&w=3840&q=100)
How an Ultra-Orthodox military draft law could bring down Netanyahu's government
Benjamin Netanyahu and his Israeli government are set to face a vote that may dissolve parliament and end his tenure as prime minster. The vote is the most serious challenge to Netanyahu's government since the war began in Gaza. But what happened? Why is Netanyahu staring down the barrel? read more
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition government is at risk of collapse.
Netanyahu and his party are awaiting a vote on Wednesday that could potentially dissolve parliament.
The collapse comes amid the party's failure to pass a bill that could reverse the long-standing exemption from the military draft for ultra-Orthodox Jews.
The opposition's call for dissolving the parliament may see the light of the day only if Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox coalition partners break with him.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The vote is the most serious challenge to Netanyahu's government since the war began in Gaza and the coalition's collapse could have major implications for Israel.
But what happened? What do we know?
Why do the ultra-Orthodox reject military service?
It is mandatory for Jewish people in Israel to serve in the military.
While men need to complete three years and women serve two years in active service, it is followed by years of reserve duty. But here's the twist — the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox are granted exemptions from service if they are full-time students in religious seminaries.
The exemption dates back to the creation of Israel in 1948.
Back then, the enlistment exemption for the ultra-Orthodox was granted to a small number of gifted scholars as a direct response to the profound loss of Jewish scholarship during the Holocaust.
An ultra-orthodox Jewis man shouts during a protest against army recruitment in Bnei Brak, Israel. AP
But today the numbers of those being exempted have reached new heights due to politically powerful religious parties.
While Israel's Supreme Court said the exemptions were illegal in 2017, repeated extensions and government delay tactics have prevented a replacement law from being passed.
Among Israel's Jewish majority, mandatory military service is largely seen as a melting pot and rite of passage. That's exactly why some ultra-Orthodox don't want their children to serve.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'It mixes together people with very different backgrounds, very different ideas, some people with very immoral ideas,' said 66-year-old Rabbi Ephraim Luft, from the ultra-Orthodox stronghold of Bnei Barak. Luft said the community's dedication to upholding Jewish commandments protects the country as much as military service.
'Over thousands of years, the Jewish people have stood very strongly against any kind of decrees to force them to give up their religion, they've given up their lives for this,' Luft said. 'People have to understand there's no difference between the Spanish Inquisition or the Israeli draft law.'
Why are the ultra-Orthodox parties ready to topple the Israeli govt?
Netanyahu's coalition relies heavily on two Haredi or 'God-fearing' parties.
For new elections to be forced, both these parties including the Shas party would need to vote to dissolve the government.
A spokesperson for the Shas party conveyed to an ultra-Orthodox radio program on Monday that the party currently intends to cast its vote in favour of dissolving parliament.
This of course is contingent upon the absence of a breakthrough in ongoing negotiations. Meanwhile, the other coalition partner, Degel HaTorah, has been making threats to withdraw from the government since last week.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Basically, they don't really care about the war and the economic situation of the state and anything else but their communal interest. And the focus of this communal interest is getting the exemption from serving in the army,' said Shuki Friedman, an expert on religion and state affairs and vice president of the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank.
Friedman and other experts say the current system is unsustainable. With its high birth rate, the ultra-Orthodox are the fastest-growing segment of Israel's population, at about four per cent annually. Each year, roughly 13,000 ultra-Orthodox men reach the conscription age of 18, but less than 10 per cent enlist, according to parliament's State Control Committee, which held a hearing examining the issue.
The shock of the October 7 attack appeared to ignite some enthusiasm among the ultra-Orthodox to serve, but no large enlistment materialised. The army has repeatedly declined to comment on the ultra-Orthodox enlistment rate.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What will happen if the parliament is dissolved?
According to Gayil Talshir, a political science professor at Hebrew University, even if the dissolution vote is successful, it would still need to navigate a series of bureaucratic procedures. This includes further parliamentary votes, a process the current government would likely extend over several weeks or months.
'It will be like a gun that's been put into position, but that doesn't mean the coalition is over,' she said. Elections in Israel are currently scheduled for the fall of 2026.
Israeli police officers disperse ultra-orthodox Jewish men during a protest against army recruitment. AP
Both Talshir and Friedman believe it's unlikely the dissolution vote will pass Wednesday. If one ultra-Orthodox party is absent, the vote will not pass and another cannot be brought for six months, Talshir said.
However, there's also a 'valid possibility' the rabbis who advise the ultra-Orthodox parties will say they've waited long enough for a draft exemption law because they are facing enormous pressure from their communities, Friedman said.
The army has issued thousands of draft notices to the ultra-Orthodox community, and those who refuse to serve can face arrest. While only around a dozen have been arrested after being stopped for trying to leave the country or for traffic violations, the fear this has inspired is significant, he added.
How will this impact the war?
Netanyahu frequently cites the ongoing war as a reason why Israel needs to provide a united front against its enemies. While the ultra-Orthodox parties remain part of the coalition, they want the war to end as quickly as possible, Talshir said.
'The Haredim think once the war is over, the pressure will be off them and they will be able to get their (military) exemption law,' she said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court refuses to reduce sentence of advocate who abused woman magistrate in 2015
The Supreme Court Tuesday decided not to interfere with a Delhi High Court order which refused to reduce the sentence awarded to an advocate for outraging the modesty of a woman judicial officer in 2015, and granted him two weeks to surrender. A bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan recorded that it is 'not inclined to interfere with the orders' passed by the Delhi High Court against advocate Sanjay Rathore and dismissed his plea. In October 2015, the complainant judicial officer was serving as a metropolitan magistrate in the Karkardooma court when Rathore, enraged by an adjournment in his matter in his absence, verbally abused the officer, including using gendered abusive language. An FIR was subsequently lodged at the Farsh Bazar police station. Rathore was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment under Indian Penal Code Section 509 (intending to outrage modesty of a woman), three months under Section 189 (injury to public servant), and an additional three months under Section 353 (assault or criminal force against public servant to deter them from their duty). It was directed that the sentences should run consecutively, thereby resulting in a total sentence of two years. The Delhi High Court, while refusing to reduce the sentence, however, modified it so that the sentences could run concurrently instead of consecutively. As a result, Rathore was sentenced to a total of one year and six months in prison. The high court, in its order of May 26, emphasised that acts threatening or intimidating a judge, especially through 'gender-specific abuse, is an assault on justice itself, and must be met with firm accountability'. While refusing Rathore any relief, it further recorded in its order, 'The act of outraging the modesty of a judicial officer while she was presiding over court proceedings, seated on the dais and discharging her solemn duty of dispensing justice, in this court's opinion, attacks the very foundation of judicial decorum and the institutional integrity.'
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Indian students at Harvard navigate uncertainties amid attacks by Trump administration
Indian students at Harvard say they are navigating a 'rollercoaster' of uncertainty and anxiety amid the Trump administration's relentless battle against the university while also dealing with a dearth of job opportunities. 'It's just been a time of not quite knowing what to do, whether we should make our moves back home, or whether we should try and figure something out here,' an Indian student, who graduated last month from the Harvard Kennedy School, said, not wishing to be identified. Also Read | 'If this pause extends…': Expert advises students aspiring to study in US universities Indian students at Harvard, speaking to PTI on condition of anonymity, shared their concerns and experiences of the last few months during which the prestigious university has seen relentless attacks by the Trump administration. The administration's actions include a freeze of USD 2.2 billion in grants, revocation of the university's eligibility to enrol international students and suspension of entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programmes at Harvard. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has said that Harvard's leadership has created an 'unsafe campus environment by permitting anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators to harass and physically assault individuals, including many Jewish students, and otherwise obstruct its once-venerable learning environment.' US President Donald Trump, in a proclamation last week, said Harvard had refused recent requests of the DHS for information about foreign students' 'known illegal activity,' 'known dangerous and violent activity,' 'known threats to other students or university personnel,' and other related data. Another Indian student, who graduated from the Harvard Graduate School of Design after completing a two-year course, said students come to American institutions with plans of finishing their studies and then finding jobs to work for a few years in the US. But she described the situation of the past few months as being a 'rollercoaster.' 'With all the uncertainty, I can say that a lot of people who are hiring were generally hesitant of international students, and maybe the Harvard tag helped earlier, but that's not the same right now at this particular moment,' she said. The student from Harvard Kennedy School pointed out that she is in a 'desperate job search' at the moment, noting how difficult it is to get a job in the current environment. 'Employers have just stopped entertaining any international students, forget international students from Harvard, because our visa statuses are so volatile that who would want to employ us right now.' She said she doesn't know whether she will be going back to India, staying back or heading to a different country altogether. 'That uncertainty is a lot in a country like America where you're paying' huge amounts of money in rent. She added that she thinks this is a short-term turbulence and things will settle down in the future. 'But while we're caught in the crossfire, I think it's been difficult to plan, and so it's stressful for sure.' The students also pointed out that funding cuts initiated by the Trump administration are impacting jobs in the policy space, climate change, healthcare and public health sectors. The Design School student recalled that just days before graduating last month, students found out that the Trump administration had terminated Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP) certification, which meant the university could no longer enrol foreign students and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status. 'We had just finished our final presentations, we were celebrating over lunch, and we saw this news. It was quite unbelievable. Six months ago, you could never predict that something like this would happen,' she said. She however urged foreign students not to feel discouraged by the current situation. 'This should not discourage people. Because I think what institutions like Harvard also do is that they make you a global citizen. And if not America, people are finding pathways elsewhere,' she said. Several students say they had planned to move back to India eventually but had hoped to work in the US for the initial few years, both to get experience in the American job market and also to earn to pay back the significant student loans they have. Another young student, who graduated from Harvard Kennedy School, said while the current situation has been full of 'unpredictability', at some levels students are building some kind of resistance, immunity to respond to developments in real time because the Trump administration's moves against Harvard have been blocked and stalled by the courts. 'The challenges that we face on a day-to-day basis probably are in terms of job opportunities, how we plan our future and the next steps,' he said. 'I know of some classmates of mine who have been in the final stages of interviews with a few companies, but once they found out that these students were from Harvard, they were like 'that might pose a few issues later on. So we'll move on with another candidate',' the student said. 'I've seen a higher number of people who are going back (to India). They have made up their mind that it's not worth staying and then being in a state of uncertainty, away from family and home, sacrificing a lot of things for a future that remains highly, highly uncertain. So that holds lesser value now for a lot of my peers,' he said. He cited media reports that said the State Department has told US consulates globally to resume processing visa applications for students planning to attend Harvard University. 'All this is a signalling effect currently, which is hurting all of us a lot. Because you don't really know what, where you can apply, what you can do, employees are hesitant.' He added that he has also been talking to a lot of students from India who are set to arrive in the US to commence studies at Harvard around September this year. 'Generally, yes, the concern has increased a lot in terms of what kind of opportunities exist, because they would be leaving a lot of things back home. The opportunity cost is higher than ever.' He said incoming students or those planning to come to the US in future to study are hesitant and are considering whether they should apply to universities in Europe and elsewhere given 'the kind of environment which has been created for international students generally in the US', which will have far-reaching consequences. He said that while no one he has spoken to among the incoming students has been denied a visa, 'some are reconsidering. They are unsure since there's fear of losing funding and scholarships they've received this year if they defer or don't join.' According to statistics on the website of Harvard International Office, there are 788 students and scholars from India at all schools under Harvard University for the 2024-25 academic year. The Harvard Global Support Services said on its website that each year, anywhere from 500-800 Indian students and scholars study at Harvard. Harvard hosts a total of about 10,158 students and scholars from around the world across its schools, according to Harvard International Office estimates. The Kennedy School student pointed to the 'American Dream' that used to bring students from India and elsewhere to the US. 'I think that has been significantly affected. It's definitely not the same what it used to be, even, I would say five years ago, because a lot of this damage is unrepairable.' But amid all this what he found 'heartening' was the university administration 'stepping up' and putting forward a more resolute and strong show of support for the students. 'The other thing which has been absolutely amazing to see is students showing more support for their international peers.'
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC grants bail to Uttarakhand man jailed for interfaith marriage, says ‘state can't object…they married as per wishes of parents'
Granting bail to a man booked under the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, the Supreme Court last month held that the state cannot have any objection to the man's interfaith marriage as the couple married 'as per the wishes to their respective parents'. The Supreme Court relief by a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, in an order on May 19, comes after the man, Aman Siddiqui, spent nearly six months in jail, for consensually marrying a Hindu woman in a wedding voluntarily arranged by the families and consented to by the parties involved. Siddiqui's counsel had told the apex court that 'the families voluntarily decided to arrange the marriage of the appellant with the lady. However, soon after the marriage certain persons and certain organizations seemed to have objected to the marriage'. This led to an FIR being lodged at Rudrapur police station in Uttarakhand on December 12, 2024, against Siddiqui, two days after his wedding on December 10. Siddiqui's parents were also booked, but they were later granted anticipatory bail. Siddiqui's counsel also told the Supreme Court bench that if granted bail, Siddiqui and his wife would reside separately from their families and 'continue to live peacefully without any hindrance'. Even as the state opposed the bail plea, the bench recorded in its order, 'We observe that the respondent – State cannot have any objection to the appellant and his wife residing together inasmuch as they have been married as per the wishes to their respective parents and families. In the circumstances, we find that this is an appropriate case where the relief of bail ought to be granted…'. A day after his wedding was conducted in accordance with Hindu rituals, Siddiqui was made to sign an undertaking by his wife's cousin brothers, assuring that he would not cause 'any kind of physical and mental harm' to her and that he would not force 'in any manner either physically and mentally to convert her to other religion'. The undertaking further stated that his wife would be 'independent to practice Hindu Religion' and 'free to follow all the Hindu Tradition with full freedom' and that Siddiqui would not interfere in her religious faith. The Uttarakhand High Court had rejected Siddiqui's bail plea on February 28. Before the high court, Siddiqui had submitted that his mother was a practising Hindu married to a Muslim man and had not converted. He further said that he too followed his mother's religion, including his parents performing a thread ceremony for him. The high court was also told that Siddiqui's father had separated from his joint family 'so that the applicant's (Siddiqui's) mother could comfortably follow her customs and rituals of Kumaoni Hindu family'. Meanwhile, the state had alleged that Siddiqui had suppressed the religion of his father. The high court had ultimately refused to grant bail.
