Angry at Sharaa!
Sharaa has not succumbed to popular pressure as previous leaders had, most notably President Gamal Abdel Nasser. The latter paid a heavy price for going along with the masses. Sharaa understands popular sentiment can sweep you and turn you into a hostage, limiting your options at every pivotal juncture. Sharaa has clearly learned from the experiences of President Anwar Sadat, who went against the popular mood and even key figures in his regime but retrieved the Sinai and averted new wars that would have destroyed Egypt.
What also distinguishes Sharaa is that he does not exploit obsolete cliches. We are tired of this rigid ideological jargon. He speaks simply and frankly - no equivocation or prevarication. Devastated and divided, Syria does not need an orator seeking glory, but rather a realistic, rational leader who can responsibly address its complex crises.
The extremists who celebrated his arrival in Damascus believed that he would resume the Brotherhood's moment in the "Arab Spring," turning Syria into a hub for jihadists. When their hopes were dashed, they began attacking Sharaa instead of praising him.
But the question is: Would they have cursed him today if he had declared jihad? Or waged a futile war with Israel? Or clashed with his Arab neighbors? Or made inflammatory insults against the "Great Satan" and "colonial" powers? Certainly not. They would have glorified him as the "jihadist leader." Meanwhile, the Syrian people alone would have paid the price: another 50 years of poverty and displacement.
Fortunately, Sharaa chose another path: rationality, state-building, and restoring the Syrian economy. He avoids empty slogans and boisterous rhetoric, preferring dry but effective technocratic discourse that furthers the national interest and rejects blackmail. "Syria First" is the slogan, and it is the gateway to rebuilding trust between Syria and the international community.
That's why Saudi Arabia threw its political and economic weight behind Syria and contributed to the effort to ensure sanctions relief, removing one of the most significant obstacles to Syria's recovery.
Syria needs patience and time, but the path has become clear. Indeed, we would have reason to worry if the extremists and mendacious orators had praised him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
14 minutes ago
- Arab News
UN warns Daesh remains a major threat in Middle East despite leadership losses
NEW YORK CITY: Daesh remains an active and dangerous presence in the Middle East, the UN warned on Wednesday, as the group works to rebuild its operations in Syria and Iraq, even after the loss of senior leaders. Vladimir Voronkov, the UN's counterterrorism chief, told the Security Council that Daesh has maintained its operational capacity in the region and continues to exploit instability, especially in the Badia region of Syria and parts of the country under the control of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham. 'Daesh continues to exploit security gaps, engage in covert operations and incite sectarian tensions in Syria,' Voronkov said as he presented Secretary-General Antonio Guterres's 21st report on the threat posed by the terrorist organization. The group also remains active in Iraq, he added, where it seeks to destabilize local authorities and reclaim influence. The humanitarian and security situations in northeastern Syria remain 'deeply concerning,' Voronkov warned, particularly in the camps and detention facilities that hold suspected terrorists and their families. 'The secretary-general's concern about stockpiles of weapons falling into the hands of terrorists has, unfortunately, materialized,' he said. In Afghanistan, Daesh-Khorasan continues to pose one of the most serious terrorist threats to Central Asia and beyond, through ongoing attacks against civilians, minority groups and foreign nationals, while leveraging dissatisfaction with the de facto authorities. Despite the ongoing threats in the Middle East, Africa remains the region experiencing the highest intensity of Daesh-related activity, Voronkov said, with violence escalating in West Africa and the Sahel. There has been a resurgence of Daesh in the Greater Sahara, while Daesh-West Africa Province has emerged as a key source of propaganda that is attracting foreign fighters, primarily from within the region. In Libya, arrests have revealed the logistical and financial networks linked to the group and connected to the Sahel. In Somalia, a large-scale Daesh attack in Puntland early this year involving foreign fighters prompted a military counteroffensive that killed 200 militants and resulted in more than 150 arrests. 'Though weakened, Daesh still benefits from regional support networks,' Voronkov said. Assistant Secretary-General Natalia Gherman, executive director of the Counter-Terrorism Committee's Executive Directorate, or CTED, echoed the concerns. She noted that Daesh-Somalia's role as a global logistical hub has been growing recently, though counteroffensives had degraded some of its operational capabilities. Daesh continues to exploit instability in Africa, she added, where more than half of the world's terrorism-related fatalities now occur. In the Lake Chad Basin region, for example, the group has received foreign money, drones, and expertise on improvised explosive devices. Gherman also highlighted the growing use by Daesh of emerging technologies and financial innovations, as terrorist groups increasingly leverage encrypted platforms, artificial intelligence, and cross-border financial systems to raise funds, spread propaganda and recruit new members. In response to these evolving threats, CTED has visited countries across Europe and Africa, including Somalia, Chad, Cameroon, Hungary and Malta, to assess local capacities and provide tailored support. The EU-UN Global Terrorism Threats Facility has helped implement legislative reforms and capacity building in countries such as Iraq, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria and Tajikistan. Voronkov urged member states to invest more in long-term strategies for prevention, rather than focusing only on killing or capturing the leaders of terrorist groups. He said effective counterterrorism efforts must address the root causes of radicalization, while complying with the requirements of international law. He raised concerns in particular about detention camps in northeastern Syria, where tens of thousands of people, mostly women and children, continue to be held in unsafe and undignified conditions, risking further radicalization. Gherman said that CTED is helping states address such challenges through the adoption of principles for tackling the use of drones, financial tech and artificial intelligence for terrorism purposes. Despite the geopolitical and resource-related constraints, both of the officials emphasized the need for sustained international collaboration on the issue. 'The persistence of the threat posed by Daesh, despite national and international efforts, underscores the urgency of sustained global counterterrorism cooperation,' said Voronkov.
Asharq Al-Awsat
44 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Israel Says It Has Taken First Steps of Military Operation in Gaza City
Israel's military has taken the first steps of a planned operation to take over Gaza City, Israeli military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said on Wednesday. Following a clash with Hamas south of Khan Younis in the strip on Wednesday, he said: "We will deepen the attack on Hamas in Gaza City, a stronghold of governmental and military terror for the terrorist organization." Defrin said troops had already begun circling the outskirts of Gaza City and Hamas was now a "battered and bruised" guerrilla force. "We have begun the preliminary operations and the first stages of the attack on Gaza City, and already now forces are holding the outskirts of Gaza City," he said. Israel's military called up tens of thousands of reservists on Wednesday in preparation for the expected assault on Gaza City, as the Israeli government considered a new proposal for a ceasefire after nearly two years of war. The call-up signals Israel is pressing ahead with its plan to seize Gaza's biggest urban center despite international criticism of an operation likely to force the displacement of many more Palestinians. But a military official briefing reporters said reserve soldiers would not report for duty until September, an interval that gives mediators some time to bridge gaps between Palestinian militant group Hamas and Israel over truce terms. Israeli troops clashed on Wednesday with more than 15 Hamas fighters who emerged from tunnel shafts and attacked with gunfire and anti-tank missiles near Khan Younis, south of Gaza City, severely wounding one soldier and lightly wounding two others, an Israeli military official said. In a statement, Hamas' Al-Qassam Brigades confirmed carrying out a raid on Israeli troops southeast of Khan Younis and engaging Israeli troops at point-blank range. It said one fighter blew himself up among the soldiers, causing casualties, during an attack that lasted several hours.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Is Netanyahu an isolated phenomenon?
Benjamin Netanyahu's allies are also his adversaries, both Arabs and Israelis. The Israeli prime minister spares no effort in provoking them and stirring enough dust to stay in the headlines or to distract them from his own issues. The focus on Netanyahu as an individual is understandable and even justified under the circumstances of the Gaza war and its horrors. But is he really an exceptional, rebellious figure within Israel? Some Arab media outlets have portrayed the situation since the beginning of the crisis by suggesting that Israelis are against Netanyahu and oppose the war — wishful thinking. The reality is different. Hard-line policies and the iron-fist approach emerged as a response to Hamas' mistake in October, and Netanyahu went to the extreme in his retaliation. Netanyahu is not an exception. Former prime ministers who were no less rigid and aggressive — Golda Meir, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, and Ariel Sharon — all had their turn as targets of Arab criticism. They represented Israel, not outsiders to the system, and they reflected the majority. Therefore, trying to separate the Israeli establishment from the prime minister and directing attacks only at him is a way of avoiding the real problem: the poor relationship with Israel as a whole, not just the occupant of the prime minister's office. It is natural in an open society to hear dissenting voices. But these voices should not be overvalued when analyzing Israel's broader direction or its handling of the crisis. Palestinians, more than anyone else, need to build a relationship with Israeli public opinion — not Arab public opinion. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed When some cite criticisms from opposition politicians in the Knesset, former presidents, or opposition parties within Israel's political system, they mislead Arab public opinion. These critics are not the majority. If they were, Netanyahu, who survives on a slim majority, would have already been ousted. Similarly, efforts by the families of hostages inside Israel and appeals from world leaders to pressure Netanyahu have not succeeded. For almost two years, reports suggested the war was nearing its end and Netanyahu was in trouble. Yet, as we see, 'the prime minister's ears are deaf' and the catastrophe continues. Netanyahu has not fallen because most Israelis support him despite suffering the highest human losses on multiple fronts in Israel's history. This stance largely reflects a solid bloc across military, civilian, legislative, and party institutions insisting on eliminating 'Palestinian and regional threats.' That is what has happened, and it seems we are in the final chapter. A resolution to the Gaza crisis is expected in the remaining months of the year. What has disappeared from the scene is Israel's leftist bloc — traditionally opposed to wars and sympathetic to some Palestinian rights. This group has shrunk significantly after the shock of Hamas' October 2023 attacks, which destroyed the base of leftists and moderates within Israeli society. The Arab world does not need convincing; it already believes in the Palestinian cause. But it does not carry the political weight needed to sway decisions. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Seeing the whole picture inside Israel and understanding the trends among its citizens is one of the most important sources for making sense of what is happening in our region, especially in the multiple conflicts with Israel. Relying instead on repetitive rhetoric aimed at mobilization creates a distorted image of reality. Without broad popular support for Netanyahu's decisions, the Gaza war would not have started or continued, nor could he have remained in power despite hundreds of Israeli dead and thousands wounded, both military and civilian. Nor would he have risked his military adventures against Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iran. Without public acceptance, it is difficult to stop the war, achieve peace, or grant Palestinians their rights. This does not mean there are no political rifts in Israel. There is a spectrum of opinions and parties, yet most have rallied behind the government in the war — even as they face a moral and political dilemma following the horrific October attacks, with the killing and abduction of children and women, and the subsequent brutal killing of civilians in Gaza, pushing them to the brink of starvation. Palestinians, more than anyone else, need to build a relationship with Israeli public opinion — not Arab public opinion. The Arab world does not need convincing; it already believes in the Palestinian cause. But it does not carry the political weight needed to sway decisions.
