
TOM HARRIS: Frankly, I'm not buying a meek and mild Nicola Sturgeon
The individual described in the 446-page opus will seem unfamiliar to most Scots. The Nicola Sturgeon of Frankly is a nervous, frightened woman completely lacking in confidence, forever seeking the approval of others and almost permanently on the brink of tears.
She spends sleepless nights fretting about whether she is good enough to do the job of a politician and she is deeply hurt when anyone says mean things about her.
Back on the planet earth, however, those who have observed Ms Sturgeon from her earliest days as an SNP activist all the way through to her dominance of her party as First Minister are more familiar with the 'nippy sweetie', the fierce and unforgiving woman so obsessed with independence that she seemed rarely to allow herself even the occasional smile, except, perhaps, when political opponents humiliatingly lost their seats.
But it is the meek and mild Nicola Sturgeon that appears throughout the book. The reader is invited to swallow this attempt to reinvent our former First Minister entirely as someone who only ever sought consensus and who was always loyal to friends and colleagues, until they behaved too badly to tolerate. And even then they were abandoned only with the heaviest heart.
For about the first third of the book, I found myself falling for this sleight of hand, starting to feel genuine sympathy for a misunderstood leader thrust almost unwillingly into the public eye. But that's when I began to see the pattern so carefully followed by Ms Sturgeon: the unexpected displays of emotional intelligence – something she has arguably failed to exhibit in public in the last 30 years – were convincing because they were so unexpected. But seen as a whole, the book is no more than an attempt to rewrite crucial parts of Scottish political history and enable the finger of blame to be pointed at anyone but her.
Those who might have been looking forward to a detailed explanation of the genuinely perplexing fall-out between Ms Sturgeon and her former friend, mentor and patron, Alex Salmond, will be disappointed.
Not only does the author point the finger of blame at the late SNP leader over the leaking to the media of sensitive information regarding complaints of sexual misconduct made about him, but she dismisses as a 'witch hunt' the Holyrood committee set up to investigate the Scottish Government's handling of those complaints after it concluded she had broken the Ministerial Code. A far more, reliable, independent review concluded the opposite, and that's enough for Ms Sturgeon.
And on her greatest and most controversial political defeat – her failed attempt to introduce self-ID for trans people – she energetically blames everyone else for sins of which she is herself guilty.
It was ordinary, decent Scottish women who raised concerns about the impact on women's rights if men who identified as women were allowed further access to women's spaces like rape shelters and changing rooms. Yet to Ms Sturgeon, 'it is beyond argument that the trans debate has been hijacked by voices on the far right . . . like Putin, Trump and Orbán.'
On one page she repeats her appalling assertion that many who campaigned against her Gender Recognition Reform Bill were 'raging homophobes' and 'racists', while on the very next she bemoans a failure of opponents to 'elevate the debate or illuminate the issues at the heart of it.'
More glaring than her tendency to point the finger of blame at others is her propensity not to mention certain things at all. The scandal of her and her ministers' deleted WhatsApp messages during the Covid pandemic, for example.
In the end, Frankly is a valiant, though failed, attempt to restore the reputation of an individual who promised so very much to party and country but who ultimately delivered very little. Had she been honest about her failings, perhaps Scotland could have forgiven her. But forgiveness demands repentance first, and there's precious little of that in this book.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
JK Rowling savages Sturgeon's book for ‘shameless denial of reality'
JK Rowling has reviewed Nicola Sturgeon 's memoir, Frankly, and said it 'reads like a PR statement that's been through sixteen drafts.' The Harry Potter author said the former first minister remained 'stubbornly wedded' to the idea that transgender women should be allowed into women-only spaces. Rowling said Sturgeon looked 'like a complete f***wit' when she was asked whether transgender rapist Isla Bryson was a man or a woman during a television interview. The author was a staunch critic of SNP plans, which were later ditched, to make it easier for transgender women to change their legal gender. Earlier this week the author mocked Sturgeon for using the memoir to warn about making public spaces safer for women. She tweeted a picture of the relevant pages of the newly-released book, across which she had scrawled in capital letters: 'Are you f-----g kidding me?' Rowling said she used to feel some 'non-partisan admiration' for Ms Sturgeon and empathised with her descriptions of being subjected to sexism. But in the review, she says Sturgeon 'denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification.' Rowling added: 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts.' Rowling began the review by comparing Ms Sturgeon to Bella Swan, the heroine of the teen fantasy Twilight novels, saying they both start out as 'a shy, awkward, bookish girl' and end up as a 'monomaniac'. She wrote: 'Both are consumed by a single, overriding ambition. In Nicola's case, it's independence for Scotland. 'In Bella's, it's having loads of hot sex with Edward Cullen without getting accidentally killed. Spoiler alert: only one of these ambitions is realised,' Rowling wrote. The Harry Potter author also mocked Ms Sturgeon's claim the 2014 independence referendum was not 'unpleasant and divisive', saying: 'No s***, Nicola. 'You, surrounded only by adoring nationalists, flying between public meetings in a helicopter bearing a large image of your own face, enjoying police protection and all the excitement of potentially bringing about your life's ambition, enjoyed the referendum? I'm amazed.' She added: 'Oddly, this message didn't resonate too well with No voters who were being threatened with violence, told to f*** off out of Scotland, quizzed on the amount of Scottish blood that ran in their veins, accused of treachery and treason and informed that they were on the wrong side of, as one 'cybernat' memorably put it, 'a straightforward battle between good and evil.'


The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine cause akin to Second World War Allies, Starmer says before Alaska talks
Ukraine is fighting for the same values as the Allies did in the Second World War, Sir Keir Starmer has said ahead of a summit in Alaska that could see an end to the conflict against Russia. The Prime Minister addressed a reception, including veterans, to mark the 80th anniversary of VJ Day, which marked the Allies' defeat of Japan. Speaking in Downing Street, Sir Keir said: 'I sat on this terrace this very morning with President (Volodymyr) Zelensky, who is fighting for the same values as we were fighting for. And so when we say never forget, we must pass on the stories of those who have gone before us.' It came as US President Donald Trump suggested European leaders could be invited to a second meeting if the summit is successful, which could pave the way to peace in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Mr Trump will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday at the summit which could see the drawing up of peace terms for Ukraine. Mr Trump and Sir Keir have spoken optimistically about a potential ceasefire, including at a virtual meeting of Ukrainian allies on Wednesday. Leaders of the European-led 'coalition of the willing' could then join talks between Mr Trump, Mr Putin and Ukrainian leader Mr Zelensky to end the war. The possibility was raised by Mr Trump in the White House on Thursday, before he flew to Anchorage where he will meet Mr Putin. He said: 'We have a meeting with President (Vladimir) Putin tomorrow, I think it's going to be a good meeting. 'But the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not.' The PA news agency understands that Sir Keir will attend a meeting if he is invited. He has been a central player in the coalition group which also includes French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Mr Trump added: 'I think President Putin will make peace. I think President Zelensky will make peace. We'll see if they can get along. And if they can it will be great.' The head of the British armed forces, Sir Tony Radakin, said the West should not be 'cowed' by Mr Putin and praised the strength of Britain and Nato. Writing in the Telegraph on the anniversary of VJ Day, he said: 'Putin doesn't want a war with Nato because he would lose. So we should not be cowed by his rhetoric or his campaign of sabotage, outrageous as it may be. 'The one weapon that is most needed in our arsenal is confidence. Despite the global instability, Britain is secure at home. Nato is strong. Russia is weak. It is not complacent to point this out.' Sir Keir met Mr Zelensky in Downing Street on Thursday. They both said there was 'strong resolve' for peace in Ukraine. The two leaders embraced as the red carpet was rolled out for Mr Zelensky's arrival in Downing Street, and they later discussed the conflict. They expressed cautious optimism about the prospect of a truce 'as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious' about ending the war, a Downing Street statement said. In a separate statement, Mr Zelensky said there had been discussions about the security guarantees required to make any deal 'truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killing'. But concerns linger over the prospect of Kyiv being excluded from negotiations over its own future, and pressured to cede territory, after Mr Trump suggested any agreement may need to involve 'swapping of land'.


The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Putin 'must prove he is serious' about ending Ukraine war, Downing Street says
Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelensky met in London, expressing a united and strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are scheduled to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss a potential ceasefire in Ukraine. Concerns have been raised that the two leaders might decide the war's outcome without Ukraine's direct involvement, potentially jeopardising European security. Trump has stated his belief that Putin will make a deal, though he also suggested a subsequent meeting involving Zelensky would be more significant. Volodymyr Zelensky has firmly rejected any proposals that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity and urged Britain to join the Purl (Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List) initiative for weapons supply.