Top Air Force general to resign because Pete Hegseth wants to take Pentagon in ‘different direction'
The Air Force announced in a statement that Allvin would leave his role on November 1, with Air Force Secretary Troy Meink thanking him for his 'transformational' efforts.
'I'm grateful for the opportunity to serve as the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff and I'm thankful for Secretary Meink, Secretary Hegseth and President Trump's faith in me to lead our service,' Allvin is quoted as saying.
'More than anything, I'm proud to have been part of the team of airmen who live out our core values of integrity, service and excellence every day as we prepare to defend this great nation.'
According to The Washington Post, Allvin was 'informed last week that he would be asked to retire and that the Pentagon under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wanted to go in another direction.'
'It was certainly not his choice,' the newspaper quotes an unnamed source as saying.
The Independent has asked the Pentagon for clarification about the circumstances of Allvin's departure.
Gen. Thomas Bussiere, whom Trump nominated in July to become vice chief of staff of the Air Force and was involved in the 'Operation Midnight Hammer' strikes on Iran's nuclear bases in June, has been tipped as a possible replacement for the outgoing general.
The upheaval is only the latest to take place under Hegseth, with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the chief of naval operations, the commandant of the Coast Guard, and the vice chief of staff of the Air Force all changed since he took charge in January.
Several generals and admirals in less prominent roles also have been replaced.
Earlier this year, it was reported that Vice President JD Vance and Donald Trump 's White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles had had to step in to help Hegseth hire a new chief of staff and two senior advisers due to an abiding reluctance to work with him.
While those positions would ordinarily be considered highly prestigious, the secretary was struggling to fill them after causing a stir with his response to the 'Signalgate' scandal, which erupted in March when Trump's short-lived national security adviser Mike Waltz accidentally added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat in which top secret information about an upcoming bombing raid on Houthi rebels in Yemen was discussed.
In April, The New York Times reported that Hegseth had shared sensitive material in another group chat that included his wife, brother, and personal attorney.
Hegseth responded by accusing three senior aides of leaking to the media. Still, an investigation later found no evidence against them, which reportedly cast fresh doubt on his judgment within the West Wing.
Shortly after that, his chief of staff, Joe Kasper, and spokesperson John Ullyot both left the Department of Defense, leaving behind an unwanted portrait of chaos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Account tied to Trump nominee posted conspiracy theories about Epstein, the 2020 election and Covid, report says
A social media account tied to President Donald Trump 's controversial pick to take over the Bureau of Labor Statistics has a history of posting various far-right conspiracy theories – the latest eyebrow-raising report to emerge about what is often a nonpartisan nominee. Last week, Trump announced he would nominate Erwin John 'EJ' Antoni III, the chief economist at The Heritage Foundation, the conservative group that created Project 2025, to replace former BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer. A surface-level review of Antoni, 37, shows that he is a loyal Trump supporter who has aligned himself with the current administration's ideals – contributing to Project 2025, bashing former president Joe Biden's record, and even being a 'bystander' at the January 6 attack on the Capitol. But a more in-depth look at Antoni's history online indicates that a now-deleted X account, which once used Antoni's name, posted theories about Jeffrey Epstein's death, Covid-19's origins, and the validity of the 2020 presidential election, according to WIRED. A website archive of the account 'PhDofbombsaway,' shows that it used the name 'Dr. Erwin J. Antoni III,' 'Dr. J.,' as well as 'Dr. Curtis LeMay,' – an apparent reference to the Air Force general largely credited with planning and executing mass bombings on Japan during World War II, as well as advocating for nuclear weapon usage. The account's profile picture was of a fiery mushroom cloud, not unlike the one associated with nuclear weapon detonations. 'All or nothing. Do it die,' the account posted in late November 2020 in response to a tweet encouraging Republicans to stand up to 'fraudulently mailed machines.' The account consistently re-posted false claims about election fraud and theories about stolen ballots from prominent accounts. On January 5, 2021, hours before the attack on the Capitol, the account posted a reference to violence in the Bible while responding to a tweet from Trump in which he encouraged Republicans to 'fight.' 'Samson has his arms around the temple pillars, and although he may not survive, he will bring it all down on his enemies,' it posted, referring to the story of Samson receiving strength from God to rise up against his enemies. Last week, photos of Antoni outside the Capitol on January 6 circulated online. The White House confirmed Antoni was present as a 'bystander' who wandered over to see coverage of it on the news. Other posts from the account indicate the person running it was ingrained in far-right rhetoric and conspiracy theories. In November 2019, the account responded to a person theorizing about Epstein's death by suicide, claiming, 'Epstein didn't kill himself.' That theory was widely circulated among far-right communities online and continues to be a central part of concerns about government transparency around Epstein. Later that month, the same account replied to a tweet that seemed to make a sexual innuendo about former vice president Kamala Harris with its own. 'She does her best work when life brings her to her knees,' the account wrote. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Antoni declined to comment to Wired. While the account has since been deleted, Antoni remains present online with an X account that mostly posts Trump-aligned views of the economy or economic data. But his nomination has been subject to criticism even before NBC News reported his presence at the Capitol, or Wired reported about his alleged former X account. The president previously fired McEntarfer, a career civil servant, after expressing dissatisfaction with the BLS's job numbers reports. Trump insinuated, without evidence, that McEntarfer had manipulated the numbers to make the president look bad because the figures did not line up with Trump's rhetoric about the economy. Some economists and lawmakers have expressed concern that Trump's new nominee could be more inclined to alter BLS numbers to appease the president. While there is no rule about who may be the BLS commissioner, they are typically expected to be nonpartisan, given that the BLS is an independent fact-checking arm of the Department of Labor. Upon announcing Antoni's nomination, the president vowed that his nominee would 'ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE.' Antoni previously tweeted, calling for a 'better' way to collect and disseminate BLS data and criticizing the current method of doing so. Antoni's nomination will require Senate confirmation. So far, at least two Democratic senators have called for the Senate to reject Antoni's nomination.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nexstar CEO praises Trump administration as local TV giant announces $6.2 billion merger with rival
Nexstar, the largest owner of local television stations in the United States, announced on Tuesday that it would be acquiring rival Tegna in a $6.2 billion mega-deal that would reshape the landscape of local media as the Trump administration seems poised to loosen regulatory limits. In fact, seemingly alluding to the presumption that Donald Trump's handpicked FCC chief Brendan Carr would approve the deal despite current restrictions in place, Nexstar CEO Perry Sook heaped praise on the administration in his company's announcement of the deal. 'The initiatives being pursued by the Trump administration offer local broadcasters the opportunity to expand reach, level the playing field, and compete more effectively with the Big Tech and legacy Big Media companies that have unchecked reach and vast financial resources,' Sook said in a statement. 'We believe TEGNA represents the best option for Nexstar to act on this opportunity.' As Deadline's Dade Hayes reported, the merger 'challenges decade-old limits on control of local media' as the new company would control 265 local TV stations across 44 states and the District of Columbia, representing about 80 percent of American households. This would far exceed the current limit of 39 percent, which has been in place for the past three decades through both Democratic and Republican administrations. Making his intentions crystal clear shortly after Trump's 2024 electoral victory that he sought an end to the broadcast station ownership cap, Sook declared in November that he hoped GOP control of government would help usher in an expansion of his company. 'It's evident that the antiquated ownership caps applied to broadcasters do not reflect the reality of today's competitive media environment,' Sook said at the time. 'We believe that there is value to be created for our shareholders through further consolidation, while driving true and new benefits to the American people who want and deserve fact-based, unbiased local news.' Citing his company's upstart 'centrist' cable news channel NewsNation, Sook also appeared to offer up some 'fair-and-balanced dog whistling' by reiterating Nexstar's commitment to 'eliminating the level of activist journalism out there' while asserting that 'maybe fact-based journalism will come back into vogue.' Ahead of Tuesday's announcement, public interest group Free Press (not to be confused with Bari Weiss' similarly-named 'anti-woke' outlet) warned that Nexstar and Tegna were striking a 'devil's bargain' with the proposed merger. 'Under any previous administration, such a combination would have been unthinkable,' Free Press co-CEO Craig Aaron wrote. 'Under Donald Trump, it's just a question of how much of your independence and integrity you're willing to sacrifice to get a deal done.' Carr has been outspoken about his willingness to deregulate broadcasting ownership rules and ditch the 39 percent national cap. Before beginning FCC proceedings in June to change the rules, Carr complained about the 'arcane, artificial limits on how many TV stations any one company can own.' 'So I want to ultimately empower those local stations and, frankly, constrain some of the power of those national programmers,' he added at the time. Additionally, Nexstar – which merged with Tribune Media in 2019 and owns the majority of The CW network – has found ways to dodge Trump's anti-media lawsuits while other media conglomerates continue to be targeted. Semafor reported in April that Nexstar was dropped from a Truth Social defamation complaint when the company's digital media outlet The Hill fired a breaking news reporter who had written an aggregated story about the Trump-owned platform's earnings. A Nexstar spokesperson denied that the company fired the reporter in exchange for being dropped from the lawsuit. The merger, which Nexstar announced would take place in the second half of 2026, is still far from a done deal. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that Sinclair, the nation's second-largest local TV broadcaster, has also offered to merge with Tegna. In preparation for the deal, Sinclair has offered to spin off some of its nontraditional media and cable assets – which include the Tennis Channel – in order to merge its remaining broadcast channels with Tegna. Meanwhile, local reporters are sounding the alarm over what a Nexstar-Tegna merger would mean for their industry. 'Media consolidations are rarely a good thing, and the Buffalo market is likely to be ill-served by a Nexstar-TEGNA merger,' Buffalo-based investigative reporter Jim Heaney observed. 'Competition is likely to take a hit and a downsizing of the joined operations is likely, although the stations would maintain separate newsrooms.' As 'local broadcast television is edging toward one of the biggest consolidation waves in its history,' Hayes noted that this proposed deal stands 'in sharp contrast to the punitive approach to the Paramount-Skydance merger.' Of course, in that instance, Carr spent months accusing CBS of 'news distortion' while Trump secured a $16 million settlement of a 'meritless' lawsuit over a 60 Minutes interview shortly before the FCC approved the merger.
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.
