
Liberal backbenchers urge Coalition not to raid foreign aid budget to pay for rumoured $15bn defence boost
Liberal backbenchers are urging the Coalition not to cut the overall foreign aid budget to pay for a potential $15bn increase in defence spending and other big-ticket budget items.
While the opposition is yet to announce details about its foreign aid package, the backbenchers have noted the UK government's decision to slash the foreign aid budget to pay for a generational increase in defence spending.
One Liberal backbencher, who declined to be named so they could speak freely before Thursday's budget-in-reply speech, said the foreign aid budget should not be raided to pay for other expensive policies ahead of an election.
'It is always an easy political fix to say 'let's cut foreign aid' and 'look after Australians first', but as a relatively wealthy nation … we have an obligation to help our neighbours as much as we can,' the backbencher said.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'If we start cutting foreign aid to our neighbours in the Pacific, then we have the threat of the Chinese government coming in, with all of their funding, to gain loyalty.
'It is very important, particularly in the South Pacific, that we are seen as assisting them so we are seen as the leaders.'
Liberal MP Warren Entsch, who last month wrote to the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, to express concerns about the US government's foreign aid freeze, said it was 'absolutely critical that we maintain' aid spending.
'With the uncertainty around decisions taken by the leader of the free world, I think it is important that we continue to step up and be part of the solution,' Entsch said.
Guardian Australia has spoken to multiple Liberal MPs who have raised concerns about how the foreign aid budget is being used, but do not support any cut in overall expenditure.
Dr Cameron Hill, a senior researcher at the Australian National University's development policy centre, said previous Coalition governments had 'instituted large cuts to aid'.
The aid budget fell to an all-time low in 2019 when measured against gross national income. But this trend was reversed after the pandemic, when the then Morrison government allocated more money to the Pacific region.
During a foreign policy speech last week, Peter Dutton highlighted the Morrison government's foreign aid for the Pacific and criticised the Trump administration's plan to freeze foreign aid for 90 days.
The shadow foreign affairs minister, David Coleman, was contacted for comment. In a speech last month, Coleman defended the Coalition's record on aid and said 'it is vital that we succeed in the Pacific'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Last week, the Australian Financial Review reported the Coalition was considering an increase of at least $15bn a year in defence spending, which would put significant pressure on the budget. Dutton and the shadow defence spokesperson, Andrew Hastie, have not commented on the policy reportedly canvassed by Coalition sources.
Former Australian defence force chief Chris Barrie said raiding the foreign aid budget to pay for any increase in defence spending would be 'lazy thinking'.
'The UK is doing that, but the UK is locked into Nato and all sorts of other security arrangements,' Barrie said. 'I can think of Pacific island nations that were given US aid because they didn't want support from China.'
Hill said the government 'should not cut aid to fund defence increases'.
'Apart from being self-defeating, Australia has one of the widest ratios of defence to development spending among the 31 OECD official development assistance bilateral aid providers – more than 10:1 in 2023,' Hill said.
Last week, Dutton said the Trump administration's decision to pause foreign aid was 'detrimental to the collective interests in the region, and I hope that there can be a discussion between our governments about a sensible pathway forward in that regard'.
In recent weeks, Australian diplomats have consulted with Pacific nations to assess the impact of the US freeze on aid and what additional support could be provided ahead of Tuesday's federal budget.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Aussies unleash after Scott Morrison receives top accolade in King's Birthday Honours: 'Baffles me'
Australians have lashed out after Scott Morrison was awarded the highest accolade in the King's Birthday Honours List. The former prime minister, who led the nation for four years from 2018 to 2022, was recognised for his 'eminent service to the people and the parliament of Australia, particularly as prime minister'. A Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) is the highest award of the Order of Australia honours system. It is followed by Officer of the Order (AO), Member of the Order (AM), and Medal of the Order (OAM). Former prime ministers are typically honoured in the King's Birthday awards, but the 30th prime minister's recognition sparked widespread criticism. Mr Morrison's term as prime minister was overshadowed by multiple controversies, including his secret appointment to several ministerial portfolios, involvement in the Robodebt scandal, and his widely criticised remark during the 2019 Black Summer bushfires: 'I don't hold a hose, mate'. On Monday, Australians took to social media to blast the former PM. 'If you get a shiny trinket just because your a*** has occupied the PM's chair then what is that trinket worth?' one Australian wrote on X. 'Someone should have intervened to deprive Australia's worst ever Prime Minister of this award.' 'It baffles me that we award public servants for doing the job they were paid for. I understand if they do something 'special', but politicians very rarely do,' another added. 'Morrison certainly did nothing 'special'. Not to mention the retirement package that they all enjoy.' 'It's demeaning of the honour system to be giving this cruel, disingenuous s***-bag any honour,' a third added. One Aussie kept a close tally of Mr Morrison's missteps. 'You lied to the public. Repeatedly. You appointed yourself to five secret ministries. Then claimed it was no big deal,' they wrote. 'You prayed the virus away, outsourced the vaccine rollout, then took credit when premiers fixed your mess. 'You fled to Hawaii during a bushfire crisis. Then blamed your daughters. 'Oh Scotty. Even your religion's ashamed of you. Jesus turned water into wine. You turned democracy into a private members club for gas executives.' Some Australians said Mr Morrison was 'underrated'. 'Respect, well deserved,' one wrote. 'Well deserved, Scomo is very underrated and deserves a lot more respect than what he is given,' another said. Since the establishment of the Order of Australia in 1975, every ex-prime minister has been appointed a Companion except Paul Keating. He declined because he believed the honours should be reserved for those whose community work went unrecognised. Mr Morrison's honour specifically points to his 'notable contributions to global engagement, to leadership of the national Covid response, to economic initiatives, and to national security enhancements, especially through leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS'. He received significant support during the early days of the pandemic, with an April 2020 Newspoll revealing he had the highest satisfaction rating for any prime minister since Kevin Rudd in 2009. But by the end of his second term, he had become the most unpopular major party leader since at least 1987, according to an Australian National University study. The King's Birthday Honours List names 581 people in the General Division of the Order of Australia, including academics, ex-sport stars, leaders and creatives. 'These honours recognise the selfless service, integrity, achievement, creativity, and care that flourish across our country,' Governor-General Sam Mostyn said. Fourteen people were appointed to the highest honour, AC. Baz Luhrmann and Catherine Martin, best known for their work on films including Moulin Rouge, The Great Gatsby and Strictly Ballroom, received the accolade for their service to the arts. Environmental scientist Mark Howden, who served as a vice chair on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, was also appointed to AC alongside business leader Jennifer Westacott and NASA climate science centre co-director Graeme Stephens. Bangerang and Wiradjuri woman Geraldine Atkinson has been named an Officer (AO) of the Order of Australia for her work with Indigenous communities and reconciliation.


North Wales Chronicle
13 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.

Rhyl Journal
13 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.