European bond yields set to rise as US' Ukraine stance boosts military spend: BNP Paribas
Long-term European government bond yields will continue to rise amid increased government spending on defence as a result of the US retreat from its commitment on Ukraine, according to BNP Paribas Asset Management.
Advertisement
'We're beginning to get a steepening of the European yield curve,' said James McAlevey, the French bank's head of global aggregate and absolute return. This means that long-term yields are growing faster than short-term ones.
A week ago, US President Donald Trump ordered a 'pause' on aid to Ukraine to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to engage in negotiations to end the war. As the US withdraws its support, European countries have been reinforcing their commitments.
'European fixed-income investors are waking up to the idea that even within Europe, we're going to start getting more fiscal expenditure on defence, not less,' said McAlevey, 'We're not talking small numbers here.'
On March 1, the UK approved a £2.26 billion (US$2.9 billion) loan to Ukraine to enhance its defence capabilities. On Tuesday, the European Commission announced a plan to lend up to €150 billion (US$162.7 billion) to member states to help them boost military spending.
Advertisement
Total 2024 defence expenditures by European Union member states were estimated at €326 billion, or about 1.9 per cent of the EU's gross domestic product. The proportion is expected to approach 3 per cent as they ramp up their spending.
The bond-yield curve started to steepen because the market was anticipating bond issuances as governments raise money to support the higher spending, McAlevey said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
9 hours ago
- RTHK
China extends anti-dumping probe into EU pork imports
China extends anti-dumping probe into EU pork imports The Commerce Ministry says the probe is extended by six months "given the complexity of the case". File photo: Xinhua China on Tuesday extended an anti-dumping investigation into pork products imported from the European Union (EU) by six months. The Commerce Ministry said the probe will be extended until December 16 "given the complexity of the case, and in accordance with relevant regulations", according to Xinhua News Agency. The trade spat erupted last summer when the EU moved towards imposing hefty tariffs on electric vehicles imported from China, arguing that Beijing's subsidies were unfairly undercutting European competitors. Beijing denied that claim and announced probes into imported European pork, brandy and dairy products. China imported US$4.8 billion worth of pork, including offal, in 2024 – over half of it from the EU, with Spain leading the bloc in exports by volume. (Xinhua and agencies)
RTHK
11 hours ago
- RTHK
Madrid streets to make debut in next F1 season
Madrid streets to make debut in next F1 season The Shanghai leg of the Formula One season is set for March. File photo: NurPhoto/AFP Formula One will have two races in Spain next season with Madrid's new street circuit making its debut in September and Italy's Imola dropping off the 24-round calendar, F1 and the governing FIA announced on Tuesday. Melbourne's Australian Grand Prix will again be the season-opener on March 8 with Shanghai hosting round two a week later, as the sport enters a new engine era with Cadillac also arriving as an 11th team. Japan will be round three as a standalone event on March 29. Monaco will be the first European round on June 7, swapping dates with Canada, whose race in Montreal moves to May 24 and follows Miami on May 3. Canada, which clashes with the 24 Hours of Le Mans endurance race this year, is now set to overlap instead with the Indianapolis 500. Barcelona's Circuit de Catalunya, which is entering the final year of its current contract and will no longer be designated the Spanish Grand Prix, is scheduled for June 14. Madrid's Madring, a part-street layout around the city's Ifema exhibition centre, will be the last race in Europe on September 13 and the weekend after the Italian Grand Prix at Monza. The Dutch Grand Prix at Zandvoort, due to drop off the calendar after 2026, will be held on August 23 as a sprint weekend. The season will end in Abu Dhabi on December 6, immediately after Qatar. "We are excited to welcome Madrid to the calendar, and to see huge automotive brands like Audi, Cadillac and Ford join the Formula One grid," said Formula One chief executive Stefano Domenicali in a statement. Swiss-based Sauber will become the Audi works team in 2026 while Ford are partnering with Red Bull. Formula One will also have 100 percent sustainable fuel. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia will again be held on successive weekends in April due to Ramadan taking place in February and March. The calendar has been organised to create more of a geographical flow, which Formula One said would deliver significant freight efficiencies and help the sport's sustainability push. There will be a total of six back-to-back race weekends, with two triple headers of three in a row starting with Austin, Mexico and Brazil and ending with Las Vegas, Qatar and Abu Dhabi. (Reuters)
Asia Times
15 hours ago
- Asia Times
US-China: what's really at stake in London
A high-stakes showdown is unfolding this week in London—far from the manufacturing plants of Shenzhen or the trading floors of Wall Street, yet central to the global economic order. Senior US and Chinese officials will hold a second day of talks today (Tuesday) aimed at de-escalating the most consequential economic rivalry of our time. After Monday's first day of talks, US President Donald Trump said, 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy…I'm only getting good reports.' China is negotiating for looser US tech controls while the US wants China to ease limits on rare earth mineral exports. But for investors watching from Singapore to Silicon Valley, these meetings aren't just about tariffs. They're about who writes the rules of the 21st-century global economy. Both sides are seeking to revive the Geneva framework established last month—an agreement that temporarily eased a volatile tariff standoff by rolling back US import duties on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, and slashing Chinese tariffs from 125% to 10%. The compromise was a ceasefire, not a peace treaty. Since then, fiery accusations of non-compliance have resumed. Washington says Beijing is dragging its feet on critical mineral exports. Beijing accuses the US of doubling down on tech restrictions, particularly on semiconductors and AI. The talks in London are significant because the stakes have never been higher. China and the US are no longer just competing powers—they are operating two fundamentally divergent systems, each trying to shape the global economic architecture in its own image. This is a full-spectrum competition that spans data flows, digital currencies, energy policy, national security, and ideology. Investors ignore this at their peril. To understand the gravity of this week's negotiations, you have to look beyond the tariff tables and see the wider trajectory. Under Trump, the US is doubling down on strategic protectionism. The re-imposition of sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April was not an isolated action—it was the next phase in a broader effort to reshape American economic exposure. China, under President Xi Jinping, is responding in kind by accelerating self-reliance campaigns, boosting its military-industrial complex and tightening control over capital flows and foreign technology. The two economic giants are hurtling toward a split system of parallel supply chains, competing standards, rival digital currencies and mutually exclusive rules for artificial intelligence. The old model—interdependence through globalization—is unraveling in real time. From a market perspective, this fracturing introduces volatility but also extraordinary opportunity. Strategic sectors are being rapidly repriced. Defense tech, AI, cybersecurity, semiconductor manufacturing and rare earths have all emerged as proxies in this economic power contest. Recent capital flows tell the story: US and European investors are ramping up exposure to domestic chip production, while China is injecting vast state funding into its own tech champions and weaponizing industrial policy. Just last week, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced a new 500 billion yuan (US$69 billion) investment initiative focused on dual-use technologies—those with both civilian and military applications. Simultaneously, the US Commerce Department expanded its export restrictions to cover quantum computing components and AI training data sets. The message from both sides is unmistakable: dominance in tomorrow's tech is national security today. The London talks, then, a theater where the future is being negotiated—or not. With US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer facing off against China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, these are the most senior discussions since the Geneva reset. Both capitals know what's at stake, and neither wants to look like it's blinking. Investors are caught in a strange double bind: exposed to the risks of fragmentation, but positioned to benefit from the rush to secure the commanding heights of the future economy. That's why the London talks are being watched as closely in corporate boardrooms as in diplomatic circles. If the talks succeed in holding the Geneva line, it could stabilize sentiment and breathe life into cross-border dealmaking that's been paralyzed by policy uncertainty. If they fail—and signs point to fundamental misalignments in trust and expectation—then the decoupling will accelerate. Supply chains shift faster, capital reallocates at scale and inflation risks in key inputs like semiconductors and rare earths will spike again. Investors will need to think in terms of dual portfolios: one optimized for the Western bloc, the other for the Chinese sphere of influence. However, there is another, deeper implication that should not be overlooked. The current rivalry is not just about GDP or tech leadership; it's about two economic visions vying for legitimacy. One is anchored in democratic capitalism, now reasserting control over trade and industrial policy after decades of liberalization. The other is a centralized, state-driven model that promises order, speed and resilience. This isn't the Cold War redux, it's something newer, more fluid—and potentially longer-lasting. That's why framing these talks purely as tariff negotiations misses the point. This is about system design and every conversation about chips, data or critical minerals is, in reality, a conversation about who gets to define economic power in the coming decades. Some investors have already begun adjusting to this reality. Sovereign wealth funds are shifting long-term allocations away from passive indices and toward strategic sectors. Venture capital is increasingly split along ideological lines. Private equity is retreating from cross-border deals in politically sensitive industries. The smart capital knows this is the macro megatrend. What London offers this week is a readout not just of policy positions but of political will. Are the world's two largest economies capable of coexisting with guardrails, or are we headed toward a fully bipolar economic order? Markets have always priced in risk. But this is something more fundamental. This is about pricing in rival worldviews. And the London talks are where the next chapter begins.
