The Demons will appeal the Steven May ban that has left players confused
The Demons on Thursday confirmed they would appeal the ban, adamant May's 'sole intention was to win the ball'.
FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo?
Join now and get your first month for just $1
.
Western Bulldogs coach Luke Beveridge weighed in, saying he didn't agree with the suspension, but was adamant talk of it changing the fabric of the game was misplaced.
May was suspended despite the AFL tribunal conceding his collision with Carlton's Francis Evans last Saturday night was not a bump.
In the final minutes of his defence
, May's legal counsel Adrian Anderson declared 'there was not much more he could do', but after more than 90 minutes of deliberation, the three-man tribunal panel determined he should have slowed down or changed his path to avoid Evans.
Debate has raged since the incident, with some pundits adamant the game could no longer allow players to charge headlong towards opponents, whether the ball was in play or not.
That's the grounds on which Melbourne will appeal with a hearing next week.
'We felt we presented a really strong case and Steven's sole intention was to win the ball, and we believe he provided a contest in a reasonable way given the circumstances.' Melbourne football boss, Alan Richardson said.
'After reviewing the outcome and seeking further expert legal advice this morning, we have decided to appeal the Tribunal's decision.'
Evans, who lost a tooth and was left bloodied and bruised, conceded to the tribunal that he didn't think he was going to get to the ball before May, adding to the confusion over the ban.
Essendon vice-captain Andy McGrath conceded the incident was a 'tricky' one for the tribunal but said over the course of his career his on-field attitude had changed, and he now asked himself questions despite the 'split second' nature of making calls.
'They are split-second decisions, there are so many in game, and the longer I play – this is my ninth season – those split-second contests have changed a lot,' he said.
'If you are second to the ball, you have a big responsibility to not make contact with your opponent's head.
'It definitely comes through your mind, whether that causes us to hesitate slightly, I am questioning that more and more in the game to protect the opposition player's head.'
Beveridge said talk of the May ban setting any sort of 'precedent' was unfounded and it purely determined that the outcome of this collision was a suspension.
The Demons star failed to beat a three-match ban at the Tribunal for this shot on Carlton's Francis Evans.
'One of the things that has never happened in our tribunal system is there's never really been any precedent established, so I don't think anyone should be talking about precedents and how it affects the game into the future,' he said.
'Each one on their own terms is assessed.
'Do I agree with it? Probably not. When there is eyes for the ball and for all intents and purposes the players are trying to win the ball … that's where the debate rages.'
Carlton captain and Brownlow medallist Patrick Cripps said he wasn't sure what May could have done and McGrath agreed.
'It didn't look great but it's really hard to pull out of that contest at the last second,' he told SEN.
'As players, it's pretty tricky to know what penalty lies based on the act and we know that's margins between a fair play and a pretty significant sanction.'
Prior to their announcement, Demons great Garry Lyon believed the club would appeal.
Lyon did not agree with the AFL tribunal's argument that May 'had sufficient time with an unimpeded view of what was before him to determine what he could and should do in the likely event that he did not reach the ball either first or at the same time'.
'That's nonsense, which is why I've lost a bit of faith in this and why I think they'll appeal,' Lyon told SEN Breakfast.
'No-one could reasonably think that they weren't going to get to that football. (Evans) thought Steven May was going to get there first.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
25 minutes ago
- The Age
Mega offers flow for Wanganeen-Milera as bidding war heats up
The chase for Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera's services is on, with Port Adelaide and Adelaide presenting the 22-year-old with a range of short- and long-term offers to consider as he prepares to make one of the most keenly anticipated decisions by an AFL player in the past decade. The ante has been upped since the Saints' midfielder's form exploded mid-season and amid a changing player market, with Victorian clubs vying for West Coast's emerging star Harley Reid. A number competition sources said Port Adelaide's financial offer for Wanganeen-Milera would exceed that of the Crows, who sit second on the ladder with several stars in their line-up and poised to enter a premiership window. Both clubs, however, have presented Wanganeen-Milera with serious options that would secure his financial future. The mega offers to Wanganeen-Milera from across the border present the 2021 No.10 draft pick with the chance to sign a short-term deal that would carry an option to later sign on for an extended period or lock in a longer-term deal from the start. The Saints would be open to similar options, but if Wanganeen-Milera is to re-sign it's expected it will only be on a deal lasting two years, not one that locks him to the club for an extended period. The Saints also have big offers in play to attract Carlton's restricted free agent Tom De Koning and the Giants' defender Leek Aleer. The Saints have considerably upped their offer to Wanganeen-Milera. He now stands to earn more than $1.4 million per season if he stays at the club, where he has a good relationship with coach, Ross Lyon, and teammates. However, he also has a strong pull of home and close friends from his time playing football in Adelaide, and he will not have to sacrifice any money if he decides to return home. Reid's asking price, meanwhile, is nudging $2 million per year as agents realise clubs have room to move because the collective bargaining agreement will drive their salary cap up to $18,148,376 per club in 2026.
7NEWS
25 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
AFL boss Andrew Dillon defends fixture and competition of two halves
With Gold Coast's postponed match against Essendon looming as an increasingly pivotal part of the AFL top-four race, an announcement on the timing of the rogue fixture is imminent. The opening-round clash on the Gold Coast was postponed because of Tropical Cyclone Alfred and rescheduled to the end of the season, rather than for either club's bye week. There have been reports the stray game could be played on the Wednesday between Round 24 and the pre-finals bye. Now at the pointy end of the season, the Suns' and Bombers' vastly contrasting fortunes means the game could play a crucial role leading into what looms as Gold Coast's first finals series. The eighth-placed Suns (48 points) are four points ahead of the Western Bulldogs but four behind fourth-placed Geelong, who are on 52 points along with Hawthorn, GWS and Fremantle, but Gold Coast have a game in hand. The injury-ravaged 15th-placed Bombers are on an eight-game losing streak, and up against it to win another game this year. It means a likely — and potentially percentage-boosting — win for Gold Coast could be what launches the Suns into the top four. 'That's the last fixture, so that's the final part of flexing the fixture,' AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon said on Tuesday. 'So we're working through that at the moment, 'I reckon we'll be making an announcement on that in the next week or so.' Dillon was speaking ahead of the AFL's industry summit, which included representatives from all clubs, including Tasmania. He acknowledged the gulf in quality between the AFL's top nine and bottom nine this season, but considered it an anomaly. 'There is a bit of a gap,' he said. 'But I think what's really pleasing for some is you look at the top eight or nine this year with four teams that have come from outside to inside. 'You often get anomalous seasons. Last year, we were at 13 or 14 teams in it right to the end. This year's a little bit different 'What we do have is an incredibly tight competition at the pointy end.' The league has come under criticism for Essendon and Carlton continuing to play in prime timeslots despite their decline in fortunes. 'Maybe this year's just a bit of an outlier in terms of the teams that were selected earlier on, some big Victorian teams who were in pretty solid form at the time the floating fixture was put in, that hasn't come to fruition,' Dillon said. 'But again, the games are still rating pretty well, they're still pretty well attended, but we'll take on board feedback from fans and broadcasters and our clubs as we look to the 2026 fixture.' Dillon said the league needed to strike a balance between ensuring the fixture was flexible, while also looking after the fans. He was 'really confident' the Tasmanian expansion club would be ready for the 2028 season, but stressed their licence was dependent on the building of the roofed 23,000-capacity stadium at Macquarie Point.
ABC News
25 minutes ago
- ABC News
How St Kilda's use of a tagger against Melbourne sparked the AFL's greatest comeback
The tagger is one of the most talked-about roles in footy. Each week, speculation abounds about whether teams will deploy a tagger on the stars of the competition. On Sunday, the tagger was out in force. For the first three quarters, Saint Marcus Windhager toiled after Melbourne's Kysaiah Pickett. In the fourth, the most remarkable comeback in AFL history was completed. For that last quarter, the Saints largely abandoned the tag and focused on attack. A 46-point deficit was wiped off the scoreboard in an instant. That doesn't mean that tagging doesn't work — but it does speak to the situational value of the role. Defining a tagger is tough and working out whether they are effective is even harder. ABC Sport has talked to a range of AFL coaches over the course of the season to try to work out what a tagger is in 2025, and whether they are effective in the modern game. The traditional image of the tag is pretty simple. It is a player standing directly next to a star on-baller, pushing, poking and niggling them prior to a ball-up. The traditional tagger doesn't just stop there — the tagger follows their prey around the ground with indifference to winning the ball themselves. No eyes for the ball, just their target. These days, balance is required between stopping a player and contributing positively as well. These run-with players are deployed situationally by most teams and are expected to contribute on both sides of the ball. Sydney coach Dean Cox has praised the way Swans tagger James Jordon can combine accountability with his own impact on the ball. "The great thing about James is the balance that he does have between 'OK, I need to restrict' but also 'I need to impact when I get the chance as well,'" Cox said. "He's done that numerous times when he's played on an opponent, to be able to try to have shots at goal, or to impact not only by quelling someone's influence." There's a fine line — if there's too much attacking intent, it can open up the defence. GWS regularly deploys Toby Bedford in a variety of roles, including as a tagger. Part of his strength is his ability to counterattack. "It's a hard balance to have — because the more he [Bedford] attacks, chances are his opponent has got a big gap on him and then it's hard to defend," GWS coach Adam Kingsley said earlier this year. The orthodoxy of who to tag has also shifted over the years. While Ron Barassi was once called too creative to tag, these days it's the creative players who draw the most focus. Often, the belief is that if the ball is in the contest, there's little that can be done to prevent first access by the best in the game. Instead, it's the more open ball and work down-field that merits restriction. A player like Pickett — with the ability to break lines when winning the ball on the inside and to do damage with ball in hand — is a prime target of opposition stoppers. In last week's match, this played out to form. For the first three quarters, Pickett was able to win the ball at the contest but had his ability to rack up easy football limited. Despite this, when the tag was broken in the last quarter and St Kilda focused more on winning the ball, Pickett's supply of harder ball dried up. Pickett compiled just one knock-on and three handball receives for the quarter, while the freed Windhager managed five ground-ball gets and four score involvements. There were other major reasons for the comeback, including moving Max Hall into the middle and being more proactive with their ball movement. The total result was a massive turnaround in all facets of the game. It's often hard to work out when a player is being tagged from the outside. Match-up data is patchy at league level and doesn't distinguish between a common match-up, a soft tag or a hard tag. As a result, it's hard to know exactly when players are being tagged without intensive research or unless coaches or players across the league disclose the use of the tactic. Take Brad Scott's explanation after Essendon's loss to GWS in round 19. To most watching the game, a tag was not easily discernible. It also didn't appear to have any impact on Tom Green's monster game, with the Canberran racking up 30 disposals, including 17 contested possessions and 16 clearances. It's tough to assign causation to one player, but when their teams have lost this season, some of the top midfielders in the competition have struggled. Players like Nick Daicos, Caleb Serong, Hugh McCluggage and Jason Horne-Francis have seen their inside 50s drop by a third and their metres gained by about a quarter in losses against wins. Geelong coach Chris Scott explained the idea on Fox Footy earlier this year. "There is a cost to tagging. Very few teams play one-on-one where they think they are going to take out a certain player," Chris Scott said. "Every team prioritises their structures and their set-ups first, but what I will say — no team plays Collingwood and puts no time or effort into stopping Nick Daicos. It all happens on a spectrum." This is exactly why teams tag. Limiting an opposition's best player can have massive impacts on game results. But usually it's hard to work out whether it was the tag or whether the player in question was having an off day. No tactic in football comes without a cost. To get something, clubs have to give something. A tag can also hand over initiative to the opponent, with Craig McRae saying two weeks ago that "you can manipulate the tag a lot". This manipulation of the tag can take several forms. Clubs copping a midfield tag have free rein to decide where the opposing player will be positioned and what parts of the ground they'll be taken to. Often, they'll be moved forward for patches, hoping for a hand-off or a mismatch in the forward line. Against the Saints, Bulldogs coach Luke Beveridge shifted Bontempelli to the back line to influence the game there. "Marcus played a really selfless game tonight. It meant teammates capitalised on that." Beveridge explained after that Saints game. "He went to half back briefly, he played forward, so that means they have to move their chess pieces around a bit and it can be a bit destabilising" Of course, forcing a star player into a secondary role can often be the victory the tagging club is after. Moving Nick Daicos away from the ball could be the difference in a game. There are also some more direct tactics that can be employed. Teams can also use space at contests to create more space for the other midfielders in a side. This can turn a 3v3 contest at centre bounce into a 2v2 and will allow an easier exit if executed correctly. If a side still wants to focus on getting the tagged player the ball, they can execute blocks to physically force the tagger to switch opponents. This often only works for a matter of seconds, but that can be enough to get the separation required to get the ball headed goalwards. The practical elements of the game aren't the only reasons to tag. In a tough sport where group mentality is one of the great intangibles, some clubs also believe tagging can bring the risk of instilling a negative mindset or distracting players. "Sometimes when you have too many of those things going on, it sends the wrong message to your team," noted Brisbane coach Chris Fagan after they declined to tag in their win over Geelong. "We just came out to play, and that was more because I wanted our players to have a positive mindset." The Lions chose to take a different path around the ball, working positionally to make Cats opponents like Bailey Smith accountable for their own stars. Flipping this accountability on its head is also one of the ways some of the best taggers mitigate many of the drawbacks associated with the tactic. There's also the need to be flexible in-game when applying a tagging role. For GWS, Kingsley often switches up tags mid-game. Other sides move away from tags when they don't look like working. Fremantle's coach explained the idea after the Dockers' landmark comeback victory over the Pies in round 19. "Well, we tried [to tag Daicos]. He [started] at half-back. We actually played better when we dropped the tag. That can happen sometimes. You get caught up in that and it creates a bit of confusion." St Kilda coach Ross Lyon didn't place much focus on the dropping of the tag in the wake of their win. "I think it's a part of giving you a different mix. There's no doubt about that. When you're coming from behind, as an old coach taught me, you've got to do everything right and you've got to take your opportunities. Clearly, we did that, didn't we?" Like all things in football, the tagger isn't a golden bullet. But it also isn't likely to disappear fully any time soon.
