
Almost half of Europeans do not trust 'tech bros' or companies rolling out frontier tech like AI
ADVERTISEMENT
Business leaders in Western Europe are overconfident that the general public is positive about their adoption of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI).
But the reality couldn't be more different, with general public confidence in tech entrepreneurs also waning, a new study has found.
Just under half of Europeans (46 per cent) surveyed across five European countries said they felt positive about businesses using new tech, while 79 per cent of businesses said they felt the public was trusting in tech, according to a new survey shared first with Euronews Next on Wednesday.
The general public was also 20 per cent less optimistic than business leaders about frontier technologies, the survey conducted by research firm Opinium and released by tech consultancy firm Hotwire Global, showed.
"Without public trust, it doesn't matter how good the technologies are if no one is going to use them," Chris Holmes, Baron Holmes of Richmond, a member of the UK's House of Lords, told Euronews Next.
"It is abundantly clear from the research that public trust is essential if we are to optimise the opportunities and empower people against the risks from new technologies," added Holmes, who did not participate in the survey, but whose focus is digital technologies for the public good.
The poll surveyed 8,000 members of the general public and 740 business leaders in the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany on 15 different frontier technologies, which include generative AI (GenAI), Agentic AI, robotics, and cloud computing.
The survey's conclusions showed that the countries had reached a general consensus in trust between what companies and the public felt, and there was very little difference between countries.
The French and German public felt the least positive about businesses using frontier tech, while the UK was barely ahead in third place.
They were followed by Italy and then Spain, whose publics felt slightly more confident than the other countries. However, overall, the stats were very similar and paint a picture that no country is confident in the deployment of these technologies by businesses.
"It's no surprise that the majority, not only tech leaders, but business leaders are very enthusiastic about the frontier technologies and say: 'I want to employ that, I can create efficiencies and so on," said Ute Hildebrandt, CEO of Continental Europe at Hotwire.
"What becomes interesting is when we look at how they think that the general public sees it, and they think the general public is as enthusiastic as they are, and lo and behold, that is not the case," she told Euronews Next.
The study concluded that over half of the general population said they were concerned about how these technologies would impact the job market or wealth, and equality.
"At a time where the role of business in society is under close scrutiny, there is a significant risk that business becomes disconnected from public sentiment regarding the use of technology to achieve commercial objectives," Hildebrandt said.
For her, it is vital that businesses communicate what technology is and their objectives in a clear way.
ADVERTISEMENT
"We are in a space and time where it's about being transparent in your communication, and also act instead of only talk, to really show what your story is, be open, interact with the public, understand that you have stakeholders outside your investors, and then also really put action into place," she advised companies.
'Technology is too important to leave to the tech bros'
However, at a time when tech companies have been shown to sell user data, such as the Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal, users should also be wary and educated about such matters, Lord Holmes said.
But he is optimistic that from these types of data scandals, new tech models emerge, such as BlueSky, which gives users more control.
"We're seeing the rise of these decentralised technologies, especially in, I would say, in a younger, more tech-savvy target," he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
As well as the general public being better educated in technology, Lord Holmes said that it was not just a question of whether we should trust tech companies or not, but that regulators should also play a role in ensuring technology is safe and that users are protected.
Despite the EU implementing its AI Act, Lord Holmes said it is too soon for it to have a major impact on general public trust in AI, as its first provisions only came in at the beginning of February.
But he said that for citizens in the European Union, they probably feel the EU AI Act is "somewhat distant from their daily lives," adding that "there needs to be that coming together and that connecting of the Act and what this means for people on an everyday basis".
"The EU AI Act, certainly, they were first out of the blocks to legislate. But it's that public-engagement connecting piece which is still missing in that jurisdiction as well," Lord Holmes said.
ADVERTISEMENT
The study also found that only 24 per cent of the public trust companies that use frontier technologies without explaining why and how.
Trust in tech bosses is also at a low with the European public, who are 29 per cent less likely to identify them as a trustworthy source. On the other hand, business leaders rank tech entrepreneurs as the most trusted source of information when it comes to frontier technologies.
The general European public instead trusts scientists and researchers the most.
"Everybody has a voice, everybody's voice must be enabled in this discussion. Technology is too important to leave to the tech bros," said Lord Holmes.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Ultimately, it's our data, our decisions, if we get this right, it can be such a positive. Our human-led digital futures," he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
French car maker Renault could make drones in Ukraine, signaling the automotive industry's shift into defense
Will the "war economy" advocated by Emmanuel Macron since his June 2022 speech reach a symbolic turning point? Renault announced on Sunday, June 8, that the Ministry of Armed Forces had reached out about producing military drones. "Discussions have taken place, but no decision has been made at this stage, as we are still waiting for further details from the ministry regarding this project," the automaker said, without disclosing further information. Renault would be working in partnership with another French company. According to broadcaster Franceinfo, the planned production lines would be located in Ukraine, "some tens or hundreds of kilometers from the front line." This information corroborated statements made a few hours earlier by Armed Forces Minister Sébastien Lecornu. When questioned about this on French television on June 6, Lecornu announced "a completely unprecedented partnership in which a major company producing French cars (…) will join forces with a French defense SME to set up production lines in Ukraine in order to manufacture drones." The type of drones was not specified, but they are intended primarily for the Ukrainian army. "But we will also ensure that our own French armed forces benefit from these drones so that we can maintain tactical and operational training that reflects the reality" of the conflict in Ukraine, Lecornu added.


France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
India a voice for Global South at G7, says foreign minister
India is not a member of the G7 -- which comprises Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States -- but the world's most populous nation and one of its biggest economies has been invited to summits since 2019. "We have been an outreach country in the G7 for many years, and I think it brings benefits to the G7," he told AFP in Paris. "There are very strong feelings in the Global South about the inequities of the international order, the desire to change it, and we are very much part of that," he added. "It is important for us to organise ourselves and make our presence felt." The leaders of the G7 kick off a yearly summit in the Canadian Rockies on Sunday. They have invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, along with the leaders of Ukraine, Mexico, South Africa and South Korea, to attend at a time of global turmoil and a radical new US approach to world affairs. The member nations are also expected to deliberate on troubled relations with China and Russia. India is a leading member of BRICS -- a bloc of leading emerging economies that includes Russia and China, whose leaders are set to meet in early July. BRICS has growing economic clout and is increasingly seen as a G7 rival. Jaishankar said India had "the ability to work with different countries in a way without making any relationship exclusive". "To the extent that that serves as a bridge, it's frankly a help that we do to international diplomacy at a time when, mostly what you see are difficult relationships and excessive tensions," he added. No need for 'more tension' The foreign minister said his country had been in favour of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to end the conflict since 2022. But Jaishankar -- whose nation is a political ally of Russia and trades with Moscow -- said sanctions such as those against President Vladimir Putin's government did not work. "Where sanctions are concerned, you could argue that it has not actually had much impact on policy behaviour," he said. Europeans are in favour of a plan for a "secondary" sanctions plan, including a 500-percent tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, gas and raw materials. "The world does not need more tension, more conflict, more hostility, more stresses," the former Indian ambassador in Washington said. US President Donald Trump is expected at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. Modi is expected to meet him to push a trade deal with the United States -- India's largest trading partner -- before the July 9 deadline when Washington's punishing 26 percent tariffs are set to resume. Jaishankar said Trump "clearly, in many ways, represents a discontinuity". "He is definitely a very nationalistic person who puts his country's interests very strongly ahead," he added. 'Stable relationship' with China As for China, it was a balancing act, said the minister. India and China, the world's two most populous nations, are intense rivals competing for strategic influence across South Asia, and their 3,500-kilometre (2,200-mile) shared frontier has been a perennial source of tension. Their troops clashed in 2020, killing at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers, and forces from both sides today face off across contested high-altitude borderlands. Despite both country's differences, "we are also today the major rising powers in the world", Jaishankar said. "Where we (India) have to be strong and firm, we will be strong and firm. Where we have to forge a stable relationship, we are prepared to do that," he added. China has also been a staunch partner of India's arch-enemy Pakistan. Pakistan used Chinese jets against India when the nuclear-armed foes fought an intense four-day conflict last month in which 70 people were killed, their worst standoff since 1999. The fighting was triggered by an April 22 attack on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi accused Pakistan of backing -- a charge Islamabad denies. The territory is claimed in full by both India and Pakistan, which have fought several wars over Kashmir since their 1947 independence from British rule. But Jaishankar dismissed fears at the time of a nuclear escalation. These were "only the concerns of people who were completely uninformed," he said.


Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
Indian PM Modi's visit to Cyprus - upgrade of Indo-European relations?
Narendra Modi is expected to sign multi-level cooperation agreements between India and the Republic of Cyprus during his visit to the island on the first visit of an Indian Prime Minister to the country in over two decades. The official talks between President Nicos Christodoulides and the Indian Prime Minister will take place on Monday, when Narendra Modi will be officially received at the Presidential Palace. However, already after his reception at Larnaca airport on Sunday, Modi and Christodoulides will attend a meeting of businessmen from Cyprus and India in Limassol before sitting down to an informal working dinner. Modi's visit follows an invitation extended to him by Christodoulides and comes eight years after then President Nicos Anastasiades visited India. President Tassos Papadopoulos had also visited India in 2006, while the last time an Indian Prime Minister visited Cyprus was in 2002 with Atal Bihari Vazbayi. Modi is coming to Cyprus before heading to Canada for the G7 summit. This is the Indian prime minister's first trip abroad since the Pakistan crisis and it is seen as particularly meaningful in view of Turkey's activities in the region, given Ankara's support for Islamabad. Cyprus is already preparing to take over the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union (first half of 2026) and New Delhi and Nicosia are seeking to strengthen and possibly upgrade their already close relations, as India sees Cyprus as a "bridge" to the EU - perhaps even "rewarding" its supportive stance on the Kashmir issue. Conversely, India's developing relations with both Greece and Cyprus are not seen in a good light by Turkey, with reports in the Turkish press portraying the moves as negative for Ankara. The discussions between the two delegations, apart from the Indo-European and Indo-Cypriot relationship, will also touch on the Indian strategic project of the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). The Indian Prime Minister will be accompanied by a large delegation and he will be given a tour by President Christodoulides of the ceasefire line in Nicosia before a formal lunch at the Presidential Palace and his departure for Canada. In a dangerous development in the mutual escalation between Iran and Israel, an Iranian missile hit the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, south of Tel Aviv, at dawn on Sunday. The Weizmann Institute is one of the most important scientific centres in Israel and the world. Its roots date back to 1934, when it was founded by Chaim Weizmann under the name "Daniel Seif Research", before it was renamed in 1949 after its founder, who later became the first president of Israel. Today, the institute is home to some 2,500 researchers and staff and offers advanced master's and doctoral programmes in fields including mathematics, physics, biology, chemistry, biology and computer science. It has more than 30 scientific laboratories, a huge library, as well as residential and lecture facilities. But the institute is not just an academic facility; it is seen as part of Israel's national security infrastructure, playing a pivotal role in supporting the military through advanced research and technology. The Weizmann Institute is one of the pillars of technological innovation in Israel, directly contributing to the development of complex military systems, including: - Artificial intelligence for data analysis and combat guidance. - Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies and autonomous systems. - Advanced electronic tracking and jamming tools. - Alternative GPS navigation systems. - Protection of military codes. - Encrypted communication in hostile environments. - Research in directed energy and nuclear applications. - Development of field treatments for injured soldiers. These activities partly explain why the institute is considered a strategic target for Tehran, especially after recent Israeli strikes on military facilities and prominent Iranian scientists. It is notable that the Israeli media did not show pictures or share accurate details about the extent of the damage, in accordance with strict instructions from the military censors that prevent the disclosure of injuries or damage to sensitive facilities. This reticence reflects the extent of the security embarrassment resulting from the breach of air defences, and highlights the vulnerability of Israeli infrastructure to precise attacks. The institute is generously funded by the Israeli government, in addition to significant support from international organisations, which enhances its ability to attract minds and develop projects that serve scientific and military progress. The institute also serves as a platform for international scientific collaborations, which could create diplomatic tension if investigations prove that sensitive internationally supported scientific facilities were directly attacked.