
The Rest Gap — Why Women Are So Exhausted
Last month, UK-based Stylist magazine published an article about the 'rest gap.' In essence, the rest gap describes the idea that women get less sleep than men because of societal pressures and expectations that take their focus away from much-needed rest.
Research says women tend to report more sleep trouble in general. They also have to deal with hormone-related issues like hot flashes or nausea during pregnancy, perimenopause, and menopause, which further disrupt sleep.
This all creates a tough cycle where women aren't getting the seven to nine hours of sleep they need.
'I'm always kind of happy to see that somebody can give a name that simplifies such a very nuanced and complex phenomenon,' said LaWanda Hill, a psychologist based in California. 'The rest gap speaks to just the ways in which women disproportionately are impacted in society.'
'I think you can add the rest gap, you can add the wealth gap, you can add the health gap ... it just really simplifies all the things which we are subjected to because of structures, systems, policies, laws and societal norms,' Hill continued.
There are a lot of contributing factors to the rest gap. Below, experts share their thoughts on why this happens and how to sleep better if you're experiencing it:
'Societally, there's so many different reasons why [the rest gap happens] and why women often don't give themselves permission to rest,' said Tasha Bailey, a psychotherapist in London and author of ' Real Talk: Lessons From Therapy on Healing & Self-Love.'
'I think as women, we've been primed to be people-pleasers,' Bailey continued. 'When we're children, we're often celebrated for being nurturing and showing empathy and cooperation.'
Hill offered a similar sentiment, saying that women often grow up believing 'they're responsible for the well-being of ― at the very minimum ― their immediate family.'
Conversely, it's seen as a bad thing when women are assertive or focus on themselves.
'I think that then leads many women to disregard their own need for rest and to keep working, pushing on and eventually burning out,' Bailey said.
This is especially true for moms.
For women who have children, parenthood adds an additional layer. While many men are more involved than ever when it comes to taking care of their kids, generational conditioning has still taught many people that women need to be the main caregivers. This is often on top of demanding jobs, family of origin needs, friendship needs and community obligations.
This responsibility is 'not going to be undone tomorrow ... socialization starts in childhood, so we've been socialized for so long to believe that we were primarily responsible for that,' Hill said.
Being the main nurturer or caretaker for your kids and family can be rewarding, but it is also downright exhausting. If you're the main person in charge of making lunches, helping with homework, caring for ailing parents and shuttling kids back and forth to school — you'll only have less time to rest.
We live in a productivity-obsessed world.
'I love the term 'hustle culture' because I think that is what we're all living in. We're just working and we're hustling, and we're trying to be productive and we're trying to get everything right,' said Meredith Van Ness, a psychotherapist and the owner of Meredith Van Ness Therapy in Colorado. 'Everyone's trying to do the best that they can, but it's like, 'When is the best good enough?''
The goal post keeps moving, and, as a result, trying to do your best can quickly become strenuous. For example, if you're trying to be the best mom and caretaker, you're probably showing up to every single event or reading longer stories to your kids at night. But that's a cycle that can go on and on until burnout.
For people who aren't moms, it could mean telling yourself you deserve a quiet weekend but letting guilt take over, leading you to clean your house, car and garage instead of resting.
Our culture glorifies being busy, Van Ness noted, 'and when we do that ... then I think it's going to be harder for women to turn that off at the end of the night.'
The obsession with productivity will likely make you put your bedtime off if you think you have to finish a lengthy to-do list before the lights go out.
'We feel like there's so much pressure on being productive, and self-care and rest aren't necessarily a part of that equation as far as kind of what our society has put on us,' Van Ness said.
In office settings, women are often working doubly hard to prove themselves. This is even more exacerbated for Black women, other women of color and members of the LGBTQIA+ community, Hill said.
This heightened pressure at work can lead to mental and physical stress, as well as anxiety.
'And anxiety often rears its head at the time for women to go to sleep or rest,' Hill said. 'So their sleep is disrupted because of the amount of stresses that they have [from just] being a woman in society.'
Day-to-day work stress wasn't something most women faced 100 years ago, either, as most women did not work outside of the home.
'Obviously, now we're in a modern world where women are working ... but they still have the same expectations to run the family home and to maintain family harmony, yet still hold up a full-time job,' Bailey said.
The expectations haven't been loosened to meet the reality of 40-hour work weeks. Instead, women are expected to do the same tasks that were expected decades ago.
To cope, it can be helpful to take breaks during the day and set boundaries.
Sleep is non-negotiable. Rest throughout the day can even be looked at this way, too, with Van Ness noting that rest can mean different things for people.
'That's a different category than sleep ... we could also call that mindfulness, or we could also take that as moments of well-being,' Van Ness said.
'You could probably call it anything you want, but I think it's resting emotionally, mentally just throughout the day ... taking a few deep breaths, and just saying, 'OK, how am I doing? I'm going to check in with myself.''
There's no one right way to rest, either. You can listen to your body's cues and practice whatever relaxation technique you see fit. This could be meditation, going on a walk, spending time in nature, practicing breath work or calling a friend. Not only will you feel better after listening to what your body needs, but you'll also be better prepared to finish the tasks that need to get done.
Allowing yourself to rest and de-stress during the day can also carry over into the night. Walking and mindfulness meditation are known to help people sleep better — so it's a win-win all around.
While carving out time for yourself to rest, also consider where else you can make time for yourself.
'Because we haven't capped what we are taking on — as moms, parents and women — then we take on too much,' Hill said.
This is where boundaries can come in.
'I think we've got to do a better job of having more emotional boundaries, as hard as it is, so that ... we can begin to close this gap,' Hill said.
So, if you feel too drained to babysit your nephew, say no to that request. Or consider setting boundaries around your phone use so your friends and family know not to expect a text reply from you after a certain time.
Know that sleep is essential, not a reward.
It's common for people to look at rest as a reward that happens once a task is complete, but this is the wrong perspective.
'Rest [is] our basic human essential need, we need to feel rested and energized in order to do what we need to do in our day-to-day lives,' Bailey said.
'If we don't get that rest, whether it's physical rest or whether it's emotional rest ... we will end up feeling burnt out, we'll end up feeling resentful, we'll end up feeling like we can't really be fulfilled.'
Getting enough sleep has countless benefits: it's good for your heart health, can reduce your risk of cancer and dementia, and is good for your mental health, too.
In other words, you shouldn't be skimping on sleep, even if society makes it harder for women to get enough of it. As we need food and water, rest is also a basic need, Bailey said.
HuffPost.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to slash funding for flagship US HIV programme by 40pc
America is proposing to cut its flagship anti-HIV programme by almost 40 per cent next year, according to new budget details that reveal sweeping reductions to global health spending. Details from Donald Trump's 2026 budget request show nearly a two-fifths fall in funding for the United States President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar). The long-running programme is estimated to have saved more that 20 million lives in the past two decades, and is often cited as one of the world's most successful public health schemes. A recent analysis published in the Lancet found that as many as half a million more children could die from Aids by the end of the decade because of disruptions to Pepfar. The details on global health funding for the State Department, USAID agency, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) also show deep cuts elsewhere. Analysis by the San Francisco-based KFF health policy charity found the government departments were planning a 55 per cent cut in separate tuberculosis funding, a 47 per cent cut in malaria funding and a 92 per cent cut in maternal health funding. The proposal also withdraws all £221m ($300m) given to Gavi, the vaccine alliance which provides jabs to children in poor countries. In total, the request for money for the American government's main global health funding account is £2.8bn ($3.8bn) in 2026, down from £7.4bn ($10bn) in 2025. Setting out the cuts, the State Department said the request for money 'eliminates funding for programmes that do not make Americans safer, such as family planning and reproductive health, neglected tropical diseases, and non-emergency nutrition'. Mr Trump's government upended US aid spending days after taking office, saying it would suspend all aid while projects were reviewed. It then proceeded to close hundreds of aid programmes, including Pepfar projects, resulting in lay-offs for thousands of health workers, particularly in Africa. The budget proposals now give a clear indication that Mr Trump intends to continue with sharp cuts and will quash any hopes that the funding taps could be switched back on again. A State Department explanation of the budget request uses the phrase 'America First' 37 times as it explains a new focus on cutting costs and protecting US national interests. For the 2026 fiscal year, which begins on Oct 1, the budget proposals request £2.1bn ($2.9bn) for Pepfar, a 38 per cent reduction from the £3.5bn ($4.7bn) requested in 2025. The State department said that after spending a total of £88bn ($120bn) in the past two decades, it was now focussing on finding a responsible 'off ramp' to hand over responsibility for the campaign against HIV to countries themselves. 'This [budget] request will allow the United States to accelerate the transition of HIV control programmes to recipient countries and increase international ownership of efforts to fight HIV/Aids.' Some projects may still be paid for by other government funds, but overall the KFF analysis found the budget included 'significant reductions in global health funding including the elimination of some programs and activities'. The details will prove a severe disappointment to aid projects who had hoped that despite Mr Trump's rhetoric, there was a chance funding could be renewed in the new fiscal year. Public health officials argue that continuing to fund global health projects to stamp out infectious diseases is still in America's best interests as infections often cross borders. One executive at a major South African anti-HIV organisation said: 'Nobody wins unless we all win. No one can make it out of this alone. This is how we achieve epidemic control.' Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Beef jerky, snack sticks recalled: See list of affected products
Beef jerky, snack sticks recalled: See list of affected products Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a health care provider, according to the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service. Show Caption Hide Caption Tips to help manage food recalls and prevent foodborne illnesses About 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 people die each year from preventable foodborne illnesses. Payton, USA TODAY Misbranding and an undeclared fishy allergen have led to the recall of more than 15,000 pounds of heat-treated shelf-stable ready-to-eat beef jerky and snack stick products, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Springville Meat & Cold Storage Co. issued the recall on Tuesday, June 3, for the beef jerky and beef stick items produced on various dates from May 30, 2023, to May 30, 2025, the FSIS announced. In addition to the recall, the Springville, Utah-based company is voluntarily inspecting elk, venison and buffalo jerky products for misbranding and undeclared allergens, the government agency said. The allergen not declared on the meat products' labels is fish, more specifically, anchovies, according to the FSIS. The affected products, which were shipped to retail locations nationwide, have the establishment number "EST. 20528" inside the USDA mark of inspection. FSIS inspectors discovered the issue during product observations, which revealed that the Worcestershire sauce used in the jerky and snack sticks contained anchovies, the government agency said. The meat processor previously used Worcestershire sauce without anchovies, but the new Worcestershire sauce used for the products does contain the small fish, the FSIS said. The FSIS said there have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to the consumption of the beef jerky and stick products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a health care provider, according to the government agency. What should I do if I bought the recalled beef jerky, snack stick products? For anyone who may have the affected products in their pantries, they should not consume them, the FSIS said. Instead, consumers should throw away or return the products to the place of purchase, the government agency added. Product labels, lot codes for recalled Springville Meat items There are multiple product labels and lot codes associated with the recall, which can be viewed below:
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maine has fifth-highest rate of emergency department visits nationwide
Editor's Note: The following story first appeared in The Maine Monitor's free health care newsletter, Health Monitor, that is delivered to inboxes every other Thursday. Sign up for the free newsletter to stay informed of Maine health care news. Maine has the fifth-highest rate of emergency department visits in the country, which hospital officials say could get worse with cuts to Medicaid and further contraction of services. Hospitals in the state saw 555 emergency department visits per 1,000 people in 2023, according to recent data from the American Hospital Association analyzed by KFF. The only states with higher rates were West Virginia with a rate of 596 per 1,000 people, North Dakota with a rate of 591, Louisiana with a rate of 589 and Mississippi with a rate of 567. Nevada had the lowest rate of 226, followed by Alaska at 258 and Arizona at 281 visits per 1,000 residents. Steven Michaud, president of the Maine Hospital Association, said Maine has had a high rate of emergency department visits for decades, which he said is largely because it is one of the most rural states and has limited access to primary care doctors, which can drive Mainers to the emergency department if they can't get timely access to primary care. 'A lot of it is not an emergency,' he said. 'They're using it as their primary care, which you just don't want to do because it's inefficient, it's expensive and all that.' While the trend is not new, this all comes at a time when Maine hospitals are merging, reducing services and even closing. Northern Light Inland Hospital in Waterville stopped its services on May 27. A California-based nonprofit announced plans to take over three hospitals through its purchase of Central Maine Healthcare. Northern Light Health reported a $156 million loss last year. Mount Desert Island Hospital announced it would close its birthing unit in July. MaineGeneral planned to end its pediatric psychological services last month. And on May 29, two Aroostook County hospitals said they would merge their management for a year to 'remain viable.' Michaud said these are 'unprecedented times,' and that these closures are happening across the state, even in smaller communities where they don't grab as much attention. For example, he said Penobscot Valley Hospital also had to end behavioral health services due to financial losses and paused payments after lawmakers failed to initially pass the supplemental budget. All these closures may not be the primary driver of the trend of emergency visits, but they're definitely a factor, he said. 'What happens when people get into a behavioral health crisis? Where do they go? The emergency departments,' Michaud said. Hospitals have tried to address the issue by creating walk-in clinics, he said, but that requires additional staff. Dr. Jay Mullen, CEO of BlueWater Health and a practicing emergency physician with experience in hospitals around the state, agreed with Michaud that the highest use of emergency departments is in the 'most rural areas where access to primary care, dental care and urgent care services are the most limited.' He added that Maine has a higher proportion of older adults and people with chronic conditions, which can contribute to emergency department visits. High use of emergency departments can strain resources, leading to longer wait times and potentially delayed care, Mullen said. 'For patients, this can mean fragmented care and less continuity, especially when (emergency department) visits are used in place of primary care,' he said. 'However, it's important to note that (emergency departments) in Maine are doing their best to meet these needs — often serving as the only accessible point of care for vulnerable populations.' And in some communities, Mullen said there can be benefits. High rates of emergency department visits can actually be a 'financial stabilizer' for rural hospitals by providing critical revenue to support broader hospital operations. 'Rural (emergency departments) operate with high fixed costs — staffing, infrastructure, and compliance requirements remain constant regardless of patient volume,' he said. 'When visit volumes are low, these fixed costs are spread across fewer encounters, making each visit disproportionately expensive. But when volume increases, even modestly, it helps offset those fixed costs and improves the financial viability of the department.' Both Mullen and Michaud said another factor contributing to high rates of ED visits is that many Mainers have coverage from MaineCare, the state's version of Medicaid. Nearly a third of all Mainers were enrolled in MaineCare last year, including two-thirds of nursing home residents and half of all children. This isn't limited to rural areas, Mullen said. Urban areas with a lot of people on MaineCare also see higher rates of emergency department visits, suggesting 'that both geographic and socioeconomic factors are at play.' People on MaineCare often struggle to find primary care providers who will accept them due to low reimbursement rates, Michaud said. As a result, they might end up in the emergency department. Michaud said expected federal cuts to Medicaid will only make this worse: 'Any time you reduce coverage, you exacerbate this.' U.S. House Republicans narrowly forwarded a bill last week that would reduce Medicaid spending by at least $600 billion dollars over 10 years and is expected to reduce enrollment by about 10 million Americans. Another factor impacting emergency department visits is that Maine sees high numbers of visitors, many of whom don't have doctors, so hospitals in destination towns along the coast often see surges in the summer, Michaud said. While Maine's rural nature may explain its high ranking for emergency department visits per capita, there were some rural states that had low rates. In particular, Michaud said he was surprised to see Alaska among the lowest rates. And Massachusetts, which has near-universal healthcare, still had the 14th highest rate of emergency department visits. Michaud said there are many factors that contribute to these trends and it's difficult to tell what might explain each state's ranking. It might be that some states have robust public health networks, unlike Maine, which has only two city public health departments in Portland and Bangor. 'Hospitals in Maine serve as the public health infrastructure,' he said.