logo
Farmers harvesting for oil and fencing say new rules ruining livelihoods

Farmers harvesting for oil and fencing say new rules ruining livelihoods

New South Wales farmers who have harvested native plants on their land for eucalyptus oil and brush fencing for decades say new restrictions are ruining livelihoods.
Eucalyptus oil has been distilled from blue mallee around West Wyalong in the Central West region of New South Wales since the early 1900s, and for the last 50 years, mallee-broombush has been harvested to provide a popular alternative to timber or metal fencing.
But that has come to a halt for many property owners due to laws protecting environmentally significant native vegetation.
Over decades, Gaye Wheatley and her late husband Ned expanded the areas of mallee-broombush on their property to provide an alternate source of income to cropping, sheep, and cattle.
"We could see how we could make it productive, encourage the bush and have the income," she said.
"[Harvest involved] weaving through the bush in a mosaic way, leaving certain trees and taking dead wood to regenerate, making sure that we got the strangle vine down so that bush could replenish itself."
More than 40 per cent of Ms Wheatley's property is now classified as sensitive regulated land, which means clearing is not permitted and a limited range of activities are allowed.
"It's virtually stopped our industry, and my three sons were involved with it … and it has greatly affected my income too," she said.
The Lynch family has been harvesting broombush in the West Wyalong district since the 1970s, manufacturing brush fencing panels that are sold across the country.
Len Lynch said his family had invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in equipment, but now most of their traditional harvest areas were off limits.
"The economy in the town is affected, the landowners get a royalty, and all the truck drivers — it's a big loss to the township."
A group representing about 45 affected landholders and businesses called Landholders Right to Farm will meet with NSW members of parliament in Sydney on Wednesday.
They claim data used in 2010 to list woodland and shrubland dominated by mallee and mallee-broombush as a critically endangered ecological community under-represented the amount of habitat remaining.
The group also argues that new draft native vegetation mapping is flawed and does not recognise the continued use of the bushland for eucalyptus oil and brush fencing.
Significant areas of blue mallee plantations have been established in the West Wyalong district but on some farms, stands of bush have also been harvested.
Landholders Right to Farm spokesperson Annabelle Davis said to produce eucalyptus oil, the blue mallee was cut down near the base and allowed to regrow.
"The trees are hedged to about 20 centimetres above the ground," she said,
"The leaves and the branches are taken up to the distillery where it's boiled, steamed, distilled and the oil is extracted."
Ms Davis said the restrictions on land use were "ruining livelihoods".
Landholders Right to Farm said several members had been fined or accused of illegal land clearing.
Ms Davis's family company disputes an accusation of illegal clearing, and Ms Wheatley has a remediation order over part of her property.
The meeting at NSW Parliament was organised by Member for Cootamundra Steph Cooke, who said current mapping had left many people too afraid to continue a sustainable practise due to the threat of legal penalties.
In a statement, a Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water spokesperson said the department continued to work through mapping and compliance issues.
The spokesperson said landowners could seek approval from the independent Native Vegetation Panel to clear broombush in the critically endangered ecological community.
The statement said NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe had met with landholders and continued to investigate alternative solutions.
Landholders Right to Farm said its members had only recently become aware they could apply for approval to harvest broombush.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian couple accused of money laundering scheme to face Qld Supreme Court
Russian couple accused of money laundering scheme to face Qld Supreme Court

ABC News

time19 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Russian couple accused of money laundering scheme to face Qld Supreme Court

A Russian couple accused of masterminding a multimillion-dollar money laundering operation have been committed to stand trial in the Queensland Supreme Court. Alexandra Bugrova, 47, and Dmitry Rimskiy, 50, who moved to Australia in 2015, have been charged with dealing with the proceeds of crime worth $1,000,000. An Australian Federal Police (AFP) investigation was launched after a tip-off from Austrac that the Gold Coast pair had deposited more than $4 million into ATMs across 576 transactions, which were structured to avoid the financial crime watchdog's $10,000 reporting threshold. Police allege the cash was laundered at banks and ATMs in New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and South Australia between July 2022 and September 2023. The funds were allegedly used to purchase or rapidly repay mortgages for waterfront mansions in Hope Island, Broadbeach Waters and Runaway Bay, houses in Labrador, Alexandra Hills and Mount Gravatt, and a high-rise unit at Milton. The AFP seized $15.6 million in assets, including seven properties in Brisbane and the Gold Coast, $514,000 worth of cryptocurrency and more than $1.95 million in cash found in a suitcase during a raid on the couple's Hope Island home in December 2023. While defence barrister Angus Edwards KC acknowledged the transactions were deliberately designed to evade detection, he said the charges should be thrown out because there was no evidence the money was the proceeds of crime. Mr Edwards told a committal hearing at the Southport Magistrates Court the couple were wealthy business owners who were trying to move their money out of Russia and were afraid of political persecution from the Putin administration. "We certainly accept that we have engaged in conduct designed to hide the money being deposited," Mr Edwards said. "Russia is not a democracy. [The government] is engaged in a war in Ukraine and it is well-known they are prone to seizing assets. "They were afraid of sticking their heads up above the parapet and having their assets and their businesses stripped from them in Russia." Crown prosecutor Dylan Kerr conceded the Commonwealth's case was circumstantial but told the court the "irresistible inference" was the money was the proceeds of crime. "It is not uncommon in a money laundering case that authorities do not know where the money came from," he said. "If it is the case that all this money came from Russia, why was it deposited in Australian dollars and not in rubles?" Magistrate Kerry Magee said the cash deposited "exceeded their reported earnings by a significant amount". "In essence, the defendants are asking me to find that … the defendants' conduct was for the purposes of avoiding seizure of their assets by Russian authorities," Ms Magee said. "I have no means of assessing the reasonableness or otherwise of that hypothesis. "I am of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient to put you on trial." The couple do not speak English and a Russian translator had to be used for the arraignment. They did not enter a plea and were released on bail. The maximum penalty for the charges is 25 years in jail. The pair will face Brisbane Supreme Court at a date yet to be set.

US Air Force hosts biggest ever exercise in Pacific territory Guam, with experts saying China the focus
US Air Force hosts biggest ever exercise in Pacific territory Guam, with experts saying China the focus

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

US Air Force hosts biggest ever exercise in Pacific territory Guam, with experts saying China the focus

The US Air Force says it is preparing to "fight and win" the "battle of tomorrow" as the US Pacific territory of Guam plays host to the biggest combat exercise the region has ever seen. In a move experts say is undoubtedly "directed at China", the US Air Force's Resolute Force Pacific (REFORPAC) exercise sees more than 400 aircraft and 12,000 personnel from the US and allies such as Australia, converge on the small US island territory, about 3,000 kilometres north of Darwin. Coinciding with the Talisman Sabre exercises in Australia, the US Air Force says REFORPAC is designed to test how quickly the US and its allies can "mobilise air power across vast distances, under pressure, in a contested environment". On the ground at Guam's Andersen Air Force Base, hundreds of jet fighters and support aircraft have been flying in and out over the past two weeks, conducting various drills. Speaking at the base, Colonel Charles Dan Cooley told the ABC it was an exercise that had never been done "on this scope and scale". "That exercise, for us, is just an opportunity to practice." However, some, including the US Air Force's own social media accounts, suggest there is a far more targeted motive. This week, the US Air Force promoted a social media post that said the exercise proved how it would "fight and win in tomorrow's battlespace (sic)". Although the enemy or conflict was not specified, experts say it is directed at one country. "There's been very little disguising the fact that this exercise is directed at China," Leland Bettis, the director of Guam-based think tank Pacific Centre for Island Security, told the ABC. The exercises in the Pacific come on the back of US Defense Undersecretary Elbridge Colby's comments last week, calling on allies, such as Australia, to make clear if they would commit troops to a conflict with China over Taiwan. Guam has been identified by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as the country's most important strategic base in the region. Mr Bettis said REFORPAC reflected the reality that Guam could be vulnerable in a conflict, so the US was practising how to quickly disperse its forces. "There are significant aviation assets in [nearby US territories] Tinian and in Saipan," he said. "I think what US contingency planners anticipate in the event involving conflict with an adversary in the region is that they would use a distributed and dispersed plan, which would be able to move assets around, anticipating that some assets are not going to be available, and some bases are not going to be available. "So the fact that you have significant assets in Saipan and in Tinian also signalled that they expect that Guam assets will not be available in conflict." Back on the ground at the Andersen Air Force Base, this was backed up by Colonel Matt Johnston, commander from the Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska, who is in Guam for exercises. "Our ability to take off in our fighters, which don't carry a lot of gas, go get fuel, accomplish our objectives, probably go back and get some more fuel so that we can come back and land. "So, we're learning a lot of lessons through that." The military build-up comes as the Trump administration continues to realign the US's priorities in the Pacific region, most notably through its multi-billion-dollar cuts to USAID. Mr Bettis said the absence of "soft power", such as USAID-led diplomacy in the region, would pave the way for development supporting a military purpose, instead of direct assistance to nations. "The face of America in our part of the world wears a uniform, and I think you're going to probably see that more and more throughout the region."

South Perth council votes to remove trees on public land after complaints about obstructed views
South Perth council votes to remove trees on public land after complaints about obstructed views

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

South Perth council votes to remove trees on public land after complaints about obstructed views

The City of South Perth will rip up six small trees planted last year on the Swan River foreshore parkland, after complaints they would eventually block residents' "million-dollar views" of the city skyline. The council planted the saplings in Sir James Mitchell Park last winter, but on Tuesday night voted in favour of removing the trees on behalf of residents whose homes face the park and the city skyline beyond. Speaking at the meeting, Cr Nic Coveney said residents on Jubilee Street were simply seeking to protect the value of their homes. "What these residents are asking for is consistency to maintain a similar vista as to when they purchased their property," Mr Coveney said. "They are not seeking to remove mature trees. They are seeking to move juvenile trees before they become mature and which they say were planted without any consultation. "Whilst some may disagree, I don't think it's unreasonable to buy a house or an apartment on the foreshore with a significant view and have an expectation of maintaining that view. "To do otherwise would deny the very real and direct effect of views on property values and amenities." In the council agenda documents, the council staff said views were taken into consideration when the trees were planted and were positioned in alignment with the dividing property boundaries, not directly in front of properties. It also said the species chosen would also help mitigate waterlogging, a problem that appears in the park for extended periods during winter. Most of the young trees were expected to grow to heights of four to 10 metres, and one of the trees, a corymbia calophylla, could eventually grow to 15 — 30 metres tall. Mayor Greg Milner was one of three council members to vote against the motion, telling the meeting many residents had voiced support for keeping the trees. "Cr Coveney tells us that he's been contacted by over a dozen residents on Jubilee Street who are concerned about losing their million-dollar views of the Perth CBD skyline," Mr Milner said. "But I do note that we've all received correspondence from many, many, many other residents. Bronwyn David, co-convenor of the South Perth Tree Canopy Advocates group, slammed the council's decision. "People might think, well, it's just six trees. What does six trees matter?" Ms David said. "But it's the precedent. We are preferencing the views of a very small number of people over the whole of our community, which frankly needs more tree cover to survive. Ms David was also critical of the waste of resources involved in the decision. "It may be that we have just thrown away a lot of money in the City of South Perth, both in putting these trees in the ground to begin with, and then the labour and effort to remove them, find somewhere else and put them in the ground a second time, only to have them die." The City of South Perth declined a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store