STV by-election debate made me uncomfortable. Here's why
Mackay – STV political editor – told the audience that six candidates, from the SNP, Reform UK, Scottish Labour, the Tories, the Lib Dems and the Greens – had been given the opportunity to 'defend themselves and question their opponents'.
Only the SNP's Katy Loudon and Reform's Ross Lambie were willing to 'cross swords' as Mackay put it.
Loudon launched her segment taking aim at winter fuel payments, announced by Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves last year.
There is immediately a slight glimmer of consensus between the two despite their blatantly obvious disagreements on politics.
Read more by-election coverage:
Voters are 'scunnered', they both agreed, but Lambie brings an abrupt end to consensus as he blames the SNP of being part of the political establishment that has caused a 'lost generation'.
Cross examination allows Loudon to ask the Reform candidate whether he agrees with Nigel Farage on scrapping free tuition and prescriptions.
Fair play to Lambie on this. We get a straight answer.
'No, I don't think so,' he said.
''In Scotland, we have a devolved administration, our manifesto in Scotland will not be scrapping anything along those lines.'
When it comes to Mr Lambie's cross examination on Ms Loudon, he goes straight to a local issue: Wishaw's neonatal unit, raising concerns about plans to centralise the specialist care to a facility in Glasgow.
Ms Loudon's response won't sit well with locals. She said her background is in teaching, adding: 'I'm not a nurse, I'm not a doctor, I'm not a clinician.'
That, I would say, is a point to Lambie. But where he falters, instead of pushing Loudon on the local issues, he gives her a free shot to criticise Labour by asking her about cuts to winter fuel payments. It's not the strongest attack from Lambie.
An absolutely brutal watch. https://t.co/ToXb7aoh0K — Rebecca McCurdy (@_RebeccaMcCurdy) June 2, 2025
Lambie then, bizarrely, accuses Loudon of being 'snobby' against football fans after John Swinney ruled out reintroducing alcohol in Scottish football stadiums.
Lambie said: 'Don't you realise for local teams, like Hamilton Accies, you're putting a strain on their local finances.'
Loudon seemed a bit perplexed by the accusation, but lumps her response in with the question on the NHS. She said: 'This is about taking expert opinion.'
Loudon also faced tough questioning from Mackay, who pressed her on whether she would apologise to Lanarkshire residents, the region where waiting times in hospitals are amongst the worst.
She did not directly answer, but said: 'I'm not going to sit here and pretend things are perfect,' but added the SNP was 'listening'.
Lambie also did not come out of the debate well as her was quizzed on the Reform adverts using a speech from Anas Sarwar, accusing Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar of stating he wanted to 'prioritise the Pakistani community' – which he did not say.
He refused to be drawn on whether it was racist and rejected that Mr Sarwar was misquoted.
Look, the whole debate was pretty uncomfortable to watch. But it only got worse when Davy Russell, the Labour candidate, entered the frame.
Read more:
Russell said he would not attend the live debate because he would be out chapping the doors of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, but he told Mackay in a sit-down interview that he stopped door-knocking at 8.30pm, giving him ample time to appear at STV studios for the 10.40pm broadcast.
So why wasn't he there?
'In a debate you can't listen,' he said, oddly, given if elected to Holyrood he would be expected to do just that three days a week.
More uncomfortable viewing followed. Russell, while stating Scottish Labour opposed policies like the two-child benefit cap and the winter fuel payment, he would not answer the whether the UK Government was wrong. Mackay asks almost 10 times if he backed the Chancellor. Brutal.
There hasn't been much press for the Scottish Tory candidate Richard Nelson, with the party widely expected to come fourth in the by-election.
Attending the debate would have been a significant opportunity to boost his platform but instead, his small segment seen him argue the NHS was in crisis. But there is a trend here: there were no solutions offered. He was also keen to dismiss any concerns around his membership with the Orange Order.
Lib Dem candidate Aisha Mir came across as a strong debater but did not seem confident on whether she could actually win, while the Greens completely declined to have any part in the debate.
Was there a winner of the debate? I do not think so. Loudon was clearly the most competent on camera, but this is not her first by-election and she should have done better given that.
The losers are obvious: the constituents in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse who were not given a competent debate they deserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
County councils say rural taxpayers to face unfair burden under funding reforms
Council taxpayers in rural areas will contribute unfair levels of funding for services in urban communities under proposed Government reforms, county councils have warned. Large rural authorities have also highlighted that maximum council tax increases will be needed to deliver necessary core budget increases for essential services over the next three years. In its submission to the Government's consultation on planned reforms, known as the 'fair funding review 2.0', the County Councils Network (CCN) said the proposals were 'better than feared'. The network welcomed some elements that determine funding levels, such as an indicator for remoteness and a new formula for social care and school transport allocations, which it said 'better recognise the needs' of the 38 county areas. But CCN called on the Government to reconsider its broader approach, insisting the proposals 'place a disproportionate burden on council taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas'. Modelling showed that under the proposals £1.6 billion in council tax income generated in county areas will be redistributed across the country. This is due to a decision by ministers to include 100% of local council tax receipts when allocating funds in a bid to 'equalise' revenue across the sector, in a departure from the previous approach which took in 85%. CCN said this means 32 of the 38 county and rural authorities will lose an additional £400 million in a process that would represent an 'overwhelming' benefit for urban metropolitan boroughs. The analysis showed 22 authorities will receive increases in direct Government funding totalling £845 million under the plans. But on average these councils will receive 70% of their overall increase in core spending power, the official measure of funding available for services, from council tax rises specifically. In addition, 16 other councils, including some located in the North and the Midlands, will experience funding cuts totalling £470 million. With no increase in direct Government funding, the entire increase in core spending power for these authorities will come from council tax rises, CCN said. 'One third of council tax income raised in these areas over the three-year period is needed to offset cuts to funding and prevent them falling below a proposed 0% funding floor,' the network added. Across all 38 county and rural unitary councils, direct grant funding will increase by £374 million, with 90% of the total uplift in core spending power coming via maximum 5% annual council tax rises. The modelling suggests this scenario is in stark contrast to the impact on councils in urban areas, with nearly 50% of metropolitan authorities' extra resources coming from additional grant funding of £1.2 billion over three years. Overall, in the absence of maximum annual council tax rises over the period, the analysis showed 33 of the 38 county and rural unitary authorities would experience a real-terms reduction in funding, CCN said. The new Government grant would fund just 9% of the estimated £4.4 billion increase in the cost of providing services in county and rural areas over three years, while the boost in Government funding for metropolitan authorities would fund half of the total £2.4 billion increase in estimated costs of services in those areas. CCN said it is 'simply unrealistic' to expect some of England's largest social care councils to 'provide life critical services while receiving deep cuts in Government grant' and called for 'significantly' more funding to prevent 'unsustainable cuts'. Chairman of the CCN Tim Oliver said: 'Some 16 county and rural councils across the length and breadth of the country will see reductions in grant funding, while the Government's proposals place a disproportionate burden on council taxpayers in county areas to fund local services and redistribute funding to urban areas. 'Those facing cuts in Government funding will inevitably have to reduce vital frontline services, while the reliance on council tax rises leaves even those with modest funding increases facing an extremely challenging funding outlook. 'While we recognise the need to take account of how much councils raise in local taxation, the Government's proposals to fully equalise unfairly redistribute hundreds of millions of local council tax to other areas, while weakening the incentive to build homes.' Sir Stephen Houghton, chairman of the Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities, backed the Government's approach. He said: 'It is absolutely right that any new funding system must fully reflect the wide disparities in councils' ability to raise income through council tax. 'The failure to do so over the past decade has led to disproportionately deep cuts in the most deprived areas, worsening inequality across the country.' The Government's consultation on the reforms closed on Friday. A Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'We do not recognise the (CCN) analysis. The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded has left communities behind and damaged local services. 'This must change and is why we are taking decisive action as part of our Plan for Change to reform the funding system so we can improve public services, while maintaining the previous government's referendum threshold on council tax rises so taxpayers have the final say and are protected from excessive increases.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'Yet again the Labour government are showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'The family farms tax has been devastating for British farming and scrapping the rural services grant has put rural councils under enormous pressure. Now this latest spiteful change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas. 'Only the Conservatives are serious about standing up for our rural communities' Liberal Democrat local government spokeswoman Vikki Slade said the reforms could be severely detrimental to some areas. Ms Slade said: 'Councils across the country are already teetering on the edge after years of Conservatives' neglect of local funding and services – from bus services cuts in rural areas to the rising costs of social care. These ill-thought-out reforms only risk leaving parts of the country significantly worse off. 'To truly help local authorities, the Government should urgently look at supporting councils who receive the least grant funding and those that face additional pressure on services in rural and coastal areas, to help them with spiralling costs.'
The Courier
an hour ago
- The Courier
New Perth High School WILL have separate boys and girls toilets
Families have been assured the new Perth High School WILL have separate boys and girls toilets when it opens on Thursday. Head teacher Martin Shaw has confirmed the school is making alterations to provide fully single-sex facilities. It follows concerns about the impact of a recent Court of Session ruling that Scottish schools must provide separate male and female toilets. Perth and Kinross Council said last week it was still awaiting Scottish Government guidance on the schools under its control. These included the £80 million Perth High School, which was designed with a mix of single-sex and gender-neutral toilets for up to 1,600 pupils. Mr Shaw has written to parents and carers, clarifying the arrangements for toilets at Perth High School ahead of the start of term. He says there has been 'considerable interest' in the issue. And he explains: 'While the new Perth High School was originally designed to allow fully-enclosed unisex toilet cubicles, there is scope to alter this arrangement to provide fully single-sex facilities, which we have done. 'We already have designated male/female public toilets on the first and second floor in our new school. 'This is an area that was designed to be mixed, but with separate designated space, on the ground floor. This area is being altered.' Mr Shaw also assures families: 'As a school we take the safety and wellbeing of our pupils extremely seriously and always work to allay any concerns our young people and their parents or carers may have.' Perth and Kinross Council previously said it had nine schools with mixed-sex facilities. They include Bertha Park High School, which opened in 2019, and was built with gender-neutral toilets. A Perth and Kinross Council spokesperson said: 'While the new Perth High School was originally designed to allow fully enclosed unisex toilet cubicles, the design arrangements have allowed the provision of fully single-sex facilities. 'There will therefore be separate facilities for both male and female pupils when the school opens to pupils later this week.' April's Court of Session judgment was made in a case brought against Scottish Borders Council by parents concerned about a new primary school that had been built with only gender-neutral toilets. The decision came after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law. Following the Supreme Court judgment, the Equality and Human Rights Commission issued an interim update on its guidance. It said: 'Schools must provide separate single-sex toilets for boys and girls over the age of eight. 'Pupils who identify as trans girls (biological boys) should not be permitted to use the girls' toilet or changing facilities, and pupils who identify as trans boys (biological girls) should not be permitted to use the boys' toilet or changing facilities.' Calls to ban unisex toilets in schools have been made previously after an incident at a secondary school in Dundee. A 15-year-old boy was charged in connection with voyeurism in December 2024. A female pupil reportedly found a phone hidden – with the camera switched on – inside a toilet roll holder. The device was said to contain hundreds of videos and images of naked girls.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Swinney says SNP majority at Holyrood could make second referendum a ‘reality'
He dismissed as 'laughable' claims from critics that this strategy for getting a second referendum is 'punting' independence 'into the long grass'. However, while opinion polls have the SNP in the lead in the run-up to the crucial Holyrood vote, none has indicated Mr Swinney's party could win an overall majority. The Scottish Parliament's proportional representation system makes it harder for any single party to win more than half of the seats, with only former SNP leader Alex Salmond having achieved this in 2011. That victory led to the 2014 independence referendum, with Mr Swinney now relying on this 'precedent' as he seeks to secure a second vote on Scotland's place in the UK. His comments came as he indicated independence supporters are 'frustrated' that despite the 2016 and 2021 Holyrood elections both returning majorities of MSPs supporting independence, successive Westminster governments have refused to allow a second ballot to be held. Mr Swinney, speaking at an event organised by think tank Enlighten in Edinburgh on Tuesday, also noted that while Scots voted to stay in the UK in 2014 there were now 'various polls' with a majority for independence. Pressed on his strategy of using a Holyrood majority to achieve another referendum, the Scottish First Minister insisted that the idea this was 'punting it into the long grass is laughable for me'. Instead, he insisted independence as an 'urgent necessity', claiming decisions by the Labour Government at Westminster will make it harder for him to achieve his 'mission' of eradicating child poverty. However, he insisted he has 'got to be realistic' about how a second referendum could be brought about. Mr Swinney said: 'An independent Scotland will only come about if it carries domestic and international legitimacy, ie the rules of how it becomes independent are accepted by all parties.' He stressed this had been the case in 2014, as he added: 'If we want to advance on this issue there has got to be a means of breaking the log jam that we are currently in. 'Two successive elections, the majority of members of the Scottish Parliament supporting holding a referendum on independence and the Westminster government just folds its arms and says 'no'.' The First Minister noted that 'in 2011, when the SNP won a majority of seats in the Scottish Parliament, that led to a referendum in 2014'. John Swinney said the fact the 2014 independence referendum came after the SNP won a majority of seats in Holyrood set a 'precedent' (Jane Barlow/PA) And he added: 'If we want independence to happen we have got to rely on that precedent.' He rejected suggestions from Enlighten director Chris Deerin that returning a majority of SNP MSPs to Holyrood next May was a 'bold ambition', as he called on independence supporters to make the issue a 'priority' in that election. 'Then we can turn this into reality,' Mr Swinney said. Polls currently indicate the SNP could still be the largest party at Holyrood after the next election, but have so far failed to show Mr Swinney's party winning more than half the 129 seats. However, Mr Swinney recalled that in the run-up to 2011 election, his party was 'miles behind' in the opinion polls but 'then we won a majority four months later'. And he said: 'Today, nine months out from the election, I am ahead in the opinion polls. 'When I took over as SNP leader we were behind. I have brought the SNP back into the lead, a commanding lead in the opinion polls, and on the opinion polls today, we still would be the largest party by a country mile in the Scottish Parliament.' However he insisted: 'That's not good enough for me. 'I have set out what we have got to do to clear a pathway to win Scottish independence and I am going to give absolutely every fibre of my being from now until May 7 next year to make sure it happens.'
