Elon Used So Much Ketamine He Couldn't Pee Right: Report
Elon Musk's use of ketamine was so intense during the 2024 campaign that he complained it was negatively affecting his bladder function, according to a New York Times report detailing the billionaire's drug use as he joined President Donald Trump's circle last year.
The Times paints a picture of a man caught in an erratic cycle of substance abuse and family drama. While Musk has previously spoken of using ketamine as a scheduled prescription treatment for depression, sources who spoke to the Times say his use of the anesthetic was frequent — almost daily —and regularly in combination with other drugs while in the throws of campaign season. The billionaire also took Ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms as he campaigned for Trump, and traveled with a box of daily medication, including Adderall, according to a photo obtained by the Times.
It's unknown whether Musk's drug use continued into his time leading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)'s teardown of the federal government, although he exhibited erratic behavior throughout his time in the White House.
Musk's ketamine use reportedly became so chronic last year that he began to experience some of the negative side effects of frequent consumption: namely complaining of issues with his bladder.
Studies have shown that frequent recreational ketamine use can lead to a condition known as 'ketamine-induced cystitis,' or inflammation of the bladder and urinary tract. A report published by the National Institute of Health states that 'common KIC-related problems are urinary pain and discomfort, bladder epithelial barrier damage, reduced bladder storage and increased pressure, ureter stenosis, and kidney failure.'
'Furthermore, it becomes a vicious cycle when KIC patients attempt to manage their urinary pain with increased ketamine use,' the study adds.
Speculation about the extent of Musk's drug use, and its effects on the management of his various companies as well as his foray into the federal government, has existed for some time now. Last year, The Wall Street Journal spoke to various sources within and around Musk's companies who expressed concerns that the mogul's regular drug use was not only a major liability to his businesses, but could spiral into a full blown health crisis.
In the year and change since the Journal's report, Musk's personal and corporate life have only become more erratic. The billionaire is caught in multiple high-profile child support, paternity, and custody battles with the various mothers of his ever-growing brood. According to the Times, the musical artist Grimes, who is mother to three of Musk's children, privately indicated that she feared for the safety of her son X Æ A-12 (X), who is frequently seen in the public eye alongside Musk in what Grimes says is a violation of their custody agreement. Grimes reportedly expressed concerns that the five-year-old's health was being affected by the long travel and irregular sleep schedule.
On Friday, Musk will officially step back from his role as de-facto head of DOGE. Publicly, the departure is being attributed to the expiration of Musk's authorization as a Special Government Employee. Meanwhile, reports have emerged that executives at Tesla considered replacing Musk as his plummeting popularity and reckless government tenure continued to harm the company's stock valuation, and led to widespread national protests against the electric vehicle manufacturer.
More from Rolling Stone
Senator Dismisses Medicaid Cuts Killing People: 'Well, We're All Going to Die'
Vets Are Working Out of Closets Because of Trump's Nonsensical War on the VA
Trump Admin Moves to Create 'Remigration' Office to Supercharge Deportations
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's robotaxi rollout is alarming the public, new report shows
Tesla's robotaxi rollout is alarming the public, new report shows originally appeared on TheStreet. As the calendar turns to June, many people are focused on a key event that Elon Musk has been touting all year: the Tesla () robotaxi rollout. After a volatile and complicated start to the year, marked by a disappointing earnings report and declining sales across multiple key markets, the electric vehicle (EV) producer has put investors through many motions. This prompted investors and analysts to call for Musk to refocus his energy on the company. 💵💰💰💵 Now the CEO seems to be doing that, after announcing he will be ceasing his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and returning to his responsibilities at Tesla and SpaceX. This comes at a pivotal time, as the automaker prepares to roll out its self-driving robotaxi fleet in Austin, Texas. Despite the positive momentum surrounding this key event, though, a recent report shows that public perception toward Tesla's new technology isn't positive. The rise of self-driving vehicles has become a defining trend over the past few years, as companies like Tesla and Waymo have worked to outmaneuver each other. While the latter has already established a presence in several major U.S. cities, Elon Musk has made sure the world knows Tesla's launch is coming soon.A true master of hype, Musk has successfully kept the nation's focus on Tesla's historic event, making it clear that it is proceeding as planned. However, a market research initiative that tracks consumer sentiment toward EVs recently published a detailed report with some statistics that may concern Musk. In the May 2025 edition of the Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report (EVIR), its authors highlight some potential problems both for Tesla and any automakers seeking to venture into the autonomous driving space. However, much of the negative sentiment seems to center on Tesla. 'Consumers are skeptical of the full self-driving (FSD) technology that undergirds the robotaxi proposition, with 60% considering Tesla's full self-driving 'unsafe,' 77% unwilling to utilize full self-driving technology, and a substantial share (48%) believing full self-driving should be illegal,' the report states. It adds, though, that younger, higher-income individuals who live in urban areas are more open to autonomous driving technology than other groups. Those are the type of consumers Musk is likely targeting with the new robotaxi fleet. Even so, the authors also flag another concerning element for Tesla. They note that the former EV leader has been declining in areas such as brand positivity and trust but add that its rivals, such as Lucid and Rivian, have recently made progress in these areas, indicating that consumers are increasingly shifting away from Tesla. More Tesla News: Billionaire fund manager dumps Tesla in favor of other tech stock Elon Musk, Tesla send bold message to Washington, DC Elon Musk's robotaxi ambitions hit with major roadblock Other experts have also raised concerns regarding Tesla's robotaxi launch. TheStreet's Tony Owusu reports that Wall Street analyst Alexander Pots of Piper Sandler has speculated that the company's FSD technology isn't advanced enough to handle the challenges that the launch will pose. With the robotaxi launch drawing closer by the day, investors and consumers are watching closely to see how the event will turn out. Musk has described himself as being 'extremely paranoid' about it, even after Tesla reported that its FSD system has almost tripled the cumulative miles it has driven over the past Roth Smith, head of research for the EVIR, spoke to TheStreet about the report's statistics and their potential implications for Tesla and Musk. While he sees damage to the brand's reputation as a likely problem, he states: 'Even more worrisome is the data on robotaxis, which is what Musk has pointed to as the solution to Tesla's sales woes — the market just isn't there yet. Consumers are extremely skeptical towards robotaxi technology, extremely hesitant to adopt it, and half of consumers want to ban it.' As Roth Smith sees it, Tesla is likely facing an uphill battle as it bets big on robotaxis. The report's data makes it clear that many consumers don't trust the technology behind them and therefore aren't likely to embrace it, which could severely compromise Tesla's growth robotaxi rollout is alarming the public, new report shows first appeared on TheStreet on May 31, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on May 31, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
South Africa's push to amend BEE laws for Musk's Starlink triggers public backlash
The South African government is facing intense political backlash after changes to its Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) laws, potentially allowing Elon Musk's Starlink to operate in the country with exemptions from existing Black ownership requirements. The South African government is facing criticism for proposed changes to Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) laws. The new laws may allow foreign companies, such as Starlink, to bypass Black ownership requirements through alternative contributions. Critics claim this move undermines South Africa's existing empowerment policies aiming to correct historical injustices. As reported by the Financial Times, South Africa's Minister of Communications, Solly Malatsi revealed plans to allow telecom companies like Starlink to sidestep the 30% Black ownership law through ' equity equivalence ' initiatives, such as local partnerships, job creation, or supporting small businesses, in lieu of equity stakes The proposal follows public remarks by Musk that he has been locked out of South Africa's telecom market because he is " not Black." However, the timing and framing of the legislation has sparked intense criticism from opposition parties and civil society, who accuse the government of tailoring laws to benefit a powerful foreign billionaire. Criticism spreads over SA's BEE amendment Build One South Africa (BOSA), a prominent opposition party, has criticized the government's decision as a " backdoor deal" with Musk, arguing it unfairly favors the billionaire's interests over those of local businesses bound by BEE laws. According to BOSA deputy leader Nobuntu Hlazo-Webster " The message being sent is that if you are a powerful foreign billionaire, you can sidestep South Africa's laws, while our local businesses are forced to jump through hoops," BOSA spokesperson Roger Solomons also warned that the proposed exemption would allow Starlink to enter the market" under conditions favourable to them, not the country," He called the move " impulsive and reckless." Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema echoed this sentiment, promising to oppose Starlink's entry in Parliament. ' We will not be dictated to by business,' Malema said, accusing the government of prioritizing corporate interests over national policy. Defense grows amid criticism Meanwhile, the ruling African National Congress (ANC) has defended BEE as essential to reversing the effects of apartheid, while the Democratic Alliance (DA), the second-largest party and a key coalition partner, is suing the government over existing BEE laws. DA MP James Lorimer called the proposed rules ' a death knell for foreign investment' "These ownership demands will crush what little appetite remains for investment in South African mining," He said. " The bill doubles down on failed transformation policies at a time when our economy needs growth." He added. The country's President Cyril Ramaphosa has stood firm against dismantling BEE, attributing South Africa's economic stagnation to concentrated ownership rather than empowerment policies. He said: "It is the partial and exclusive ownership of the means of production in our country that is holding this economy from growing," The controversy is consequent of a major political shift: the ANC, weakened by poor 2024 election results driven by public frustration over crime, unemployment, and inflation, has entered into a 10-party coalition, the first time since the end of apartheid that it has lost its wide majority. As Parliament debates the bill in the coming week, the government faces a balancing act; modernize economic policy to attract foreign innovation and investment or risk undermining the very affirmative action framework that has defined its post-apartheid vision.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Admits Its Cybertrucks Lose Their Value Insanely Fast
The struggles never seem to end for Tesla. Elon Musk's embattled electric vehicle empire is floundering on its long-anticipated robotaxi launch as sales plummet to record lows and Tesla bulls dump their stocks. Tesla's Cybertruck — the garish luxury all-electric truck — is no exception to the carnage. With a reputation for breaking down constantly and drawing the ridicule of just about every other driver on the road, the stainless steel tanks aren't exactly a popular choice for car buyers. Earlier this month, news emerged that Tesla was sitting on over 10,000 unsold Cybertrucks, an estimated $800 million worth of inventory. Now, Tesla has decided to start taking Cybertruck trade-ins after over a year of deliveries, and disgruntled customers are already revealing what Tesla is willing to pay for a used rig. Though an AWD foundation series Cybertruck will set you back $100,000, Tesla's only willing to pay $65,400 to take it off your hands — and that's presumably if it has 6,000 miles or less on it, according to Electrek. A screenshot of the trade-in estimate was obtained from a disgruntled poster in the Cybertruck Owners Club, noting that it gives the Cybertruck a depreciation rate of about 34.6 percent in just one year. A typical pickup truck, claims Electrek, should take three to four years to lose that kind of value. It's not exactly shocking news. The cracks had started to show as early as spring of 2024 — just months after Cybertrucks hit the market — as news of the EV's shoddy production quality became well-known. Back then, Tesla didn't accept returns, while resellers were understandably reluctant to get involved, sending the aftermarket price of a new Cybertruck into the toilet. Of course, this is all in stark contrast to Musk's absurd claim that Tesla vehicles would only increase in value, a promise he made back in 2019. "If you buy a Tesla today, I believe you are buying an appreciating asset, not a depreciating asset," he said in an interview. The Cybertruck isn't the only floundering Tesla product. By last year, a 2021 Tesla Model 3 — which retailed for about $40,000 — was reselling for just $23,700, a 29 percent markdown compared to its price in 2023. The used-car average over the same period was just 19.5 percent, according to a used car site. Tesla is also facing fallout from a bizarre leasing program revealed by Reuters last week. Typically, customers will have an option to buy a car outright at the end of their lease. Instead, Tesla's internal policy made potential buyers send their cars back to Tesla, to be part of Musk's "robotaxi" network. Of course, that robotaxi network has yet to actually materialize. In reality, those cars were being outfitted with the latest software updates and flipped to new buyers for much more than they would have sold to those wrapping up a lease. Basically, the writing's on the wall: don't count on a new Tesla's value to go anywhere but down. More on Tesla: Doomsday Preppers Say the Cybertruck Is a Horrible Choice for the End of the World
