Nebraska lawmakers hear concerns, local to national, at South Omaha town hall
OMAHA — A town hall in South Omaha, hosted by two freshmen Nebraska state lawmakers, drew about 50 people and questions ranging from local and state to national matters.
State Sens. Margo Juarez and Dunixi Guereca of Omaha, in the first of what they said will be more joint community meetings, said that on some issues they will be a link to help constituents resolve problems with city or other officials.
After a nearly two-hour session, the senators said they believed a key goal was accomplished — providing an open forum for people in their districts to express whatever concerns them.
'I realize there's frustrations with there not being more attention paid here in the community. Obviously that is why we are here today,' Juarez at one point told the group gathered in an auditorium at Omaha South High School.
Among those in the audience were Roger Garcia, Douglas County Board chairman, Yanira Garcia, board member of the Regional Metro Transit Board, and Don Preister, a Bellevue City Councilman and founding member of the South Omaha Neighborhood Alliance.
'What we saw also is some real anxiety about what is going on on the federal level,' said Guereca, referring to questions raised about actions of the Trump administration.
One audience member cited the president's resistance to judicial orders and how that filters to his community and Latinos. Others commented on the demise of Juarez's previous priority bill, Legislative Bill 299, which partly sought to allow immigrants — those with legal permission to work in the U.S. but who lack permanent residency — access to unemployment insurance benefits their employers pay into.
Juarez explained to the group that the bill was crushed under the weight of a Trump administration threat that the state could lose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid.
On state-related issues, perhaps the loudest reaction followed comments about the Legislature's actions seeking to weaken voter-passed protections for paid sick leave.
In November, nearly 75% of Nebraska voters approved a ballot measure requiring businesses with over 20 employees to pay sick leave to eligible workers based on hours worked. A bill making its way through the Legislature seeks additional carveouts that would not require paid sick leave for workers ages 14 and 15, seasonal ag workers or workers in businesses with 10 or fewer employees.
An audience member questioned why state lawmakers believe they need to make the law 'better.'
'I think if we voted for it, it's already better. Do they just think we can't be trusted with voting?' she said.
Guereca and Juarez said they oppose changing the voter-approved law.
'We will continue to fight it,' Guereca said, saying that negotiations on the bill continue in the Legislature that wraps up its session in early June.
A few audience members asked about the status of a Guereca bill that would allow local researchers quicker access to health data collected by the Nebraska Department of Human Services.
Guereca said that DHHS cites a 'legal technicality' that effectively keeps local researchers waiting for the data a couple of years, when it is released by federal health officials. He is seeking to get Legislative Bill 446 on a path for passage yet this year, to allow certain qualified researchers quicker access to 'de-identified data.'
'If we're looking for alarming trends, waiting two years isn't going to cut it,' he said.
The senators were somewhat divided on a movement that could raise the pay for lawmakers.
Guereca said he was opposed: 'I knew what I was getting into,' he said.
For Juarez, she said she is still contemplating, as she believes the $12,000 annual salary is a deterrent to running for the office, particularly for young people, and has created a legislative body that is not 'a good representation of the state.'
'I was able to run, not because I'm wealthy, but because I am retired so I have other monthly income coming in,' she said.
Among other topics that surfaced were federal actions targeting immigrants. A South Omaha resident questioned the Omaha Police Department's impound lot operations. A 24th Street merchant aired frustrations with the homeless population frightening customers.
'We don't have in South Omaha a consistent ongoing voice of unity, of unified outrage, to confront government when it does things, not just nationally but locally,' said South Omaha activist Ben Salazar.
Juarez and Guereca talked about other bills they have championed, the lawmaking process and invited participants to weigh in on how often they want town halls.
One woman suggested at least once a month — 'because of the speed at which things are happening (nationally) that impact what you're doing.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Where the redistricting fight goes from here: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, a newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Ben Kamisar takes a look at the states where the redistricting fight could spread to next after Texas and California. Plus, Andrea Mitchell reports on Israel's looming operation in Gaza City. — Adam Wollner Where the redistricting fight goes from here After a weekslong delay caused by Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in protest, the Republican-controlled Texas House is now poised to pass a new congressional map that aims to pad the GOP's majority in the U.S. House by as many as five seats. The new lines will still need to be approved by the state Senate and Gov. Greg Abbott before they can be enacted ahead of next year's midterm elections. But that will only mark the first chapter in a redistricting battle that has spread across the country. Democratic lawmakers in California are advancing a plan this week that seeks to offset Texas's effort with a map of their own that would add as many as five seats to their party's ranks in the House. They will need voters to approve the new lines in a special election this fall to circumvent California's independent redistricting commission. The spotlight has been on Texas and California, given the swings in power that could result from their newly drawn lines. But a handful of other GOP-led states are considering their own redistricting pushes that could have major implications in the 2026 battle for the House, where Republicans currently hold a slim three-seat majority. Ohio: The Buckeye State is required to redraw its congressional lines by law because state lawmakers approved a 2021 map without Democratic support. The timing could work out well for Republicans, who control the Legislature. Two of Ohio's three Democratic House members won re-election last cycle by less than 3 points. Indiana: The state's entire Republican congressional delegation has in recent days lined up behind a redistricting effort that's been encouraged by the White House. The GOP already controls seven of the nine congressional seats in the Hoosier State. Gov. Mike Braun, a Republican, hasn't said whether he plans to call for a special session of the Legislature to take up a new map. But Vice President JD Vance traveled to Indiana earlier this month to meet with Braun. Missouri: Republicans have been pushing Gov. Mike Kehoe to call a special legislative session for redistricting in the Show Me State, where Republicans control six of eight House seats. Florida: Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said this week that people can 'anticipate' a mid-decade redraw because there has been a 'sea change in demography' since the 2020 census. The GOP represents 20 of the Sunshine State's 28 congressional districts. Israel moves forward with plan to take over Gaza City By Andrea Mitchell Almost two years into the war in Gaza, Israel is calling up thousands of army reservists to gain control of the last major civilian area: Gaza City. Troops are already beginning to clear people from their tents on the outskirts of the city, home to as many as a million residents, and force them south. Sixty-thousand reservists will be involved in the offensive, and the service of 20,000 troops already deployed will be extended. This comes despite a rare public clash between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his hand-picked army chief of staff, who had said that the military is exhausted and that the offensive would endanger surviving hostages. That point was emphasized to NBC News by Orna Neutra, whose son Omer is believed to have been killed during the Oct. 7 massacre. She told me if Israeli forces gets close to where Hamas is holding the remaining hostages, the militants won't hesitate to execute them. She and her husband have been pressing for a peace deal to get their son's remains returned. Her view reflects broad opposition by the Israeli public to expanding the war. On Sunday, hundreds of thousands of Israelis marched in a nationwide strike against Netanyahu's plans, the largest protest in Israel in years. As the world focuses on Gaza, Israel's government announced final approval of thousands of new homes for Jewish settlers in the West Bank, where settlers have been escalating their attacks against Palestinian residents. Rapidly becoming a tinderbox, the new settlements had been on hold for years because of opposition from the Arab world, European leaders and previous U.S. administrations. An estimated 700,000 Israeli settlers now live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The location of the new settlement is controversial because it would separate two major Palestinian cities, Ramallah and Bethlehem. All this is taking place as some of America's closest allies, including France, the United Kingdom and Canada, have said they may join the more than 145 countries that recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire. Israel has become increasingly isolated because of a monthslong blockade of food, water and fuel, followed by a trickle of aid delivered at only four sites in southern Gaza guarded by the IDF. The United Nations has said resulting clashes have led to 1,400 Palestinian deaths of people seeking food and 4,000 injuries. President Donald Trump, who recently told Netanyahu to 'finish the job' in Gaza, spoke admiringly of the prime minister Tuesday night in an interview with conservative radio host Mark Levin, calling him a 'war hero' for his strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. Trump added, 'I guess I am, too. Nobody cares, but I am, too. I mean I sent those planes,' referring to the U.S. strikes in Iran.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota minimum wage will increase 2.5% to $11.41 per hour on Jan. 1
A server resets tables at a Minnesota restaurant earlier this year. (Photo by Ellen Schmidt/Minnesota Reformer) Minnesota's statewide minimum wage will increase 28 cents to $11.41 per hour on Jan. 1, a 2.5% increase based on the annual rate of inflation. The minimum wage applies to virtually all employees since the Democratic-controlled Legislature eliminated a lower minimum wage for small businesses, workers younger than 18 and workers on J-1 visas in 2024. (As before, tips cannot be counted toward the minimum wage.) Only workers under 20 years old in their first 90 days of training may receive a lower wage of $9.31 per hour starting in 2026. Minneapolis and St. Paul each have higher minimum wages of $15.97 per hour, which will increase with inflation in 2026. Small and micro businesses in St. Paul may pay a lower minimum wage, but the city is phasing in a single minimum wage for all employees by 2028. Minnesota's minimum wage is higher than most of its neighbors' (save South Dakota), but it isn't enough to cover basic living expenses. The cost of living for a childless, working-age adult requires earning $17.68 per hour, according to the state Department of Employment and Economic Development. A household with two children requires two parents earning at least $24.25 per hour. The federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour has remained unchanged since 2009 and is the effective minimum wage in 20 states, including Wisconsin. Minnesota's minimum wage has been indexed to inflation since 2018 but was limited to annual adjustments of 2.5% until last year when lawmakers raised the threshold to 5% to ensure the lowest paid workers receive larger raises in periods of high inflation. The increase will directly affect a relatively small number of workers. Fewer than 90,000 salaried and hourly jobs out of more than 3.3 million in Minnesota were paid at or below the minimum wage in 2023, according to the state's latest minimum wage report. Still, a rising minimum wage puts upward pressure on jobs paying just above minimum wage, creating a ripple effect across a larger number of workers. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why neither party can bank on Latino voters
Texas Republicans are set to pass their new congressional maps through the state House Wednesday, officially putting their stamp on the redistricting arms race that has unfolded as national Republicans push to retain control of the House in next year's midterms. The Republican-led gambit to redistrict — which is being met with similar efforts across other states and notable retaliation in California — rests on a significant gamble banking on the emerging realignment of many working-class Latino voters toward the GOP. But over a year out from the 2026 elections, there's an emerging reality operatives say are slapping both parties in the face: President Donald Trump's approval numbers with Latino voters are souring — and those same voters still don't trust Democrats. Trump came in with a net 27-percent approval among Latinos in the Pew Research Center's August survey. The Economist/YouGov poll put him at 28 percent. Reuters/Ipsos' latest numbers published Monday gave Trump 32 percent, which matches his lowest approval in their survey. But the resounding warning signs are in Latino-run Equis Research's latest polling memo released this week, which went beyond just Trump's favorability, and offer lessons for Republicans and Democrats. With Republicans' razor-thin majority in the House and the possibility of entirely new, Hispanic-majority districts defining the next elections, the flagging figures are worth paying attention to on both sides of the aisle, multiple Democratic and Republican strategists told Playbook. With Latinos, both parties are in the wilderness. 'This confirms what we've been seeing over and over again,' Chuck Rocha, a Democratic strategist, told Playbook. 'Some Latinos having regrets voting for Trump — but also still not sure that the Democrats are the answer.' One of the most striking statistics from Equis' research shows 56 percent of Latino men now disapprove of Trump — the same coalition that swung for Trump last year. And pocketbook issues rank among the top reasons why. 'The cost of living was by far Trump's weakest area,' Maria Di Franco Quiñonez, a research director at Equis, told Playbook. 'It's really extended to the Republican Party as a whole.' That should be especially concerning when it comes to redistricting, Republican strategist Mike Madrid told Playbook. 'That is who they're banking on with this new carved out map in Texas. That's madness.' But this doesn't mean Latinos are now flocking to Democrats, Di Franco Quiñonez said. Latino voters are split down the middle on Democrats in the most competitive House districts, 47 percent favorability to 48 percent. And a majority don't see Democrats mounting an effective opposition. 'They have not been able to stop that bleeding,' one high-level Republican operative granted anonymity to discuss strategy told Playbook. 'There's no pushback to Trump, there's no leader in the Democratic Party, they don't know who that is.' Republicans also know they're playing on what was once Democratic turf, the GOP operative said. Even with fluctuations in Trump's approval — Equis found that 8 percent of Latino voters regretted voting for Trump and 19 percent are disappointed with his actions as president — these aren't the same numbers as 2018, when voters snapped back toward Democrats, they argue. The operative pointed to Equis' polling showing 70 percent of Latinos that voted for Trump are happy with their choice. 'I read that and I'm like, that's great,' they said. 'We're feeling good about where we are.' When it comes to this swing group, there's always been a swath of Latinos — Miami's Cubans, for example — that have been historically conservative. It's the portion of Latinos that are somewhere on the fence (Equis reported 16 percent undecided) that have the power to flip the House next year, Rocha told Playbook. 'We're never gonna get all of them back, but we can get back 10 to 20 percent of them and realign this to what it used to be, because the data shows they're not happy with Republicans,' Rocha said. This has to be a wake-up call for both parties, Madrid told Playbook. 'We're witnessing two parties in significant transition here, and they're both operating off of false assumptions, and neither is completely sure or confident in what their future coalition will be, but they know that their old coalition does not work for them,' Madrid said.
