logo
Trump rescinds $4bn in US funding for California High-Speed Rail project

Trump rescinds $4bn in US funding for California High-Speed Rail project

The Guardian2 days ago
Donald Trump said on Wednesday the transportation department is rescinding $4bn in US government funding for California's High-Speed Rail project.
The department said there was no viable path forward for California's High-Speed Rail project and it was considering potentially clawing back additional funding related to the project.
The Federal Railroad Administration issued a 315-page report last month citing missed deadlines, budget shortfalls and questionable ridership projections.
One key issue cited is that California had not identified $7bn in additional funding needed to build an initial 171-mile segment between Merced and Bakersfield, California.
The California High-Speed Rail System is a planned two-phase 800-mile (1,287km) system with speeds of up to 220 miles per hour that aims to connect San Francisco to Los Angeles/Anaheim, and in the second phase, extend north to Sacramento and south to San Diego.
The California High-Speed Rail Authority said previously it strongly disagrees with the administration's conclusions 'which are misguided and do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California'.
It noted California governor Gavin Newsom's budget proposal before the legislature extends at least $1bn per year in funding for the next 20 years 'providing the necessary resources to complete the project's initial operating segment'. The authority noted in May there is active civil construction along 119 miles in the state's Central Valley.
Transportation secretary, Sean Duffy, said: 'Newsom and California's high-speed rail boondoggle are the definition of government incompetence and possibly corruption.'
Newsom responded on social media: 'Won't be taking advice from the guy who can't keep planes in the sky.'
Voters approved $10bn for the project in 2008, but the costs have risen sharply. The transportation department under former president Joe Biden awarded the project about $4bn.
The entire San Francisco-to-Los Angeles project was initially supposed to be completed by 2020 for $33bn, but has now jumped from $89bn to $128bn.
In 2021, Biden restored a $929m grant for California's high-speed rail that Trump had revoked in 2019 after the Republican president called the project a 'disaster'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why the Epstein case looms large in MAGA world
Why the Epstein case looms large in MAGA world

BBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Why the Epstein case looms large in MAGA world

When Jack Posobiec walked into the Department of Justice in Washington, DC last February, he thought he would finally get some answers about Jeffrey when he and other MAGA supporters were given essentially just rehashed, already-public material - and when the government put a damper on the release of any new information this July - they balked."We were all told more was coming. That answers were out there and would be provided. Incredible how utterly mismanaged this Epstein mess has been. And it didn't have to be," Posobiec posted on social media on 7 Donald Trump is finding it hard to shake loose the conspiracy theories that have animated his base since he first broke through into Republican politics a decade ago. Posobiec, who emerged from the fringes of the internet in 2016 when he spread false rumours about a child abuse ring based in a Washington DC restaurant - a conspiracy theory that became known as Pizzagate - is just one of many MAGA die-hards who believes officials are hiding key truths about Epstein's life and disgraced financier and convicted sex offender died by suicide in a New York prison cell in 2019 while he was awaiting trial on sex trafficking a recent podcast hosted by Breitbart News editor Alex Marlow, Posobiec said the MAGA base see this case as shorthand for the thorough rot of the so-called "deep state"."It's not that they care about Epstein personally," he said. "It's that they care that there's this optic that Epstein was somehow involved with a shadowy system that actually has control over our government, control over our institutions, control of our lives, and really is a ruling power over us."Over the years, some have claimed that government officials possess files on Epstein that reveal sordid details, including that a "client lint" exists with notable names on it who may have participated in some Epstein's alleged has, in the past, played to that crowd. During last year's election campaign, he said he would have "no problem" releasing Epstein case files, and after the election directly answered a question about whether he would "declassify" the files by saying: "Yeah, yeah, I would."Conspiratorial thinking has been a part of President Trump's movement from the outset. His entry into the once-crowded world of Republican Party politics a decade ago came as he amplified the false theory that Barack Obama wasn't born in the United however, the world of conspiracy is biting back. Epstein's crimes are real and horrific, and there remains the possibility that further information could emerge about they have also become subsumed by grander narratives – Pizzagate, and later QAnon, the sprawling interactive conspiracy theory that swamped the internet during Trump's first term, pushing the idea that the highest echelons of society were controlled by a child-abusing elite cabal. The conspiracy theory spread through cryptic messages posted by a pseudonymous character called Rothschild, author of several books on Trump-era conspiracies, including The Storm Is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult and Conspiracy of Everything, said Epstein was mentioned in several such messages dating back to late 2017."Epstein is seen as one of the major players in a global 'paedo elite' that's been trafficking children for centuries, and that Q and Trump were supposed to put an end to once and for all," he told the after the justice department meeting in February, administration officials, including FBI director Kash Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino - who both stoked Epstein rumours for years - started to dampen talk of any major on 8 July, the Department of Justice and FBI said in a memo that Epstein's cause of death was suicide and there was no evidence he had a "client list".The president seemed eager to move on, calling the Epstein case "sordid, but it's boring" while also blaming Democrats for continuing to make it an Trump supporters are happy to follow the president's lead. But a subset of extremely online MAGA supporters are still deeply passionate about the Epstein orders officials to release Epstein court documentsProsecutor in Diddy and Epstein cases fired by justice departmentTrump's Epstein strategy could pit him against loyal supporters Several MAGA voices, including former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, have alleged that Epstein was employed by the Israeli security services. And among more extreme elements of the movement, the conspiracy theories around Epstein sometimes veer into the Rothschild said most of the people in MAGA world are simply itching for more information – if it indeed exists – about the financier's connections with Bill Clinton and other Democrats and Trump opponents. Epstein cultivated powerful people from both major US political long history of MAGA's Epstein obsession mean Trump is now finding it difficult to satisfy the conspiratorial elements in his story took another twist late on Thursday as The Wall Street Journal reported Trump had sent Epstein a "bawdy" birthday greeting in 2003. The pair's one-time friendship is well-known, but Trump says he cut ties with Epstein long ago and filed a lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal's parent company, its owner and two reporters following the report. Meanwhile, Trump seemed more willing to indulge the conspiracy theorists, posting on Truth Social: "Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval."There is no doubt that conspiracy theories clearly have the power to motivate some of the president's base. QAnon supporters were among some of the most visible participants at the January 2021 riot at the US a survey conducted just before last November's election, the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) think tank found that nearly a fifth of Americans agree with QAnon-linked statements, including most pointedly: "The government, media, and financial worlds in the US are controlled by a group of Satan-worshipping paedophiles who run a global child sex trafficking operation."Many see the Epstein case as a confirmation of those views, and the QAnon-believing population is heavily pro-Trump, the PRRI found, with 80% backing the with that support has come influence. Posobiec, the Pizzagate and Epstein conspiracy theorist who was at the DOJ meeting in February, reportedly accompanied Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on a recent trip to also has been photographed meeting with neo-Nazi's, although he denies being a white nationalist did not respond to the BBC's request for is adamant that Epstein's case is connected to the wider conspiracy world."It ties to Covid, it ties to lockdowns, it ties to vaccines," Posobiec said, on the Alex Marlow podcast, which was recorded at a conference last week where multiple speakers brought up Epstein and demanded further revelations."It ties to so many different buckets of the anger people are feeling."Rich Logis, a former longtime Trump supporter who broke ranks and started an organisation called Leaving MAGA, said that these outlandish theories serve "as ties that bind many within the MAGA community", even amongst those who doubt says Trump's dismissal this week of their concerns this left some supporters "feeling confused and stunned"."They expected Trump to keep his promise and reveal those who allegedly aided and abetted Epstein," he the Epstein case presents a political quagmire for Trump, there is also a problem for his supporters, particularly the vocal influencer class, in figuring out where to funnel their rage. Targeting the president could backfire when it comes to their own followers."Many of the major influencers are furious," Rothschild said, "and while they might not take it out on Trump, they might take it out on the GOP (Republican Party) in general."Trump has so far stood by Pam Bondi, his attorney general. But she, Patel and Bongino may increasingly feel the pressure if MAGA's conspiracy wing continues to demand more files - whether or not they actually exist.

Now Trump is blamed for $2bn surge in cost of building reservoir in drought-plagued California
Now Trump is blamed for $2bn surge in cost of building reservoir in drought-plagued California

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Now Trump is blamed for $2bn surge in cost of building reservoir in drought-plagued California

California 's most ambitious water infrastructure project in nearly half a century has just become a whole lot more expensive - and President Donald Trump is being blamed for part of the staggering price surge. Planners behind the colossal Sites Reservoir, a sprawling basin that could one day provide drinking water to more than 24 million Californians have confirmed that the cost of construction has ballooned from $4.5 billion to at much as $6.8 billion. And among the reasons cited for the $2 billion spike are the Trump tariffs imposed during the early part of this year which project leaders say are still sending shockwaves through the supply chain. 'The biggest drivers of the increase included factory shutdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic and recent tariffs from President Donald Trump,' Jerry Brown, executive director of the Sites Project Authority (no relation to the former governor), told the Press Democrat. 'Increasing costs are never looked forward to, but they are something that is a fact of life.' He attributed the jump to inflation for steel, concrete, and other building materials since 2021. The revelation has ignited fresh political tensions in the Golden State, where Governor Gavin Newsom 's administration has been pushing hard to shore up water infrastructure amid escalating climate extremes. The Sites project - a reservoir so massive it would stretch 13 miles long and four miles across in Colusa County - is fast becoming a flashpoint in the long-running battle over water, money, and environmental priorities. Nearly 70 residents in Antelope Valley are expected to lose their homes as the basin swallows up swaths of Colusa County. For them, the price tag isn't measured in billions of dollars, but in broken lives and uprooted communities. 'Scores of people are set to see their homes flooded,' read a previous report on the project's local impact, which has been more than 45 years in the making. If completed, the Sites Reservoir would become California's eighth-largest, holding 1.5 million acre-feet of water, or nearly 490 billion gallons - intended primarily for use in Southern and Central California, as well as the Bay Area. Construction is still slated to begin next year with completion by 2033, Brown said. But rising costs may force tough decisions on funding and prioritization. Although the Sites project received backing from both Congress and the Biden administration, with nearly $365 million in federal grants over the past three years, the newly projected cost spike has become a political lightning rod particularly as Trump-era tariffs are now being identified as a contributing factor. On Wednesday, Brown presented the updated cost to the nine-member State Water Commission, which has already set aside $875 million in Proposition 1 bond funds for the project. Commissioner Daniel Curtin said 22 water agencies have committed planning money, with 16 more on a waiting list seeking extra water capacity. 'The rubber hits the road when the money comes,' Curtin said. 'But it sounds like the commitments are pretty strong.' Commissioner Jose Solorio added: 'All of the state would benefit from the construction of this project.' California Republicans have largely avoided commenting on the tariff connection, while environmental groups are using the moment to revive their long-standing opposition to the plan. 'The Sites Reservoir would harm the Sacramento River ecosystem, threaten already imperiled fish species, and release greenhouse gas pollution,' argued a lawsuit filed by conservationists, later dismissed in Yolo County Superior Court. 'The project will cause much environmental harm, which falls on the public, and a small amount of good, which primarily benefits the project investors,' added Stork, senior policy advocate at Friends of the River. 'Among other harms, the reservoir will be a major greenhouse gas emitter. A recent analysis estimated that Sites would emit the equivalent of 80,000 gasoline-powered cars each year.' Opponents lost their appeal last year, but they aren't backing down. 'It's not surprising,' said Ron Stork, policy director at Friends of the River. 'Large mega-projects typically escalate in costs considerably from their initial estimates. There's a reason why these dams haven't been built yet.' Stork added, 'We'll have to see if the wealthy urban water districts in Southern California and the Bay Area want to continue to invest in this project.' He estimated that the Sites Reservoir's odds of being built now stand at 'about 50-50.' The backlash hasn't deterred Governor Newsom, who has thrown his full support behind the project as part of his broader water resilience strategy. 'We are going to need more storage projects with climate change,' said Matt Keller, a spokesperson for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, one of the project's backers. 'Our board is evaluating several different water supply projects from around Northern California and locally, and has been following this one for a while.' 'The longer we wait and the longer it takes to get this done, the more expensive it becomes,' Brown told reporters. 'Even though it is costing more, it is still something we need to do badly.' He compared Sites to a savings account for future droughts: 'People look at all the water running through rivers in wet winters and say why can't we save more of that?' Proponents argue that Sites is uniquely positioned to capture 'excess water from major storms' and store it for drier years, which are increasingly common as global temperatures rise. But for critics, the project epitomizes the high environmental and social cost of mega-infrastructure in an era of climate uncertainty. 'It's very difficult to justify the expense and environmental costs of big surface storage infrastructure projects,' said John Buse, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'The Sites Reservoir will cause far more harm than good.' Ironically, the project's price hike comes after a rare string of wet winters that have filled existing reservoirs to capacity. Shasta Lake and Lake Oroville both overflowed for a third consecutive year in 2025. Had the reservoir already existed, Brown noted, Sites could have captured runoff from the past two wet winters. 'It would have filled to the top,' he said, adding that it would have diverted only about 3% of Delta flows during the wettest months. But experts warn that complacency is dangerous. With California's precipitation increasingly concentrated into short, intense bursts followed by prolonged dry spells, the need for storage remains urgent. 'Water scarcity is always just around the corner,' the project's website warns. Brown acknowledged that the project has drawn sharp scrutiny - but said history is on its side. 'Rarely when looked back upon 20, 40 or 60 years later are these projects regretted in terms of the benefits to society,' he said. 'These are hard decisions to make as a society, but we are building this for ourselves and future generations.'

Microsoft to stop using engineers in China for tech support of US military, Hegseth orders review
Microsoft to stop using engineers in China for tech support of US military, Hegseth orders review

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Microsoft to stop using engineers in China for tech support of US military, Hegseth orders review

SAN FRANCISCO, July 18 (Reuters) - Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab on Friday said it will stop using China-based engineers to provide technical assistance to the U.S. military after a report in investigative journalism outlet ProPublica sparked questions from a U.S. senator and prompted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to order a two-week review of Pentagon cloud deals. The report detailed Microsoft's use of Chinese engineers, opens new tab to work on U.S. military cloud computing systems under the supervision of U.S. "digital escorts" hired through subcontractors who have security clearances but often lacked the technical skills to assess whether the work of the Chinese engineers posed a cybersecurity threat. Microsoft, a major contractor to the U.S. government, has had its systems breached by Chinese and Russian hackers. It told ProPublica it disclosed its practices to the U.S. government during an authorization process. On Friday, Microsoft spokesperson Frank Shaw said on social media website X the company changed how it supports U.S. government customers "in response to concerns raised earlier this week ... to assure that no China-based engineering teams are providing technical assistance" for services used by the Pentagon. Earlier on Friday, Senator Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican who chairs the chamber's intelligence committee and also serves on its armed services committee, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Microsoft's reported practices. Cotton asked the U.S. military for a list of contractors that use Chinese personnel and more information on how U.S. "digital escorts" are trained to detect suspicious activity. "The U.S. government recognizes that China's cyber capabilities pose one of the most aggressive and dangerous threats to the United States, as evidenced by infiltration of our critical infrastructure, telecommunications networks, and supply chains," Cotton wrote in the letter. The U.S. military "must guard against all potential threats within its supply chain, including those from subcontractors," he wrote. In a video posted on X on Friday, Hegseth said he was initiating a two-week review to ensure China-based engineers were not working on any other cloud services contracts across the Defense Department. "I'm announcing that China will no longer have any involvement whatsoever in our cloud services, effective immediately," Hegseth said in the video. "We will continue to monitor and counter all threats to our military infrastructure and online networks."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store