
Comedian Matt Rife is now ‘legal guardian' of the haunted Annabelle doll: What does it mean?
The development came after Dan Rivera, a paranormal investigator, died on July 13 in a Pennsylvania hotel while bringing the doll on a national tour in the United States. Rivera was taking the doll on tour on behalf of the New England Society for Psychic Research (NESPR), a group founded by the late paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren.
The Annabelle doll is housed in the Warren Occult Museum, also founded by the Warrens. Rife and Castee have bought the museum, and become the legal guardians of around 750 'haunted artefacts' kept there. However, they legally do not own these items.
Why do Rife and Castee not legally own the artefacts? What does being a legal guardian mean? Can inanimate objects have a legal guardian? Here is a look.
Annabelle is a Raggedy Ann doll that is believed to have been gifted to a nursing student in 1968. The student brought it to her apartment, which she shared with a roommate.
The student and her roommate subsequently 'noticed strange occurrences with the doll' before a psychic medium told them it was 'inhabited by the spirit of a young girl named Annabelle,' according to the website of the NESPR.
'The two roommates tried to accept the doll's spirit and please it only to have it reciprocate maliciousness and violent intent,' the NESPR said.
Eventually, the doll came into the possession of the Warrens, who kept it on display in their museum in Monroe, Connecticut.
The term 'legal guardian' is typically used in personal law to refer to someone who acts on behalf of another person who is unable to act for themselves, like a minor or a person with a disability.
By this definition, inanimate objects do not qualify for guardianship. As they have no rights or needs of their own. However, people are often appointed as caretakers for objects that hold cultural, emotional or symbolic value, thus borrowing the language of guardianship.
The Warren Occult Museum is a private collection of the Warrens, and was shut down in 2019 due to zoning issues. Its artefacts do not fall under any historical preservation scheme as of now.
In a statement to TODAY.com, NESPR Director Tony Spera, son-in-law of Ed and Lorraine Warren, clarified that while Rife and Castee purchased the home, he and his wife Judy Spera remain the owners of the artefacts.
'All of the artefacts, including the infamous Annabelle doll, are owned by Judy and myself… We have no plans to ever 'sell' the artefacts,' Spera said.
Under property law, real property, such as land or a building, is distinct from personal property, which includes movable items such as artefacts. In the absence of an agreement that transfers the ownership of such personal property, the new owners act as custodians or caretakers of such items under a private agreement.
Rife and Castee's statement as being legal guardians of the items in the museum underpins their responsibility for how these items are stored, displayed or treated.
Museums, government departments and private collectors may sometimes hold items they don't technically 'own' but are responsible for preserving or protecting. In these cases, the term used is that of a 'custodian' or a 'trustee'.
In India, heritage is governed by laws like the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act 1972. These laws regulate how monuments and artefacts must be handled. Under the 1958 Act, the Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India is the official legal guardian of all protected monuments. Their job is to ensure that these sites are preserved and not damaged or misused.
In the US, similar obligations exist under the National Historic Preservation Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Institutions holding items of cultural or religious significance are required to consult communities, such as the Native American tribes, before displaying or transferring those objects.
Moreover, ownership or representation is sometimes extended to non-human entities to establish clear responsibility. In India, temple deities are treated as juristic persons that can hold legal rights and have a representative to appear in court. The person who manages the deity's affairs, called a shebait, is expected to act in the deity's interest, much like a guardian would for a human.
In the entertainment domain, the rights to represent, use, or adapt fictional characters are typically managed by rights holders such as their creators. Families or companies act as stewards of these fictional works. This includes ensuring that the character's image is not misused or misrepresented. This usually comes under the intellectual property rights.
For instance, after the death of the Japanese creator of Astro Boy, Osamu Tezuka, his estate now manages the characters' appearances and licensing through Tezuka Productions. This responsibility can not be framed as guardianship but reflects a similar idea that someone must take care of what the character symbolises.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, August 7, 1975: Hitch delays flight of plane with Gunmen
Kuala Lumpur, August 6: Five terrorists who held 52 hostages in the U.S. Consulate for two days boarded a plane at Kuala Lumpur airport to-day and officials said they would leave for Libya at 8 a.m. local time (6 a.m. IST) to-morrow. The five still held 15 of their hostages aboard the plane, including the U.S. Consul, Mr. R. Stebbins and the Swedish Charge d' Affaires Mr. Bergenstrahle. Officials said they were to be released in exchange for two Malaysian and two Japanese Government officials who would accompany the terrorists to Libya as substitute hostages. The two Malaysians were named as Mr. Ramli Omar, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Communications and Mr. Osman Cassim, Secretary-General of the Home Ministry. According to American officials here, the Libyan Government had agreed to accept the guerillas. Meanwhile, the five Japanese radicals who were released from Japanese prisons and flown to Kuala Lumpur as demanded by the terrorists, were waiting in an airport building to board the plane for the flight. After exhausting negotiations, the gunmen agreed this morning to leave the American International Assurance building which houses the U.S. and other embassies in downtown Kuala Lumpur and join their five comrades at the airport. Masked, wearing gloves and carrying automatic revolvers and hand grenades, they marched their 15 hostages along with them and made the 22 km drive to the airport in a large bus.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
HC declines to issue notices to respondents in PIL seeking probe into YSRCP-era scams
Vijayawada: The high court on Wednesday declined to issue notices to respondents, including former chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, in a PIL which a special investigation team (SIT) headed by a retired judge and comprising officials from CBI, ED, and Income Tax dept to probe into various scams during the YSRCP regime. One Mehek Maheswari, an advocate from South Delhi, filed the petition and argued the matter as party in person. He relied upon various white papers, released by the NDA govt in the state, pointing out irregularities during the YSRCP regime. Maheswari told the high court that according to the white papers released by the govt in the assembly, several scams have taken place and state agencies are ineffective in unearthing the details of the scams. The HC bench headed by Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice Cheemalapati Ravi expressed several doubts on the bona fides of the petitioner. The bench wondered why a busy lawyer in Delhi came down all the way to Amaravati to file and argue a PIL regarding alleged scams during the previous govt. Noting that a CBI investigation should be done only in rare and exceptional circumstances, the bench asked the petitioner to explain and satisfy the court on the conditions set forth by the apex court for ordering a CBI inquiry. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Living perfectly well without American goods': Why more Chinese shoppers support local brands CNA Read More Undo Special govt pleader S Pranathi told the high court that the state govt has constituted a SIT to probe the alleged irregularities and sought time to submit details. The high court accepted her request and adjourned the matter for further hearing.


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Karma strikes: Millionaire trophy hunter killed by the very buffalo he was hunting
A 52-year-old American millionaire and experienced trophy hunter, Asher Watkins, was fatally gored by a Cape buffalo during a licensed hunting expedition in South Africa. The incident occurred in the Limpopo province, a region known for its game reserves and big game safaris. According to reports, Watkins was participating in a licensed safari with Coenraad Vermaak Safaris, one of South Africa's oldest and most prominent hunting operators. He had already successfully hunted a waterbuck earlier in the trip and was tracking a large Cape buffalo, a species often dubbed the " Black Death " due to its notorious aggression and unpredictability. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program While attempting a close range shot, the buffalo charged without warning. Despite the presence of a professional guide and tracker, the animal managed to reach Watkins, goring him fatally. Medical personnel were called to the scene, but he was declared dead on arrival. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Authorities have confirmed that the incident is being treated as a tragic accident. An investigation is ongoing, though no foul play is suspected. Cape Buffalo: Africa's most dangerous game The Cape buffalo is one of the most feared animals in the African bush. With a weight exceeding 1,500 kg and capable of charging at great speed, it is responsible for more hunter fatalities on the continent than any other large animal. When injured or threatened, the buffalo often retaliates aggressively, making it especially perilous to pursue on foot. Live Events Though legally hunted under conservation permits, Cape buffalo are known to test even the most seasoned hunters. Watkins, a frequent participant in international hunts, had reportedly undertaken several similar expeditions in the past. Conservation debate rekindled Watkins' death has sparked renewed conversation over the practice of trophy hunting. While proponents argue that licensed hunts bring in revenue for conservation and local communities, critics question the ethics and risks involved. Animal rights advocates have called the incident a stark reminder of the consequences of treating wild animals as trophies. Meanwhile, the safari operator expressed condolences to the family, stating all safety protocols had been followed. Watkins, a father of one, is survived by his daughter and former wife. His death marks one of the rare but grim reminders of the lethal risks associated with big game hunting in Africa. FAQs Q1. What is a Cape buffalo and why is it dangerous? A1. The Cape buffalo, often called the 'Black Death,' is known for its aggression, especially when injured. It weighs over 1,500 pounds and can charge at lightning speed. Q2. What's the controversy surrounding trophy hunting? A2. Supporters argue it supports conservation and rural economies. Critics see it as unethical and exploitative toward wildlife.