Street sweeper Shaun Turner says he speaks for 'silent majority' after questioning use of Acknowledgement to Country during Darebin Council work meeting
Shaun Turner, 60, last week won his unfair dismissal case against Darebin Council after he was let go when he asked why the ritual was being introduced at a toolbox meeting.
He had argued in the meeting "people who have worn the uniform and fought" for Australia are the ones that should be thanked, later telling councillors he did not have to be "welcomed into my own country" and that the use of it was "getting out of hand".
The council alleged Mr Turner said Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people "do not deserve an acknowledgement at the start of meetings" in a disrespectful way.
But the Fair Work Commission found Mr Turner's way of expression was not aggressive, as claimed by the council, and that his opinion did not warrant being sacked.
Speaking to The Australian, who first reported the story, the father-of-three said the use of Acknowledgement to Country in small meetings was "pushing it too far".
Mr Turner doubled down on previous remarks that the ceremony should be reserved for special occasions and foreign dignitaries when they visit the country.
"I think the silent majority who won't just say anything, but they probably all think the same way but they don't want to upset the apple cart," he said.
Asked if Australia has become "too politically correct", the council worker said "it's all gone too far the other way and people have just had enough now".
'I just feel like if you were a pale, stale male you can't go to work now and have a laugh. If me and you are having a laugh, and he (a third person) takes it to management, well, next minute we're getting a warning for not being inclusive," he said.
Mr Turner, who voted for the Liberal Party at the federal election, said often people jump jump to accusations of racism if they question the Welcome to Country.
But he insisted he has "no problem with Aboriginal people".
The Fair Work Commission is still considering whether the worker from Research, northeast of Melbourne's outskirts, should be compensated or be given his job back.
Mr Turner is unsure whether he wants to continue in the role again due to a painful shoulder condition that had left him on WorkCover prior to being sacked.
He would consider being redeployed to another role and/or compensation.
Overnight, Senator Pauline Hanson praised Mr Turner for speaking his mind.
"That council worker, good on him for actually fighting back over it and questioning it. And yet he's lost his job. He's won it in the courts and I hope that they actually apologise to him and offer his job back," Senator Hanson told Sky News' Danica and James.
It comes after a poll from the Institute of Public Affairs over the weekend found 56 per cent of people surveyed say Welcome to Country Ceremonies are divisive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese government set to overhaul childcare subsidy model
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has revealed the Albanese government may need to completely overhaul its childcare subsidy model. Universal childcare has been the goal for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese since he pledged to work toward it during the election campaign. Speaking to The Australian, The Treasurer says universal care is an ambitious plan which needs to be achieved in an affordable way.
Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
Voice 2.0: Albanese sets his sights on peace in Gaza having tried and failed to find a solution to Aboriginal disadvantage
Anyone who has worked in a newsroom understands the hierarchy of suffering that determines the running order of a bulletin. A tragedy on our doorstep matters more than a larger tragedy on the other side of the world. So we shouldn't be surprised if most Australians care less about the conflict in Gaza than what it is doing to our country. The hatred on our streets breaks the unwritten rule that everyone who enters Australia leaves their troubles at the border. That's not to dismiss the distressing images emerging from Gaza, not all of which are faked. Nor are we downplaying the good fortune of living in the only permanently populated country untouched by civil war. We want to keep it that way. Much as we wish for global peace, our greatest desire is to enjoy harmony at home. Two years after his humiliating referendum defeat, the Prime Minister has once again been drawn into gesture politics with a promise that divides Australians and tests the strength of our social fabric. Belatedly, the PM has adjusted his rhetoric in deference to the discomfort we felt at the sight of an angry mob flying the banners of jihad while burning the Australian flag. 'Australians overwhelmingly want to see the killing stop,' he told a TV host Tuesday. 'They also, of course, don't want to see conflict brought here to our harmonious, multicultural society.' His acknowledgment is almost certainly too little and too late. He was the one who picked sides by recognising the non-existent state of Palestine. It was his announcement that terrorists praised and the US has condemned. The immediate consequence is that Anthony Albanese will be starved of the oxygen to talk about anything else, just as he would with the Voice. There's no obvious way to subdue the hornets now that the nest has been stirred. Every press conference spent on this issue will add to the remorse of Australians who voted, thinking they were electing a prime minister, not an activist-in-chief. Once again, he has failed to explain the point of the exercise, resorting to banal clichés. He wants to 'send a message' that he wants to see 'the world move forward'. He tells us he wants to make 'a practical contribution towards building momentum' and engage 'in detailed dialogue' with the international community, 'talking about what a peace looks like in the region'. He should have begun engaging in a detailed dialogue with the Australian people about what this gesture will achieve, beyond rewarding bad behaviour, getting Australia offside with our most important ally. Polling suggested Australians were sympathetic to the idea of a Voice. By referendum day, however, they'd worked out that its purpose was merely symbolic and that the PM was winging it, hoping to get through on the vibe. The hubris is astonishing. Having failed to find a solution to the problem of Aboriginal disadvantage, the PM has extended his ambition by promising to bring peace to the Middle East. He says Australia can help broker a peace deal that defied the best efforts of Anwar Sadat, Menachem Begin, Jimmy Carter, King Hussein, Yitzhak Rabin, Henry Kissinger, George H. W. Bush, Shimon Peres, Bill Clinton, and a host of others better versed in the art of statesmanship than he. The recognition of Palestine will be welcomed by many, just as millions of Australians were passionately in favour of the Voice. Yet if a plebiscite were held, it is not hard to guess the demographic profile that would vote in favour. They will be the same constituencies, more or less, that voted in favour of a Republic in 1999 and the Voice in 2023. They are the seats that recorded the most significant majorities in favour of same-sex marriage. There would be variations of course in seats with large Muslim populations that were strongly opposed to same-sex marriage. The hypothetical plebiscite would be less well received in "woke" seats with large Jewish populations, such as Wentworth. However, the people who marched over the bridge were, for the most part, the same inner-metropolitan elite who sign up to every fashionable cause. Some of them would have marched across the bridge a quarter of a century ago in the Walk for Reconciliation. Some may have even glued themselves to the tarmac during peak hour in April 2022 to raise awareness about the climate emergency. They are members of the activist class, the people who wear their compassion on their sleeve, heavily invested in the cause of humanity but less concerned about humans themselves, particularly their fellow citizens who have the humility not to advance an opinion about things they know little about. For those people, the behaviour of the radical alliance between progressives and terrorists is a frightening development. They are disturbed by the politics of identity that divides citizens according to race or religion. They find the assault on the Jewish community abhorrent, not just because it is anti-Semitic but because Australian multiculturalism is not meant to work like that. Our social fabric is held together by the twin instincts to live and let live and treat every citizen with equal respect. The implication that Palestinians in Australia deserve special status for inherited suffering, and Jewish Australians must carry the collective guilt for the imagined sins of Israelis, is anathema to Australians who grew up understanding that character is infinitely more important than race. The anti-colonial narrative that divided us between First Nation people and others, by implication, Second Nation people, was the deal breaker in the Voice referendum. Mr Albanese has made the same mistake over Palestine. He has embraced a decisive narrative that exacerbates the divide in Australia, incites hateful protests and leaves many of us wondering if we recognise the country in which we once lived. Nick Cater is a senior fellow at Menzies Research Centre and a regular contributor to Sky News Australia
Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
A handful of soil: 50 years since iconic land hand-back
Half a century ago then prime minister Gough Whitlam poured a handful of soil into the hands of a man who had led an eight-year protest for the rights of his people. On August 16, 1975 Mr Whitlam travelled to Wave Hill Station, about 600 kilometres south of Darwin, to hand back land to the Gurindji people. During an official handover ceremony, transferring leasehold title to a parcel of land at the Wave Hill cattle station to Gurindji people, Mr Whitlam poured the soil into the hands of senior Elder Vincent Lingiari. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the iconic image of the red earth trickling from Mr Gough's hands to Mr Lingiari's was an enduring tribute to the courage, determination and solidarity of Gurindji people. "There is more to do to ensure Traditional Owners can unlock the economic potential of their land and build the long term prosperity that will see their communities thrive," he said. "Let the milestone we look back on today, inspire us for the journey ahead." Mr Lingiari had been a stockman at Wave Hill, and almost a decade earlier had led 200 Gurindji, Mudburra and Warlpiri stockmen, domestic workers and their families on a strike. Walking off the station, the workers were taking a stand against injustice, demanding fair pay, better work conditions and the return of their traditional lands. The group set up at Dagauragu, and for eight years the strikers stayed firm in their demands. The Wave Hill Walk Off helped pave the way for Aboriginal Land Rights legislation in the Northern Territory, and for federal laws which enabled First Nations people in the NT to claim rights for Country. Indigenous Affairs Minister Malarndirri McCarthy said the strike laid the foundations for Aboriginal land rights across Australia. "The formal handover of land to the Gurindji people - and the soil passing from one hand to another - is a defining moment in the Aboriginal land rights movement and Australian history," she said. Each year, the annual Freedom Day festival brings people together to mark the walk off and the hand-back. The Gurindji Aboriginal Corporation says this year's festival carries extra significance, marking the 50th anniversary. "The festival is in recognition of a story of national significance, which changed the Australian landscape and history forever," the corporation said in a social media post. "Vincent's legacy still lives on today through his grandchildren, great-grandchildren and all the Gurindji people." The Freedom Day festival will be held at Kalkarindji from August 22 to 24.
