SAHRC probes ‘Open Chats Podcast' despite apology
The popular podcast came under fire this week, sparking outrage and calls for its removal. Political parties, including the ANC, DA, PA and EFF, have condemned the behaviour and reported the matter to the commission.
Despite the hosts apologising and the clip being removed from the episode, the commission said it would proceed with its investigation.
'The commission, through its Gauteng provincial office, has opened an own accord investigation and will continue with its investigative process,' the SAHRC said.
'The commission also confirms receipt of several complaints from political parties and individuals against the Open Chats podcast for the pain endured by the coloured community and other vulnerable communities as a result of offensive remarks on the episode.'
The SAHRC said it has sent allegation letters to the respondents and would determine the way forward.
The commission urged the public to use the media responsibly, emphasising the right to freedom of expression is not absolute and hate speech is prohibited.
'Podcasts are not exempted from the limitations. Podcast owners, hosts and guests are subject to the constitution and all applicable laws.'
The commission said it would make a submission to the draft white paper on audio and audiovisual media services and online safety released by the communications and digital technologies department.
'Recent online attacks against the coloured community and other vulnerable communities again underscore the urgent need for stronger digital regulations to protect dignity, equality and human rights in the digital age.
'The commission also advises that any individual complainant seeking criminal sanction may lodge a crimen injuria complaint with the police.'
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
National Dialogue will go ahead as planned, says Ramaphosa
JOHANNESBURG - The African National Congress (ANC) is calling for an urgent resolution to disputes surrounding the upcoming National Dialogue after several legacy foundations withdrew from the preparatory task team. The party said the concerns, ranging from transparency and financial oversight to the need for a truly citizen-led process, must be addressed to preserve the dialogue's integrity and credibility. It has urged the foundations, including those of former presidents Thabo Mbeki and Kgalema Motlanthe, to reconsider their withdrawal, calling their experience "invaluable" to the success of the process. In a statement, the ANC said the National Dialogue must be rooted in inclusive participation, guided by the spirit of the constitution and liberation values. President Cyril Ramaphosa, speaking in Vereeniging, also weighed in, insisting that the event would go ahead as planned. He said that funds had been released, a venue secured, and an operation centre was already functioning with thousands of invites sent to community leaders, business, labour and government representatives. The ruling party added that it was ready to support improvements to the dialogue framework, including proper financial governance, transparent decision-making and clear accountability structures. It called on all stakeholders, including government, to work with urgency and humility to rebuild public trust, saying the initiative must rise above administrative shortcomings and focus on the collective good.
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
The state must listen and talk to the people
When it comes to civic engagement in South Africa, considerable attention is paid to protest action. Democratic participation is meant to influence decision-making processes. But its effect on local governance appears limited. One contributing factor may be how the government interacts with citizens. For example, planning and budget documents presented by the local government are often lengthy, use technical terminology and are released shortly before public consultations. As a result, the timeframe available for citizens to read, interpret and respond to them is constrained, which restricts the potential for informed input into planning, budgeting, and service delivery. From a data perspective, there is an overall decline in civic engagement. But what does this suggest, what modes of civic interaction are declining and what does this tell us about political behaviour in South Africa? Civic engagement encompasses multiple political and civic activities. The type of civic interaction that most South Africans participate in may give insight into how they are choosing to engage with the state. The 2025 Afrobarometer Discussions on civic participation often centre on elections and protest action. Elections are usually recognised as the bridge between citizens and politicians, and a Figure 1 compares civic engagement in South Africa to the regional averages. The figure indicates that national responses for attending a community meeting, joining others to raise an issue, contacting a councillor and participating in a demonstration or protest are higher than the regional averages. This suggests participation is deeply rooted in movement-based, consultative, and mobilised forms of civic engagement. This trend is based in the country's history of struggle-based activism, where civic engagement was often Cumulatively, targeting councillors, community meetings and participating in demonstrations shows that Responses also show that contacting an MP is the least common type of civic engagement (8%), while having voted in the 2019 election (61%) and discussing politics (57%) are the most common types of civic engagement. Afrobarometer data also suggests that, compared with other types of leaders, contact with local government officials is reported more frequently. One possible explanation is their accessibility, or that their Local governments are tasked with delivering basic services, enforcing the law and maintaining infrastructure. Given these responsibilities, citizen perceptions of political performance and institutional effectiveness may be shaped by their assessments of local government actors. Worth noting, from a regional perspective, is that South Africa has one of the highest levels of contact with a councillor (39%). Zimbabwe has an average of 42%, whereas the regional average stands at 28%. This highlights a proactive stance in seeking to address community issues and grievances through formal channels. Among the 39 African countries surveyed, about one in 10 (9%) of respondents say that they participated in a protest or demonstration, making it the least common mode of engagement. Alongside Cabo Verde, protest action is the third highest in South Africa (15%). When it comes to civic engagement in South Africa, considerable attention is paid to protest action. But data suggests that respondents who say they have taken part in demonstrations have decreased over the years. In 2017-18 and 2021-23 attendance in demonstrations or protests decreased from 27% to 14%. The 2015 Furthermore, the report found that those who regularly communicate with their councillors tend to believe that their voices are being acknowledged. These findings further highlight the importance of establishing transparent and responsive communication channels between the government and its constituents. It suggests that when citizens perceive their concerns are being recognised and addressed by their representatives, they are more likely to adopt non-violent methods of engagement. As depicted in Figure 2, long-term trends in civic and political engagement in South Africa are complex. While there has been a decline across most participation indicators, contact with councillors stands out as an exception, showing a steady recognition of them as accessible points of contact for community concerns, especially compared with other tiers of government. The data also shows two notable shifts from 2020, coinciding with the Covid-19 pandemic. First, contact with councillors continued to increase post-2020, possibly because of the need for assistance during the lockdown and service delivery disruptions. Second, the decline in protests is probably a result of movement restrictions. The July 2021 riots in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng were essentially anomalous, but nonetheless important. Despite these variations, active forms of participation, such as attending community meetings, protests, community mobilisation, and discussing politics, remain the most prevalent modes of engagement in South Africa. But the overall decline since 2018 is concerning and may reflect public frustration, political fatigue or a perceived ineffectiveness of participatory mechanisms. Last, the consistently low levels of direct contact with political leaders point to a persistent gap in state-society relations. This suggests that citizens do not view political elites as responsive or approachable, further entrenching disillusionment with formal political institutions. The trends in civic engagement point to a persistent disconnect between how citizens interact with the state and how the state engages with citizens. Citizens participate through bottom-up, localised and often informal channels, rather than formalised, institutional mechanisms. In contrast, the state prioritises institutionalised, top-down models of participation, often through structured consultations, national dialogues, public hearings or representative forums that may feel distant or inaccessible to many. This divergence limits meaningful democratic engagement, because citizens prefer participatory modalities. As democracy continues to evolve, the state must recognise and integrate community-driven forms of participation. Rather than relying on protests to be heard or treating grassroots efforts as oppositional, leadership should be people-centred and responsive to lived realities. In a context of deep inequality and institutional mistrust, state responses must be grounded in everyday experiences — flexible to new forms of engagement, and inclusive enough to bridge the widening gap between state and society. Dr Mmabatho Mongae is a lead data analyst at Good Governance Africa.
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
Gayton's K-word, racist tweets go viral – Call for Minister to RESIGN
Will Gayton McKenzie resign as minister over his K-word old tweets? Images via X/Pexels South Africans are not only demanding an apology, but are calling for Gayton McKenzie to resign as Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture over his old social media post, which includes the K-word. ADVERTISEMENT This comes as the Patriotic Alliance leader called for the hosts of the Open Chats Podcast to be cancelled over their comments about the coloured community. The Minister has since addressed his old posts, stating that the backlash was 'hilarious'. On the X app (formerly Twitter), Gayton McKenzie's old, racially-charged posts about black people have resurfaced. In them, the Patriotic Alliance leader, and now Minister of Sport, Art and Culture, implied that all black people were poor and uneducated. He also repeatedly called them the K-word. ADVERTISEMENT A viral clip also saw Gayton being interviewed on the SABC's Morning Live, where he alluded to black people being 'lazy'. In another clip, Gayton criticised the government for offering a state funeral to the late artist Mampintsha, Mandla Maphumulo, after reportedly declining to assist the family of the late AKA, real name Kiernan Forbes. CALLS TO CANCEL OPEN CHATS PODCAST PRESENTERS This week, Gayton McKenzie called out Open Chats Podcast co-hosts Mthokozisi Donald and Sino Kama and their two female guests. Shortly after DStv shared news that they had dropped the show from their programming, the minister hinted at the presenters being cancelled over their comments. ADVERTISEMENT He posted: 'No one wants to see young people destroyed. It is, however, a teachable moment for these young people and their peers that racism has no place in South Africa; to let them continue as if nothing happened is the surest way of destroying them. He added, 'Consequence is a great teacher.' Gayton McKenzie has been criticised over his comments condemning the presenters of Open Chats Podcast. Images via X A day earlier, Gayton instructed PA MP Liam Jacobs to open a case of hate speech and crimen injuria against the Open Chats Podcast hosts. He said in a Facebook Live: 'We are giving you seven days to cancel that show. You are going to learn. This is where we draw the line'. ADVERTISEMENT WILL MINISTER STEP DOWN? On the X app, South Africans branded Gayton McKenzie a 'hypocrite' over his past comments and demanded a formal apology. Many called on the Minister of Sport, Art and Culture to step down from his post over his racial slurs. However, it appears Gayton is unwilling to apologise or tender his resignation. He posted amid the backlash: 'This whole campaign to find something racist I ever said is hilarious. Because you have now gone 13 years back and can't bring out one racist thing I ever said. ADVERTISEMENT 'I always and still fight that Coloureds and Blacks are one people being treated differently mistakenly'. DOES GAYTON MCKENZIE DESERVE TO BE CANCELLED? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
