New fireworks legislation after New Year's Eve disaster
Deputy Attorney General Tricia Nakamatsu joins producer/host Coralie Chun Matayoshi to discuss key bills passed this legislative session to enhance law enforcement's ability to apprehend buyers and sellers of illegal fireworks, enable more successful prosecution of violators, and increase penalties for repeat offenders and those whose violations result in serious or substantial harm or death. The Governor's deadline to veto any of the bills passed is July 9, 2025.On New Year's Eve, the deadliest fireworks disaster in Hawaii's history occurred. Six people died in two separate incidents, including a 3-year-old child. Over two dozen others were left disfigured and face long, difficult roads to recovery. Although aerial fireworks have been illegal statewide for 30 years (except by license or permit), dozens of people are treated for fireworks-related injuries every New Year's, and more throughout the year, in emergency rooms across the state.
7 tips to get your family safely through Hawaiʻi's hurricane season
Q. Because of tragedies like this, an interagency Illegal Fireworks Task Force was created within the Department of Law Enforcement in 2023 (Act 67), to detect and seize illegal fireworks. Funding for the Task Force was due to sunset so the Legislature this year extended it until 2030. I want to talk about legislation that was passed this year to help catch buyers and sellers of illegal fireworks. First, what are illegal fireworks – and let's focus on consumer fireworks that people set off on New Years Eve.
Consumer fireworks are basically things that stay on or near the ground, sparklers, and firecrackers like the type used for Chinese cultural events. In Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii Counties, anyone with a permit can legally use these for 4 hours, from 9pm on New Year's Eve to 1am New Year's Day. Under a new law that may go into effect this year, each person will be limited to 50 permits per year. On Oahu, the City & County ordinances are much more restrictive about consumer fireworks, so only firecrackers are allowed.
Q. Walk me through typical scenarios of how law enforcement catches people setting off illegal fireworks.
If someone personally witnesses what they believe to be illegal fireworks being set off, they can call 911 to report it, and the responding officer will most likely take a written statement, ask witnesses to identify the person that did it, and try to collect any additional evidence such as videos (HRS 132D-20) or physical evidence. But in order for the case to be prosecuted, a witness must be willing to testify in court, if the case ends up going to trial. Because many people in the community are reluctant to do this, I believe most fireworks cases rely on law enforcement officers who personally witnessed the illegal activity.
Q. A 2023 investigation by a news organization found that between 2018 and 2022, 94% of the citations on Oahu ended in dismissal or dropped prosecutions and the 15 successful cases generated only $1,000 in fines. What are the obstacles to prosecuting violators under the current law and how might these obstacles be overcome by bills just passed by the Legislature?
Definitions – Current definitions for the terms 'fireworks' and 'aerial device' are very technical, requiring prosecutors to prove that the fireworks contained 130 milligrams or less of explosive material, and that it met certain federal parameters. There are a number of reasons why this is challenging, but it's particularly difficult when fireworks are set off and destroyed in the blast. HB 1483 adds alternative definitions that are more common sense, so an aerial device could basically be anything that 'rises more than twelve feet into the air' after being set off, then 'explodes…in the air, shoots or emits flaming balls, or shoots or emits sparks.'
Standard of proof – Another issue that presented challenges in some fireworks cases was having to prove the case 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' Again, if the fireworks already exploded, and there's no physical evidence collected, it's very difficult to reach that level of certainty & meet the legal requirements for a criminal conviction. HB 1483 creates the first non-criminal fireworks offenses in Hawaii—fireworks infractions—which have no possible jail, can only result in a fine, and have a much lower standard of proof in court, called preponderance of evidence. That basically means it's more likely than not that the offense occurred. Another benefit of fireworks infractions is that they can be issued by law enforcement officers very quickly and easily, with just a citation, if the officer witnessed the incident themselves. And they'll probably be processed by the courts much faster too, because they'll be handled like traffic tickets, where people can just mail-in their fine, mail-in a written explanation, or request a hearing with the judge. Of course, the bill also increases a lot of penalties and creates or expands a number of offenses, so we hope that will serve as a deterrent to illegal fireworks as well.
Q. Will HB 1483 increase the penalties for buying, selling, or setting off illegal fireworks?
Consumer fireworks – Yes and no. Buying or setting off consumer fireworks without a permit will technically be a lower penalty, because that'll be an infraction now with a $200 fine.
Importing, storing or distributing – But importing, storing, or distributing consumer fireworks or aerials without a permit, will either be a class C felony—up to 5 years in prison and/or up to $10,000 fine—or if it involves 25 pounds or more, that will be a class B felony, which means up to 10 years prison and/or $25,000 fine.
Class C Felony – punishable by up to 5-year maximum prison sentence and no more than $10,000 fine. Distribution to a minor is a Class C felony.
Class B Felony – if total weight of aerial is 25 lbs. or more. Punishable by up to 5-year maximum prison sentence and no more than $10,000 fine.
Buying or setting off aerials – Buying or setting off aerials without a permit would now range from an infraction—which is subject to a $300 fine—all the way up to a class B felony which can get up to 10 years prison and/or up to $25,000 fine, depending on the weight of the fireworks.
$300 fine – if total weight of aerial is less than 5 lbs. or cannot be determined. Lower standard of proof (more likely than not versus beyond a reasonable doubt). Akin to a traffic ticket.
Misdemeanor – if the total weight of aerial is 5 lbs. or more. Punishable by up to 1 year in prison and/or $2,000 fine.
Class C Felony – if the total weight of aerial is less than 25 lbs. or more. Punishable by up to 5-year maximum prison sentence and no more than $10,000 fine.
Class B Felony – if the total weight of aerial is 50 lbs. or more. Punishable by up to 10-year maximum prison sentence and no more than $25,000 fine.
Increased penalties for repeat offenders, serious/substantial injury or death –HB 1483 also does something very unusual, by increasing all of these criminal penalties—across the board—if those fireworks cause any major injuries, such as second-degree burns, broken bones, or serious permanent disfigurement, or if someone dies as a result of those fireworks. So, offenders could potentially be charged with a class A felony, which is subject to up to 20 years in prison and/or up to $50,000 fine. That applies to everyone in the chain, including anyone who illegally imported, distributed, stored, purchased, or set off those fireworks. There's also increased penalties for repeat offenders who had a prior fireworks conviction within the past ten years.
Violators shall be guilty of the offense one class or grade higher if convicted one or more times for any offense under HRS 132D within 10 years or the fireworks cause substantial bodily injury
Violators shall be guilty of the offense two classes or grades higher if the fireworks cause serious bodily injury or death.
Q. So in order to increase the penalties, the Prosecutor just has to prove that the person had a prior conviction within 10 years of the current conviction or that the fireworks caused serious or substantial injury or death?
All of the increased penalties mentioned above would require some additional proof (i.e. proof that the person actually had prior fireworks convictions, or that the fireworks connected to their illegal actions actually caused the injuries or death), but it would not have to be proven that the offender knew that would be the result.
Q. What about violators with multiple infractions – are they subject to increased penalties too?
Infractions will not be subject to any of these increased penalties, because infractions are not crimes, so they're on a separate track. However, HB 1483 does expand an existing crime that prohibits setting off aerials less than 500 feet from a hotel…so now it will be a misdemeanor (up to 1 year jail and/or up to $2,000 fine) to set off aerials less than 500 feet from any dwelling (e.g., house) unless you have a permit. If you're a repeat fireworks offender, that becomes a class C felony. If someone suffers substantial bodily injury, it's a class B felony. And if someone suffers serious bodily injury or death, that could be charged as a class A felony.
Q. What about liability for property owners, managers, and renters who allow people to set off or store illegal fireworks on their property?
I can only speak to criminal liability, and HB 1483 expands that as well, making it a petty misdemeanor (up to 30 days in jail and/or $1,000 fine) to allow anyone to set off aerials from your property without a permit.
If you allow others to store aerial devices on your property, that will be a misdemeanor, which can get up to 1 year in jail and/or $2,000 fine. If you allow them to store more than 25 pounds of aerials on your property, that will be a class C felony.
In addition, these offenses also qualify for increased penalties if you have a prior fireworks conviction in the past ten years, or if anyone suffers major injuries or death as a result of those fireworks. So, under very bad circumstances, allowing someone to store illegal fireworks on your property could actually result in a class A felony, which can get up to 20 years in prison and/or up to $50,000 fine.
H.R.S. Section 132D-14.5 [became law in 2019] – a homeowner, renter, or person otherwise responsible for the real property who intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly allows an individual, while on the real property, to possess, set off, ignite, or otherwise cause to explode any aerial device shall be deemed to be in violation of this chapter and shall be subject to the penalties as those who possess or set the fireworks off.
HB 1438 adds 'negligently' and increases penalties for violators:
Petty Misdemeanor – Punishable by up to 30 days in jail and $1,000 fine.
Misdemeanor – allows aerial devices, articles of pyrotechnic, display fireworks or pyrotechnic composition to be stored in the real property without a license. Punishable by up to 1 year in jail.
Class C Felony – allows 25 lbs. or more of aerial devices, articles of pyrotechnic, display fireworks or pyrotechnic composition to be stored in the real property without a license. Punishable by up to 5-year maximum prison sentence and no more than $10,000 fine.
HB 1438 increases penalties for all habitual offenders
Violators shall be guilty of the offense one class or grade higher if convicted one or more times for any offense under HRS 132D within 10 years or the fireworks cause substantial bodily injury
Violators shall be guilty of the offense two classes or grades higher if the fireworks cause serious bodily injury or death.
Q. Is there any criminal liability for parents and guardians of minors who knowingly allow them to possess, purchase or set off fireworks?
In general, distribution of fireworks (consumer fireworks or aerials) to a minor will be a class C felony. There is an exception for parents or guardians who allow minors under their care to use consumer fireworks, as long as the minor is under the immediate supervision of an adult. Other than this exception, however, any parent and guardian who knowingly allow their minor to purchase, possess, or set off aerials or consumer fireworks:
Misdemeanor – punishable by up to 1 year in prison and/or up to $2,000 fine.
Class C Felony – if fireworks cause substantial bodily injury. Punishable by up to 5 years prison and/or up to $10,000 fine.
Class B Felony – if fireworks cause serious bodily injury or death. Punishable by up to 10 years prison and/or up to $25,000 fine.
Q. Twelve people were arrested in connection with the Aliamanu New Year's Eve blast, for various felonies including first degree endangering the welfare of a minor. No charges have yet been filed. If the case results in convictions, can the defendants receive higher sentences as outlined in the legislation that just passed (assuming the Governor signs it into law)?
As with many bills, HB 1483 has a savings clause that expressly prohibits these new laws from being used retroactively.
Q. Was any other legislation passed this year to help catch people who possess or set off illegal fireworks and make it easier to prosecute them?
HB 806 – Provides funding to the State Department of Law Enforcement, to conduct fireworks sting operations and establish an explosives and firearms laboratory. Sting operations can be effective in apprehending buyers and sellers, and may also deter illegal activity, because one of the parties could be an undercover officer. Having an in-state explosives laboratory would also help to prosecute certain types of fireworks cases.
HB 550 – Allows drone footage made by law enforcement agencies to be used to establish probable cause in arrests, for fireworks offenses, if the drone was directly above public property and the act leading to the arrest was committed on public property.
To learn more about this subject, tune into this video podcast.Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Falls Amid Musk Vs Trump Feud
Tesla TSLA shares had their worst day since March, falling 14% on Thursday as the feud between Elon Musk and President Trump continues to heat up, and is making international headlines. In the aftermath of his 130-day term ending as a special government employee, Musk has publicly criticized the Trump administration's budget reconciliation bill after previously heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Despite losing favoritism in the White House, Tesla shareholders have previously called on Musk to focus his attention back on the leading EV maker amid declining sales. Underlying this is that having a CEO push a political agenda had disrupted public sentiment, with Tesla facing significant losses of more than $100 million this year regarding vandalism at its dealerships and EV charging stations, which spilled over from nationwide protests targeting Elon Musk. This also created a somewhat unnecessary way for General Motors GM and Ford F to potentially take more share of the domestic EV market, with the public outcry of the 'Tesla Takedown' movement coming as the DOGE cut thousands of federal jobs at the discretion of the world's wealthiest person. Adding fury to Musk's frustration with President Trump's budget reconciliation bill is that it will eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles that have benefited Tesla and other EV manufacturers, while undermining his cost-cutting efforts as head of the DOGE. However, harsh criticism and a personal vendetta against the Trump administration could, of course, make Tesla the target of harsher EV regulations in the U.S., with the President threatening to take away the company's government contracts. Furthermore, this comes on the heels of recent reports that Tesla's sales have continued to decline in Europe, as sales in May fell 45% year over year in the U.K. and 36% in Germany amid rising competition from Chinese EV brands such as BYD and XPeng XPEV. Notably, BYD has surpassed Tesla as the top-selling EV brand in Europe. Most concerning to technical traders is that TSLA has fallen below its 50-day simple moving average (Green Line) of $292 a share, which is lower than its 200-day SMA (Red Line) of $310 due to the recent volatility in the stock. Generally, the 200-day SMA is lower than the 50-day SMA when a stock is in an uptrend and higher than the 50-day SMA when a stock is in a downtrend, as in Tesla's case. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Also suggesting more risk ahead for Tesla stock, and correlating with news of declining sales in Europe, is that fiscal 2025 and FY26 EPS estimates are noticeably lower in the last month and have now dropped 25% and 18% over the last 60 days, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Considering the short-selling strategy has paid off with TSLA of late, with it noteworthy that Tesla has led the Zacks Short Sale List with +20% gains after borrowing shares at $358.91 on Tuesday, May 27. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The back-and-forth spat between Elon Musk and President Trump won't do any favors for Tesla's outlook. Unfortunately, TSLA lands a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) at the moment in correlation with the trend of declining earnings estimate revisions. Eventually, this could end up being a lucrative buying opportunity for TSLA down the road, but a dispute between the world's most powerful and wealthiest person could drag down the broader market as well, with Tesla dragging the Nasdaq down roughly 1% on Thursday. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Ford Motor Company (F) : Free Stock Analysis Report General Motors Company (GM) : Free Stock Analysis Report XPeng Inc. Sponsored ADR (XPEV) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
U.S. Trade Officials to Meet with China on June 9
Yesterday, President Trump said that his phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping resulted in a ' very positive conclusion ' with plans for representatives from both sides to hold another round of trade talks. That conversation will come sooner than later. Confident Investing Starts Here: Today, Trump announced that Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet with Chinese representatives on Monday, June 9 in London. 'The meeting should go very well,' said Trump in a Truth Social post. U.S.-China Tensions Ease ahead of Talks Last month, both the U.S. and China agreed to lower their tariffs on each other by 115% in a preliminary trade deal, among other measures. A few weeks later, Trump accused China of violating the deal, with accusations such as continuing to restrict the flow of rare earth elements.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Hard things lead to adaptation': Utah's colleges on what they'll cut, add following state pressure
Friday's Utah Board of Higher Education meeting offered telling glimpses into the academic future of the state's public colleges and universities. Earlier this year, the Legislature passed House Bill 265 — the so-called 'strategic reinvestment' initiative requiring Utah's eight public colleges and universities to reallocate millions of dollars to programs determined to be of highest value to both students and Utah's economy. On Friday, representatives from the state's eight degree-granting public schools presented their strategic reinvestment plans to the board. There's much on the line. If the schools' respective plans are approved by the Board of Higher Education and, in the coming months, by the Legislature, they can reclaim the 10% of their annual budget that was cut during the recent legislative session. Each of Utah's schools are, of course, unique in size, funding and mission. Their respective reinvestment plans reflect those differences. But there were shared similarities Friday. First, the institutional changes demanded by HB265 certainly exact some pain. Jobs, academic programs and colleges are being cut to reinvest in other areas. But higher education leaders also said the legislation presents opportunities to decide how to best serve the state's students — professionally and personally — in an ever-evolving world. A statement Friday from University of Utah President Taylor Randall speaks to a 'moment of reinvention' in higher education: 'My support for these moves is not only about legislative compliance and fiscal responsibility — it is also a reflection of my commitment to the vision of where the University of Utah needs to go to be an impact university," Randall said. The state-imposed reallocation/reinvestment plans will occur over a three-year period. At least 30% of the reallocated dollars must be deployed by each school in fiscal year 2026. At least 70% in 2027. And 100% in 2028. Here are highlights of each school's Strategic Reinvestment Plan presentations: Celebrating its 175th anniversary this year, the University of Utah has a student body of almost 37,000. The state's flagship institution of higher learning has the largest HB265 reallocation burden: More than $19.5 million. The University of Utah's strategic reinvestment plan remains a work in progress. The school is still finalizing its reallocation targets for fiscal years 2027 and 2028 — 'Phase 2' and 'Phase 3.' The board on Friday approved the school's reinvestment plan, conditional on the institution returning by September with sufficient details. Randall said the time extension is needed because of the volatility facing 'Research 1' universities due to changes implemented by the Trump administration. On a daily basis, 'there are tens of millions of dollars of grants moving back and forth,' he said. 'Those actually affect staffing decisions and faculty decisions. So we are grateful that you've allowed us some time to let some of those things settle down.' The University of Utah's 'Phase 1' reinvestment plan includes reallocation investments in engineering; advancing responsible AI and biotechnology; boosting programs that address the critical nursing shortage; and strengthening General Education by focusing on civic responsibility and building durable skills such as critical thinking and conflict resolution. The University's 'Phase 1' disinvestments will come largely by implementing improved efficiencies in administration and administrative support areas. Meanwhile, scores of courses and programs at the University of Utah are being sunset across a variety of colleges — including graduate programs in educational psychology, bioengineering, modern dance, Middle East Studies, sociology/criminology and neurobiology. Looking forward, Randall said the school's finalized reinvestment plan will look at maximizing shared services opportunities while also examining program and college redesigns and early retirement opportunities for employees. The state's sole land-grant university with a statewide enrollment of almost 29,000, USU is required by HB265 to reallocate approximately $12.6 million. School leaders are concentrating their changes on three broad categories: Technologies and Careers for the Future (i.e., addressing critical needs in engineering, artificial intelligence, computing, and analytics); Health and Wellbeing Workforce; and improving Student Access, Success & Outcomes. Proposed reallocations include new faculty positions in AI and data science, a new school of computing, a new chemical engineering program and the expansion of the school's aviation program. In health care, USU proposes to expand mental health and well-being programs and its nursing program — while creating a new College of Health and Human Sciences and a new Doctor of Physical Therapy program. Investments are also planned in Student Success Support programming and USU's Online Enterprise. USU's proposed plan does include significant personnel costs. Approximately 120 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions are slated for elimination — including positions in school administration, staff and faculty. (Note: FTEs do not represent, number-to-number, full-time employees.) Several USU programs, degrees and certificates are expected to be discontinued — including bachelor's degrees in American Studies, agriculture communication, deaf education; master's degrees in financial economics, fitness promotion; and an associate's degree in theatre offered at the school's Price, Utah, campus. USU's Interim President Alan Smith aptly noted the mix of challenges and opportunities offered by HB265. 'Hard things,' he said, 'lead to adaptation.' The state's largest community college with an enrollment of almost 25,000 students, SLCC is required by HB265 to reallocate approximately $5.2 million. SLCC is focusing on three 'major outcomes' in support of the bill's goals to align funding to evolving student and workforce needs: 1 - Reinvesting in workforce and high-demand transfer programs — including over $2 million reinvested in technical programs, almost $1 million in the Gail Miller Business School and $586,000 in the School of Health Sciences. 2 - Reducing administrative overhead costs to reinvest in instruction programs by, in part, eliminating five administrator positions and through consolidation. 3 – And centering student outcomes in the decision-making process — prompting almost $600,000 in additional reductions that went beyond HB265's budget reduction requirements. SLCC's proposal would result in decreasing the number of instructional offerings from 195 to 147 total certificate and degree programs, while also consolidating the School of Arts, Communication & Media. The changes are expected to impact 50 full-time and part-time employees. Fifteen are vacant positions — 35 are slated for layoffs. Many employees impacted by layoffs will have opportunities to transfer to another position at the school — or pursue a retirement option, according to the school. Five new SLCC faculty positions will be added, through reinvestment. Almost 5,000 students are pursuing higher education opportunities at Snow College. The Ephraim-based community college is required by HB265 to reallocate $1.7 million over the next three years. Plan highlights include expanding the school's prison education program, the elementary education program, the respiratory therapy program — and the creation of several new programs, including Pre-Architecture & Drafting, Strategic Communication and Public Relations, Commercial Driver's License and Rural Entrepreneurship. Additionally, there are plans for 12 'reinvested' positions in the works. Meanwhile, several academic programs are slated for disinvestment — including French, Italian and Media Studies. There will be 11 jobs eliminated — including positions in information technology and student affairs. However, there were no involuntary separations or forced layoffs. One vice president position was eliminated at Snow. Located in St. George, Utah Tech University has enjoyed steady enrollment growth in recent years. Today's UT student body is over 11,000. HB265 requires UT to reallocate $2.5 million over the course of its implementation. UT's plan aims to meet workforce demands, while increasing enrollment — including adding 19 faculty and instructional staff positions in high-demand areas such as business, engineering, psychology, health sciences and digital media programs. The school also plans to add an Associate Dean for Arts. Reductions are being made, in part, by eliminating several staff, faculty and administrative positions — including the school's Executive Director of Strategic Partnerships, one Spanish Education and one Theater Directing faculty member; and one school dean and five administrative support positions. The direction of HB265, said newly installed president Shane Smeed, helps UT 'strengthen and accelerate UT's pursuit of polytechnic mission and value.' Home to almost 14,000 students, SUU is required to reallocate $3.1 million. The school's plan focuses primarily on Utah's workforce needs and identifying emerging student opportunities. Multiple faculty positions, for example, are being added to the school's business, STEM, health care, and innovative tech programs. Several new positions are also being created to enhance student support as they prepare for careers. Meanwhile, 25 positions are being eliminated in several fields — including chemistry, biology, history and math. Twenty-four academic programs are being eliminated. Majors slated for elimination include Philosophy, French, French Education and Art History. The Arts Administration (face-to-face) and Athletic Training master's programs are also being cut. Several associate degree programs — including many which were already slated for eventual elimination — are also being dropped. Also, SUU's College of Engineering & Computational Sciences will be combined with the College of Natural Sciences. 'This has been a good thing to get us looking to the future,' said SUU President Mindy Benson. Weber State University, which has experienced record growth in recent years, enrolls approximately 27,000 students. The Ogden institution is required by HB265 to reallocate approximately $6.7 million. Forty-nine positions are being cut: 11 administrative positions, 10 staff positions and 28 salaried faculty — with most of the faculty cuts coming from the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences and the Lindquist College of Arts & Humanities. Several administrative slots are also being reduced — including the school's Assistant Vice President for Regional Partnerships and the executive director for Academic Support Centers & Programs. Meanwhile, dozens of majors, certificates and minors are being eliminated — including majors in Applied Physics, Dance Education, Geography, German and Computer Science Teaching. Reallocation highlights at WSU include more than $800,000 going towards academic advising support; $685,000 for high need health profession areas; more than $2.6 million to support, in part, the development of sub-120 hour degree programs; initiatives to enhance students' academic experiences; and development of new credentials aligning with Talent Ready Utah Occupational Priority List. WSU also plans to establish a new associate dean position within the Dumke College of Health Professions, specifically focused on nursing. The state's largest university with an enrollment of almost 47,000 students, UVU is required by the state to reallocate approximately $8.9 million. During their presentation Friday, UVU leaders say they have been implementing efficiency-focused decisions long before HB265 — reducing, in recent years, a number of academic schools/colleges and discontinuing the English Language Learning Program. And last October, the school implemented a campus-wide hiring freeze to manage budgets. Still, this year's Legislative actions are taking a toll at the Orem institution. Forty-five employee positions are being eliminated. Thirteen of those jobs were already vacant. Meanwhile, several specific academic programs are slated for cuts — including a specialized associate's degree in business; certificates in woodworking/cabinetry and administrative information support; and a nursing education Master's degree. Expenditures are also being reduced in UVU's Academic Affairs departments — including the Innovation Academy and Program Assessment budgets. Other highlighted areas of UVU's reinvestment plan include: Expanding resources for emerging occupations such as AI. Increasing engineering-related initiatives in mechanical engineering, computer science and IT. Expanding health and wellness opportunities in occupational therapy and behavioral health. And further investing in General Education to develop critical thinking, communication and durable skills.