logo
Still a chance for NY packaging reduction bill to reach assembly floor

Still a chance for NY packaging reduction bill to reach assembly floor

Yahoo14-06-2025
A spokesperson for the leader of the New York State Assembly said it's possible lawmakers in Albany will consider a packaging reduction bill supported by local and statewide environmental advocates before the session ends next week.
Whether there will be enough votes to actually approve the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act remains to be seen.
In response to questions from the Niagara Gazette this week, Thomas O'Neil White, a spokesperson for assembly Majority Leader and Buffalo Democrat Crystal Peoples-Stokes, said the bill is not on the agenda yet, but People-Stokes believes it will make it to the floor for a vote before the end of the session, which is expected to close either Tuesday or Wednesday.
'It depends on what is in the bill as it could change a few times before coming up for a vote,' O'Neil White said.
Supporters of the bill said on Friday that 'possible' consideration was not good enough.
Renae Kimble, president of the Niagara Falls chapter of the NAACP, who joined local and statewide environmental advocates in calling for the bill's passage earlier this week, described the bill on Friday as 'vitally important' to protect the health of every Western New Yorker.
'Given the toxic legacy of Western New York, we need all of the assembly members to lead and support this bill,' Kimble said. 'The bill has already been amended 26 times at the request of various businesses. The Senate has already adjourned meaning there is no time for further amendments, so we need the assembly to vote on the bill, as is, before they also adjourn in the coming days.'
The act would impose a 30% reduction on packaging statewide over the next 12 years and calls for the phasing out of 17 toxic chemicals currently found in various forms of packaging.
Supporters say it would cut plastic waste, improve public health and reduce costs for taxpayers. They also warn that remnants from plastic waste impact health and wellness, resulting in higher costs of care borne by New York residents and local governments. Environmental advocates say plastic waste is particularly harmful to the environment, especially the Great Lakes, including Lake Ontario.
Kimble said the impacts have proven particularly harmful to minorities living in cities like Niagara Falls and Buffalo.
'Black, brown, disabled, and marginalized members of our communities across the state have been subjected to the deadly effects of toxic pollutants due to the disproportionate amount of contaminated packing waste sent to landfills and incinerators in heavily populated Environmental Justice communities,' Kimble said.
Supporters of the bill's passage have also noted that existing state and local policies, such as the State Agency Green Purchasing Executive Order, and retailer programs, such as Walmart, already work to avoid the use of high-hazard toxic chemicals in packaging and products.
Patti Wood, executive director of Grassroots Environmental Education, said the bill builds upon Governor Paterson's 2008 State Agency Green Purchasing Executive Order, which requires state agencies to prioritize the procurement of products. The former governor's order requires the state to reduce or eliminate the health and environmental risks from the use or release of toxic substances, minimize the risks of the discharge of pollutants into the environment and minimize the volume and toxicity of packaging.
'This bill builds on smart green purchasing state and local policies that have been requiring manufacturers to avoid highly toxic chemicals in their products and packaging and 'green the marketplace' since 2008,' Wood said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold rush hits Trump-era Washington, from prices to the Oval Office
Gold rush hits Trump-era Washington, from prices to the Oval Office

Washington Post

time40 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Gold rush hits Trump-era Washington, from prices to the Oval Office

Donald Trump promised Americans a golden age. In one way, he's already delivered: gold is glittering like never before. Over the past year, the price of the precious metal has surged by roughly 35 percent, vastly outstripping gains in the overall stock market. Investors are increasingly turning to the metal — used as a safe financial asset for millennia — amid mounting economic uncertainty and heavy buying by central banks seeking to diversify their reserve holdings. The rally intensified last week, when gold futures in New York spiked after U.S. Customs and Border Protection unexpectedly said that certain widely traded gold bars, many from Switzerland, would be subject to Trump's new tariffs. The unexpected move pushed U.S. prices above the global benchmark set in London, easing only after Trump later announced on social media that gold would not be subject to tariffs. In Trump's Washington, the gold rush is more than a market trend — it's a decor choice. And business executives who know that come armed with gilded gifts, hoping to win the president over. The Oval Office now gleams with gold-colored drapes, medallions, frames, figurines, cherubs, eagles and moldings. Corporate executives who have recently visited the president for one-on-one meetings have described the office as overwhelmingly golden. When Apple CEO Tim Cook stopped by last week, he presented the president with a commemorative plate anchored in a 24-karat gold base. A day earlier, a Cabinet secretary took to X to share a video of himself autographing a gold-colored tractor on the National Mall. Meanwhile, the administration has promoted a $5 million 'gold card' aimed at wealthy foreigners. Known for private residences that celebrate opulence, Trump has transformed one end of Pennsylvania Avenue into an extension of the gilded style he's favored for decades at places like his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, with rooms full of gold touches. 'The Oval Office's transformation from drab and dull under Joe Biden to glittering and glamorous under President Trump reflects a nationwide transformation: a country that was dead and stagnant is now hot and thriving towards a new Golden Age,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. Outside the White House gates, gold is booming in more traditional ways. Dealers report a surge in activity as investors rush to cash in on the metal's rally. Some are selling inherited coins, jewelry or bars; others, including cryptocurrency holders, are converting digital earnings into bullion rather than fiat currency. Some see gold as a hedge against inflation or a safeguard against doubts over the long-term viability of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency. Mike Coan, a gold dealer who runs Marion Adam Rare Coins in Elletsville, Indiana, said his business is headed for a banner year. 'It's basically a runaway train with no conductor behind the wheel,' he said. 'I've not seen anything like it. I've been in business 21 years.' The surge is also showing up in financial markets. CME Group, an exchange operator, has seen record volumes across futures and options exchanges, according to a spokesman. Its 'micro' gold contract, which is a tenth of the size of its main contract, saw record year-to-date average daily volume of 214,000 contracts. The reasons for the run-up in gold prices are deeper than presidential decor, economists say. Nearly half the recent run-up in gold prices can be traced to an extraordinary spike in global economic uncertainty, particularly over trade policy, that has approached levels last seen during the early days of the pandemic, according to a recent analysis by EconoFact, a nonpartisan economics publication. Rising expectations for inflation — which often lead investors to buy gold as a hedge — contributed to the metal's climb, EconoFact's analysts said. For investors, gold offers no explicit yield, unlike bonds, which pay an annual interest rate, or stocks that pay dividends. But holding gold can still provide benefits in an investment portfolio. People will purchase gold when they expect the price of the metal to rise, allowing them to cash it in at a higher price — although there is also a risk of capital losses in the face of a price decline. 'This leap cannot be explained by a sudden increase in the demand for gold as jewelry or for its use in industrial production,' EconoFact wrote in March. 'Rather, it reflects the shifting demand for the yellow metal as a financial asset.' Another factor behind gold's surge: Central banks, including in China, ramped up purchases after European countries froze Russian assets in response to Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. By keeping the metal in domestic vaults, central banks keep it beyond the reach of foreign institutions and governments. Goldman Sachs says buying on London's over-the-counter gold market has since jumped fivefold. 'This changed the market structurally,' said Samantha Dart, Goldman's co-head of commodities research. 'We think of it as, 'Hey we need to just diversify a little bit more, increase the share of gold in our reserves, because a precedent has been set.'' Goldman expects gold to hit about $3,700 a troy ounce by year's end — up from roughly $3,400 this week — and $4,000 by mid-2026 as central bank buying continues. A troy ounce is slightly heavier than a regular ounce and is historically used to measure precious metals. The rally isn't confined to markets. The song 'Golden' by HUNTR/X, the fictional K-pop girl group featured in the popular animated Netflix film 'KPop Demon Hunters,' took the top spot on the Billboard Hot 100 this week.

Adam Schiff, Letitia James and Trump's Payback Plan
Adam Schiff, Letitia James and Trump's Payback Plan

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Adam Schiff, Letitia James and Trump's Payback Plan

President Trump's Justice Department recently reached a nadir when two prominent Democrats, New York's attorney general, Letitia James, and Senator Adam Schiff of California, were placed under criminal investigation for their personal financial dealings. They are the wrong targets chosen for the wrong reasons in a case supervised by the wrong prosecutor. But there's not much either of them can do about it. The process leading up to the investigation demonstrates how this president has eroded longstanding ethical norms governing the relationship between the White House and the Justice Department. As the head of the executive branch, the president has authority over all the agencies in his cabinet, including the Justice Department; but since the abuses of Watergate, all subsequent presidents have taken steps to remove themselves from individual prosecutorial decisions while still leading on policy matters. The Justice Department manual instructs that 'the legal judgments of the Department of Justice must be impartial and insulated from political influence. It is imperative that the department's investigatory and prosecutorial powers be exercised free from partisan consideration.' To that end, the manual sharply restricts contacts between prosecutors and the White House in criminal cases. With Mr. Trump using his social media megaphone, those limits don't exist. Ms. James earned the president's ire by accusing him and the Trump Organization with fraud in connection with the valuation of real estate and winning a $454 million judgment against them (Mr. Trump is appealing). Mr. Schiff was a leader, in his days as a member of the House of Representatives, of the investigation of Russia's efforts to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election, and he became the lead House manager in Mr. Trump's first impeachment. Among many other insults, Mr. Trump has reposted a call for Ms. James to be 'placed under citizens arrest' for 'blatant election interference and harassment,' and over the years he's denounced 'Shifty Schiff,' demanding that he be 'questioned at the highest level for Fraud & Treason.' If there were any doubt that these investigations amount to political hit jobs against two of President Trump's most indefatigable political adversaries, the issue was settled with Attorney General Pam Bondi's pick to lead the inquiries — Ed Martin, the Justice Department official who was so unqualified and partisan that he couldn't win confirmation in the Republican Senate to be the United States attorney in Washington. As a consolation prize for that failure, Mr. Trump appointed him to lead the so-called Weaponization Working Group, the Orwellian name for the prosecutorial payback operation designed to build cases against those who investigated Mr. Trump during the Biden administration. Some of Mr. Martin's first targets are Ms. James and Mr. Schiff. Far from displaying the open mind that honorable prosecutors should demonstrate, Mr. Martin said his goal was to 'stick the landing' against the two Democrats. But a president's critics, like the president himself, should not be above the law, so what, then, is the evidence against Ms. James and Mr. Schiff? For both, the issues relate to real estate and mortgages, and the facts about them seem already well established. The case against Ms. James has three parts, First, in 2023, she financed the down payment to help her niece buy a single-family home in Norfolk, Va. According to her attorney Abbe Lowell, Ms. James signed several documents that made clear that her niece, not Ms. James herself, would live in the house. But on one form, a power of attorney, she indicated that she herself would live there, which was obviously a mistake. In light of the other documents, the bank itself could not have been misled, and in any event, the mistake on the power of attorney brought Ms. James no monetary gain. In 2001, Ms. James bought a four-story brownstone in Brooklyn with separate apartments for herself, her mother, her brother and a family friend. On one form, filed 24 years ago, the property was listed as having five units, not four. At all other times, she correctly listed it as four units. Last, in 1983, Ms. James's father bought a house in Queens for the family. On the mortgage application, he mistakenly listed Ms. James, who was just out of college, as his spouse, not his daughter, although other documents listed their relationship correctly. Ms. James has denied any wrongdoing, and according to her lawyer, the accusation that she may have financially benefited is baseless. In a demonstration of the ferocity of the legal assault on Ms. James, her office was subpoenaed last week in a different criminal investigation, led by Justice Department prosecutors in upstate New York. This inquiry is apparently aimed at proving that Ms. James committed some kind of misconduct during the fraud investigation of Mr. Trump and his company, as well as in a separate lawsuit that her office filed against the National Rifle Association. The only basis for this case, it seems, is that the president was unhappy with the outcome of both cases, which Ms. James's office won. As for Mr. Schiff, the investigation of him is rooted in the fact that like many members of Congress, he owns two residences, one in his home state of California and another in the Washington suburbs. According to mortgage documents, Mr. Schiff listed both as his 'primary' residence, which, according to a social media post by the president, represented an effort to 'get a cheaper mortgage and rip off America.' At the time Mr. Schiff applied for the mortgages, he was already in Congress, so the banks knew he had two residences. There does not appear to be any deception by Mr. Schiff and he has publicly denied the claims. (In addition, Mr. Schiff apparently last applied for a mortgage in 2012, which means any possible crime would be outside the 10-year statute of limitations; that would probably apply to most of the charges against Ms. James as well.) For the moment, Ms. James and Mr. Schiff are essentially powerless. There is no remedy in federal law to stop even clearly meritless investigations. At best, the two elected officials can look forward to months of detailing their personal financial arrangements; in other words, they will be compelled to violate the political maxim that holds if you're explaining, you're losing. Worse yet, their legal fates are in the hands of a dedicated political enemy who will be able to present the case for indictment to a grand jury. There, in the famous utterance of Sol Wachtler, the onetime chief judge of New York's Court of Appeals, prosecutors can get a grand jury to 'indict a ham sandwich.' The two elected officials will be able to offer formal legal and factual defenses only after they are indicted — that is, when they are criminal defendants in federal court, which is, to put it mildly, hardly a welcome forum. President Trump has always been a master of projection. His accusations of misconduct nearly always replicate what he himself has done. So it is with 'weaponization,' which is how he describes the entirely legitimate efforts during the Biden years to hold him accountable for his financial chicanery and his efforts to overturn his loss of the 2020 election, among other misdeeds. Now, at his behest, his administration is turning that word against two of his most prominent critics. For Mr. Trump, there may be few spoils of victory sweeter than the ordeal that Ms. James and Mr. Schiff will soon endure. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.

New York judge refuses to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts despite Trump's request
New York judge refuses to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts despite Trump's request

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New York judge refuses to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury transcripts despite Trump's request

A New York judge has refused a request from the Trump administration to unseal the federal grand jury transcripts in the case of sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The U.S. government had failed to cite any 'special circumstance' that would warrant release of the transcripts and exhibits in Maxwell's sex abuse case, wrote Judge Paul Engelmayer of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in an opinion Monday. "The Government's invocation of special circumstances, however, fails at the threshold," Engelmayer wrote. "Its entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes, or the Government's investigation into them — is demonstrably false." The decision comes after President Donald Trump asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce 'any and all pertinent' grand jury transcripts in the criminal cases of Maxwell and Epstein, in a bid to tamp down further conspiracies over the government's botched handling of the so-called "Epstein Files.' A Justice Department memo on July 6 stated that no further investigation was warranted into Epstein's alleged sex trafficking schemes. It also concluded that Epstein had died by suicide and there was no evidence of a 'client list' of high-profile associates. The memo caused uproar on both sides of aisle, and among Trump's MAGA base. Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year sentence for her role in a scheme to abuse and exploit girls with Epstein. The disgraced financier died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. It is unclear how much the grand jury transcripts would have revealed had they been released. The Justice Department acknowledged that the documents contained no testimony from witnesses, outside of law enforcement. Experts have said that these documents only account for a small fraction of the files related to the investigations. Several Epstein survivors had supported making the grand jury transcripts public, while Maxwell had opposed the move. Her legal team has asked the Supreme Court to take up her case, and her lawyers argued that releasing the raw transcripts would 'inevitably influence any future legal proceeding' and cause 'severe and irrevocable' reputational harm. Maxwell has never been allowed to review the documents, the attorneys said in a memo to the court earlier this month. Maxwell was interviewed by the Justice Department last month as the Trump administration tried to contain fallout from the Epstein Files. During the meeting, she said that she never saw Trump do anything that would cause concern. 'She was asked about maybe about 100 different people. She answered questions about everybody and she didn't hold anything back,' Maxwell's attorney David Markus said. 'She never invoked a privilege. She never refused to answer a question. So we're very proud of her.' Soon after, she was moved from a Florida federal prison to a Texas prison camp, known as 'Club Fed' because of its relatively relaxed environment. The prison also houses Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes and Real Housewives of Salt Lake City star Jen Shah. Separately from the Maxwell case, a federal judge is considering whether to release the grand jury transcripts that led to Epstein's indictment. The House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed the Justice Department for files in Epstein's case, and issued subpoenas to conduct sworn questioning of former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Former President Clinton and President Trump, were among Epstein's many powerful friends. Both have said they knew nothing of his crimes until he was charged and neither has been formally accused or charged with any crime. Trump and Epstein were friendly in the 1990s and early 2000s and were seen together at parties in Palm Beach and New York. Trump also called Epstein 'terrific guy" in a 2002 New York Magazine article, and flight records show that he flew on the financier's private jet. Their friendship dissolved in the mid-2000s, with the president telling reporters he hadn't spoken to him in 15 years following Epstein's arrest on sex trafficking charges in 2019. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store