US-backed aid group GHF proposed ‘Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza
The $2 billion plan, created sometime after February 11 for the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, was submitted to the Trump administration and recently discussed in the White House, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The plan, reviewed by Reuters, describes the camps as 'large-scale' and 'voluntary' places where the Gazan population could 'temporarily reside, deradicalize, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so.'
The Washington Post made a reference to GHF plans to build housing compounds for Palestinian non-combatants in May.
A slide deck seen by Reuters goes into granular detail on the 'Humanitarian Transit Zones,' including how they would be implemented and what they would cost.
It calls for using the sprawling facilities to 'gain trust with the local population' and to facilitate US President Donald Trump's 'vision for Gaza.'
Reuters could not independently determine the status of the plan, who submitted it, or whether it is still under consideration.
The aid group, responding to questions from Reuters, denied that it had submitted a proposal and said the slides 'are not a GHF document.' GHF said it had studied 'a range of theoretical options to safely deliver aid in Gaza,' but that it 'is not planning for or implementing Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs).'
Rather, the organization said it is solely focused on food distribution in Gaza.
A spokesperson for SRS, a for-profit contracting company that works with GHF, told Reuters 'we have had no discussions with GHF about HTAs, and our 'next phase' is feeding more people. Any suggestion otherwise is entirely false and misrepresents the scope of our operations.'
The document included the GHF name on the cover and SRS on several slides.
Relocation fears
On February 4 Trump first publicly said that the US should 'take over' the war-battered enclave and rebuild it as 'the Riviera of the Middle East' after resettling the population of 2.3 million Palestinians elsewhere.
Trump's comments angered many Palestinians and humanitarian groups about the possible forced relocation from Gaza. Even if the GHF proposal is no longer under consideration, the idea of moving a large portion of the population into camps will only deepen such worries, several humanitarian experts told Reuters.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
The proposal was laid out in a slide presentation that a source said was submitted to the US embassy in Jerusalem earlier this year.
The US State Department declined to comment. A senior administration official said, 'nothing of the like is under consideration. Also, no resources are being directed to that end in any way.'
The source working on the project said that it had not moved forward due to a lack of funds. Reuters previously reported that GHF had attempted to set up a Swiss bank account from which to solicit donations, but UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to work with the organization.
The Israeli Embassy in the US did not respond to a request for comment.
Ismail Al-Thawabta, director of the Gaza government media office, to told Reuters it 'categorically' rejects the GHF, calling it 'not a relief organization but rather an intelligence and security tool affiliated with the Israeli occupation, operating under a false humanitarian guise.'
'Large-scale' camps
The undated slide presentation, which includes photos dated February 11, said that the GHF is 'working to secure' over $2 billion for the project, to 'build, secure and oversee large-scale Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs) inside and potentially outside Gaza strip for the population to reside while Gaza is demilitarized and rebuilt.'
The Humanitarian Transit Areas described in the slides would be the next phase in an operation that began with GHF opening food distribution sites in the enclave in late May, according to two sources involved in the project.
GHF coordinates with the Israeli military and uses private US security and logistics companies to get food aid into Gaza.
It is favored by the Trump Administration and Israel to carry out humanitarian efforts in Gaza as opposed to the UN-led system which it says let militants divert aid.
Hamas denies this and says Israel is using hunger as a weapon.
In June US State Department approved $30 million in funding for the GHF and called on other countries to also support the group.
The United Nations has called GHF's operation 'inherently unsafe' and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. The UN human rights office says it has recorded at least 613 killings at GHF aid points and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups including the UN.
One slide outlining a timeline said a camp would be operational within 90 days of the launch of the project and that it would house 2,160 people, along with a laundry, restrooms, showers and a school.
A source working on the project said that the slide deck is part of a planning process that began last year and envisions a total of eight camps, each one capable of sheltering hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
The proposal did not specify how the Palestinians would be relocated into the camps, or where the camps could be built outside Gaza, but a map shows arrows pointing to Egypt and Cyprus as well as other points labeled 'Additional Destination?'
GHF would 'oversee and regulate all civil activities required for construction, deradicalization and temporary voluntary relocation,' the proposal said.
Responding to questions from Reuters, three humanitarian experts expressed alarm over details of the plan to build camps.
'There is no such thing as voluntary displacement amongst a population that has been under constant bombardment for nearly two years and has been cut off from essential aid,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, president of the Refugees International advocacy group and a former senior US Agency for International Development official who reviewed the plan.
The source who worked on planning for the camps told Reuters that the intent 'is to take the fear factor away,' enabling Palestinians to 'escape control of Hamas' and providing them 'a safe area to house their families.'
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, caused a hunger crisis, and displaced nearly Gaza's entire population internally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Khamenei advisor says no nuclear talks if US insists Iran abandon enrichment
Iran will not take part in talks with the United States over its nuclear program if Washington insists Tehran abandon uranium enrichment, an advisor to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said Monday. 'If the negotiations must be conditioned on stopping enrichment, such negotiations will not take place,' advisor Ali Velayati was quoted as saying by the state news agency IRNA. Earlier on Monday, Iran said it had 'no specific date' for a meeting with the United States on Tehran's nuclear program, following a war with Israel that had derailed negotiations. 'For now, no specific date, time or location has been determined regarding this matter,' said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei of plans for a meeting between Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi and US envoy Steve Witkoff. Araghchi and Witkoff met starting in April, without concluding a deal after five rounds of talks that were the highest-level contact between their two countries since Washington in 2018 abandoned a landmark nuclear agreement. The Omani-mediated negotiations were halted as Israel launched surprise strikes on the nuclear facilities of its staunch enemy Iran on June 13, starting a 12-day war which the United States later joined. 'We have been serious in diplomacy and the negotiation process, we entered with good faith, but as everyone witnessed, before the sixth round the Zionist regime, in coordination with the United States, committed military aggression against Iran,' said Baghaei. President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a statement on Monday that Iran 'supports diplomacy and constructive engagement.' 'We continue to believe that the window for diplomacy remains open, and we will seriously pursue this peaceful path.' Israel and Western nations accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied. While it is the only non-nuclear power to enrich uranium to 60-percent purity, close to the level needed for a warhead, the UN's atomic energy watchdog has said it had no indication that Iran was working to weaponize its stockpiles. Israel's offensive last month, which it said was aimed at thwarting a nuclear threat from the Islamic Republic, killed nuclear scientists and top-ranking military officers as well as hitting military, nuclear and other sites and residential areas. The United States launched its own set of strikes against Iran's nuclear program on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz. The extent of the damage from the strikes remains unknown, and Baghaei said it was 'still under investigation.' Iran responded with missile and drone attacks on Israel, and attacked a US base in Qatar in retaliation for Washington's strikes. Pezeshkian in his latest statement warned of an 'even more crushing retaliation' to any 'new aggression against Iranian territory.' Baghaei said on Monday that Iran remains in contact with Britain, France and Germany, the three European parties to the 2015 nuclear deal that the United States later withdrew from. The Europeans have threatened to trigger the 'snapback' mechanism under the 2015 agreement, which allows the reimposition of UN sanctions in the event of non-compliance. Baghaei said Tehran was 'in continuous contact with these three countries' but added that he 'cannot provide an exact date' for the next meeting with them. There was 'no legal, moral or political basis' for reimposing sanctions, according to Baghaei, as Iran was still committed to the 2015 agreement. The ministry spokesman added that such a move would be met with an 'appropriate and proportionate' response, following Iranian threats to quit the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. After the United States pulled out of the nuclear accord during Donald Trump's first term as president, Iran in 2019 began rolling back its commitments to the agreement that restricts its atomic activities in return for sanctions relief. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran still considers itself a member of the JCPOA,' Baghaei said of the 2015 deal.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Hungary's ambassador bids farewell to Saudi Arabia after a decade of diplomacy
RIYADH: Hungarian Ambassador to Saudi Arabia Balazs Selmeci bid farewell to the Kingdom as he concluded his decade-long tenure. Selmeci visited Arab News headquarters in Riyadh on Monday, where he met with Editor-in-Chief Faisal J. Abbas. The envoy said his goals were to strengthen political and diplomatic relations, expand economic ties and promote a positive image of Hungary in Saudi Arabia. At the same time, Selmeci sought to highlight Saudi Arabia's changes and opportunities in Hungary, as well as the hospitality and kindness of the Saudi people. 'I believe I achieved good results in both areas, thanks to the support of Saudi institutions, the people and my colleagues at the embassy,' Selmeci told Arab News. Reflecting on his time in the Kingdom, Selmeci highlighted the significant changes he witnessed over the years. He singled out the closing ceremony of Riyadh Season at King Fahd Stadium as a moment that symbolized Saudi Arabia's rapid transformation. Saudi society showed commitment to the reforms, leading to a more open and globally connected country. Balazs Selmeci, Hungarian Ambassador to Saudi Arabia He recalled that the stadium was full of men and women together, and Saudi ballet dancers performed on stage — something that would have been unimaginable earlier. 'At that moment, I realized how much Saudi Arabia had changed. I saw many talented Saudis and felt their happiness, both on stage and in the audience,' the envoy said. Over more than 10 years in Saudi Arabia, Selmeci observed the transformative impact of Vision 2030, including societal reforms and economic diversification. He added that social reforms — such as involving women in the workforce, increasing their participation across sectors, welcoming international visitors and events, and balancing tradition with modernization — laid the foundation for economic progress. 'Vision 2030 itself required great courage from the leadership and strong support from the Saudi people,' Selmeci said. From the outset, Saudi society showed commitment to the reforms, leading to a more open and globally connected country, he added. 'These social and ongoing economic reforms have increased Saudi Arabia's international presence and influence,' Selmeci said. He added that the reforms have allowed foreigners to better understand the Kingdom and build trust, and that the dedication of both the government and the people provides a strong foundation for success. Selmeci began his tenure as ambassador on Nov. 14, 2019, presenting his credentials to Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan on Dec. 12, and to King Salman on Jan. 8, 2020. Before then, he served in Riyadh as deputy head of mission from March 2014 to June 2018, marking more than a decade since he first began working to strengthen Saudi-Hungarian relations. During his tenure, he oversaw the first-ever bilateral meeting between the two countries' foreign ministers in the Kingdom, as well as the first bilateral meeting between their defense ministers. Selmeci said that among the economic cooperation projects during his tenure, his favorites were the reestablishment of the Saudi-Hungarian Business Council, the launch of the Saudi-Hungarian Digitalization Cluster and the creation of the first Saudi-Hungarian joint venture in the Kingdom. He also extended his best wishes to the Saudi people, encouraging them to continue working with determination toward a better life, making the country more prosperous while preserving its traditions and heritage. Asked what message he would leave for his successor, Selmeci expressed hope that they would build on these achievements and accomplish even greater successes, while creating as many memorable experiences as he did. He added that his successor could count on the full support of the Saudi leadership, officials, the people, the diplomatic corps and embassy staff. In his closing remarks, the ambassador said he planned to return to the Kingdom in the future — 'even as a simple tourist, to walk in King Salman Park, visit Qiddiya or attend Expo 2030.'
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Time to put principles above profit
Francesca Albanese is such a threat to world peace and security, according to the US, that she joins four International Criminal Court judges and the court's chief prosecutor on its sanctions list. She is the first UN expert in history to be the subject of sanctions. The US has also written to the UN secretary-general to demand she is sacked. Albanese has not killed anyone. She has not stolen anything. She has not committed any crime. Her mortal sin is to stand up for international law and human rights, and demand that this applies to Israel. Albanese will not be deterred. She has been labeled a terrorist, a Marxist and an antisemite by those wishing to smear her and get her fired. She has not blinked. What is the report she has published that the US dislikes? It is entitled 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide,' an examination of the economic underpinnings of Israel's genocide. Much of the media and political focus of those determined to ensure accountability for Israel's crimes has understandably focused on states. The campaign for an arms trade ban has been supercharged in major weapons-exporting states, with some results. Others want states to rip up free trade agreements with Israel. But one of the core foundations of Israel's occupation and genocide has been corporate complicity. This underpins the scaffolding of the regime of occupation and apartheid. For years, this has been a central feature of global civil society's efforts to hold Israel to account. This is what Albanese examines in this groundbreaking report. To what extent have major corporate actors become sponsors of these crimes? To what extent can they do what states, for legal or public relations reasons, cannot? She cites more than 60 international companies involved in 'the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide.' She called on the International Criminal Court to look to prosecute the chief executives of these companies. One of the most incredible aspects of Israel's 58-year-old occupation is how profitable it is. These companies are not generally motivated by ideology, but by good old-fashioned corporate greed. They make money. Given that, as the report points out, the Israeli defense budget has doubled since October 2023, they make considerable quantities of money. Albanese is clear that the report is not a mere list of such companies but an attempt to expose the system and how it enables genocide. The UN already has a database of companies that trade and do business in settlements, though many member states oppose or ignore this. This should change. This corporate network is vital for Israel not just to maintain its occupation, but to expand it. The arms companies are well known, but less so is the fact the Occupied Territories are a testing ground for weapons and artificial intelligence systems. But there are also civilian businesses, banks, insurance companies and major tourism companies that, for example, rent properties in illegal Israeli settlements. One 2025 survey found 760 rooms in illegal settlements were available for rent on just two platforms. When you examine the entries for these properties, the unknowing tourist would have no idea they would be holidaying in occupied territory. Banks and financial institutions are also in Albanese's crosshairs. The report points out that 'major global banks have underwritten Israeli treasury bonds, which have bankrolled the devastation, and the largest sovereign wealth and pension funds invested public and private savings in the genocidal economy, all the while claiming to respect ethical guidelines.' Major tech firms also stand accused. Many have offered their cloud services for use by the Israeli authorities, including the country's military. Israel's genocide in Gaza has seen the military deploy facial recognition software, target-selection algorithms and automated targeting systems such as Lavender, all provided and tested by tech giants. One of the core foundations of Israel's occupation and genocide has been corporate complicity. Chris Doyle Heavy machinery firms have provided bulldozers and other equipment that have destroyed huge parts of Gaza and the West Bank. Israeli authorities are recruiting drivers for such bulldozers, reportedly paying them per property destroyed. They get about 2,500 Israeli shekels ($744) for demolishing a small building and 5,000 shekels for a large one. How will this corporate complicity end? Consumer pressure will matter, as it did with the anti-South African apartheid campaign. Already, consumer pressure has hit businesses and pension funds. Options for strategic litigation for those who are seriously complicit are being examined. Ultimately, however, states need to do more. Trade with settlements should have been terminated decades ago. And why are states selling arms to Israel? Given their role in the global system, private corporations need to be held to account just as much as political leaders. It is a legal duty for states, under the UN's Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to ensure businesses in their territory and jurisdiction adhere to international law and punish such abuses. It is time to put principles above profit.
