chinese semiconductor company without obtaining licenses." In a statement, Tan said there has been "a lot of misinformation circulating" about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. "I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40+ years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem," Tan said. "And I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards." He stressed that the United States has been his home for over 40 years and that he is "profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me." He added that he fully shares Trump's commitment to "advancing US national and economic security" and is proud to lead a company "so central to these goals." The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at struggling Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. He has previously said it "won't be easy" to overcome challenges faced by the company. The company was also caught by surprise with the emergence of Nvidia as the world's preeminent AI chip provider. Intel's niche has been chips used in traditional computing processes, which steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution.
