Westinghouse pursues U.S. nuclear expansion after Trump orders, FT reports
Nuclear equipment supplier Westinghouse is in talks with U.S. officials and industry partners about deploying 10 large reactors, in response to presidential executive orders, the Financial Times reported on Sunday, citing the company's CEO.
President Donald Trump's executive orders, which were published on May 23, directed the government to cut down on regulations and fast-track licences for reactors and power plants to shrink a multi-year process to 18 months.
Dan Sumner, Westinghouse's interim chief executive, told the FT that the company was "uniquely positioned" to deliver the president's agenda because it had an approved reactor design, a viable supply chain, and recent experience of building two of its AP1000 reactors in Georgia.
"There is active engagement with the administration, including key points of interface with the loan programs office, recognizing the importance of financing to the deployment of the model," he told the FT.
Westinghouse did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside regular business hours.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
President Trump to golf with SEC commish, Notre Dame AD as college leaders seek federal help
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua were scheduled to play golf with President Donald Trump at his course in New Jersey on Sunday as college sports leaders continue to look to the federal government for support. Two people briefed on the meeting confirmed the president's plans to The Athletic, speaking on condition of anonymity because they had not been authorized to speak publicly. Yahoo! Sports first reported about the golf outing. Advertisement Sankey is the longest tenured power conference commissioner and a longtime policy shaper at the NCAA and national level. Bevacqua leads the athletic department of one of the most prominent schools in college sports. The former television executive was previously the CEO of the PGA of America and has a prior relationship with the president going back to the days before he became a politician; the tour regularly played tournaments at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, N.J. The meeting comes two days after a federal judge approved a $2.8 billion antitrust lawsuit settlement that will pave the way for colleges and universities to directly pay their athletes for the first time. But the rules and regulations laid out in the terms of the agreement are still vulnerable to legal and political attacks. College sports leaders have been lobbying lawmakers on Capitol Hill for legislation to pre-empt myriad state laws that have created a patchwork of rules regarding athlete compensation, address athletes' employment status and provide some antitrust protection for the NCAA and its conferences. Now with the settlement of House v. NCAA in place, lawmakers have a structure to build upon — if they can come to agreement on a bill. Trump has indicated he would like to help facilitate a federal solution for college sports, possibly with an executive order. Plans were in the works for a presidential commission on college sports led by billionaire businessman Cody Campbell, a prominent Texas Tech booster, and former Alabama coach Nick Saban. The commission is currently on hold as lawmakers in the Senate, led by Republican Ted Cruz of Texas and Democrat Cory Booker of New Jersey, work on what they hope will be a bipartisan bill. Another hearing on college sports and how athletes are compensated for name, image and likeness is scheduled for later this week in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. (Photo of Pete Bevacqua and Donald Trump in 2014: Mike Stobe / Getty Images for PGA of America)
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump ally stands firm against 'big, beautiful bill' despite pressure: 'It'll completely backfire'
EXCLUSIVE — One of the leading opponents of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" declared not even the commander in chief will be able to deter him from speaking out against what he sees as a bill that falls short of Republicans' goal of cutting government waste. "It'll completely backfire on him," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told Fox News Digital of any attempts by Trump to sway him on the current legislation. Johnson has become a prominent voice of opposition against the House GOP's offering to the budget reconciliation process. Senate Republicans finally began the tedious process of parsing through the bill this week. Lawmakers in the upper chamber, Johnson included, are determined to make changes to the bill, with most wanting to make reductions to Medicaid and food stamps more palatable. Trump has made it clear his bill must pass but has acknowledged the Senate will need to make a few changes. Trump's directive has been to deliver a bill that can survive the razor-thin majorities in both chambers. Johnson, however, wants to see spending returned to pre-pandemic levels, cuts that are trillions of dollars deeper than what House Republicans could stomach. And he is ready to vote against the bill unless he sees the changes he wants. And he believes that a pressure campaign from the president against him and other like-minded fiscal hawks will fail. He said a better approach would be to work with lawmakers and fiscal hawks like him to gain a better understanding of the reality of the country's fiscal situation, a reality that "is grim," he said. Johnson has been up front about his disdain for the bill but has so far avoided public retribution from Trump. In fact, the two have spoken twice this week, once on Monday and later during a Senate Finance Committee meeting at the White House Tuesday. The lawmaker has told Trump he's in Trump's corner and that he wants "to see you succeed," but he has been steadfast in his position that the bill does not go far enough to tackle the national debt. And the debt continues to climb, nearing $37 trillion and counting, according to Fox News' National Debt Tracker. The House's offering set a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, which lawmakers in the lower chamber have pitched as a positive step forward to righting the country's fiscal ship, an offering Johnson panned as falling drastically short of the GOP's promises to cut deep into government spending. "What's so disappointing about what happened in the House is it was all rhetoric. It's all slogans," Johnson said. "They picked a number. Literally, they picked a number out of the air." Johnson views this attempt at the budget reconciliation process as a rare opportunity to "do the hard things" when it comes to spending cuts, but others in the GOP have been more hesitant to cut as deep. Johnson said a main reason Republicans have so far fallen short of meeting the moment for the most part is that lawmakers don't understand just how much the federal government shovels out the door year in and year out. The lawmaker recalled a moment roughly three years ago during a debate over another year-end omnibus spending bill, when each of the dozen appropriations bills is crammed into one, bloated package that is universally reviled and almost always passes. He asked his colleagues if they really knew just how much the government spends, and no one "volunteered to answer." "Nobody knew. I mean, think of that. The largest financier in the world. We're supposedly, in theory, the 535 members of the board of directors, and nobody knew," he said. "Why would they? We never talked about it." Johnson has been busy trying to better educate his colleagues, putting together his own charts and graphs that cut out the "noise," like the latest nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office report that found the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over a decade. The GOP has universally panned that projection. "We can't accept this as a new normal," Johnson said. "We can't accept — you can take pot shots of CBO, but you can't deny that reality. [It] might be off a little bit, but that is the trajectory, and that's undeniable."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Half of the bond market is US Treasurys. Why it's 'not healthy.'
Over the past 12 months, about half of all debt in the U.S. bond market has been Treasurys – bonds and notes issued by the federal government. That's according to a June 8 research note from Torsten Sløk, the chief economist for money manager Apollo. 'This is not healthy,' Sløk wrote. 'Half of credit issued in the economy should not be going to the government.' As USA TODAY has previously reported, the growing U.S. budget deficit has caught the attention of investors in the bond market. The deficit is the consequence of revenue – taxes, mostly – not keeping up with spending. As it increases, the government issues more debt to plug the hole, and as supply rises, the government needs to pay more to attract demand from investors. President Donald Trump's proposed tax bill would exacerbate that dynamic, swelling the deficit by an estimated $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. More: Treasury bond yields are surging as the Trump tax bill progresses. Here's why it matters. Since all kinds of credit products, such as mortgages, are linked to the important U.S. Treasury market, those higher borrowing costs ripple through the economy. Sløk has written previously about the concerns over the power dynamic between the government and bond investors. Some analysts are concerned that investors may become what's sometimes called 'bond vigilantes' – demanding certain fiscal conditions as a condition of buying a government's debt. Overseas investors own nearly one-third of outstanding Treasury debt. Sløk's June 8 analysis is a reminder that the Treasury's mounting debt has many ripple effects. 'The consequence is that investors need to allocate more and more dollars to finance the government rather than financing growth in the economy through loans to firms and consumers,' Sløk wrote. Read next: The White House's tax bill will consider SALT (again). What could that mean for you? This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Half of the bond market is US Treasurys. Why it matters. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
