Stoke Park paddling pool reopening delayed over unsafe water
In a video posted on Facebook, McShane explained: "In the last phases of the water testing, we discovered the water has been contaminated..."So we have taken the decision that it isn't safe to open the paddling pool."I'm really sorry, we are all devastated."McShane said the council had "worked so hard" to get the pool resurfaced and the staffing in place for the scheduled opening but said it would look into what had happened and "put things right".
Maksim Fedosov, who has a two-year-old child, told BBC Radio Surrey his family used the pool last summer.He said: "It's quite disappointing, especially in the hot weather. It's quite useful."Adrian Fuller, 71, said: "When you start getting the good weather it gets very, very busy down there with the kids. It's a very popular thing."It's absolutely choc-a-block in the good weather."
The paddling pool, which typically opens annually from May until September, also suffered opening delays in 2024 due to staffing problems.It last underwent a refurbishment in 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fire crews tackle blaze at disused factory in Birmingham
Crews are tackling a blaze at a disused factory in Midlands Fire Service said 12 crews went to the three-story building on Barr Street in Hockley, just before 08:00 BST on said the third floor and roof were alight, and the cause of the fire was not yet road is blocked on the southbound side, travel information company Inrix said. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Fat jab price rise could fuel surge in dangerous fakes
Experts have warned people against trying to beat the Mounjaro price rise by turning to black market weight-loss jabs. Dealers are importing the copycat drugs from Chinese labs and selling them on social media and in beauty salons. Drug crime specialists expect a rise in the number of illicit sales in the wake of 170 per cent price rises due to Donald Trump's tariffs, designed to make medications cheaper for Americans. Steroid dealers have reacted to the cost of private weight-loss injections and NHS supply bottlenecks by turning to the black market. Chinese laboratories can imitate the real drugs and sell them online for as little as £1.50 a vial, with dealers buying them in bulk and selling them on for profit. Mounjaro, the weight-loss medication made by Eli Lilly, has increased in price to as much as £330 for a month's supply. The US-based company's product is the most effective injection on the market. Dr Luke Turnock, a criminologist at the University of Lincoln who specialises in the sale of enhancement drugs, warned that this would see many people turn to imported imitations sold cheaply online. 'I would definitely expect the price rise to lead to more people looking to the illicit market,' he told The Telegraph. 'If you're paying £330 for a prescription and you see something advertised for £110, then you would think it would be stupid to keep going and getting this private prescription.' A study by Dr Turnock found that one company allegedly sells replicas of both semaglutide and tirzepatide, known commercially as Wegovy and Mounjaro, made by Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, respectively. But with these drugs now regulated in the UK it is technically a crime to sell them and as a result the number of fake versions available online has diminished. Next-generation weight-loss jab However, the laboratories have pivoted to selling imitation retatrutide, a next-generation weight-loss jab still in clinical trials. Also made by Eli Lilly, retatrutide could be Mounjaro's big brother and is potentially the most powerful weight-loss drug yet as a result of its triple-threat mechanism, which targets three pathways in the body. Ozempic – a drug for type 2 diabetes – works on just one, and Mounjaro only hits two of the three. Online marketing shows retatrutide to be the most effective fat injection, but it is not yet proven safe or effective. Early clinical trial data suggest it is also able to speed up how much fat a person's body burns as well as suppressing appetite and slowing down stomach emptying. But the drug is as yet unauthorised and unregulated and this provides a loophole for the Chinese laboratories who can sell their product under the guise of a 'research chemical'.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BBC is forced into embarrassing U-turn over 'false statistics' on Lucy Letby Panorama documentary after 'sloppy and amateurish' journalism
The BBC has been forced to correct and re-edit a Panorama programme on Lucy Letby after being accused of 'sloppy and amateurish' journalism and producing 'false statistics'. The documentary repeated discredited claims that when Letby worked as a nurse at Liverpool Women's Hospital between 2012 and 2015, the dislodgement of breathing tubes occurred at a rate 40 times higher than normal during her shifts. The claims had first been aired by Richard Baker KC, who represented the victims' families at the Thirlwall Inquiry, but were heavily contested by Jane Hutton, a professor of statistics at Warwick University, who wrote to the inquiry to express her 'concern at your very poor presentation of statistics relating to accidental dislodgement of endotracheal tubes'. Professor Hutton wrote: 'Your statements implied that an evaluation of shifts shows a substantial increase in events when Letby was on shift. This is a fine example of statistical illiteracy which can mislead juries and the general public.' However, Monday's Panorama, presented by Judith Moritz and Jonathan Coffey, described the figures as 'empirical' and suggested they damaged Letby's claims of innocence. The presenters are this month publishing an updated paperback version of their book, Unmasking Lucy Letby, which partly back-peddles on the original version's presumption of Letby's guilt. After several experts, including Professor Hutton, complained to the BBC about the segment, the corporation has now retracted the figure and edited the version of the programme available on iPlayer. In a statement released in response to an inquiry from The Mail on Sunday, the BBC said: 'We stated that babies' breathing tubes came out 40 times more often than normal when Lucy Letby was on shift. 'We have now removed that line from the programme and some associated commentary. We have also made clear that Lucy Letby was in training during both periods at the Liverpool Women's Hospital. 'We originally stated that her supporters questioned the review's findings around Liverpool Women's Hospital, and this has now been changed to say that critics say the hospital's findings are not credible and that there are any number of reasons why breathing tubes could become dislodged more often.' Dr Amy Wilson, a lecturer in statistics at Edinburgh University, described the segment as 'very concerning'. She told the corporation in a formal complaint: 'You state that the 1 per cent background rate is per ventilated baby per shift (a 'ventilation shift') and yet you compare this to a 40 per cent 'per shift' rate for Letby. 'This comparison is incorrect – Letby's rate should also be calculated as per ventilated baby per shift. Using the assumptions in your programme of ten ventilated babies per shift and 50 shifts, this would mean Letby was present for 500 ventilation shifts with 20 dislodgements. 'She would then have a rate of 4 per cent per ventilated baby per shift, not 40 per cent. The assumptions used also need to be checked – for example, if there were more than ten ventilated babies per shift, Letby's rate would be lower still.' Mark McDonald, Letby's lawyer – who says he was rebuffed by the BBC when he warned them not to air the statistic – said: 'The documentary was sloppy, amateurish and full of errors. 'It made mistakes on statistics and failed on basic maths when it came to incidents at the hospital. This may have gone down well at a literary festival to sell the presenters' new book but when it comes to journalism it was grossly misleading. 'The most egregious failing yet again was in producing false statistics which were used to implicate Lucy in further invented crimes. The statistics weren't just false, they were internally illogical.'
