Tesla Insurance Rates Could Rise as Anti-Musk-Driven Vandalism Spreads
For years, Tesla has been one of the most expensive car brands to insure, but a new trend may send rates soaring even higher. Increasing incidents of vandalism targeting Tesla vehicles have insurers bracing for a surge in claims, which could mean higher premiums or even outright blacklisting for Tesla owners.
Vandalism against Tesla vehicles isn't new. Since the brand's early days, owners have reported incidents of keying, tire slashing, and other damage, often documented by Tesla's own Sentry Mode cameras. However, the situation has escalated dramatically in recent months.
The root of the problem? CEO Elon Musk's increasingly polarizing political activities. From controversial social media posts to drastic moves that have impacted thousands of government workers, Musk has become a lightning rod for criticism. Activists who oppose Musk's actions aren't just voicing their concerns online — they're taking it out on his company's cars. Reports from across the U.S. detail Teslas being spray-painted with political messages, having their windows shattered, and even being set on fire.
Tesla's unique status as both a tech disruptor and a cultural symbol has made it a target for more than just car enthusiasts. Until recently, Tesla's vehicles were often the target of criticism from conservatives who saw electric vehicles as an unnecessary and even artificially propped-up part of the automotive market. Now, as Musk cements himself as a key figure in President Donald Trump's cabinet, frustration with Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is being taken out on Teslas across the country.
Online forums and social media platforms have amplified this sentiment. Viral videos of Tesla vandalism incidents circulate widely, sometimes with individuals justifying their actions as a form of protest. Whether it's defacing a Model Y at a protest site or damaging a Cybertruck in a parking lot, these acts are becoming more frequent and more destructive.
When a car is vandalized, owners typically file a comprehensive insurance claim to cover the damage. However, as the frequency and severity of Tesla-related vandalism incidents increase, insurers are reevaluating their risk calculations.
'If vandalism involving Tesla vehicles continues to rise and doesn't go back down, we could see rates rise for comprehensive coverage in the future,' said Matt Brannon, a data journalist at Insurify, in a recent interview with Newsweek.
Insurance analyst Shannon Martin echoed this concern, explaining that while vandalism claims don't raise rates as much as collision claims, they still contribute to the overall cost of insuring a vehicle. And for Tesla owners, those costs are already steep.
Even before the recent wave of vandalism, Tesla owners were paying premiums comparable to ultra-luxury brands. According to Insurify, the average annual cost of full-coverage insurance for a Tesla Model 3 jumped 30% last year to $4,362 — about $800 more than a comparable Mercedes-Benz A-Class. The Tesla Cybertruck, still new to the market, has an estimated annual insurance cost of $3,813.
For context, that means many Tesla owners are paying close to $400 a month just for insurance. That's higher than the monthly payment on a 2025 Nissan Sentra financed over 72 months. If rates continue to climb, the cost of insuring a Tesla could become untenable for many drivers.
Additionally, Tesla's proprietary repair process contributes to higher costs. Unlike traditional vehicles, Tesla repairs often require specialized technicians and official Tesla service centers, which can lead to expensive parts and labor costs. This adds another layer of financial burden, making insurance claims more expensive for providers and leading to higher premiums for owners.
While rising insurance costs are already a concern, there's an even bigger risk looming: some insurers might stop offering coverage for Teslas altogether. 'As we have learned from the 2023 TikTok theft trend targeting certain model Kias and Hyundais, if these types of losses continue, carriers could refuse to offer coverage for Tesla vehicles altogether,' warned Bankrate's Shannon Martin.
This wouldn't be unprecedented. In the wake of the Kia Boys theft saga, several major insurance companies, including Progressive and State Farm, temporarily refused to insure certain Hyundai and Kia models that lacked proper security features. If Tesla vandalism claims continue to surge, insurers may decide the risk isn't worth it, leaving some owners scrambling for coverage. Tesla owners in states like California and New York, where vandalism rates are highest, may be particularly at risk of facing coverage restrictions.
For Tesla owners worried about rising insurance costs, options are limited. Some may opt to downgrade their coverage, dropping comprehensive insurance in favor of collision-only policies. However, this strategy carries a significant risk — if a vandalized car isn't covered, the owner will have to pay out-of-pocket for repairs. And for those still financing their vehicles, most lenders require comprehensive coverage as part of the loan agreement.
Another option is Tesla's own in-house insurance program, available in select states. Tesla claims to offer competitive rates based on real-time driving data, but whether this program can shield owners from the fallout of increased vandalism claims remains to be seen.
Owners can also take preventive measures, such as installing additional security cameras in their garages, parking in well-lit areas, or even using aftermarket protective films to make their cars less vulnerable to keying and graffiti. A growing number of Telsa owners have resorted to plastering stickers over their vehicles, saying things like, 'I Bought This Before We Knew Elon was Crazy!' While these measures won't eliminate the risk, they could reduce the likelihood of severe damage and deter some would-be vandals.
The situation Tesla owners find themselves in today is eerily similar to what happened with Hyundai and Kia owners just a couple of years ago. In both cases, vehicle owners are suffering the consequences of circumstances beyond their control — whether it's a security oversight or a CEO's divisive public persona. As long as Musk remains a controversial figure and activists continue to lash out at his brand, Tesla vandalism will likely persist. And as vandalism claims pile up, insurance rates will only climb higher. For Tesla owners, that means the true cost of ownership might be more than they ever anticipated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Democrats are looking for answers — outside Washington
On the campaign trail, President Trump made a lot of promises. He promised to strengthen our economy. He promised to make our government more efficient. He promised to bring down costs. But after more than 100 days in, our economy is not strengthened, our government is certainly not more efficient, and costs are not down. The president has entangled us in trade wars with some of our closest trading partners — wars that erased $10 trillion from the stock market this spring and threaten to decimate family farms in my district and across the country. And with the help of the Department of Government Efficiency, he has waged an all-out assault on the federal government in an effort to weed out 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' I believe the American people elected Trump because they wanted solutions to pocketbook issues and a government that took action to get things done. But the president's agenda isn't working, and Democrats need to deliver. That's where the New Dem Coalition comes in. Before I explain why, I want to acknowledge that Democrats haven't always gotten everything right. During the election, we saw many working class voters drift away from the party. At times, our emphasis on identity politics or concepts like 'saving democracy' — while undeniably important — overshadowed the core economic issues that affect people's everyday lives. Instead of meeting voters where they are, we sometimes come across as telling them where they should be. That approach can feel out of touch and give the impression that the party is elitist, disconnected from the realities of everyday people. Working class voters are focused on how they'll afford their mortgage, put food on the table, or save for their kids' college — not necessarily on abstract debates about the soul of the nation. Don't get me wrong: the threat to democracy is real and urgent, especially with a president who shows little respect for courts or the Constitution. But if we're truly going to save democracy, we must build a broader coalition and bring more voters along. That means meeting people where they are, rather than telling them what should matter most. We need to address the tangible, kitchen-table issues that keep folks up at night. The New Dem Coalition has always done this. We have prioritized the needs of hard working Americans over the politics of D.C. We understand that we should be finding ways to make our government more efficient. We understand that we have to work across the aisle when we can — without compromising our values. That's why New Dems are crafting a proactive agenda — not only to win the House majority in 2026, but to maintain it for the long term. So, we're getting out of the D.C. bubble for a new series known as 'New Dems On the Road.' We'll be engaging with communities across the country, and gathering the critical feedback we need to guide our work. We're tackling every issue — from improving education outcomes to bolstering our national security — and working to find practical, lasting solutions that reflect the values and priorities of the American people. For our first stop, we zeroed in on immigration. Immigration isn't a problem we're going to solve overnight, but it's one that is consistently top of mind for the American people. We've come close to bipartisan solutions, only for selfish interests to squash our efforts in the 11th hour. That's why New Dem Immigration and Border Security Working Group members Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.) and Lou Correa (D-Calif.) sat down with Arizona leaders to talk about immigration. They met with industry and union representatives, members of the Arizona business community, and DACA recipients to discuss the importance of immigrants to Arizona's economy. The panel addressed the need to secure our border and pass a long-lasting immigration reform policy. It was instructive. And it showed the folks in these communities that we are listening to them. We know we don't have it all figured out — that's why we need real, local voices to help guide our work. Voices on the ground who are living and breathing these problems every single day. Then, it was my turn. I joined my friends Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) and Wesley Bell (D-Mo.) for a conversation around clean energy and potential opportunities for bipartisan cooperation. We discussed the actions the Trump administration has taken to gut clean energy tax credits. There is no way around it — this is going to have a negative impact on people's utility bills. They will feel this. We also discussed what's ahead — like permitting reform, carbon capture and ultimately ways we can lower costs for people trying to keep the lights on, not raise them. Last month, Reps. Sarah McBride (D-Del.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) got together to talk one-on-one with Delawareans about paid family and medical leave for working families. This is just the beginning. In total, we'll be conducting at least nine New Dems On the Road events — across the country. We need to come together, share ideas and forge a new path forward. A path that can address the issues that demand our attention: whether it's a single mom struggling to afford child care, a farmer looking to break into new markets, or a family who wants a good, public school education for their kids. We should all be committed to finding effective ways to achieve our shared goals and ensure that the government serves the people better. This isn't a partisan objective; it's a matter of common sense. However, real progress requires thoughtful strategy and careful action, not reckless cuts. Simply slashing budgets without consideration doesn't eliminate waste — it erodes the very foundation of what our government is meant to do: serve its citizens. New Democrats understand this deeply. We recognize that this moment calls for a meaningful response and an agenda that inspires — not the status quo. Our communities have elected us to take action, to solve problems and to improve lives. Now, more than ever, Democrats need to prove we can deliver Nikki Budzinski represents the 13th District of Illinois and is vice chair for policy for the New Dem Coalition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's term a ‘rough time for science in America': Ex-NASA astronaut
(NewsNation) — The United States has grown 'completely reliant' on SpaceX, said Col. Terry Virts, a former NASA astronaut and International Space Station commander. 'It's not only NASA, also the Defense Department and the intelligence community are very dependent on SpaceX,' Virts told NewsNation. President Donald Trump has threatened to cut SpaceX contracts amid a public feud with onetime adviser Elon Musk, who briefly countered with a threat to decommission his Dragon space capsule. Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: 'Major blunder' Musk's threat has since been walked back, but Virts said it indicates a greater problem: national needs left to Musk's whims. 'I think it's very concerning, especially when the CEO is so unstable and has been so, you know, unpredictable and some might say, dangerous in recent years,' Virts said. Trump's proposed NASA budget would cut $6 billion — the largest single-year cut in the agency's history, according to the nonprofit Planetary Society. Under the budget, human space programs would get a boost, with more than $7 billion allocated for lunar missions and $1 billion allocated for new investments in efforts to get people to Mars. The budget includes significant cuts to staffing, maintenance, environmental compliance, and the space and Earth science programs. 'It has been a chaotic and stressful time. Unfortunately, it affects the nation's space exploration and science community, not only at NASA, but also in the medical research and other fields,' Virts said. Milky Way has 50-50 chance of colliding with neighbor galaxy Musk's company is set to launch Falcon 9 for Axiom Space's Axiom Mission 4 on Tuesday, seemingly signaling a secure partnership between SpaceX and NASA. But Virts warned of overarching damage to the American science community that has been building since Inauguration Day. 'You can't just turn on a space program, and in a matter of months. You can certainly turn it off, and that's what's happened with this administration's chaos,' Virts said. 'But getting it back is going to be a problem.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Business Insider
19 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Tesla stock gets a fresh downgrade, with the Musk-Trump fight fueling uncertainty and risk of 'brand damage'
Tesla stock got a fresh downgrade on Monday following a dramatic public feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump last week. Analysts at Baird downgraded shares of Tesla from "Buy" to "Neutral," saying the Musk-Trump spat has heightened the potential for brand damage. "The recent incident between Musk and President Trump exemplifies key-person risk associated with Musk's political activities," senior research analyst Ben Kallo wrote in a client note Monday. "While we have no indication of how the relationship may change or what either will do, we see the situation as adding uncertainty to TSLA's outlook." The note added that "brand damage has occurred and, when coupled with increasing competition, will fuel bearish narratives regarding demand." Shortly after leaving the White House earlier this month, Musk took to social media to criticize Trump's "big beautiful" tax and spending bill that has been moving through Congress. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk said on X. As Musk's criticisms ramped up, Trump eventually responded, with the president threatening to cut Musk's government contracts with his companies, like SpaceX. But Baird said the public feud is just one reason for its downgrade. Rising competition from China in the EV space could eat into Tesla's market share, the firm said, and tariffs could disrupt its supply chains in the near term. Investors' expectations for Tesla's robotaxi rollout are also too high, Baird said. "Musk has said there will be hundreds of thousands of vehicles on the road by 2H next year," Kallo wrote. "We model 6K, and while we don't think the volume of cars matters in the near term as much as establishing a presence in the arena, we do think the robotaxi business will be harder (and likely less profitable) than the lofty expectations held by several investors." Tesla shares have risen nearly 70% in the last 12 months but have fallen 26% so far in 2025.
