Financial Ombudsman Service chief exits after board clashes
The head of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has effectively been forced out of the role after losing the confidence of its board amid growing government pressure on economic watchdogs.
Sky News understands that Abby Thomas, whose departure was announced earlier on Thursday, was at the centre of several disputes with fellow directors over issues including the introduction of a fee for claims management companies (CMCs).
Britain's banks and insurers have long argued for a fee to be imposed on CMCs that would deter spurious ambulance-chasing, with the FOS proposing last May to establish a £250 charge.
Industry executives said that Ms Thomas had argued for a much lower fee - said to be as low as £25.
Ms Thomas, who joined the FOS less than two-and-a-half years ago as chief executive and chief ombudsman, is said by insiders to have lost the confidence of the organisation's chair Baroness Manzoor.
The prime minister, chancellor and business secretary have been intensifying pressure on regulators in recent weeks as they search desperately for ways to kickstart growth in the economy.
That pressure resulted in the ousting of the Competition and Markets Authority chairman last month, and one bank executive said that Ms Thomas's exit - while not directly instigated by ministers - was a reflection of the same mood.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, recently moved to intervene in the car loan providers legal action which threatens to saddle lenders with compensation bills running to many billions of pounds.
In its statement on Thursday, the FOS - which is operationally independent but handles complaints according to rules published by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) - noted simply that Ms Thomas was "stepping down".
The FCA also appoints FOS board members, and its chair with the approval of the Treasury.
"Interim arrangements will apply with the Deputy Chief Ombudsman, James Dipple-Johnstone, covering the Chief Ombudsman role and the Chief Finance and Risk Officer, Jenny Simmonds, covering the Chief Executive role," the FOS said.
Baroness Manzoor added: "On behalf of the board and the executive, I would like to record our thanks and wish Abby every success in her future career."
Ms Thomas said: "It has been an absolute privilege to lead the Financial Ombudsman Service through this period of rapid transformation and innovation.
"I am immensely grateful to the entire Ombudsman team for everything that they do to support our customers and build confidence in the financial services industry."
A spokesperson for the FOS said it would not comment beyond the statement on its website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
British firms are being stifled by excessive regulation and bureaucracy
The all-party House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee which I chair has just completed a year-long inquiry into how effective the regulators are at fulfilling their duties to boost competitiveness and growth. It's a sad tale of a deeply entrenched culture of risk aversion, of disproportionately high costs of compliance, and of a complex regulatory landscape driven by expansion and overlap in the regulators' remits and by the volume and scope of regulatory activity. There is no doubt that operational inefficiencies and suffocating bureaucracy are damaging growth and place the UK at a competitive international disadvantage. Despite the regulators' growth mandate, the firms which gave evidence to the year-long inquiry say the system is slow and inflexible. Firms complain of being buried under regulatory paperwork and of facing a never-ending barrage of information requests from both the FCA and PRA. The CEO of Nationwide told the inquiry she received 4,519 pieces of direct correspondence in 12 months. Santander responded to more than 300 regulatory requests and managed 400 regular regulatory reports equating to over 2,500 submissions a year. One firm told us it employed 78 compliance officers for its UK operations compared with a total of 73 to cover the other 40 countries it operated in. We were dismayed by the evidence we received which highlighted long-standing issues that limit investment and the ability of financial firms to grow, innovate and compete. The lack of proportionality in the regulators' approach was evident in the FCA's failure to distinguish between wholesale and retail markets and the PRAs approach to capital requirements. The vagueness surrounding the Consumer Duty and the Financial Ombudsman's evolution into a quasi-regulator has created uncertainty and a worrying perception of a regulatory penalty for investment in UK businesses. It is essential for the FCA and FOS to be aligned on redress and interpretation. The FCA and the PRA alone employ around 6,500 staff at a cost of £1.1 billion. This results in an ever-rolling stream of consultation documents, regulatory changes and compliance advice which firms are expected to follow, communicated sometimes informally through speeches by senior regulators and letters to CEOs. My committee receives notice of these every week and it is frankly overwhelming. The regulators lack clear focus and appear to be still haunted by the 2008 financial crisis. This leads to excessive caution, sluggish approvals, high compliance costs and endless red tape. There is an urgent need for the FCA and PRA senior leadership to drive cultural change. This change should emphasise a more tailored and proportional approach to the risks posed by regulated firms, a culture of continual operational improvement and innovation, and a more transparent and trusting relationship with the businesses they regulate. An approach is needed which embraces technology and streamlines compliance for fintech and AI-driven firms. The skills and quality of staff are vitally important and that means addressing remuneration. A revolving door sees regulators losing some of their most talented people, recruited to advise the companies they once regulated at substantially higher salaries. We were surprised by the difference in candour between the evidence we received from the industry in public and the views expressed to us privately. We were obliged to take evidence in private in order to get many firms to share their concerns. At one meeting I attended, a CEO read out his brief from his compliance department which said that if Lord Forsyth invited him to give evidence to his committee under no circumstances should he agree to do so. This is not a healthy situation and there needs to be a much more open and trusting relationship between the regulators and the firms they regulate. In a competitive market, speed matters. Yet firms say UK regulators are lagging behind international rivals when it comes to authorising new products, people and operations. While official stats suggest improvements, they take too long and many say those numbers are misleading: they exclude the time regulators 'stop the clock' to request more data. If launching a new fintech product takes six months longer in London than in Singapore, investors and innovators will simply go elsewhere. We heard many positive reports of the success of the concierge approach of the Singapore regulator, which involved helping firms to grow and comply with regulatory provisions. Our regulators have much to learn from this approach. The Chancellor has placed a great deal of faith in the regulators stimulating economic growth. Our report makes one thing clear: the regulators can't do this alone. The Government must step up. That means clearer economic goals, better use of statutory guidance and more robust performance tracking. Right now, metrics are focused on operational inputs, not outcomes. Without stronger leadership from HM Treasury and without aligning regulators, industry and Parliament, the growth and competitiveness objectives will be little more than political window dressing.
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
'Wave of panic': Trump immigration raids rattle businesses
The administration's push to detain record numbers of undocumented immigrants has set off "a whole new wave of panic," said Chris Thomas, a partner at the Holland & Hart law firm who represents employers in immigration cases. The sharp uptick in immigration enforcement activities is a departure for federal authorities who usually avoid going after businesses. Now, employers are worried that the escalating enforcement campaign will not only cripple their businesses but could lead to civil and criminal exposure, even when they have rigorous hiring processes, Thomas said. Tensions are running high, particularly in the construction, hospitality and food processing, but he expects the immigration crackdown will soon rattle businesses in other industries. Already, major public companies have warned investors the immigration crackdown could affect their businesses that rely on a migrant workforce. Meatpacker Smithfield warned in a securities filing in March: "Increased enforcement efforts with respect to existing immigration laws by governmental authorities may disrupt a portion of our workforce or our operations. There can be no assurance that these activities or consequences will not adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations in the future." California democrat ejected: Sen. Alex Padilla handcuffed and forcibly removed from Noem press conference "We have never seen anything like this," Thomas said. "They have just gotten started and there is so much more to come. Thus far we have seen raids on a smaller scale. But they are moving into the next stage now where they will have larger-scale worksite enforcement operations at bigger companies." President Donald Trump swept into office on a pledge to crack down on illegal immigration. It is estimated that there are more than 8 million undocumented immigrants working in the United States. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told Fox News' Sean Hannity in May that the goal for ICE was a "minimum" of 3,000 arrests a day. "And President Trump is going to keep pushing to get that number up higher each and every single day," Miller said. White House border czar Tom Homan warned this week that "worksite enforcement operations are going to massively expand." In a Truth Social post Thursday, Trump acknowledged that crackdown was hurting American employers. "Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace," Trump wrote. At the White House, he told reporters he would issue an order to help address worker shortages brought on by raids of farm and hotel workers. The president's words have not reassured employers, said Shanon Stevenson, a partner who co-chairs the national immigration practice at the Fisher & Phillips law firm. Calls from worried clients have increased 75% since last week. "Employers have to respond to the reality they are seeing. This is a massive increase in worksite enforcement," Stevenson said. "Hearing comments that specific industries won't be targeted when the employers in these industries are facing raids, and did yesterday, it's a little bit hard to swallow." Businesses are collateral damage as the explosion of immigration enforcement worsens staffing issues for businesses already facing worker shortages, according to Amy Peck, a partner with the Jackson Lewis law firm who represents employers in immigration matters. "We have employers who are not able to open their businesses because workers aren't showing up. Restaurants with multiple locations are having to consolidate or not open certain locations because of a lack of workers or they close early or close the lunch shift because there aren't enough workers," Peck said. "I have manufacturers who are going down from three shifts to two because of the lack of workers. It's really putting a squeeze on employers." Trump immigration gold card: Trump said 15,000 foreigners signed up to pay $5 million for US residency In Idaho, businesses that were already shortstaffed have lost even more employees who are afraid to show up for work, said Alycia Moss, who chairs the immigration practice group at the Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley law firm. Hispanic and Latino businesses have been particularly hard hit, Moss said. "Most of the businesses I assist and speak with could not find enough workers before this increase and now some have told me they may have to scale back or close. I have one client who had to close his business," she said.
The National
3 days ago
- The National
Spurs confirm Postecoglou's successor six days after sacking
The ex-Celtic boss was sacked by the Premier League outfit last week, despite leading them to Europa League glory. Read more: Frank's appointment was announced this evening, as the Dane joins Spurs from fellow English top-flight side Brentford. He has penned a three-year deal in North London. A Spurs statement read: "We are delighted to announce the appointment of Thomas Frank as our new Head Coach on a contract that runs until 2028. "Thomas has extensive experience in English football having joined Brentford in 2016 - since becoming one of the longest-serving current managers in the Premier League. During his time at Brentford he transformed the Club, moving them up from the Championship to an established Premier League side, consistently and significantly outperforming expectations for an extended period of time. "In Thomas we are appointing one of the most progressive and innovative head coaches within the game. He has a proven track record in player and squad development and we look forward to him leading the team as we prepare for the season ahead. "Thomas will be joined from Brentford by Justin Cochrane (First Team Assistant Coach), Chris Haslam (Head of Performance & First Team Assistant Coach) and Joe Newton (First Team Coach Analyst), with Andreas Georgson (First Team Assistant Coach) arriving from Manchester United."
