Ramaphosa seeks trade solutions in crucial G7 meeting with Trump
President Cyril Ramaphosa is currently in Canada to attend the G7 Leaders Summit where the Iran-Israel war is set to dominate the agenda.
Image: GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa is gearing up for a crucial meeting with US President Donald Trump at the G7 Summit in Canada, where he will seek answers on trade agreements, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and US-SA tariffs.
Ramaphosa, who is accompanied by International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola, is an invited guest at the summit in Kananaskis, Canada.
The Group of Seven consists of the largest advanced economies like Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the US.
Sources said the G7 meeting was likely to be dominated by the Israel-Iran war that is currently underway.
"It's unlikely that Ramaphosa will bring it up with Trump at their meeting seeing that Iran was now part of BRICS...he may avoid talking about it as the US is an ally of Israel. Ramaphosa is likely going to stick to trade agreenments," the source said.
Presidency spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya said Ramaphosa's participation in the G7 Summit outreach session would provide an opportunity to engage with various leaders on areas of common interest in bilateral relations and multilateral cooperation and to strengthen G7/G20 cooperation.
Ramaphosa is also expected to meet bilaterally with Chancellor of Germany Friedrick Merz on the sidelines of the summit.
'The Outreach Session aims to explore leadership and collaboration in driving a comprehensive approach to energy security with a focus on technology and innovation; diversification and strengthening critical mineral supply chains; and infrastructure and investment,' Magwenya said.
He said the Summit resonated with South Africa's national interests and priorities of South Africa's G20 Presidency.
'The Outreach Sessions of the G7 in which President Ramaphosa will participate has been a feature of the group over the years, with the aim to strengthen unity among G7 members and like-minded countries to deliberate on and address some of the world's most pressing issues,' said Magwenya.
The meeting comes after Ramaphosa, on his arrival on Sunday, had a successful bilateral meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, where they discussed global peace and security, trade, and economic stability.
Carney assumed the Presidency of the G7 in January this year.
The US imposed tariffs on South African imports in April, with a 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs of 30% against South African exports.
The tariffs were part of a broader set of 'liberation day' tariffs imposed by Trump on all US trading partners.
However, they were later reduced to a base rate of 10%, with the expectation that countries would use the 90 days to propose solutions addressing the US's trade deficit concerns.
According to sources, Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump will focus on key issues, including AGOA, which provides duty-free access to the US market for some African products.
The agreement is set to expire in September, and South Africa is eager to see it renewed.
Ramaphosa will also raise concerns about US-SA tariffs, urging the US not to increase them beyond the current 10% if negotiations on a new trade framework are not concluded by July.
The sources further said the meeting between Ramaphosa and Trump was crucial given the current state of US-SA trade relations.
It was previously reported that the business sector had expressed concerns about the tariff hike and Ramaphosa was under pressure to come up with answers from Trump.
Meanwhile, South Africa's Department of Agriculture has approved a special arrangement with the US that allows for a more dynamic trade response to avian influenza or bird flu outbreaks.
This agreement will ensure a continued supply of chicken imports into South Africa, increasing food security and providing relief to millions of South Africans who rely on affordable protein.
Merlog Foods, one of the country's largest importers of chicken and chilled products, has welcomed the agreement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Harvard secures extension of court order blocking Trump's international student ban
Federal judge in Boston considers issuing injunction Trump suspended ability of foreign nationals to study at Harvard Harvard accuses Trump of infringing its First Amendment rights By Nate Raymond U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, at the end of a hearing in Boston in Harvard's legal challenge to the restrictions, extended to June 23 a temporary restraining order that had been set to expire on Thursday. She said she wanted to give herself more time to prepare a ruling. 'We'll kick out an opinion as soon as we can,' she said. The judge scheduled the hearing after issuing a temporary restraining order on June 5 preventing the administration from implementing a proclamation that Trump had signed a day earlier. A preliminary injunction would provide longer-term relief to Harvard while its lawsuits proceeds. Almost 6,800 international students attended Harvard in its most recent school year, making up about 27% of the student population of the prestigious Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school. The judge, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, did not indicate how she would ultimately rule. But she said a U.S. Department of Justice attorney defending Trump's policy faced an 'uphill battle' convincing her that Harvard would not be irreparably harmed if the proclamation was implemented. Ian Gershengorn, the school's lawyer, told the judge the 'impact of the proclamation is devastating to Harvard and its students.' He said Trump signed the proclamation to retaliate against Harvard in violation of its free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment for refusing to accede to the administration's demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students. Justice Department attorney Tiberius Davis countered that Congress had given Trump 'sweeping authority' under the Immigration and Nationality Act to suspend the entry of specific categories of foreign nationals, which the president relied on to address national security concerns at Harvard. 'We don't trust them to host foreign students,' Davis said. The Trump administration has launched a multifront attack on the oldest and wealthiest U.S. university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges. Harvard has filed two separate lawsuits before Burroughs seeking to unfreeze around $2.5 billion in funding and to prevent the administration from blocking the ability of international students to attend the university. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on May 22 announced that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, the governmental mechanism that allows it to enroll foreign students. Her action was almost immediately blocked by Burroughs. While the Department of Homeland Security has since shifted to challenging Harvard's certification through a months-long administrative process, Burroughs at a May 29 hearing said she planned to issue a 'broad' injunction to maintain the status quo. A week later, though, Trump signed his proclamation, which cited national security concerns to contend that Harvard is 'no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programs.' The proclamation suspended the entry of foreign nationals to study at Harvard or participate in exchange visitor programs for an initial period of six months and directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to revoke visas of international students already enrolled at Harvard. At Monday's hearing, Davis cited Harvard's acceptance of foreign money including from China and what he said was an inadequate response to the administration's demand for information on foreign students who engaged in illegal activity during a period of 'increased unrest' on its campus as examples of those national security concerns. Trump has accused Harvard of creating an unsafe environment for Jewish students and allowing antisemitism to fester on its campus. Protests over Israel's treatment of Palestinians during its war with Hamas in Gaza have roiled numerous universities' campuses, including Harvard's.
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Sudden Eskom competence means renewable energy vendors must find new villains to vanquish
With the grid holding steady and major load shedding disruptions conspicuously absent, the air at Enlit Africa 2025 felt a bit thin and less urgent. When Eskom gets its act together, what happens to a renewables market that's become addicted to panic? You pivot to new projects or find different avenues to distribute your energy efficient products. For one company, Plentify, Enlit Africa 2025 was a resurrection of sorts. The home energy startup, once on the cusp of a residential solar revolution, found its breakout moment slipping away when the blackouts backed off. CEO Jon Kornik has always been candid about the fickle nature of their market: 'Sustained level four plus load shedding for months on end' is what it takes to really get South African households to adopt their tech. But Enlit brought news of a partnership with Conlog, a stalwart in smart metering with reach across 58 countries. The companies are teaming up to roll out Plentify's intelligent geyser and solar management tools – HotBot and SolarBot – to millions of households. It's a strategic pivot from panic-powered purchases to long-term infrastructure plays. 'Millions of South African homeowners could soon save more, have more control and backup power from the infrastructure already in their homes,' Kornik says. The maths checks out: Project Smart Geyser trials showed R300-plus in average monthly electricity savings per home, and modelling suggests that rolling HotBot out to just 25% of households could shave 20 hours of rolling blackouts off the national calendar each month. Utility scale distribution Conlog CEO Logan Moodley on the other hand positioned the partnership as part of a broader evolution. 'Our strategic vision with this project is fundamentally about evolving towards being more consumer-centric in the adoption of smart metering. We aim to understand and address the impact of energy access on consumers.' The timing couldn't be more critical. With Conlog's role as a key supplier for smart prepaid electricity meters via the RT29 tender withthe National Treasury, the partnership streamlines municipal procurement processes. As Moodley noted: 'Our goal is to minimise consumer frustration, ensuring that even during load management activities, consumers maintain access to essential services without inconvenience.' While residential solar stumbles, industrial demand tells a different story. Actom, with more than 120 years of experience in engineering and construction, has identified a new frontier: data centres. 'Data centres, particularly with the rise of AI and cloud workloads, have become totally energy hungry,' Sy Gourrah, senior general manager of Actom's smart technology division, tells Daily Maverick. The municipal problem Gourrah tells how Actom spotted the opportunity to deliver local solutions to power-hungry hyperscalers that have 10x their server rack demands with the advent of AI – some loads even touching 100kW. 'You need proper substations, batteries, diesel, solar – all of it,' she says. 'The grid has almost become a backup.' It's not just load shedding fatigue driving this hybrid-energy trend. It's a practical necessity for servers constantly chasing uptime. Actom's play? Locally built, ruggedised infrastructure for Africa's climate, modular substations and even project financing if you can't foot the bill upfront. But all this extra load is stretching municipal resources thin as they and the national utility scramble to make sure the network can meet demands. Kornik, however, isn't sympathetic. 'The trend of incentives is worrying,' he told a small breakout crowd at the conference. 'The government seems to be trying to do what they can to disincentivise solar.' He rattled off examples: import duties, tariff changes, the loss of tax breaks. And then he said the quiet part out loud. 'There seems like there might be a philosophical problem of seeing solar as a threat as opposed to an opportunity that is going to reshape South Africa and position us competitively in a market which actually cares about the carbon content of your goods.' Going down in a death spiral His words landed heavy. The idea that our own government sees citizen-led solar as a danger, not a delight, is the kind of take you can't walk back with a press release. Kornik warns of a 'utility death spiral': as more people defect to solar, utilities raise tariffs to serve those who remain, pushing even more to defect. Municipalities, instead of innovating, resist – and lose their best customers. 'There are more progressive municipalities… having really good success in forming partnerships,' he said. 'And others that aren't even ready to talk.' In the shadow of Eskom's temporary competence, the players with long-term bets and deep distribution are the ones who might just rewrite the script. But if the municipalities don't get their act together, they may find themselves cast as the villain in an energy transition that's happening with or without them. DM
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africa's coalition Cabinet — the more things change…
While much has changed within our Cabinet because of the introduction of other parties, much remains the same. When it first became clear that a national coalition was being formed around the African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), it was already obvious that it would be incredibly diverse. This has led to a Cabinet in which it can sometimes appear that ministers are following different agendas. And the person at the centre of it all, President Cyril Ramaphosa, appears to be unable to instil discipline or ensure competence. Even now, a full year after the ministers were sworn in, the diversity of our Cabinet can be breathtaking. It is not just that two parties that have competed against each other so personally for so long are working together. It is also because the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) and the Freedom Front Plus, along with the Patriotic Alliance (PA) and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), appear to be rubbing along together fairly well. It is almost a part of our South Africanness that, for the moment at least, our politicians generally have warm personal relations, despite the very real differences in the constituencies they represent. When Ramaphosa visited flood-affected communities in the Eastern Cape last week, his delegation included ministers from the IFP and the DA, and it was clear they were being included in the same way ANC ministers were. It was somehow typically South African. Everyone has a chance to do their thing. Cooperation It was perhaps this element of our society that might have led to hopes that perhaps, despite their ideological differences, members of the Cabinet would all work together to move in the same direction. There are some areas in which this has happened. For example, there have been virtually no leaks from Cabinet meetings, even though some parties would stand to gain from doing this. Some have indeed given an account of what happened during the most tense moment of this coalition, the argument over the Budget, but even so, very few details have emerged in the public domain. Also, considering that there are many departments with a minister from one party and a deputy or deputies from another, instances of open conflict have been rare. Of course, there are some. Particularly in the two situations where the current minister is from the DA, while the deputy minister is the previous ANC minister. Both in the Communications Ministry and in Public Works and Infrastructure, there have been brief public spats involving the DA's Solly Malatsi and the ANC's Mondli Gungubele (over Malatsi's withdrawal of the SABC Bill) and the DA's Dean Macpherson and the ANC's Sihle Zikalala over several issues (including the Expropriation Bill and how the department has been run). But in some areas, which could be considered political flashpoints, there has been relative peace. In the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, for example, which administers BEE, it appears that the minister, the ANC's Parks Tau and one of the deputies, Andrew Whitfield, have avoided open conflict. This is no small achievement. Considering the previous habits of both the ANC and the DA, and the very real differences on issues like the National Health Insurance, the fact that there has been no public conflagration is in itself important. Cohesion That said, there is an apparent lack of cohesion within the Cabinet. This was on full display two weeks ago. While Malatsi was making it easier for a service owned by the world's richest man to come to South Africa, Mineral Resources and Petroleum Minister Gwede Mantashe was unveiling new proposals that place onerous new transformation conditions on the mining industry. In some cases, it appears that individual ministers, no matter which party they are from, are making important progress. But strange things still happen. Last year, Home Affairs Minister, the DA's Leon Schreiber, unveiled new regulations for digital nomads. The government had promised these changes for many years, but he did it within months of taking office. This led to speculation that either Schreiber was just more competent than the ANC or that his predecessor, the ANC's Aaron Motsoaledi, had refused to publish the changes. This forced Ramaphosa to issue a statement, confirming that Schreiber had his full support. Renegades But two other factors so far also stand out from the behaviour of this Cabinet. The first is that several members have not moderated their behaviour, despite now holding national office. PA leader Gayton McKenzie, for example, appears to be in continual campaign mode. While it may be significant for a political party leader to make prejudiced and xenophobic comments, it is much more significant when those words come from a Cabinet minister. Despite very strong criticism of his comments, the President has not taken action against him. Meanwhile, the country's best-known public masticator, Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, has shown complete disrespect for Parliament and accountability. Worse, it appears her claim that the list of names of people she would appoint to chair the Setas came from an independent panel is a complete lie. If and when this is confirmed, Ramaphosa will be under pressure to remove her as she will have lied to Parliament. Coalition weakness All of this demonstrates a major weakness of the current arrangement. Ramaphosa cannot really take action against a minister who is not from the ANC. To do so could risk the entire coalition. This probably explains why he has not acted against McKenzie. And even if he were to speak to the PA about this, McKenzie is its leader. And even if the party agreed to his removal, it would probably replace him in the Cabinet with their deputy leader, Kenny Kunene. It would not be long before he made comments very similar to those made by McKenzie. Or, given Kunene's track record, something much worse. This reveals the second dynamic. Ramaphosa also appears unable to act against ANC ministers. If he can't act against ministers from other parties, can he act against those from his own? It may still be important, though, to remember that some of these dynamics are also the result of old ANC habits. For example, there was at least one example of a deputy minister contradicting a minister in public (when Godfrey Oliphant was the deputy minister of Mineral Resources, he publicly criticised Mosebenzi Zwane during the State Capture era). And of course, there are plenty of examples where a minister appeared impervious to presidential discipline. The most public example was Pravin Gordhan, who took on Jacob Zuma in the most public way in 2016 and 2017. Competence Another old ANC habit may well relate to the fact that several people in the Cabinet have been shown to lack competence. Nkabane's handling of the Seta debacle may be a good example. But Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni's statement that the government would 'smoke out' illegal miners during an incident in which at least 80 people died may be another. There is still no indication that Small Business Development Minister Stella Ndabeni (formerly Ndabeni-Abrahams) has acted as a cheerleader for business. The Minister of Land Reform and Rural Development, PAC leader Mzwanele Nyhontso, has been largely absent from debates and discussions about his portfolio, while there are other examples of ministers who appear to have made little progress in their portfolios. This suggests that while much has changed within our Cabinet because of the introduction of other parties, much remains the same. DM
